Evaluation of the routine use of pelvic MRI in women presenting with symptomatic uterine fibroids: When is pelvic MRI useful?

BACKGROUND: Pelvic ultrasound (US) diagnosis of uterine fibroids may overlook coexisting gynecological conditions that contribute to women's symptoms. PURPOSE: To determine the added value of pelvic MRI for women diagnosed with symptomatic fibroids by US, and to identify clinical factors associated with additional MRI findings. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective observational study. POPULATION: In all, 367 consecutive women with fibroids diagnosed by US and referred to our multidisciplinary fibroid center between 2013-2017. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: All patients had both pelvic US and MRI prior to their consultations. MRIs were performed at 1.5 T or 3 T and included multiplanar T2 -weighted sequences, and precontrast and postcontrast T1 -weighted imaging. ASSESSMENT: Demographics, symptoms, uterine fibroid symptom severity scores, and health-related quality of life scores, as well as imaging findings were evaluated. STATISTICAL TESTS: Patients were separated into two subgroups according to whether MRI provided additional findings to the initial US. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Pelvic MRI provided additional information in 162 patients (44%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 39-49%). The most common significant findings were adenomyosis (22%), endometriosis (17%), and partially endocavitary fibroids (15%). Women with pelvic pain, health-related quality of life scores less than 30 out of 100, or multiple fibroids visualized on US had greater odds of additional MRI findings (odds ratio [OR] 1.68, 2.26, 1.63; P = 0.02, 0.004, 0.03, respectively), while nulliparous women had reduced odds (OR 0.55, P = 0.01). Patients with additional MRI findings were treated less often with uterine fibroid embolization (14% vs. 36%, P < 0.001) or MR-guided focused US (1% vs. 5%, P = 0.04), and more often with medical management (17% vs. 8%, P = 0.01). DATA CONCLUSION: Pelvic MRI revealed additional findings in more than 40% of women presenting with symptoms initially ascribed to fibroids by US. Further evaluation using MRI is particularly useful for parous women with pelvic pain, poor quality of life scores, and/or multiple fibroids. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019.

Are fibroid and bony pelvis characteristics associated with urinary and pelvic symptom severity?

BACKGROUND: Urinary and pelvic floor symptoms often are attributed to size and location of uterine fibroid tumors. However, direct supporting evidence that links increased size to worsening symptoms is scant and limited to ultrasound evaluation of fibroid tumors. Because management of fibroid tumors is targeted towards symptomatic relief, the identification of fibroid and pelvic characteristics that are associated with worse symptoms is vital to the optimization of therapies and prevention needless interventions. OBJECTIVE: We examined the correlation between urinary, pelvic floor and fibroid symptoms, and fibroid size and location using precise uterine fibroid and bony pelvis characteristics that were obtained from magnetic resonance imaging. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review (2013-2017) of a multidisciplinary fibroid clinic identified 338 women who had been examined via pelvic magnetic resonance imaging, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory questionnaire (score 0-300), and a Uterine Fibroid Symptoms questionnaire (score 1-100). Multiple linear regression analysis was used to assess the influence of clinical factors and magnetic resonance imaging findings on scaled Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Uterine Fibroid Symptoms scores. Data were analyzed with statistical software. RESULTS: Our cohort of 338 women had a median Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory of 72.7 (interquartile range, 41-112.3). Increased Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory score was associated with clinical factors of higher body mass index (P<.001), noncommercial insurance (P<.001), increased parity (P=.001), and a history of incontinence surgery (P=.003). Uterine volume, dominant fibroid volume, dimension and location, and fibroid tumor location relative to the bony pelvis structure did not reach significance when compared with pelvic floor symptom severity. The mean Uterine Fibroid Symptoms score was 52.0 (standard deviation, 23.5). An increased Uterine Fibroid Symptoms score was associated with dominant submucosal fibroid tumors (P=.011), body mass index (P<.0016), and a clinical history of anemia (P<.001) or any hormonal treatment for fibroid tumors (P=.009). CONCLUSION: Contrary to common belief, in this cohort of women who sought fibroid care, size and position of fibroid tumors or uterus were not associated with pelvic floor symptom severity. Whereas, bleeding symptom severity was associated with dominant submucosal fibroid tumor and previous hormonal treatment. Careful attention to clinical factors such as body mass index and medical history is recommended when pelvic floor symptoms are evaluated in women with uterine fibroid tumors.

Urodynamic factors associated with the large capacity bladder and incomplete emptying after prolapse repair (2009-2015).

AIMS: To identify the clinical and urodynamic factors associated with the large capacity bladder and incomplete bladder emptying after prolapse repair. METHODS: We identified 592 women who underwent anterior and/or apical prolapse repair at our institution from 2009 to 2015. Women were stratified by urodynamic capacity. The primary outcome was incomplete emptying at the longest follow-up (postvoid residual [PVR] > 200 mL). Data were analyzed in the Statistical Analysis System software. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-six women (mean age, 61 years) had preoperative urodynamic tracings available for review. After surgery, there were 519 PVRs in 239 women recorded at up to 2949 days (mean, 396) and nine time points (median, 2; IQR, 1-3). The receiver operator curve for predicted probability of longest follow-up PVR greater than 200 mL (area under curve = 0.67) identified the 600 mL cutpoint which defined large capacity bladder. Large capacity bladders (capacity, >600 mL [n=79] vs ≤600 mL, [n=160]) had a mean: detrusor pressure at maximum flow (21 vs 22 cm H2 O; P = 0.717), maximum flow rate (19 vs 17 mL/s; P = 0.148), significantly elevated PVR (202 vs 73 mL; P < 0.001), and significantly lower voiding efficiency (VE) (74 vs 82%, P < 0.05). Following prolapse repair, elevated PVR was associated with large capacity (PVR 101 vs 49 mL, P < 0.05). Large bladders had a two- to three-fold risk of longest follow-up PVR greater than 200 mL (14.3%-20.3% [capacity, >600 mL] vs 4.1%-7.0% [capacity, ≤600 mL]). VE was similar after surgery regardless of the capacity (87% vs 88%, P = 0.772). CONCLUSIONS: The decision to pursue prolapse repair should be individualized and take into account, the bladder capacity and goals for PVR improvement after surgery.

Repeat anatomic surveys performed for an initial incomplete study: the sonographer and physician factors.

BACKGROUND: Repeat obstetrical anatomic surveys are often performed because of incomplete initial studies despite conflicting evidence on their utility. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency and yield of repeat obstetrical anatomic surveys performed because of incomplete initial studies and to determine patient and provider factors associated with the recommendation for a second study. STUDY DESIGN: A 10-year retrospective cohort study of women having an initial anatomic survey at 18 weeks to 21 weeks and 6/7 days of gestation at a single nonreferral county hospital. We identified the number of patients needed to scan to detect an anatomic abnormality for the overall cohort and for women having a repeat study. Select patient, sonographer, and reading physician factors were compared between the repeat-ultrasound and no-repeat-ultrasound groups by the 2-sample t test, chi-squared analysis, or analysis of variance, as appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the significance of multiple factors contributing to the recommendation for repeat ultrasounds. RESULTS: A total of 18,911 women had an initial anatomic survey between 18 weeks and 21 weeks and 6/7 days of gestation, and 2310 (12.2%) had a repeat ultrasound because of an incomplete initial study. For the overall cohort, there were 642 structural anomalies detected, with the number of patients needed to scan being 29. Among the 2310 repeat ultrasounds, only 7 structural anomalies were detected, whereas the number of patients needed to scan was 330, representing only 1.1% of all prenatally-identified anomalies. The frequency of recommended repeat ultrasounds varied by performing sonographer (4.5%-45.8%) and reading physician (7.1%-21.6%), both with P<.001 by 1-way analysis of variance. Clinical factors significantly impacting the odds of repeat ultrasounds included body mass index, gestational age, and previous cesarean delivery, but were less impactful than the sonographer and physician. CONCLUSION: The primary determinants of the perceived need for a repeat ultrasound are the sonographer and physician reader, with clinical factors having less but still significant importance. Repeat anatomic surveys account for a significant fraction of our total anatomic surveys and are of limited diagnostic utility. Recommendation of repeat anatomic surveys should be considered within the context of these findings.

The evolution of incontinence into resolved, refractory and de novo urgency urinary incontinence following sling placement at time of prolapse repair in a large urodynamic cohort.

PURPOSE: To improve counseling in women at risk of refractory and/or de novo urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) following sling placement at time of prolapse repair, we created an outcome model to characterize changes in storage dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 139 women who underwent urodynamics followed by sling or no sling placement at the time of prolapse repair over a 6-year period. Our primary outcome was the presence of UUI following sling placement. Data were analyzed in SAS using chi-square, Fisher's exact, Student's t-test, and Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: At baseline, the sling group had significantly higher subjective (62/81 [76.5%] vs. 18/58 [31.0%]; p<0.001), objective (62/81 [76.5%] vs. 6/58 [10.3%]; p<0.001), and occult (41/81 [50.6%] vs. 6/58 [10.3%]; p<0.001) stress urinary incontinence (SUI); and rates of subjective and objective UUI were similar to the no sling group prior to surgery. After surgery (mean follow-up 859 days) there was no difference with or without sling, in the rate of SUI (subjective, objective) and further SUI treatments (bulking agent, repeat sling). Higher rates of de novo (13/81 [16.0%] vs. 6/58 [10.3%]; p=0.454) and refractory (31/81 [38.3%] vs. 14/58 [24.1%]; p=0.048) UUI were noted in the sling group following surgery. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, a greater proportion of women in the no sling group did not report UUI at longest follow-up (hazard ratio 0.63; 95% confidence interval 0.37-1.06; p=0.081). CONCLUSIONS: Women should be counseled on the risk of de novo and refractory UUI following sling placement at time of prolapse repair.