RESUMEN
AIMS: In recent years, the human brain-bladder control network has been visualized in different functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies. The role of the brainstem and suprapontine regions has been elucidated. Especially the pontine region and the periaqueductal gray, as the central structures of the micturition circuit, were demonstrated. Detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (DSD) is a common problem in patients with neurological diseases. Residual urine and consecutive urinary tract infections with the risk of kidney damage remain a problem. In the present study, we used fMRI of the brain to compare the activation sites of patients with DSD with those of our previously published healthy controls with special emphasis on the brainstem region. METHODS: fMRI was performed in 11 patients with DSD who had an urge to void due to a filled bladder. In a nonvoiding model, they were instructed to contract or to relax the pelvic floor muscles repetitively. RESULTS: In patients with DSD, we could reproduce the activation sites found in healthy subjects, showing the regions in the brainstem as well as the other micturition-related areas. The activation of the pontine region was more rostral/dorsal compared with the healthy volunteers. CONCLUSION: Interestingly, we detected the well-known activation in the pontine region in the patients in the dorsal/rostral part compared with the more ventral activation in the healthy volunteers, suggesting that the L-region of the pontine micturition center is more prominent in cases of DSD.
Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de la Vejiga Urinaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Anciano , Encéfalo/fisiopatología , Mapeo Encefálico , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades de la Vejiga Urinaria/fisiopatología , Micción/fisiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The optimal management of patients with clinical stage I non-seminomatous germ cell testicular cancer (NSGCT I) was considered controversial until the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group determined unambiguous treatment strategies. In order to assess the long-term outcome we evaluated the data of patients with NSGCT I. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective evaluation, we included 52 patients with a mean age of 26 years (range 15-58) who were treated with different modalities at our department between 1989 and 2003. Mean follow-up was 5.9 years (range 2-14 years). After orchiectomy, 39 patients were treated with chemotherapy, 7 patients underwent retroperitoneal lymph node dissection and 6 men were managed using a surveillance strategy. Survival, recurrence rate and time of recurrence were evaluated. The histological staging and treatment modality was related to the relapse. RESULTS: Tumor specific overall mortality was 3.8%. The mortality and relapse rate of the surveillance strategy, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection and chemotherapy was 16.7% / 50%, 14.3% / 14.3% and 0% / 2.5% respectively. All relapsed patients in the surveillance group as well as in the RPLND group had at least one risk factor for developing metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Following the European consensus on diagnosis and treatment of germ cell cancer in patients with NSGCT Stage I any treatment decision must be individually related to the patient according to prognostic factors and care capacity of the treating centre. In case of doubt, adjuvant chemotherapy should be the treatment of choice, as it provides the lowest risk of relapse or tumor related death.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/cirugía , Neoplasias Testiculares/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Orquiectomía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Testiculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Temsirolimus (TEMSR) was approved for treating advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in 2007. Based on the data from a single phase 3 trial, it is recommended explicitly as first-line therapy for patients with a poor clinical prognosis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective multicentre trial (STARTOR) was to examine the effectiveness of TEMSR in daily clinical practice with a broader indication in the treatment of metastatic RCC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Metastatic RCC patients treated with 25mg of TEMSR weekly were submitted to a prospective systematic evaluation and follow-up in 87 German centres between January 2008 and October 2011 using standardised procedures. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: All data were centrally analysed by an independent clinical research organisation. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: This interim analysis of the STARTOR study included 386 patients. The observed toxicity was tolerable, the median dose intensity was 91% (interquartile range: 79-100%), and the median treatment duration was 20.1 wk (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.0-23.3 wk). Clinical benefit was seen in 157 patients (40.7%); the median progression-free and overall survival were 4.9 mo (95% CI, 4.2-5.6) and 11.6 mo (95% CI, 9.3-13.9), respectively. The effectiveness of TEMSR did not differ significantly in relation to the patient's age, histologic RCC subtype, or line of treatment. The major limitations were the noninterventional study design, limited information about Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center risk factors and detailed toxicity, and the lack of central radiologic review. CONCLUSIONS: TEMSR is an effective and largely well-tolerated treatment alternative for metastatic RCC patients in daily clinical practice, irrespective of the patient's age, histologic RCC subtype, or line of treatment.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Sirolimus/efectos adversos , Sirolimus/uso terapéutico , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The optimal management of patients with clinical stage I non-seminomatous germ cell testicular cancer (NSGCT I) was considered controversial until the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group determined unambiguous treatment strategies. In order to assess the long-term outcome we evaluated the data of patients with NSGCT I. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective evaluation, we included 52 patients with a mean age of 26 years (range 15-58) who were treated with different modalities at our department between 1989 and 2003. Mean follow-up was 5.9 years (range 2-14 years). After orchiectomy, 39 patients were treated with chemotherapy, 7 patients underwent retroperitoneal lymph node dissection and 6 men were managed using a surveillance strategy. Survival, recurrence rate and time of recurrence were evaluated. The histological staging and treatment modality was related to the relapse. RESULTS: Tumor specific overall mortality was 3.8 percent. The mortality and relapse rate of the surveillance strategy, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection and chemotherapy was 16.7 percent / 50 percent, 14.3 percent / 14.3 percent and 0 percent / 2.5 percent respectively. All relapsed patients in the surveillance group as well as in the RPLND group had at least one risk factor for developing metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Following the European consensus on diagnosis and treatment of germ cell cancer in patients with NSGCT Stage I any treatment decision must be individually related to the patient according to prognostic factors and care capacity of the treating centre. In case of doubt, adjuvant chemotherapy should be the treatment of choice, as it provides the lowest risk of relapse or tumor related death.