RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Voriconazole administered concomitantly with flucloxacillin may result in subtherapeutic plasma concentrations as shown in a patient with Staphylococcus aureus sepsis and a probable pulmonary aspergillosis. After switching our patient to posaconazole, therapeutic concentrations were reached. The aim of this study was to first test our hypothesis that flucloxacillin competes with voriconazole not posaconazole for binding to albumin ex vivo, leading to lower total concentrations in plasma. METHODS: A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was then applied to predict the mechanism of action of the drug-drug interaction (DDI). The model included non-linear hepatic metabolism and the effect of a severe infectious disease on cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes activity. RESULTS: The unbound voriconazole concentration remained unchanged in plasma after adding flucloxacillin, thereby rejecting our hypothesis of albumin-binding site competition. The PBPK model was able to adequately predict the plasma concentration of both voriconazole and posaconazole over time in healthy volunteers. Upregulation of CYP3A4, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 through the pregnane X receptor (PXR) gene by flucloxacillin resulted in decreased voriconazole plasma concentrations, reflecting the DDI observations in our patient. Posaconazole metabolism was not affected, or was only limitedly affected, by the changes through the PXR gene, which agrees with the observed plasma concentrations within the target range in our patient. CONCLUSIONS: Ex vivo experiments reported that the unbound voriconazole plasma concentration remained unchanged after adding flucloxacillin. The PBPK model describes the potential mechanism driving the drug-drug and drug-disease interaction of voriconazole and flucloxacillin, highlighting the large substantial influence of flucloxacillin on the PXR gene and the influence of infection on voriconazole plasma concentrations, and suggests a more limited effect on other triazoles.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Novel therapies for multiple myeloma (MM) promise to improve outcomes but are also associated with substantial increasing costs. Evidence regarding cost-effectiveness of novel treatments is necessary, but a comprehensive up-to-date overview of the cost-effectiveness evidence of novel treatments is currently lacking. METHODS: We searched Embase, Medline via Ovid, Web of Science and EconLIT ProQuest to identify all cost-effectiveness evaluations of novel pharmacological treatment of MM reporting cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and cost per life year (LY) gained since 2005. Quality and completeness of reporting was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards. RESULTS: We identified 13 economic evaluations, comprising 32 comparisons. Our results show that novel agents generate additional LYs (range: 0.311-3.85) and QALYs (range: 0.1-2.85) compared to backbone regimens and 0.02 to 1.10 LYs and 0.01 to 0.91 QALYs for comparisons between regimens containing two novel agents. Lifetime healthcare costs ranged from USD 60,413 to 1,434,937 per patient. The cost-effectiveness ratios per QALY gained ranged from dominating to USD 1,369,062 for novel agents compared with backbone therapies and from dominating to USD 618,018 for comparisons between novel agents. CONCLUSIONS: Cost-effectiveness ratios of novel agents were generally above current willingness-to-pay thresholds. To ensure access, cost-effectiveness should be improved or cost-effectiveness ratios above current thresholds should be accepted.