RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is a scarcity of large randomized clinical trials on the efficacy and safety of high-dose amino acid supplementation (AAS) in patients with gastrointestinal tumors undergoing surgical treatment. METHODS: This pragmatic, randomized, controlled, single-center, open-label, parallel-group AMIGITS trial was performed in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Patients with gastrointestinal tumors were randomly assigned to receive either AAS or standard care (SC). Amino acid targets were 2.0 g/kg per day in the AAS group and 1.2 g/kg per day in the SC group. The AAS group received additional amino acids intravenously, while the SC group received an iso-energetic 5% glucose intravenously. RESULTS: Overall, 407 patients (AAS group, 204; SC group, 203) were included in this study. During the intervention, the actual mean daily energy intake did not differ significantly between the AAS and SC groups (25.53 vs. 25.16 kcal/kg per day, P=0.493). However, the actual mean daily amino acid intake was significantly higher in the AAS group than that in the SC group (1.81 vs. 0.94 g/kg per day, P<0.001). The infection incidence during hospitalization and that within 30 days of surgery was significantly lower in the AAS group than that in the SC group (P=0.031 and P=0.024, respectively). The 30-day postoperative incidence of amino acid treatment-related adverse events and other complications did not significantly differ between the two groups. The postoperative hospital stay was significantly different between the two groups (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: AAS was associated with a reduced infection incidence within 30 days of major surgery in patients with gastrointestinal tumors and can be a promising strategy.
RESUMEN
Background: Patients with tumors generally present with accompanying activation of the coagulation system, which may be related to tumor stage. To our knowledge, few studies have examined the activation of the coagulation system in reference to lymph node metastasis within gastric cancer. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between multiple coagulation-related factors and lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer after excluding the influence of tumor T stage. Materials and methods: We retrospectively evaluated the relationship between lymph node metastasis and coagulation-related factors in 516 patients with T4a stage gastric cancer. We further analyzed influencing factors for lymph node metastasis and verified the predictive value of maximum amplitude (MA, a parameter of thromboelastography which is widely used to assess the strength of platelet-fibrinogen interaction in forming clots) in reference to lymph node metastasis. Results: Platelet counts (P=0.011), fibrinogen levels (P=0.002) and MA values (P=0.006) were statistically significantly higher in patients with T4a stage gastric cancer presenting with lymph node metastasis than in those without lymph node metastasis. Moreover, tumor N stage was statistically significantly and positively correlated with platelet count (P<0.001), fibrinogen level (P=0.003), MA value (P<0.001), and D-dimer level (P=0.010). The MA value was an independent factor for lymph node metastasis (ß=0.098, 95% CI: 1.020-1.193, P=0.014) and tumor N stage (ß=0.059, 95% CI: 0.015-0.104, P=0.009), and could be used to predict the presence of lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer (sensitivity 0.477, specificity 0.783, P=0.006). The independent influencing factors for MA value mainly included platelet levels, fibrinogen levels, D-dimer and hemoglobin levels; we found no statistically significant correlations with tumor diameter, tumor area, and other evaluated factors. Conclusion: We conclude that MA value is an independent influencing factor for lymph node metastasis and tumor N stage in patients with T4a stage gastric cancer. The MA value has important value in predicting the presence or absence of lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer. Clinical trial registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2200064936.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy can trigger a high incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), which produces a poor clinical prognosis. We sought to evaluate the effect of somatostatin analogs (SSA) on POPF and clinical prognosis after radical gastrectomy. METHODS: A total of 123 patients with a high risk of POPF after radical gastrectomy (drainage fluid amylase concentration on a postoperative day [POD] 1 > 3 times the upper limit of normal serum amylase value) were randomly divided into the SSA group (n = 61) and the control group (n = 62). The former received continuous intravenous SSA (0.3 mg/8 h) for 3 days from POD1, and the latter normal saline. The primary outcome was the incidence of POPF. RESULTS: The incidence of POPFs in the SSA group was significantly lower than that in the control group (3.3% vs. 14.5%, P = 0.029). The incidence of short-term postoperative complications was significantly lower in the SSA group than in the control group (9.8% vs. 24.2%, P = 0.034). The median white blood cell counts, neutrophil counts, and the percentage of neutrophils on POD4 were significantly lower in the SSA group than in the control group (all P < 0.05). The SSA group had a shorter mean time to the first liquid diet (87.33 ± 17.92 h vs. 93.97 ± 17.29 h, P = 0.039). And the SSA group had less median daily drainage volume (96.33 mL vs. 119.67 mL, P = 0.025) and shorter drainage duration (7.0 days vs. 10.0 days, P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Postoperative treatment with a somatostatin analog reduced the incidence of POPF and short-term complications after radical gastrectomy. (TRN: ChiCTR2200056201, Reg. Date: 2022/2/1).