Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Acad Pediatr ; 22(1): 137-142, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34610461

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: As abuse of prescription narcotics continues to create a growing healthcare crisis throughout the United States, states have passed legislation designed to alter narcotic prescribing habits. West Virginia State Bill 273 limited the quantity of narcotics practitioners were able to prescribe. Our objective was to determine the effect of this bill on narcotic prescribing practices for pediatric surgical patients. METHODS: A hospital-wide database at a pediatric trauma center was queried to identify all pediatric patients undergoing surgery between January 1, 2017 and December 9, 2019 and all medications prescribed to this cohort. Narcotic prescriptions written for these patients in the 2 months following surgery were isolated. The percent of patients receiving a postoperative narcotic prescription and the morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per prescription were compared before and after the law's implementation. RESULTS: The number of pediatric patients identified as having surgery in the study period was 10,176; 6069 were before the law passed and 4107 were after. The percentage of patients receiving a narcotic prescription was 46.0% before the law was passed, decreasing to 36.8% after the law (P < .0001). Adjusted for age, the average MME of each prescription before the law's implementation was 104.0, which decreased to 79.2 after the law (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The amount of narcotic per prescription written for pediatric patients after surgery and the percentage of patients receiving a prescription decreased after West Virginia State Bill 273 was implemented. This law was associated with decreased narcotics written by providers, providing an example for future legislation targeting opioid prescribing and abuse.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Hospitales Pediátricos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Niño , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Humanos , Narcóticos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
2.
J Orthop Res ; 39(10): 2159-2168, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33283316

RESUMEN

Systemic cytokine concentrations have been extensively studied in implant-associated infections, providing sensitive diagnostic markers. However, less is known about the relationships of tissue-level cytokines surrounding the joint. The aim of this study was to define the cytokine profiles of tissues to investigate the use of these cytokines as markers of debridement in chronic joint infection. Using a rodent model, muscle samples were obtained from rats following Kirschner wire implantation and infection with Staphylococcus aureus to determine if: (1) differences exist in cytokine concentrations with proximity to infection, and (2) localized infection-specific markers can be identified on a tissue level to potentially serve as debridement markers in the future. Samples were collected from 4 distinct locations, and the concentrations of interleukin(IL)-1α, IL-1ß, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-13, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, interferon-γ, and tumor necrosis factor-α were quantified in each sample, relative to the amount of tissue. Cytokine concentrations differed with proximity to the joint when implant or infection was present, and tissues at the operative knee joint showed the highest levels of most cytokines. Additionally, IL-1ß, IL-4, and IL-6 showed promise, beyond diagnostics, as tissue-level indicators of infection response. Ultimately, this study illustrated that tissue-level evaluation provided insight into infection-specific response, and these markers may be useful for guiding the debridement of implant-associated infections.


Asunto(s)
Citocinas , Interleucina-4 , Animales , Biomarcadores , Interleucina-6 , Ratas , Roedores , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa
3.
Hosp Pediatr ; 11(5): 521-524, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33846141

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate prescription opiate usage, disposal rates, and methods of disposal after pediatric surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of patients <18 years of age who underwent a surgical procedure at our institution and were given a postoperative opiate prescription between April 2017 and June 2018. A follow-up phone survey was conducted between 60 and 90 days postoperatively to ask about prescription opiate usage and disposal. RESULTS: A total of 290 patients with a mean age of 9.0 ± 4.7 years (62.8% male) met inclusion criteria. Sixty patients (20.7%) reported using all of their prescription opiate medication, whereas 230 patients (79.3%) did not use all of their pain medication. Of these 230 patients, 141 (61.3%) disposed of their leftover prescription opiates via flushing (56.4%), trash (28.6%), or take-back center (15.0%). At the time of phone survey between 60 and 90 days postoperatively, 88 patients (38.3%) still had leftover pain medication. By 7 days postoperatively, 234 of 290 patients (80.7%) had taken their last prescription opioid. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, 79.3% of patients were overprescribed opiate pain medication after pediatric surgery. Disposal rates at 60 to 90 days for leftover pain medication after pediatric surgery was just >60%. Pediatric patients are often overprescribed prescription opiates after surgery and typically only require a one-week supply of pain medication.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Dolor Postoperatorio , Adolescente , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Manejo del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Periodo Posoperatorio , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Foot Ankle Orthop ; 5(3): 2473011420934804, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35097396

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Foot width reduction is a desirable cosmetic and functional outcome for patients with hallux valgus. Triplanar first tarsometatarsal (TMT) arthrodesis could achieve this goal by 3-dimensional correction of the deformity. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in bony and soft tissue width in patients undergoing triplanar first TMT arthrodesis. METHODS: After receiving Institutional Review Board approval, charts were retrospectively reviewed for patients undergoing triplanar first TMT arthrodesis for hallux valgus at 4 institutions between 2016 and 2019. Patients who underwent concomitant first metatarsal head osteotomies (eg, Silver or Chevron) or fifth metatarsal osteotomies were excluded. Preoperative and postoperative anteroposterior weightbearing radiographs were compared to evaluate for changes in bony and soft tissue width. One hundred forty-eight feet from 144 patients (48.1 ± 15.7 years, 92.5% female) met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Preoperative osseous foot width was 96.2 mm, compared to 85.8 mm postoperatively (P < .001). Preoperative soft tissue width was 106.6 mm, compared to 99.3 mm postoperatively (P < .001). Postoperatively, patients had an average 10.4 ± 4.0 mm reduction (10.8% reduction) in osseous width and average 7.3 ± 4.0 mm reduction (6.8% reduction) in soft tissue width. CONCLUSIONS: Triplanar first TMT arthrodesis reduced both osseous and soft tissue foot width, providing a desirable cosmetic and functional outcome for patients with hallux valgus. Future studies are needed to determine if patient satisfaction and outcome measures correlate with reductions in foot width. Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA