The Impact of Virgin and Aged Microstructured Plastics on Proteins: The Case of Hemoglobin Adsorption and Oxygenation.

Plastic particles, particularly micro- and nanoparticles, are emerging pollutants due to the ever-growing amount of plastics produced across a wide variety of sectors. When plastic particles enter a biological medium, they become surrounded by a corona, giving them their biological identity and determining their interactions in the living environment and their biological effects. Here, we studied the interactions of microstructured plastics with hemoglobin (Hb). Virgin polyethylene microparticles (PEMPs) and polypropylene microparticles (PPMPs) as well as heat- or irradiation-aged microparticles (ag-PEMPs and ag-PPMPs) were used to quantify Hb adsorption. Polypropylene filters (PP-filters) were used to measure the oxygenation of adsorbed Hb. Microstructured plastics were characterized using optical microscopy, SAXS, ATR-FTIR, XPS, and Raman spectroscopy. Adsorption isotherms showed that the Hb corona thickness is larger on PPMPs than on PEMPs and Hb has a higher affinity for PPMPs than for PEMPs. Hb had a lower affinity for ag-PEMPs and ag-PPMPs, but they can be adsorbed in larger amounts. The presence of partial charges on the plastic surface and the oxidation rate of microplastics may explain these differences. Tonometry experiments using an original method, the diffuse reflection of light, showed that adsorbed Hb on PP-filters retains its cooperativity, but its affinity for O2 decreases significantly.

Role of the Protein Corona in the Colloidal Behavior of Microplastics.

Microparticles of polyethylene and polypropylene are largely found in aquatic environments because they are the most produced and persistent plastic materials. Once in biological media, they are covered by a layer of molecules, the so-called corona, mostly composed of proteins. A yeast protein extract from Saccharomyces cerevisiae was used as a protein system to observe interactions in complex biological media. Proteins, acting as surfactants and providing hydrophilic surfaces, allow the dispersion of highly hydrophobic particles in water and stabilize them. After 24 h, the microplastic quantity was up to 1 × 1011 particles per liter, whereas without protein, no particles remained in solution. Label-free imaging of the protein corona by synchrotron radiation deep UV fluorescence microscopy (SR-DUV) was performed. In situ images of the protein corona were obtained, and the adsorbed protein quantity, the coverage rate, and the corona heterogeneity were determined. The stability kinetics of the microplastic suspensions were measured by light transmission using a Turbiscan analyzer. Together, the microscopic and kinetics results demonstrate that the protein corona can very efficiently stabilize microplastics in solution provided that the protein corona quality is sufficient. Microplastic stability depends on different parameters such as the particle's intrinsic properties (size, density, hydrophobicity) and the protein corona formation that changes the particle wettability, electrostatic charge, and steric hindrance. By controlling these parameters with proteins, it becomes possible to keep microplastics in and out of solution, paving the way for applications in the field of microplastic pollution control and remediation.

A proteome scale study reveals how plastic surfaces and agitation promote protein aggregation.

Protein aggregation in biotherapeutics can reduce their activity and effectiveness. It may also promote immune reactions responsible for severe adverse effects. The impact of plastic materials on protein destabilization is not totally understood. Here, we propose to deconvolve the effects of material surface, air/liquid interface, and agitation to decipher their respective role in protein destabilization and aggregation. We analyzed the effect of polypropylene, TEFLON, glass and LOBIND surfaces on the stability of purified proteins (bovine serum albumin, hemoglobin and α-synuclein) and on a cell extract composed of 6000 soluble proteins during agitation (P = 0.1-1.2 W/kg). Proteomic analysis revealed that chaperonins, intrinsically disordered proteins and ribosomes were more sensitive to the combined effects of material surfaces and agitation while small metabolic oligomers could be protected in the same conditions. Protein loss observations coupled to Raman microscopy, dynamic light scattering and proteomic allowed us to propose a mechanistic model of protein destabilization by plastics. Our results suggest that protein loss is not primarily due to the nucleation of small aggregates in solution, but to the destabilization of proteins exposed to material surfaces and their subsequent aggregation at the sheared air/liquid interface, an effect that cannot be prevented by using LOBIND tubes. A guidance can be established on how to minimize these adverse effects. Remove one of the components of this combined stress - material, air (even partially), or agitation - and proteins will be preserved.