Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 36
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 72(35): 957-960, 2023 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37651293

RESUMEN

An outbreak of multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB) involved 13 persons in four households in a low-income, under-resourced urban Kansas community during November 2021-November 2022. A majority of the seven adults identified in the Kansas outbreak were born outside the United States in a country that had experienced an MDR TB outbreak with the same genotype during 2007-2009, whereas most of the six children in the Kansas outbreak were U.S.-born. Prompt identification, evaluation, and treatment of persons with MDR TB and their contacts is essential to limiting transmission.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Kansas/epidemiología , Genotipo , Pobreza , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/epidemiología
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 71(4): 1010-1016, 2020 08 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31556947

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2012, the Food and Drug Administration approved use of bedaquiline fumarate as part of combination therapy for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB). We describe treatment outcomes, safety, and tolerability of bedaquiline in our case series. METHODS: Data on patients started on bedaquiline for MDR TB between September 2012 and August 2016 were collected retrospectively through 4 TB programs using a standardized abstraction tool. Data were analyzed using univariate methods. Adverse events were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. RESULTS: Of 14 patients, 7 (50%) had MDR, 4 (29%) had pre-extensively drug-resistant (XDR), and 3 (21%) had XDR TB. All had pulmonary TB, 5 (36%) had pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB, and 9/13 (69%) were smear positive. One patient (7%) had HIV coinfection, 5 (36%) had diabetes mellitus, and 5/14 (36%) had previous treatment TB. All patients were non-US-born and 5/14 (36%) had private insurance. All patients achieved sputum culture conversion within a mean of 71 days (26-116); 5 after starting bedaquiline. Twelve (86%) completed treatment and 1 (7%) moved out of the country. One patient (7%) had QTc prolongation >500 milliseconds and died 20 months after discontinuing bedaquiline of a cause not attributable to the drug. Common adverse events were peripheral neuropathy 7/14 (50%), not customarily associated with bedaquiline use, and QTc prolongation 6/14 (43%). CONCLUSIONS: Of 14 patients, 1 (7%) had an adverse event necessitating bedaquiline discontinuation. Safety, culture conversion, and treatment completion in this series (7%) support use of bedaquiline for the treatment of MDR/XDR TB.


Asunto(s)
Antituberculosos , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos , Antituberculosos/efectos adversos , Diarilquinolinas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológico , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
3.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 22(6): e13357, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32510808

RESUMEN

Transmission of tuberculosis (TB) from a deceased solid organ donor to recipients can result in severe morbidity and mortality. In 2018, four solid organ transplant recipients residing in three states but sharing a common organ donor were diagnosed with TB disease. Two recipients were hospitalized and none died. The organ donor was born in a country with a high incidence of TB and experienced 8 weeks of headache and fever prior to death, but was not tested for TB during multiple hospitalizations or prior to organ procurement. TB isolates of two organ recipients and a close contact of the donor had identical TB genotypes and closely related whole-genome sequencing results. Donors with risk factors for TB, in particular birth or residence in countries with a higher TB incidence, should be carefully evaluated for TB.


Asunto(s)
Mycobacterium tuberculosis/aislamiento & purificación , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Tuberculosis/epidemiología , Tuberculosis/transmisión , Aloinjertos/microbiología , Antituberculosos/uso terapéutico , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genética , Factores de Riesgo , Donantes de Tejidos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Receptores de Trasplantes , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tuberculosis/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis/terapia , Secuenciación Completa del Genoma/métodos
4.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 200(10): e93-e142, 2019 11 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31729908

RESUMEN

Background: The American Thoracic Society, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, European Respiratory Society, and Infectious Diseases Society of America jointly sponsored this new practice guideline on the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB). The document includes recommendations on the treatment of multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) as well as isoniazid-resistant but rifampin-susceptible TB.Methods: Published systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and a new individual patient data meta-analysis from 12,030 patients, in 50 studies, across 25 countries with confirmed pulmonary rifampin-resistant TB were used for this guideline. Meta-analytic approaches included propensity score matching to reduce confounding. Each recommendation was discussed by an expert committee, screened for conflicts of interest, according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.Results: Twenty-one Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcomes questions were addressed, generating 25 GRADE-based recommendations. Certainty in the evidence was judged to be very low, because the data came from observational studies with significant loss to follow-up and imbalance in background regimens between comparator groups. Good practices in the management of MDR-TB are described. On the basis of the evidence review, a clinical strategy tool for building a treatment regimen for MDR-TB is also provided.Conclusions: New recommendations are made for the choice and number of drugs in a regimen, the duration of intensive and continuation phases, and the role of injectable drugs for MDR-TB. On the basis of these recommendations, an effective all-oral regimen for MDR-TB can be assembled. Recommendations are also provided on the role of surgery in treatment of MDR-TB and for treatment of contacts exposed to MDR-TB and treatment of isoniazid-resistant TB.


Asunto(s)
Antituberculosos/administración & dosificación , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológico , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/microbiología , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/microbiología
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 65(8): 1383-1387, 2017 10 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29017245

RESUMEN

Affecting both mother and the existing pregnancy, tuberculosis (TB) increases the likelihood of poor birth outcomes. Despite substantial clinical need for TB prevention and treatment, pregnant women remain neglected by research initiatives. As members of 3 community advisory boards that provide input into TB drug trials, we offer a community perspective on the inclusion of pregnant women in TB drug research and discuss (1) our perspective on the risk/benefit tradeoff of including pregnant women in research to address different forms of TB; (2) recent examples of progress in this area; (3) lessons learned from the human immunodeficiency virus research field, where pregnant women have enjoyed better-although imperfect-representation in research; and (4) recommendations for different stakeholders, including researchers, regulatory authorities, ethics committees, and policymakers.


Asunto(s)
Descubrimiento de Drogas/ética , Ética en Investigación , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Sujetos de Investigación , Tuberculosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo
8.
N Engl J Med ; 366(23): 2151-60, 2012 Jun 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22670901

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Delamanid (OPC-67683), a nitro-dihydro-imidazooxazole derivative, is a new antituberculosis medication that inhibits mycolic acid synthesis and has shown potent in vitro and in vivo activity against drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. METHODS: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, multinational clinical trial, we assigned 481 patients (nearly all of whom were negative for the human immunodeficiency virus) with pulmonary multidrug-resistant tuberculosis to receive delamanid, at a dose of 100 mg twice daily (161 patients) or 200 mg twice daily (160 patients), or placebo (160 patients) for 2 months in combination with a background drug regimen developed according to World Health Organization guidelines. Sputum cultures were assessed weekly with the use of both liquid broth and solid medium; sputum-culture conversion was defined as a series of five or more consecutive cultures that were negative for growth of M. tuberculosis. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients with sputum-culture conversion in liquid broth medium at 2 months. RESULTS: Among patients who received a background drug regimen plus 100 mg of delamanid twice daily, 45.4% had sputum-culture conversion in liquid broth at 2 months, as compared with 29.6% of patients who received a background drug regimen plus placebo (P=0.008). Likewise, as compared with the placebo group, the group that received the background drug regimen plus 200 mg of delamanid twice daily had a higher proportion of patients with sputum-culture conversion (41.9%, P=0.04). The findings were similar with assessment of sputum-culture conversion in solid medium. Most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity and were evenly distributed across groups. Although no clinical events due to QT prolongation on electrocardiography were observed, QT prolongation was reported significantly more frequently in the groups that received delamanid. CONCLUSIONS: Delamanid was associated with an increase in sputum-culture conversion at 2 months among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. This finding suggests that delamanid could enhance treatment options for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. (Funded by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development and Commercialization; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00685360.).


Asunto(s)
Antituberculosos/uso terapéutico , Nitroimidazoles/uso terapéutico , Oxazoles/uso terapéutico , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Antituberculosos/efectos adversos , Antituberculosos/farmacocinética , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/crecimiento & desarrollo , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/aislamiento & purificación , Nitroimidazoles/efectos adversos , Nitroimidazoles/farmacocinética , Oxazoles/efectos adversos , Oxazoles/farmacocinética , Esputo/microbiología , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/microbiología , Adulto Joven
9.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 20(5): 812-21, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24751166

RESUMEN

To describe factors associated with multidrug-resistant (MDR), including extensively-drug-resistant (XDR), tuberculosis (TB) in the United States, we abstracted inpatient, laboratory, and public health clinic records of a sample of MDR TB patients reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from California, New York City, and Texas during 2005-2007. At initial diagnosis, MDR TB was detected in 94% of 130 MDR TB patients and XDR TB in 80% of 5 XDR TB patients. Mutually exclusive resistance was 4% XDR, 17% pre-XDR, 24% total first-line resistance, 43% isoniazid/rifampin/rifabutin-plus-other resistance, and 13% isoniazid/rifampin/rifabutin-only resistance. Nearly three-quarters of patients were hospitalized, 78% completed treatment, and 9% died during treatment. Direct costs, mostly covered by the public sector, averaged $134,000 per MDR TB and $430,000 per XDR TB patient; in comparison, estimated cost per non-MDR TB patient is $17,000. Drug resistance was extensive, care was complex, treatment completion rates were high, and treatment was expensive.


Asunto(s)
Tuberculosis Extensivamente Resistente a Drogas/epidemiología , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/epidemiología , Antituberculosos/farmacología , Antituberculosos/uso terapéutico , Comorbilidad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Tuberculosis Extensivamente Resistente a Drogas/tratamiento farmacológico , Tuberculosis Extensivamente Resistente a Drogas/historia , Femenino , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Masculino , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/efectos de los fármacos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genética , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológico , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/historia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
10.
Int J Infect Dis ; 130 Suppl 1: S12-S15, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36918080

RESUMEN

In December 2022 World Health Organization released a new treatment for multidrug-resistant/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) guideline. The main novelty of this update is two new recommendations (i) a 6-month treatment regimen composed of bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid (600 mg), and moxifloxacin (BPaLM) is recommended in place of the 9-month or longer (18-month) regimens in MDR/RR-TB patients, now including extensive pulmonary TB and extrapulmonary TB (except TB involving central nervous system, miliary TB and osteoarticular TB); (ii) the use of the 9-month all-oral regimen rather than longer (18-months) regimen is suggested in patients with MDR/RR-TB and in whom resistance to fluoroquinolones has been excluded. Longer (18-month) treatments remain a valid option in all cases in which shorter regimens cannot be implemented due to intolerance, drug-drug interactions, extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis, extensive forms of extrapulmonary TB, or previous failure. The new guidelines represent a milestone in MDR/RR-TB treatment landscape, setting the basis for a shorter, all-oral, more acceptable, equitable, and patient-centered model for MDR/RR-TB management. However, some challenges remain to be addressed to allow full implementation of the new recommendations.


Asunto(s)
Tuberculosis Extensivamente Resistente a Drogas , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos , Tuberculosis Pulmonar , Humanos , Antituberculosos/farmacología , Tuberculosis Extensivamente Resistente a Drogas/tratamiento farmacológico , Rifampin/farmacología , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológico , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico
11.
Int J Infect Dis ; 124 Suppl 1: S90-S103, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35245659

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a life-threatening condition needing long poly-chemotherapy regimens. As no systematic reviews/meta-analysis is available to comprehensively evaluate the role of delamanid (DLM), we evaluated its effectiveness and safety. METHODS: We reviewed the relevant scientific literature published up to January 20, 2022. The pooled success treatment rate with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was assessed using a random-effect model. We assessed studies for quality and bias, and considered P<0.05 to be statistically significant. RESULTS: After reviewing 626 records, we identified 25 studies that met the inclusion criteria, 22 observational and 3 experimental, with 1276 and 411 patients, respectively. In observational studies the overall pooled treatment success rate of DLM-containing regimens was 80.9% (95% CI 72.6-87.2) with no evidence of publication bias (Begg's test; P >0.05). The overall pooled treatment success rate in DLM and bedaquiline-containing regimens was 75.2% (95% CI 68.1-81.1) with no evidence of publication bias (Begg's test; P >0.05). In experimental studies the pooled treatment success rate of DLM-containing regimens was 72.5 (95% CI 44.2-89.8, P <0.001, I2: 95.1%) with no evidence of publication bias (Begg's test; P >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In MDR-TB patients receiving DLM, culture conversion and treatment success rates were high despite extensive resistance with limited adverse events.


Asunto(s)
Nitroimidazoles , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos , Humanos , Antituberculosos/uso terapéutico , Nitroimidazoles/uso terapéutico , Oxazoles/efectos adversos , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológico , Diarilquinolinas/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis ; 22: 100201, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33336084

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2019, the World Health Organization released guidelines reflecting major changes in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) management-prioritizing fluoroquinolones, bedaquiline, and linezolid (LZD) while de-emphasizing previously favored injectable agents. In some cases, linezolid use is associated with gastrointestinal intolerance, mitochondrial toxicity, and significant drug interactions. CDC's Division of Tuberculosis Elimination supports a network of regional TB Centers of Excellence, which provide medical consultation to healthcare providers. Consultations are documented in a medical consultation database (MCD) enabling evaluation of management questions and recommendations. We describe the scope of clinical inquiries and responses specific to linezolid use for MDR-TB in the US. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the major themes of provider and patient challenges regarding the use of linezolid for the treatment of MDR-TB in the US? METHODS: We queried MCD consults categorized as "MDR/XDR-TB" from 1/1/2013 to 12/31/2018. Only linezolid-specific consultations were included; incomplete and duplicate entries were excluded as were those citing linezolid historically or theoretically. Subgroup characteristics were assessed (e.g., Center, year, provider type). A descriptive coding scheme was developed through inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: In 2013-2018 of the 1889 consults regarding MDR/XDR-TB, 934 MDR-TB consults referenced linezolid; 137 met inclusion criteria, representing between 4 and 10% of MDR-TB consults annually. Four main themes emerged: adverse effects (71.5%); concerns about linezolid use due to co-morbidities or concurrent medication use (15.3%); dosing adjustments (8.8%); and monitoring and maintenance logistics (4.4%). INTERPRETATIONS: Linezolid consults consistently exceeded 4% of all consults annually over the 6-year period, suggesting a need for access to expert opinion for providers using linezolid to manage MDR-TB. While only a snapshot of MDR-TB in the US, this evaluation summarizes major provider concerns regarding particular adverse effects, and highlights a need for evidence-based guidance regarding linezolid dosing and toxicity management.

15.
Clin Infect Dis ; 51(11): 1298-305, 2010 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21039283

RESUMEN

With the recent emphasis on funding and training opportunities for global health and humanitarian aid and the increased interest in the field, many health care workers and medical researchers are traveling from resource-replete to resource-limited settings. This type of travel brings unique disease risks not routinely considered for the business or vacationing traveler. This review provides practical advice for this special population of travelers, targeted to specific health care-related risks (needlestick, hemorrhagic fever viruses, severe viral respiratory disease, and tuberculosis), with suggestions for risk mitigation.


Asunto(s)
Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Enfermedades Transmisibles/transmisión , Personal de Salud , Investigadores , Viaje , Países en Desarrollo , Humanos
17.
J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis ; 17: 100114, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31788557

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) Regional Training and Medical Consultation Centers (RTMCCs) were established in 2005 for TB medical consultation, training and education in the United States. A medical consultation database (MCD) captured all consultations provided by RTMCCs; we report on those provided from June 1, 2010 to May 31, 2014. METHODS: All MCD consultations during 2010-2014 were categorized into: provider type, setting, consultation topic, and patient age. We analyzed data frequencies and performed subgroup analyses by RTMCC, by TB incidence for the geographical area, and by year of consultation. End-user satisfaction was assessed by a 2016 telephone evaluation of RTMCC services. RESULTS: A total of 11,074 consultations were delivered, with 10,754 (97.1%) in the U.S. and its current or former territories. Of these, 6018 (56%) were for high, 2443 (22.7%) for medium, and 2293 (21.3%) for low TB incidence settings. Most were for adults (81.3%) and answered within 24 h (96.2%). Nearly 2/3 consultations originated from health departments; providers included mostly physicians (44.3%) or nurses (37.6%). Common consult categories included TB disease (47.7%), case management (29.8%), latent TB infection (19.3%), diagnosis (16.1%), pharmacology (14.7%) and adverse side effects (14.3%). Among adverse side effects, hepatotoxicity was most common (39.6%). Volume and nature of consult requests remained relatively stable over the four-year period. Feedback from a 2016 CDC evaluation indicated overall satisfaction with RTMCC medical consultation services. CONCLUSION: RTMCCS were an important source of TB medical consultation over the time-frame of this assessment and provided quality expert consultation within 24 h. RMTCCs represent a reservoir of TB subject-matter expertise in the United States.

20.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 5(4): ofy062, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29644252

RESUMEN

We describe 2 young, female patients who developed drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome while on treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). Active TB was treated successfully with second-line TB medications, including moxifloxacin, ethambutol, linezolid, and amikacin for 18 months.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA