The Safety and Efficacy of Hypertonic Saline in Achieving Primary Fascial Closure Following Damage Control Laparotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Effective fluid management is critical in patients undergoing damage control laparotomy (DCL) for trauma and sepsis. Hypertonic saline (HTS) has been proposed as an alternative to isotonic fluids to enhance primary fascial closure rates and optimize fluid balance. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HTS compared to isotonic fluids in patients undergoing DCL. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases up to the 14th of June 2024, identifying studies that compared HTS to isotonic fluids in adult patients undergoing DCL for trauma or sepsis. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting outcomes such as early primary fascial closure (EPFC) rates, time to fascial closure, fluid requirements, electrolyte imbalances, renal function, and mortality. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers, and pooled analyses were conducted using fixed-effect models where appropriate. Four studies encompassing 375 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 100 patients receiving HTS and 275 receiving isotonic fluids. HTS administration was associated with a significantly higher EPFC rate compared to isotonic fluids (odds ratio (OR): 0.314; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.142-0.696; p=0.004). The mean time to fascial closure was also significantly reduced in the HTS group by approximately eight hours (mean difference (MD): 8.007 hours; 95% CI: 5.558-10.596; p<0.001). Patients receiving HTS required significantly less total fluid over 48 hours (MD: 1.055 liters; 95% CI: 0.713-1.398; p<0.001). While HTS use led to higher peak sodium levels (MD: -4.318 mEq/L; 95% CI: -4.702 to -3.934; p<0.001), there were no significant differences in peak creatinine levels, need for inpatient renal replacement therapy, or 28-day mortality between the groups. HTS appears to be effective in improving EPFC rates and reducing both time to closure and overall fluid requirements in patients undergoing DCL for trauma and sepsis. Although associated with higher serum sodium levels, HTS did not increase the risk of renal dysfunction or mortality. These findings suggest that HTS is a safe and efficacious alternative to isotonic fluids in the management of critically ill patients requiring DCL. Further large-scale, randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these results and inform clinical guidelines.

Thoracic spine stab injury with a retained knife.

A female was admitted to a Major Trauma Centre with an isolated thoracic spine stab injury involving a retained knife. The patient was haemodynamically stable with an unremarkable peripheral neurological examination. A CT scan with three-dimensional image reconstruction showed the knife blade lodged in the T11 vertebra with its tip close to the spinal cord, aorta and inferior vena cava. A multidisciplinary trauma team, including anaesthetists, vascular, neurosurgeons and general surgeons, agreed on the treatment strategy. The lodged knife was safely withdrawn in the operating theatre with the patient in a prone position under sedation and local anaesthesia. Following the procedure, neurological examination remained normal, and an MRI scan revealed no spinal cord injury. We discuss the management of penetrating spinal injuries, the importance of detailed preoperative imaging, timely multidisciplinary input and how to safely remove a knife when a prone position prevents standard airway management.

Transitional Care in Anorectal Malformation and Hirschsprung's Disease: A Systematic Review of Challenges and Solutions.

BACKGROUND: The literature on transitional care in anorectal malformation (ARM) and Hirschsprung's disease (HD) is diverse and heterogeneous. There is a lack of standards and guidelines specific to transitional care in these conditions. We aim to establish and systematically categorize challenges and solutions related to colorectal transition care. METHODS: Systematic review of qualitative studies from MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and Scopus databases (2008-2022) was conducted to identify the challenges and solutions of healthcare transition specific to ARM and HD. Thematic analyses are reported with reference to patient, healthcare provider and healthcare system. RESULTS: Sixteen studies from 234 unique articles were included. Fourteen themes related to challenges and solutions, each, are identified. Most challenges identified are patient related. The key challenges pertain to: (1) patient's lack of understanding of their disorder, resulting in over-reliance on the pediatric surgical team and reluctance towards transitioning to adult services; (2) a lack of education and awareness among adult colorectal surgeons in caring for pediatric colorectal conditions and inadequate communication between pediatric and adult teams; and (3) a lack of structured transition program and joint-clinic to meet the needs of the transitioning patients. The key solutions are: (1) fostering young adult patient's autonomy and independence; (2) conducting joint pediatric-adult transition clinics; and (3) ensuring a structured and coordinated transition program is available using a standardized guideline. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive framework related to barriers and solutions for pediatric colorectal transition is established to help benchmark care quality of transitional care services. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV. TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic review without meta-analysis.

Comparison of the survival between coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with poor left ventricular function (ejection fraction <30%): a propensity-matched analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Existing evidence comparing the outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with poor left ventricular function (LVF) is sparse and flawed. This is largely due to patients with poor LVF being underrepresented in major research trials and the outdated nature of some studies that do not consider drug-eluting stent PCI. METHODS: Following strict inclusion criteria, 717 patients who underwent revascularization by CABG or PCI between 2002 and 2015 were enrolled. All patients had poor LVF (defined by ejection fraction <30%). By employing a propensity score analysis, 134 suitable matches (67 CABG and 67 PCI) were identified. Several outcomes were evaluated, in the matched population, using data extracted from national registry databases. RESULTS: CABG patients required a longer length of hospital stay post-revascularization compared to PCI in the propensity-matched population, 7 days (lower-upper quartile; 6-12) and 2 days (lower-upper quartile; 1-6), respectively (Mood's median test, P = 0.001). Stratified Cox-regression proportional-hazards analysis of the propensity-matched population found that PCI patients experienced a higher adjusted 8-year mortality rate (hazard ratio 3.291, 95% confidence interval 1.776-6.101; P < 0.001). This trend was consistent amongst urgent cases of revascularization: patients with 3 or more vessels with coronary artery disease and patients where complete revascularization was achieved. Although sub-analyses found no difference between survival distributions of on-pump versus off-pump CABG (log-rank P = 0.726), both modes of CABG were superior to PCI (stratified log-rank P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a longer length of hospital stay, patients with impaired LVF requiring intervention for coronary artery disease experienced a greater post-procedural survival benefit if they received CABG compared to PCI. We have demonstrated this at 30 days, 90 days, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years and 8 years following revascularization. At present, CABG remains a superior revascularization modality to PCI in patients with poor LVF.