Tracheobronchomalacia and Excessive Dynamic Airway Collapse: Current Concepts and Future Directions.

Tracheobronchomalacia (TBM) and excessive dynamic airway collapse (EDAC) are airway abnormalities that share a common feature of expiratory narrowing but are distinct pathophysiologic entities. Both entities are collectively referred to as expiratory central airway collapse (ECAC). The malacia or weakness of cartilage that supports the tracheobronchial tree may occur only in the trachea (ie, tracheomalacia), in both the trachea and bronchi (TBM), or only in the bronchi (bronchomalacia). On the other hand, EDAC refers to excessive anterior bowing of the posterior membrane into the airway lumen with intact cartilage. Clinical diagnosis is often confounded by comorbidities including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity, hypoventilation syndrome, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Additional challenges include the underrecognition of ECAC at imaging; the interchangeable use of the terms TBM and EDAC in the literature, which leads to confusion; and the lack of clear guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. The use of CT is growing for evaluation of the morphology of the airway, tracheobronchial collapsibility, and extrinsic disease processes that can narrow the trachea. MRI is an alternative tool, although it is not as widely available and is not used as frequently for this indication as is CT. Together, these tools not only enable diagnosis, but also provide a road map to clinicians and surgeons for planning treatment. In addition, CT datasets can be used for 3D printing of personalized medical devices such as stents and splints. An invited commentary by Brixey is available online. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.

Lessons Learned from Peer Learning Conference in Cardiothoracic Radiology.

Medical errors may lead to patient harm and may also have a devastating effect on medical providers, who may suffer from guilt and the personal impact of a given error (second victim experience). While it is important to recognize and remedy errors, it should be done in a way that leads to long-standing practice improvement and focuses on systems-level opportunities rather than in a punitive fashion. Traditional peer review systems are score based and have some undesirable attributes. The authors discuss the differences between traditional peer review systems and peer learning approaches and offer practical suggestions for transitioning to peer learning conferences. Peer learning conferences focus on learning opportunities and embrace errors as an opportunity to learn. The authors also discuss various types and sources of errors relevant to the practice of radiology and how discussions in peer learning conferences can lead to widespread system improvement. In the authors' experience, these strategies have resulted in practice improvement not only at a division level in radiology but in a broader multidisciplinary setting as well. The online slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.

Vascular Malformations and Tumors: A Review of Classification and Imaging Features for Cardiothoracic Radiologists.

The International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies (ISSVA) classification is a comprehensive histology-based scheme that was updated in 2018. It is important for cardiothoracic imagers to understand this classification to ensure that accurate terminology is used and that archaic terms are avoided when vascular lesions are described. Knowledge of the various malformations (including common conditions, such as venous malformation, arteriovenous fistula, and arteriovenous malformation) and vascular tumors allows for timely diagnosis and appropriate management. This review describes various vascular anomalies, in accordance with ISSVA classification and terminology; highlights key imaging features associated with each; and discusses the role of different imaging modalities. Keywords: Pulmonary, Soft Tissues/Skin, Vascular, Arteriovenous Malformation © RSNA, 2023.

Utility of Nipple Markers in the Era of Digital Imaging.

PURPOSE: Nipple markers maybe used to decrease the recall of patients undergoing chest radiography by aiding in distinguishing between a nipple shadow and lung nodule. We evaluated the use of digital chest radiographs in clinical practice including accuracy of placement and markers that do not contribute to interpretation (ie, projected outside the lung fields). We also evaluated the recall rate for additional imaging in patients who received nipple markers compared to those who did not. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this Institutional Review Board approved retrospective study, 1000 consecutive outpatient frontal and lateral chest radiographs performed in 2018 for which nipple markers were provided to patients formed the study group. Three cardiothoracic radiologists evaluated the images for the presence of markers and accuracy of placement. The recall rate was calculated over a 3-year period from March 21, 2016 and March 21, 2019. RESULTS: One or both markers were missing without an explanation (such as mastectomy), misplaced or outside the lung fields in 57.8% (578/1000) of studies. The 3-year recall rate for all chest radiographs was very low (0.03%; 42/135,792) and was lower for patients provided nipple markers (0.007%; 5/62,587) than those who were not (0.05%; 37/73,205) ( P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The low overall recall rate and high prevalence of inaccurate marker placement or markers that do not contribute to interpretation (ie, outside the lung fields) does not justify the routine use of nipple markers for chest radiography.

Is There Gender Bias in Radiology Job Postings?

BACKGROUND: Words can convey subtle cultural stereotypes and perpetuate subconscious gender biases. Wording in job advertisements that appeals to 1 gender and deters others may unintentionally skew the applicant pool and affect the early phase of the recruitment process. "Masculine" tone can lead to decreased interest among women applicants while 'feminine' wording may not affect a man's decision to apply for the job. In this study, we evaluated the presence and extent of subtle gender bias in job advertisements for radiology faculty positions. METHODS: All job postings for faculty radiologists were retrieved from the American College of Radiology Career Center website in July 2020. The complete job advertisement was analyzed using Gender Decoder, a publicly available web-based application, to determine number and percentage of female or male coded words and the overall tone of the ad. The job posts were also stratified by subspecialty, leadership positions and academic versus private practice environments. RESULTS: Of the 623 job postings reviewed, a little over half (52.0%) of job postings were feminine coded, 26.6% had a masculine tone and 21.3% had a neutral tone. Of the leadership (division director) positions, 50.0% (4/8) had a masculine tone, 37.5% had a feminine tone, and 12.5% had a neutral tone. Among various specialties, pediatric radiology had the lowest percentage of job posts with a masculine tone (10.5%) while nuclear medicine had the highest percentage (41.7%). The most commonly used feminine words were: "support," "responsible," "commitment" and the most common masculine words were: "competitive," "leader," "active." CONCLUSIONS: Most of the imaging job advertisements were feminine coded, with masculine tone in overall 26.6% posts and neutral tone in about a fifth. Leadership posts had a higher percentage of masculine tone. Awareness of these biases is important to enable diversity in recruitment and to ensure a diverse applicant pool.

Effects of Mitral Valve Prolapse on Quantification of Mitral Regurgitation and Ejection Fraction Using Cardiac MRI.

Purpose: To determine the impact of prolapsed volume on regurgitant volume (RegV), regurgitant fraction (RF), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) using cardiac MRI. Materials and Methods: Patients with MVP and mitral regurgitation who underwent cardiac MRI from 2005 to 2020 were identified retrospectively from the electronic record. RegV is the difference between left ventricular stroke volume (LVSV) and aortic flow. Left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) and LVSV were obtained from volumetric cine images, with prolapsed volume inclusion (LVESVp, LVSVp) and exclusion (LVESVa, LVSVa) providing two estimates of RegV (RegVp, RegVa), RF (RFp, RFa), and LVEF (LVEFa, LVEFp). Interobserver agreement for LVESVp was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RegV was also calculated independently using measurements from mitral inflow and aortic net flow phase-contrast imaging as the reference standard (RegVg). Results: The study included 19 patients (mean age, 28 years ± 16 [SD]; 10 male patients). Interobserver agreement for LVESVp was high (ICC, 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96, 0.99). Prolapsed volume inclusion resulted in higher LVESV (LVESVp: 95.4 mL ± 34.7 vs LVESVa: 82.4 mL ± 33.8; P < .001), lower LVSV (LVSVp: 100.5 mL ± 33.8 vs LVSVa: 113.5 mL ± 35.9; P < .001), and lower LVEF (LVEFp: 51.7% ± 5.7 vs LVEFa: 58.6% ± 6.3; P < .001). RegV was larger in magnitude when prolapsed volume was excluded (RegVa: 39.4 mL ± 21.0 vs RegVg: 25.8 mL ± 22.8; P = .02), with no evidence of a difference when including prolapsed volume (RegVp: 26.4 mL ± 16.4 vs RegVg: 25.8 mL ± 22.8; P > .99). Conclusion: Measurements that included prolapsed volume most closely reflected mitral regurgitation severity, but inclusion of this volume resulted in a lower LVEF.Keywords: Cardiac, MRI© RSNA, 2023See also commentary by Lee and Markl in this issue.