Novel antifungals and treatment approaches to tackle resistance and improve outcomes of invasive fungal disease.

SUMMARYFungal infections are on the rise, driven by a growing population at risk and climate change. Currently available antifungals include only five classes, and their utility and efficacy in antifungal treatment are limited by one or more of innate or acquired resistance in some fungi, poor penetration into "sequestered" sites, and agent-specific side effect which require frequent patient reassessment and monitoring. Agents with novel mechanisms, favorable pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles including good oral bioavailability, and fungicidal mechanism(s) are urgently needed. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of novel antifungal agents, with both improved known mechanisms of actions and new antifungal classes, currently in clinical development for treating invasive yeast, mold (filamentous fungi), Pneumocystis jirovecii infections, and dimorphic fungi (endemic mycoses). We further focus on inhaled antifungals and the role of immunotherapy in tackling fungal infections, and the specific PK/pharmacodynamic profiles, tissue distributions as well as drug-drug interactions of novel antifungals. Finally, we review antifungal resistance mechanisms, the role of use of antifungal pesticides in agriculture as drivers of drug resistance, and detail detection methods for antifungal resistance.

Performance of the clarus Aspergillus galactomannan enzyme immunoassay prototype for the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in serum.

BACKGROUND: Serum galactomannan (GM) testing is essential for diagnosing invasive aspergillosis (IA), particularly in immunocompromised individuals. The global lack of on-site GM testing capacities necessitates cost-effective alternatives, such as .the clarus Aspergillus GM enzyme immunoassay prototype (clarus AGM prototype). METHODS: This single-centre, cross-sectional study compared the diagnostic performance of the clarus AGM prototype (IMMY, Norman, Oklahoma) with the serological gold standard (=Platelia AGM assay; Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Cocquette, France). IA was classified according to modified 2020 EORTC/MSG consensus and 2024 FUNDICU criteria. In total, 300 prospectively (May-Dec 2023) and retrospectively (2012-2015) collected samples were included. RESULTS: Among 300 samples from 232 patients, 49 (16%) were classified as proven (n = 1) or probable IA (n = 48). In non-IA cases (n = 250), one patient was classified as possible IA. With the manufacturer recommended cut-off of ≥0.2, sensitivity and specificity of the clarus AGM prototype were 27% (13/49; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 15%-41%) and 99% (248/250; 95% CI: 97%-100%), respectively, while sensitivity and specificity were 78% and 79% when using the optimised Youden's cut-off of 0.0045 ODI. ROC curve analysis demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.829 (95% CI: 0.760-0.898) for the clarus AGM prototype in distinguishing between proven/probable IA and non-IA. The AUC for the Platelia AGM was 0.951 (95% CI: 0.909-994). Spearman's correlation analysis showed a weak correlation between the two assays (0.382; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The weak correlation between the clarus AGM prototype and Platelia AGM highlights the need for further investigation into the clinical performance of the clarus AGM prototype, giving the different antigen epitopes addressed.