Influence of microsurgical decompression on segmental stability of the lumbar spine - One-year results in a prospective, consecutive case series using upright, kinetic-positional MRI.

BACKGROUND: Standard procedure in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis is decompression to relieve the neural structures. Clinical results generally show superiority compared to nonoperative therapy after an observation period of several years. However, there is still a question of postsurgical segmental stability and correlation to clinical findings. Therefore, the aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcome in patients who underwent microsurgical decompression in lumbar spine and particularly to analyze intervertebral movement by use of upright, kinetic-positional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over a period of 12 months and then to correlate the clinical and imaging data with each other. METHODS: Complete clinical data of 24 consecutive participants with microsurgical decompression of the lumbar spine were obtained by questionnaires including visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Short-Form-36 (SF-36), walking distance and use of analgesics with assessment preoperatively and after 6 weeks and 12 months. At the same points of time all patients underwent upright, kinetic-positional MRI to measure intersegmental motion of the operated levels with determination of intervertebral angles and translation and to correlate the clinical and imaging data with each other. RESULTS: VAS for leg, ODI, RMDQ and physical component scale of SF-36 improved statistically significantly without statistically significant differences regarding intersegmental motion and horizontal displacement 6 weeks and 12 months after operation. Regression analysis did not find any linear dependencies between the clinical scores and imaging parameters. CONCLUSIONS: In awareness of some limitations of the study, our results demonstrate no increase of intersegmental movement or even instability after microsurgical decompression of the lumbar spine over a follow-up period of 12 months, which is equivalent to preservation of intervertebral stability. Furthermore, the magnitude of intervertebral range of motion showed no correlation to the clinical score parameters at all three examination points of time.

Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: prevalence of different forms of instability and clinical implications.

STUDY DESIGN: Imaging study with an evaluation of incidences and clinical correlation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of 3 different types of instabilities in patients with spondylolysis or isthmic spondylolisthesis. Clinical findings are correlated with imaging findings, and the imaging findings are analyzed with regard to their clinical implications. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spondylolysis and isthmic spondylolisthesis are common disorders. An unstable slip is the most well-known form of instability, but other forms also exist. However, the incidence of these instabilities and their clinical implications are yet unclear. METHODS: A total of 140 patients with 141 levels of spondylolysis identified by MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) were included in this study. Using positional MRI, the instability of the slip, an increased angular movement, and movement in the spondylolytic cleft were assessed. On the basis of clinical findings, the patients were classified as presenting with either radicular or nonradicular symptoms. The incidence of the instabilities was recorded and correlated with the incidence of radicular symptoms. RESULTS: Fifteen patients had an unstable slip (anterior instability); 35, an increased angular movement (angular instability); and 34 patients, a movement in the spondylolytic cleft (posterior instability). All forms of instability could be found together. No instability at all was found in 76 patients. Radicular symptoms were found significantly more often in patients with one or more of the described instabilities compared with patients without instability. CONCLUSION: All 3 described forms of instability are common in spondylolysis or isthmic spondylolisthesis and associated with radicular pain. This finding stresses the value of positional MRI in the evaluation of patients with spondylolysis and isthmic spondylolisthesis, especially if radicular symptoms are present.

Differential diagnosis of gastrointestinal leiomyoma versus gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

INTRODUCTION: Strategies for the diagnosis of tumors arising in the intestinal muscular wall are rapidly evolving. Immunoreactivity for CD117 (KIT) usually supports the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), but a small subset of GISTs lacks KIT expression. In these cases the differential diagnosis of KIT-negative GIST versus one of their morphological mimics is difficult and bears critical implications for therapeutic management. CASE REPORT: Here, we report a case of a KIT-negative smooth muscle cell tumor of the colon in a 21-year-old man with the clinical appearance of GIST. Mutations of the KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) gene could be ruled out. No chromosomal imbalances characteristic of GIST were found. However, cytogenetic analysis revealed losses at 7q, which has previously been reported in cases of uterine leiomyoma. DISCUSSION: We discuss current approaches to the differential diagnosis of true gastrointestinal smooth muscle cell tumor versus GIST.