Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int Ophthalmol ; 43(9): 3321-3328, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37217809

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We developed model eyes using six polymer materials to determine which materials were most appropriate in simulating real human sclera and extraocular muscle (EOM). METHODS: Five three-dimensional (3-D) printed polymers (FlexFill, PolyFlex, PCTPE, Soft PLA, and NinjaFlex) and one silicone material were systematically tested by board-certified ophthalmologists and senior ophthalmology residents. Material testing included scleral passes with 6-0 Vicryl sutures through each eye model. Participants completed a survey designed to collect demographic data, subjective assessment of each material's accuracy in simulating real human sclera and EOM, and a ranking for each polymer material to identify which would be most suitable for an ophthalmic surgery training tool. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was conducted to determine if there was a statistically significant difference in the distribution of ranks between the polymer materials. RESULTS: The distribution of ranks for silicone material's "sclera" and "EOM" components were statistically significantly higher than that of all other polymer materials (all p < 0.05). Silicone material received the highest rank for both "sclera" and "EOM" components. Survey results indicated that the silicone material effectively simulated real human tissue. CONCLUSION: Silicone model eyes performed better than 3-D printed polymers as an educational tool for incorporation into a microsurgical training curriculum. Silicone models provide a low-cost teaching tool that allows for independent practice of microsurgical techniques without requiring a wet-laboratory facility.


Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Oftalmología , Humanos , Polímeros , Competencia Clínica , Oftalmología/educación , Siliconas
2.
Indian J Crit Care Med ; 23(6): 284-286, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31435149

RESUMEN

Paraquat (1,1'-dimethyl-4, 4'-dipyridylium) is a broad-spectrum liquid herbicide associated with both accidental and intentional ingestion leading to severe and often fatal toxicity.1 Paraquat is actively taken up against a concentration gradient into lung tissue leading to pneumonitis and lung fibrosis. Paraquat also causes renal and liver injury.2 There are few case publications of paraquat poisoning and only few of them have reported that renal failure has ensued before acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Our patient presented with above lethal dose intake of paraquat containing substance and we did gastric lavage followed by charcoal hemoperfusion and hemodialysis but patient could not be saved despite optimum efforts suggesting the high fatality of this kind of poisoning. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Sharma DS, Prajapati AM, Shah DM. Review of a Case of Paraquat Poisoning in a Tertiary Care Rural-based ICU. Indian J Crit Care Med 2019;23(6):284-286. KEY MESSAGES: Acute renal injury with hypoperfusion state due to toxicity at cellular level, redox cycling and intracellular reactive oxidative stress generation may also cause death in early stages in paraquat poisoning despite optimal management.

3.
Ann Glob Health ; 88(1): 33, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35646614

RESUMEN

In this paper, we analyze the impact of COVID-19 in India and the nation's shortcomings in responding appropriately to the pandemic. We discuss how international vaccine inequities, rooted in neocolonialism, and the WHO's broad recommendation of Global North pandemic responses (i.e., lockdowns, nonspecific social distancing) blunted the effectiveness of India's COVID-19 response and instead heightened classism, economic turmoil, and unnecessary infection and death from the virus.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Gripe Humana , COVID-19/epidemiología , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Pandemias/prevención & control , Distanciamiento Físico
4.
J Family Med Prim Care ; 10(9): 3343-3347, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34760755

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: A total of 20% of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease(COPD) patients are non-smokers due to preventable causes, such as biomass fuel exposure, post tuberculous sequelae, occupational exposure, air pollution, persistent chronic asthma, and genetic predisposition. AIMS: To compare smokers and non-smokers with COPD. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: An observational study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital on 60 patients diagnosed with COPD, (GOLD criteria), who were divided into smoker and non-smoker groups. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Demographic data, clinical profile, smoking history, and radiological data were collected and compared. Exclusion criteria were individuals having active pulmonary tuberculosis and reversible air flow limitations. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Using STATA 14.2, quantitative and qualitative data were presented using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 100% of smokers were male, whereas 70% of non-smokers were female. Compared to non-smokers (16.67%), smokers (26.6%) presented with higher grade of dyspnea. A statistically significant difference was seen with more smokers diagnosed as severe (40%) and very severe (30%) COPD compared to non-smokers with mild (16.67%) and moderate (46.67%) COPD (P < 0.012), Post bronchodilator FEV1 among smokers (42.63) compared to non-smokers (56.63) (P < 0.01) and decrease in FEV1 as the grade of dyspnea increased (P < 0.002). Compared to 36.67% in non-smokers, 70% smokers showed emphysematous x-rays. CONCLUSIONS: In our study we found majority of non-smokers to be female, and smokers had a higher grade of dyspnea, more severe COPD, lower post bronchodilator FEV1, and more emphysematous changes on x-rays.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA