Definition and classification of complications of gastrectomy for gastric cancer based on the accordion severity grading system.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative complications still comprise the marker used most frequently to assess the quality of gastrectomy. However, the definition and grading of morbidity is not standardized, hampering meaningful comparisons over time and among centers. This study proposes specific definitions and a reproducible classification of complications following gastrectomy using standardized grading tools. METHODS: We defined each complication based on the literature, and adopted the Accordion Severity Grading System to stratify morbidity. The classification was applied to 890 patients with gastric cancer seen between January 2010 and April 2011. The correlation between the complication grades and the length of hospital stay (LOS) was analyzed, and risk factors for complications were examined with special reference to severity grade. RESULTS: The overall morbidity rate was 18.1 %. Mild complications occurred in 31 patients (3.5 %), moderate in 77 patients (8.7 %), severe--invasive procedure/no general anesthesia (GA) in 27 patients (3.0 %), severe--invasive procedures/GA in 18 patients (2.0 %), and severe--organ failure in 3 patients (0.3 %). Five patients (0.6 %) died postoperatively. The grade of complications had a significant effect on the LOS (p < 0.001). Operating time and cardiovascular and pulmonary co-morbidities were independent risk factors for severe complications [odds ratio (OR) 1.001, p = 0.016; OR 2.226, p = 0.006; OR = 2.896, p = 0.003, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: The complications after gastrectomy could be classified into different severity grades that had distinct clinical outcomes. The use of this classification provides more reliable, practical outcome data. Consequently, complications should be reported using a standardized classification tool such as the Accordion Severity Grading System, which requires consensus on the definition of specific complications.

Elevated preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts poor survival following resection in late stage gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Elevated neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (N/L ratio) has been shown to be a prognostic indicator in various cancers. We aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of the preoperative N/L ratio in late stage gastric cancer. METHODS: From April 2004 to August 2007, 293 patients who had undergone gastrectomy with curative intent for the AJCC/UICC TNM Stage III or IV gastric cancer were included. N/L ratio was calculated from lymphocyte and neutrophil counts on routine blood tests taken prior to surgery. RESULTS: The median follow-up time for surviving patients was 38.2 months (4.2-65.5 months) and median preoperative N/L ratio was 2.06 (range 0.47-19.73). Subjects were dichotomized at the N/L value of 2.0. A multivariate analysis established a significant relationship between the N/L ratio and overall survival (HR=1.609; 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.144-2.264; P=0.006). The cutoff value up to 3.0, the value of 75 percentiles, showed a significant prognostic effect on disease-free survival (HR=1.654; 95% CI, 1.088-2.515; P=0.019). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the elevated preoperative N/L ratio predicts poor disease-free and overall survival following resection for late stage gastric cancer. It may be utilized as a simple, reliable prognostic factor for risk stratification and will provide better treatment allocation.