RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine time from injury to initiation of surgical care and association with survival in US military casualties. BACKGROUND: Although the advantage of trauma care within the "golden hour" after an injury is generally accepted, evidence is scarce. METHODS: This retrospective, population-based cohort study included US military casualties injured in Afghanistan and Iraq, January 2007 to December 2015, alive at initial request for evacuation with maximum abbreviated injury scale scores ≥2 and documented 30-day survival status after injury. Interventions: (1) handoff alive to the surgical team, and (2) initiation of first surgery were analyzed as time-dependent covariates (elapsed time from injury) using sequential Cox proportional hazards regression to assess how intervention timing might affect mortality. Covariates included age, injury year, and injury severity. RESULTS: Among 5269 patients (median age, 24 years; 97% males; and 68% battle-injured), 728 died within 30 days of injury, 68% within 1 hour, and 90% within 4 hours. Only handoffs within 1 hour of injury and the resultant timely initiation of emergency surgery (adjusted also for prior advanced resuscitative interventions) were significantly associated with reduced 24-hour mortality compared with more delayed surgical care (adjusted hazard ratios: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.14-0.82; P = 0.02; and 0.40; 95% CI: 0.20-0.81; P = 0.01, respectively). In-hospital waits for surgery (mean: 1.1 hours; 95% CI; 1.0-1.2) scarcely contributed ( P = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Rapid handoff to the surgical team within 1 hour of injury may reduce mortality by 66% in US military casualties. In the subgroup of casualties with indications for emergency surgery, rapid handoff with timely surgical intervention may reduce mortality by 60%. To inform future research and trauma system planning, findings are pivotal.
Asunto(s)
Medicina Militar , Personal Militar , Pase de Guardia , Heridas y Lesiones , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugía , Campaña Afgana 2001-RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare therapeutic strategies and outcomes, following isolated gunshot wounds of the head, between military and civilian populations. BACKGROUND: Recent military conflicts introduced new concepts in trauma care, including aggressive surgical intervention in severe head trauma. METHODS: This was a cohort-matched study, using the civilian Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) and the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR), during the period 2013 to 2016. Included in the study were patients with isolated gunshots to the head. Exclusion criteria were dead on arrival, civilians transferred from other hospitals, and patients with major extracranial associated injuries (body area Abbreviated Injury Scale >3). Patients in the military database were propensity score-matched 1:3 with patients in the civilian database. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients in the DoDTR database were matched for age, sex, year of injury, and head Abbreviated Injury Scale with 408 patients from TQIP. Utilization of blood products was significantly higher in the military population ( P <0.001). In the military group, patients were significantly more likely to have intracranial pressure monitoring (17% vs 6%, P <0.001) and more likely to undergo craniotomy or craniectomy (34% vs 13%, P <0.001) than in the civilian group. Mortality in the military population was significantly lower (27% vs 38%, P =0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Military patients are more likely to receive blood products, have intracranial pressure monitoring and undergo craniectomy or craniotomy than their civilian counterparts after isolated head gunshot wounds. Mortality is significantly lower in the military population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-therapeutic.
Asunto(s)
Personal Militar , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Humanos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/cirugía , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Hospitales , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Puntaje de Gravedad del TraumatismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Combat-related gunshot wounds (GSW) may differ from those found in civilian trauma centers. Missile velocity, resources, logistics, and body armor may affect injury patterns and management strategies. This study compares injury patterns, management, and outcomes in isolated abdominal GSW between military (MIL) and civilian (CIV) populations. METHODS: The Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR) and TQIP databases were queried for patients with isolated abdominal GSW from 2013 to 2016. MIL patients were propensity score matched 1:3 based on age, sex, and extraabdominal AIS. Injury patterns and in-hospital outcomes were compared. Initial operative management strategies, including selective nonoperative management (SNOM) for isolated solid organ injuries, were also compared. RESULTS: Of the 6435 patients with isolated abdominal GSW, 183 (3%) MIL were identified and matched with 549 CIV patients. The MIL group had more hollow viscus injuries (84% vs. 66%) while the CIV group had more vascular injuries (10% vs. 21%) (p < .05 for both). Operative strategy differed, with more MIL patients undergoing exploratory laparotomy (95% vs. 82%) and colectomy (72% vs. 52%) (p < .05 for both). However, no difference in ostomy creation was appreciated. More SNOM for isolated solid organ injuries was performed in the CIV group (34.1% vs. 12.5%; p < 0.05). In-hospital outcomes, including mortality, were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: MIL abdominal GSW lead to higher rates of hollow viscus injuries compared to CIV GSW. MIL GSW are more frequently treated with resection but with similar ostomy creation compared to civilian GSW. SNOM of solid organ injuries is infrequently performed following MIL GSW.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Personal Militar , Centros Traumatológicos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Humanos , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Traumatismos Abdominales/terapia , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Personal Militar/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/diagnóstico , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/cirugía , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/terapia , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Department of Defense/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Militar/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To address the clinical and regulatory challenges of optimal primary endpoints for bleeding patients by developing consensus-based recommendations for primary clinical outcomes for pivotal trials in patients within 6 categories of significant bleeding, (1) traumatic injury, (2) intracranial hemorrhage, (3) cardiac surgery, (4) gastrointestinal hemorrhage, (5) inherited bleeding disorders, and (6) hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia. BACKGROUND: A standardized primary outcome in clinical trials evaluating hemostatic products and strategies for the treatment of clinically significant bleeding will facilitate the conduct, interpretation, and translation into clinical practice of hemostasis research and support alignment among funders, investigators, clinicians, and regulators. METHODS: An international panel of experts was convened by the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute and the United States Department of Defense on September 23 and 24, 2019. For patients suffering hemorrhagic shock, the 26 trauma working-group members met for almost a year, utilizing biweekly phone conferences and then an in-person meeting, evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of previous high quality studies. The selection of the recommended primary outcome was guided by goals of patient-centeredness, expected or demonstrated sensitivity to beneficial treatment effects, biologic plausibility, clinical and logistical feasibility, and broad applicability. CONCLUSIONS: For patients suffering hemorrhagic shock, and especially from truncal hemorrhage, the recommended primary outcome was 3 to 6-hour all-cause mortality, chosen to coincide with the physiology of hemorrhagic death and to avoid bias from competing risks. Particular attention was recommended to injury and treatment time, as well as robust assessments of multiple safety related outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Hemostasis Quirúrgica/métodos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Choque Hemorrágico/etiología , Choque Hemorrágico/prevención & control , Consenso , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Hemostáticos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Choque Hemorrágico/mortalidadRESUMEN
Hemorrhage is the most common mechanism of death in battlefield casualties with potentially survivable injuries. There is evidence that early blood product transfusion saves lives among combat casualties. When compared to component therapy, fresh whole blood transfusion improves outcomes in military settings. Cold-stored whole blood also improves outcomes in trauma patients. Whole blood has the advantage of providing red cells, plasma, and platelets together in a single unit, which simplifies and speeds the process of resuscitation, particularly in austere environments. The Joint Trauma System, the Defense Committee on Trauma, and the Armed Services Blood Program endorse the following: (1) whole blood should be used to treat hemorrhagic shock; (2) low-titer group O whole blood is the resuscitation product of choice for the treatment of hemorrhagic shock for all casualties at all roles of care; (3) whole blood should be available within 30 min of casualty wounding, on all medical evacuation platforms, and at all resuscitation and surgical team locations; (4) when whole blood is not available, component therapy should be available within 30 min of casualty wounding; (5) all prehospital medical providers should be trained and logistically supported to screen donors, collect fresh whole blood from designated donors, transfuse blood products, recognize and treat transfusion reactions, and complete the minimum documentation requirements; (6) all deploying military personnel should undergo walking blood bank prescreen laboratory testing for transfusion transmitted disease immediately prior to deployment. Those who are blood group O should undergo anti-A/anti-B antibody titer testing.
Asunto(s)
Transfusión Sanguínea/métodos , Resucitación/métodos , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Almacenamiento de Sangre/métodos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Humanos , Medicina Militar , Personal MilitarRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hand motion analysis by video recording during surgery has potential for evaluation of surgical performance. The aim was to identify how technical skill during open surgery can be measured unobtrusively by video recording during a surgical procedure. We hypothesized that procedural-step timing, hand movements, instrument use and Shannon entropy differ with expertise and training and are concordant with a performance-based validated individual procedure score. METHODS: Surgeon and non-surgeon participants with varying training and levels of expertise were video recorded performing axillary artery exposure and control (AA) on un-preserved cadavers. Color-coded gloves permitted motion-tracking and automated extraction of entropy data from recordings. Timing and instrument-use metrics were obtained through observational video reviews. Shannon entropy measured speed, acceleration and direction by computer-vision algorithms. Findings were compared with individual procedure score for AA performance RESULTS: Experts had lowest entropy values, idle time, active time and shorter time to divide pectoralis minor, using fewer instruments. Residents improved with training, without reaching expert levels, and showed deterioration 12-18 months later. Individual procedure scores mirrored these results. Non-surgeons differed substantially. CONCLUSIONS: Hand motion entropy and timing metrics discriminate levels of surgical skill and training, and these findings are congruent with individual procedure score evaluations. These measures can be collected using consumer-level cameras and analyzed automatically with free software. Hand motion with video timing data may have widespread application to evaluate resident performance and can contribute to the range of evaluation and testing modalities available to educators, training course designers and surgical quality assurance programs.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Internado y Residencia , Benchmarking , Humanos , Movimiento (Física) , Grabación en VideoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Early recognition and management of hemorrhage, damage control resuscitation, and blood product administration have optimized management of severe trauma. Recent data suggest hypocalcemia exacerbates the ensuing effects of coagulopathy in trauma. OBJECTIVE: This narrative review of available literature describes the physiology and role of calcium in trauma resuscitation. Authors did not perform a systematic review or meta-analysis. DISCUSSION: Calcium is a divalent cation found in various physiologic forms, specifically the bound, inactive state and the unbound, physiologically active state. While calcium plays several important physiologic roles in multiple organ systems, the negative hemodynamic effects of hypocalcemia are crucial to address in trauma patients. The negative ramifications of hypocalcemia are intrinsically linked to components of the lethal triad of acidosis, coagulopathy, and hypothermia. Hypocalcemia has direct and indirect effects on each portion of the lethal triad, supporting calcium's potential position as a fourth component in this proposed lethal diamond. Trauma patients often present hypocalcemic in the setting of severe hemorrhage secondary to trauma, which can be worsened by necessary transfusion and resuscitation. The critical consequences of hypocalcemia in the trauma patient have been repeatedly demonstrated with the associated morbidity and mortality. It remains poorly defined when to administer calcium, though current data suggest that earlier administration may be advantageous. CONCLUSIONS: Calcium is a key component of trauma resuscitation and the coagulation cascade. Recent data portray the intricate physiologic reverberations of hypocalcemia in the traumatically injured patient; however, future research is needed to further guide the management of these patients.
Asunto(s)
Hipocalcemia/etiología , Resucitación , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Calcio/fisiología , Humanos , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Massive transfusion is frequently a component of the resuscitation of combat casualties. Because blood supplies may be limited, activation of a walking blood bank and mobilization of necessary resources must occur in a timely fashion. The development of a risk prediction model to guide clinicians for early transfusion in the prehospital setting was sought. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a previously described data set from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry from January 2007 to August 2016 focusing on casualties undergoing massive transfusion. Serious injury was defined based on an Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3 or greater by body region. The authors constructed multiple imputations of the model for risk prediction development. Efforts were made to internally validate the model. RESULTS: Within the data set, there were 15540 patients, of which 1238 (7.9%) underwent massive transfusion. In the body region injury scale model, explosive injuries (odds ratio [OR], 3.78), serious extremity injuries (OR, 6.59), and tachycardia >120/min (OR, 5.61) were most strongly associated with receiving a massive transfusion. In the simplified model, major amputations (OR, 17.02), tourniquet application (OR, 6.66), and tachycardia >120 beats/min (OR, 8.72) were associated with massive transfusion. Both models had area under the curve receiver operating characteristic values of greater than 0.9 for the model and bootstrap forest analysis. CONCLUSION: In the body region injury scale model, explosive mechanisms, serious extremity injuries, and tachycardia were most strongly associated with massive transfusion. In the simplified model, major amputations, tourniquet application, and tachycardia were most strongly associated.
Asunto(s)
Transfusión Sanguínea , Heridas y Lesiones/patología , Adulto , Área Bajo la Curva , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Femenino , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Curva ROC , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess transfusion strategies and outcomes, stratified by the combat mortality index, of casualties treated by small surgical teams in Afghanistan. Resuscitation that included warm fresh whole blood (FWB) was compared to blood component resuscitation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Casualties treated by a Role 2 surgical team in Afghanistan from 2008 to 2014 who received 1 or more units of red blood cells (RBCs) or FWB were included. Patients were excluded if they had incomplete data or length of stay less than 30 minutes. Patients were separated into two groups: 1) received FWB and 2) did not receive FWB; moreover, both groups potentially received plasma, RBCs, and platelets. The analysis was stratified by critically versus noncritically injured patients using the prehospital combat mortality index. Kaplan-Meier plot, log-rank test, and multivariable Cox regression were performed to compare survival. RESULTS: In FWB patients, median units of FWB and total blood product were 4.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 2.0-7.0) and 16.0 (IQR, 10.0-28.0), respectively. The Kaplan-Meier plot demonstrated that survival was similar between FWB (79.1%) and no-FWB (74.5%) groups (p = 0.46); after stratifying patients by the combat mortality index, the risk of mortality was increased in the no-FWB group (hazard ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-6.4) compared to the FWB cohort. CONCLUSION: In forward-deployed environments, where component products are limited, FWB has logistical advantages and was associated with reduced mortality in casualties with a critical combat mortality index. Additional analysis is needed to determine if these effects of FWB are appreciable in all trauma patients or just in those with severe physiologic derangement.
Asunto(s)
Transfusión Sanguínea/métodos , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Adulto , Afganistán , Conflictos Armados , Transfusión de Componentes Sanguíneos , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Personal Militar , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Resucitación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The majority of potentially preventable deaths after trauma are related to hemorrhage and occur early after injury, with the largest number of deaths occurring before hospital arrival. Approximately one-fourth of trauma deaths may be potentially preventable through early medical and surgical interventions. Interventions dedicated to bleeding control and hemostatic resuscitation have demonstrated merit in decreasing hemorrhagic injury mortality. Advancing these novel strategies to the casualty in the prehospital phase of care, particularly in tactical or austere environments, may prove beneficial for hemorrhage mitigation to temporize the window of survival to definitive care. Future studies of resuscitation and survival after traumatic injury must include analysis of prehospital deaths to fully understand the outcomes of early interventions.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Hemorragia/terapia , Resucitación/métodos , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Hemorragia/mortalidad , Humanos , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidadRESUMEN
Recent studies have demonstrated that early transfusion of plasma or RBCs improves survival in patients with severe trauma and hemorrhagic shock. Time to initiate transfusion is the critical factor. It is essential that transfusion begin in the prehospital environment when transport times are longer than approximately 15 to 20 minutes. Unfortunately, logistic constraints severely limit the use of blood products in the prehospital setting, especially in military, remote civilian, and mass disaster circumstances, where the need can be most acute. US military requirements for logistically supportable blood products are projected to increase dramatically in future conflicts. Although dried plasma products have been available and safely used in a number of countries for over 20 years, there is no dried plasma product commercially available in the United States. A US Food and Drug Administration-approved dried plasma is urgently needed. Considering the US military, disaster preparedness, and remote civilian trauma perspectives, this is an urgent national health care issue.
Asunto(s)
Transfusión de Componentes Sanguíneos/métodos , Medicina de Desastres/métodos , Medicina Militar/métodos , Plasma , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia , Aprobación de Drogas , Humanos , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMEN
OBJECTIVEIn combat and austere environments, evacuation to a location with neurosurgery capability is challenging. A planning target in terms of time to neurosurgery is paramount to inform prepositioning of neurosurgical and transport resources to support a population at risk. This study sought to examine the association of wait time to craniectomy with mortality in patients with severe combat-related brain injury who received decompressive craniectomy.METHODSPatients with combat-related brain injury sustained between 2005 and 2015 who underwent craniectomy at deployed surgical facilities were identified from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry and Joint Trauma System Role 2 Registry. Eligible patients survived transport to a hospital capable of diagnosing the need for craniectomy and performing surgery. Statistical analyses included unadjusted comparisons of postoperative mortality by elapsed time from injury to start of craniectomy, and Cox proportional hazards modeling adjusting for potential confounders. Time from injury to craniectomy was divided into quintiles, and explored in Cox models as a binary variable comparing early versus delayed craniectomy with cutoffs determined by the maximum value of each quintile (quintile 1 vs 2-5, quintiles 1-2 vs 3-5, etc.). Covariates included location of the facility at which the craniectomy was performed (limited-resource role 2 facility vs neurosurgically capable role 3 facility), use of head CT scan, US military status, age, head Abbreviated Injury Scale score, Injury Severity Score, and injury year. To reduce immortal time bias, time from injury to hospital arrival was included as a covariate, entry into the survival analysis cohort was defined as hospital arrival time, and early versus delayed craniectomy was modeled as a time-dependent covariate. Follow-up for survival ended at death, hospital discharge, or hospital day 16, whichever occurred first.RESULTSOf 486 patients identified as having undergone craniectomy, 213 (44%) had complete date/time values. Unadjusted postoperative mortality was 23% for quintile 1 (n = 43, time from injury to start of craniectomy 30-152 minutes); 7% for quintile 2 (n = 42, 154-210 minutes); 7% for quintile 3 (n = 43, 212-320 minutes); 19% for quintile 4 (n = 42, 325-639 minutes); and 14% for quintile 5 (n = 43, 665-3885 minutes). In Cox models adjusted for potential confounders and immortal time bias, postoperative mortality was significantly lower when time to craniectomy was within 5.33 hours of injury (quintiles 1-3) relative to longer delays (quintiles 4-5), with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.28, 95% CI 0.10-0.76 (p = 0.012).CONCLUSIONSPostoperative mortality was significantly lower when craniectomy was initiated within 5.33 hours of injury. Further research to optimize craniectomy timing and mitigate delays is needed. Functional outcomes should also be evaluated.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Encefálicas/cirugía , Craniectomía Descompresiva/efectos adversos , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Presión Intracraneal , Masculino , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: Prehospital blood product transfusion in trauma care remains controversial due to poor-quality evidence and cost. Sequential expansion of blood transfusion capability after 2012 to deployed military medical evacuation (MEDEVAC) units enabled a concurrent cohort study to focus on the timing as well as the location of the initial transfusion. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of prehospital transfusion and time to initial transfusion with injury survival. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study of US military combat casualties in Afghanistan between April 1, 2012, and August 7, 2015. Eligible patients were rescued alive by MEDEVAC from point of injury with either (1) a traumatic limb amputation at or above the knee or elbow or (2) shock defined as a systolic blood pressure of less than 90 mm Hg or a heart rate greater than 120 beats per minute. EXPOSURES: Initiation of prehospital transfusion and time from MEDEVAC rescue to first transfusion, regardless of location (ie, prior to or during hospitalization). Transfusion recipients were compared with nonrecipients (unexposed) for whom transfusion was delayed or not given. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Mortality at 24 hours and 30 days after MEDEVAC rescue were coprimary outcomes. To balance injury severity, nonrecipients of prehospital transfusion were frequency matched to recipients by mechanism of injury, prehospital shock, severity of limb amputation, head injury, and torso hemorrhage. Cox regression was stratified by matched groups and also adjusted for age, injury year, transport team, tourniquet use, and time to MEDEVAC rescue. RESULTS: Of 502 patients (median age, 25 years [interquartile range, 22 to 29 years]; 98% male), 3 of 55 prehospital transfusion recipients (5%) and 85 of 447 nonrecipients (19%) died within 24 hours of MEDEVAC rescue (between-group difference, -14% [95% CI, -21% to -6%]; P = .01). By day 30, 6 recipients (11%) and 102 nonrecipients (23%) died (between-group difference, -12% [95% CI, -21% to -2%]; P = .04). For the 386 patients without missing covariate data among the 400 patients within the matched groups, the adjusted hazard ratio for mortality associated with prehospital transfusion was 0.26 (95% CI, 0.08 to 0.84, P = .02) over 24 hours (3 deaths among 54 recipients vs 67 deaths among 332 matched nonrecipients) and 0.39 (95% CI, 0.16 to 0.92, P = .03) over 30 days (6 vs 76 deaths, respectively). Time to initial transfusion, regardless of location (prehospital or during hospitalization), was associated with reduced 24-hour mortality only up to 15 minutes after MEDEVAC rescue (median, 36 minutes after injury; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.17 [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.73], P = .02; there were 2 deaths among 62 recipients vs 68 deaths among 324 delayed transfusion recipients or nonrecipients). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among medically evacuated US military combat causalities in Afghanistan, blood product transfusion prehospital or within minutes of injury was associated with greater 24-hour and 30-day survival than delayed transfusion or no transfusion. The findings support prehospital transfusion in this setting.
Asunto(s)
Campaña Afgana 2001- , Transfusión Sanguínea , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Medicina Militar , Personal Militar , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Adulto , Ambulancias Aéreas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Respiratory rate (RR) is important in many patient care settings; however, direct observation of RR is cumbersome and often inaccurate, and electrocardiogram-derived RR (RRECG) is unreliable. We asked how data derived from the first 15 min of RR recording after trauma center admission using a novel acoustic sensor (RRa) would compare to RRECG and to end-tidal carbon dioxide-based RR ([Formula: see text]) from intubated patients, the "gold standard" in predicting life-saving interventions in unstable trauma patients. In a convenience sample subset of trauma patients admitted to our Level 1 trauma center, enrolled in the ONPOINT study, and monitored with RRECG, some of whom also had [Formula: see text] data, we collected RRa using an adhesive sensor with an integrated acoustic transducer (Masimo RRa™). Using Bland-Altman analysis of area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves, we compared the first 15 min of continuous RRa and RRECG to [Formula: see text] and assessed the performance of these three parameters compared to the Revised Trauma Score (RTS) in predicting blood transfusion 3, 6, and 12 h after admission. Of the 1200 patients enrolled in ONPOINT from December 2011 to May 2013, 1191 had RRECG data recorded in the first 15 min, 358 had acoustic monitoring, and 14 of the latter also had [Formula: see text]. The three groups did not differ demographically or in mechanism of injury. RRa showed less bias (0.8 vs. 6.9) and better agreement than RRECG when compared to [Formula: see text]. At [Formula: see text] 10-29 breaths per minute, RRa was more likely to be the same as [Formula: see text] and assign the same RTS. In predicting transfusion, features derived from RRa and RRECG gave AUROCs 0.59-0.66 but with true positive rate 0.70-0.89. RRa monitoring is a non-invasive option to glean valid RR data to assist clinical decision making and could contribute to prediction models in non-intubated unstable trauma patients.
Asunto(s)
Acústica/instrumentación , Electrocardiografía/métodos , Monitoreo Fisiológico/instrumentación , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Frecuencia Respiratoria , Adulto , Área Bajo la Curva , Transfusión Sanguínea , Procesamiento Automatizado de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Curva ROC , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por Computador , Programas Informáticos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Human diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) often aberrantly express oncogenes that generally contain complex secondary structures in their 5' untranslated region (UTR). Oncogenes with complex 5'UTRs require enhanced eIF4A RNA helicase activity for translation. PDCD4 inhibits eIF4A, and PDCD4 knockout mice have a high penetrance for B-cell lymphomas. Here, we show that on B-cell receptor (BCR)-mediated p70s6K activation, PDCD4 is degraded, and eIF4A activity is greatly enhanced. We identified a subset of genes involved in BCR signaling, including CARD11, BCL10, and MALT1, that have complex 5'UTRs and encode proteins with short half-lives. Expression of these known oncogenic proteins is enhanced on BCR activation and is attenuated by the eIF4A inhibitor Silvestrol. Antigen-experienced immunoglobulin (Ig)G(+) splenic B cells, from which most DLBCLs are derived, have higher levels of eIF4A cap-binding activity and protein translation than IgM(+) B cells. Our results suggest that eIF4A-mediated enhancement of oncogene translation may be a critical component for lymphoma progression, and specific targeting of eIF4A may be an attractive therapeutic approach in the management of human B-cell lymphomas.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas Adaptadoras de Señalización CARD/metabolismo , ARN Helicasas DEAD-box/metabolismo , Factor 4A Eucariótico de Iniciación/metabolismo , Guanilato Ciclasa/metabolismo , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos B/metabolismo , Regiones no Traducidas 5'/genética , Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales/genética , Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales/metabolismo , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Proteínas Reguladoras de la Apoptosis/genética , Proteínas Reguladoras de la Apoptosis/metabolismo , Proteína 10 de la LLC-Linfoma de Células B , Linfocitos B/efectos de los fármacos , Linfocitos B/metabolismo , Western Blotting , Proteínas Adaptadoras de Señalización CARD/genética , Caspasas/genética , Caspasas/metabolismo , Línea Celular Tumoral , Células Cultivadas , ARN Helicasas DEAD-box/antagonistas & inhibidores , ARN Helicasas DEAD-box/genética , Factor 4A Eucariótico de Iniciación/antagonistas & inhibidores , Factor 4A Eucariótico de Iniciación/genética , Guanilato Ciclasa/genética , Humanos , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/genética , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/metabolismo , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteína 1 de la Translocación del Linfoma del Tejido Linfático Asociado a Mucosas , Proteínas de Neoplasias/genética , Proteínas de Neoplasias/metabolismo , Biosíntesis de Proteínas/efectos de los fármacos , Proteínas de Unión al ARN/genética , Proteínas de Unión al ARN/metabolismo , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Proteínas Quinasas S6 Ribosómicas 70-kDa/genética , Proteínas Quinasas S6 Ribosómicas 70-kDa/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Transducción de Señal/genética , Triterpenos/farmacologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Experience with the management of vascular trauma by senior surgical residents is increasingly limited. When queried about their understanding of anatomy and ability to perform specific vascular exposures, residents express a moderately high level of confidence. We hypothesized that this perception does not equal reality. METHODS: A total of 42 senior surgical residents participating in an ongoing validation study of the Advanced Surgical Skills for Exposures in Trauma course were asked to self-assess their baseline (precourse) confidence of their understanding of the anatomy required to perform and their ability to perform exposure and control of the axillary, brachial, and femoral arteries, as well as lower extremity fasciotomy using a 5-point Likert scale. Residents then performed the four procedures on a fresh cadaver model and were scored in real time by experts using a global assessment of anatomic knowledge and readiness to perform." The Student t-test was used with α set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Residents consistently rated their understanding of anatomy and their ability to perform the procedures significantly higher than expert evaluator ultimately scored them. Evaluators also deemed that residents would be unable to perform without help 65%-86% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: Senior residents are ill-prepared to perform the procedures studied and have an unwarranted confidence in their knowledge and abilities. Perception clearly does not equal reality in preparing these trainees to perform as advertized. The low global scores for anatomy and performance should be a wake-up call for surgical educators prompting curricular reform and evaluation.