Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Pediatr Nephrol ; 33(10): 1701-1712, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29974258

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nephronophthisis is an autosomal recessive ciliopathy and important cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in children and young adults. Diagnostic delay is frequent. This study investigates clinical characteristics, initial symptoms, and genetic defects in a cohort with nephronophthisis-related ciliopathy, to improve early detection and genetic counseling. METHODS: Forty patients from 36 families with nephronophthisis-related ciliopathy were recruited at university medical centers and online. Comprehensive clinical and genotypic data were recorded. Patients without molecular diagnosis were offered genetic analysis. RESULTS: Of 40 patients, 45% had isolated nephronophthisis, 48% syndromic diagnosis, and 7% nephronophthisis with extrarenal features not constituting a recognizable syndrome. Patients developed ESRD at median 13 years (range 5-47). Median age of symptom onset was 9 years in both isolated and syndromic forms (range 5-26 vs. 5-33). Common presenting symptoms were fatigue (42%), polydipsia/polyuria (33%), and hypertension (21%). Renal ultrasound showed small-to-normal-sized kidneys, increased echogenicity (65%), cysts (43%), and abnormal corticomedullary differentiation (32%). Renal biopsies in eight patients showed nonspecific signs of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Twenty-three patients (58%) had genetic diagnosis upon inclusion. Thirteen of those without a genetic diagnosis gave consent for genetic testing, and a cause was identified in five (38%). CONCLUSIONS: Nephronophthisis is genetically and phenotypically heterogeneous and should be considered in children and young adults presenting with persistent fatigue and polyuria, and in all patients with unexplained CKD. As symptom onset can occur into adulthood, presymptomatic monitoring of kidney function in syndromic ciliopathy patients should continue until at least age 30.


Asunto(s)
Ciliopatías/diagnóstico , Asesoramiento Genético , Pruebas Genéticas , Enfermedades Renales Quísticas/congénito , Fallo Renal Crónico/prevención & control , Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Edad de Inicio , Biopsia , Niño , Ciliopatías/complicaciones , Ciliopatías/genética , Ciliopatías/patología , Proteínas del Citoesqueleto , Diagnóstico Tardío/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Riñón/patología , Enfermedades Renales Quísticas/complicaciones , Enfermedades Renales Quísticas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Renales Quísticas/genética , Enfermedades Renales Quísticas/patología , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Masculino , Proteínas de la Membrana/genética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Ultrasonografía , Secuenciación del Exoma , Adulto Joven
2.
Front Psychiatry ; 13: 780281, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35211042

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Treatment development for neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is impeded by heterogeneity in clinical manifestation and underlying etiologies. Symptom traits such as aberrant sensory reactivity are present across NDDs and might reflect common mechanistic pathways. Here, we test the effectiveness of repurposing a drug candidate, bumetanide, on irritable behavior in a cross-disorder neurodevelopmental cohort defined by the presence of sensory reactivity problems. METHODS: Participants, aged 5-15 years and IQ ≥ 55, with ASD, ADHD, and/or epilepsy and proven aberrant sensory reactivity according to deviant Sensory Profile scores were included. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to bumetanide (max 1 mg twice daily) or placebo tablets for 91 days followed by a 28-day wash-out period using permuted block design and minimization. Participants, parents, healthcare providers, and outcome assessors were blinded for treatment allocation. Primary outcome was the differences in ABC-irritability at day 91. Secondary outcomes were differences in SRS-2, RBS-R, SP-NL, BRIEF parent, BRIEF teacher at D91. Differences were analyzed in a modified intention-to-treat sample with linear mixed models and side effects in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: A total of 38 participants (10.1 [SD 3.1] years) were enrolled between June 2017 and June 2019 in the Netherlands. Nineteen children were allocated to bumetanide and nineteen to placebo. Five patients discontinued (n = 3 bumetanide). Bumetanide was superior to placebo on the ABC-irritability [mean difference (MD) -4.78, 95%CI: -8.43 to -1.13, p = 0.0125]. No effects were found on secondary endpoints. No wash-out effects were found. Side effects were as expected: hypokalemia (p = 0.046) and increased diuresis (p = 0.020). CONCLUSION: Despite the results being underpowered, this study raises important recommendations for future cross-diagnostic trial designs.

3.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry ; 60(7): 865-876, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32730977

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Recent trials have indicated positive effects of bumetanide in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We tested efficacy of bumetanide on core symptom domains using a single center, parallel-group, participant-randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase-2 superiority trial in a tertiary hospital in the Netherlands. METHOD: Unmedicated children aged 7 to 15 years with ASD and IQ ≥55 were block-randomized 1:1 to oral-solution bumetanide versus placebo, titrated to a maximum of 1.0 mg twice daily for 91 days (D91), followed by a 28-day wash-out period. The primary outcome was difference in Social Responsiveness Scale-2 (SRS-2) total score at D91, analyzed by modified intention-to-treat with linear mixed models. RESULTS: A total of 92 participants (mean age 10.5 [SD 2.4] years) enrolled between June 2016 and December 2018. In all, 47 children were allocated to bumetanide and 45 to placebo. Two participants dropped out per treatment arm. After 91 days, bumetanide was not superior to placebo on the primary outcome, the SRS-2 (mean difference -3.16, 95% CI = -9.68 to 3.37, p = .338). A superior effect was found on one of the secondary outcomes, the Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (mean difference -4.16, 95% CI = -8.06 to -0.25, p = .0375), but not on the Sensory Profile (mean difference 5.64, 95% CI = -11.30 to 22.57, p = .508) or the Aberrant Behavior Checklist Irritability Subscale (mean difference -0.65, 95% CI = -2.83 to 1.52, p = .552). No significant wash-out effect was observed. Significant adverse effects were predominantly diuretic effects (orthostatic hypotension (17 [36%] versus 5 [11%], p = .007); hypokalemia (24 [51%] versus 0 [0%], p < .0001), the occurrence of which did not statistically influence treatment outcome. CONCLUSION: The trial outcome was negative in terms of no superior effect on the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes suggest efficacy on repetitive behavior symptoms for a subset of patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: Bumetanide in Autism Medication and Biomarker Study (BAMBI); https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/; 2014-001560-35.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno del Espectro Autista , Trastorno Autístico , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/tratamiento farmacológico , Bumetanida/efectos adversos , Niño , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Proteínas de la Membrana , Países Bajos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA