Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 56
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Dis Esophagus ; 33(2)2020 Mar 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31274147

RESUMEN

Patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) and low-grade dysplasia (LGD) are at increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), although many regress to nondysplastic BE. This has significant clinical importance for patients being considered for endoscopic eradication therapy. Our aim is to determine the risk for progression in patients with confirmed persistent LGD. We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with BE and confirmed LGD between 2006 and 2016. Confirmed LGD was defined as LGD diagnosed by consensus conference with an expert GI pathologist or review by an expert GI pathologist and persistence as LGD present on subsequent endoscopic biopsy. The primary outcome was the incidence rate of HGD (high-grade dysplasia)/EAC. Secondary outcomes included risk factors for dysplastic progression. Risk factors for progression were assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis with logistic regression. Of 69 patients (mean age 65.2 years) with confirmed LGD were included. In total, 16 of 69 patients (23.2%) with LGD developed HGD/EAC during a median follow-up of 3.74 years (IQR, 1.24-5.45). For persistent confirmed LGD, the rate was 6.44 (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.61-13.40) compared to 2.61 cases per 100 patient-years (95% CI, 0.83-6.30) for nonpersistent LGD. Persistent LGD was found in only 29% of patients. Persistent LGD was an independent risk factor for the development of HGD/EAC (OR 4.18; [95% CI, 1.03-17.1]). Persistent confirmed LGD, present in only 1/3 of patients, was an independent risk factor for the development of HGD/EAC. Persistence LGD may be useful in decision making regarding the management of BE.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/patología , Esófago de Barrett/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Lesiones Precancerosas/patología , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
2.
Dis Esophagus ; 32(1)2019 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30496496

RESUMEN

Progression from Barrett's esophagus (BE) to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is uncommon but the consequences are serious. Predictors of progression are essential to optimize resource utilization. This study assessed the utility of a promising panel of biomarkers applicable to routine paraffin embedded biopsies (FFPE) to predict progression of BE to EAC in a large population-based, nested case-control study.We utilized the Amsterdam-based ReBus nested case-control cohort. BE patients who progressed to high-grade dysplasia (HGD)/EAC (n = 130) and BE patients who never progressed (n = 130) were matched on age, sex, length of the BE segment, and duration of endoscopic surveillance. All progressors had minimum 2 years of endoscopic surveillance without HGD/EAC to exclude prevalent neoplasia. We assessed abnormal DNA content, p53, Cyclin A, and Aspergillus oryzae lectin (AOL) in FFPE sections. We performed conditional logistic regression analysis to estimate odds ratio (OR) of progression based on biomarker status.Expert LGD (OR, 8.3; 95% CI, 1.7-41.0), AOL (3 vs. 0 epithelial compartments abnormal; OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.2-10.6) and p53 (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2-4.6) were independently associated with neoplastic progression. Cyclin A did not predict progression and DNA ploidy analysis by image cytometry was unsuccessful in the majority of cases, both were excluded from the multivariate analysis. The multivariable biomarker model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.73.Expert LGD, AOL, and p53 independently predict neoplastic progression in BE patients and are applicable to routine practice. These biomarkers can aid in selecting patients for endoscopic ablation or more intensive surveillance.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/etiología , Esófago de Barrett/complicaciones , Esófago de Barrett/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiología , Esófago/patología , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Anciano , Área Bajo la Curva , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Biopsia/métodos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Esofagoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperplasia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Adhesión en Parafina/métodos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Curva ROC
3.
Dis Esophagus ; 32(1)2019 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30169612

RESUMEN

Limited data exist regarding patient-reported outcomes and quality of life (QOL) experienced by patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) referred for endoscopic eradication therapy (EET). Specifically, the impact of grade of dysplasia has not been explored. The purpose of this study is to measure patient-reported symptoms and QOL and identify factors associated with poor QOL in BE patients referred for EET. This was a prospective multicenter study conducted from January 2015 to October 2017, which included patients with BE referred for EET. Participants completed a set of validated questionnaires to measure QOL, symptom severity, and psychosocial factors. The primary outcome was poor QOL defined by a PROMIS score >12. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with poor QOL. In total, 193 patients participated (mean age 64.6 years, BE length 5.5 cm, 82% males, 92% Caucasians) with poor QOL reported in 104 (53.9%) participants. On univariate analysis, patients with poor QOL had lower use of twice daily proton pump inhibitor use (61.5% vs. 86.5%, P = 0.03), shorter disease duration (4.9 vs. 5.9 years, P = 0.04) and progressive increase in grade of dysplasia (high-grade dysplasia: 68.8% vs. 31.3%, esophageal adenocarcinoma: 75.5% vs. 24.5%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that high-grade dysplasia was independently associated with poor QOL (OR: 5.57, 95% CI: 1.05, 29.5, P = 0.04). In summary, poor QOL is experienced by the majority of patients with BE referred for EET and the degree of dysplasia was independently associated with poor QOL, which emphasizes the need to incorporate patient-centered outcomes when studying treatment of BE-related dysplasia.


Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett/patología , Esófago de Barrett/psicología , Esófago/patología , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Anciano , Esofagoscopía/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperplasia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Derivación y Consulta
4.
Dis Esophagus ; 31(1): 1-7, 2018 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29025076

RESUMEN

There are few data exploring modifiable risk factors for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We aimed to determine if smoking, alcohol consumption, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use were risk factors for EoE, and to assess their impact on EoE phenotypes and treatment outcomes. We performed a case-control study analyzing data collected from a prospective cohort of adults undergoing upper endoscopy for symptoms of esophageal dysfunction. Incident EoE cases were diagnosed via consensus guidelines. Exposure data were collected via standardized patient questionnaire. Follow-up assessments for cases were made after treatment, with histologic response defined as <15 eosinophils per high-power field (eos/hpf). Exposures were compared between EoE cases and controls, among EoE cases with and without fibrostenosis, and among EoE responders and nonresponders. A total of 115 cases and 225 controls were analyzed. Cases were less likely to have ever smoked cigarettes (23% vs. 47%, P < 0.001) or currently use NSAIDs (17% vs. 40%, P < 0.001) compared to controls. These relations persisted after multivariate analysis. Although alcohol use was more common among cases (75% vs. 51%, P < 0.001), the effect was abrogated after multivariate analysis. Smoking, alcohol, and NSAID use were not associated with the fibrostenotic phenotype. There was a trend toward improved histologic response among EoE patients concomitantly using NSAIDs (87% vs. 63%, P = 0.08; aOR 6.97 (95% CI: 0.81-60.3). In conclusion, NSAID and smoking were inversely associated with EoE compared to endoscopy-based controls. Alcohol use was more prevalent in the EoE cases, although not an independent risk factor. Concomitant NSAID use may improve treatment response and is worthy of future study.


Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/etiología , Fumar/efectos adversos , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Esofagoscopía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fenotipo , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
5.
Dis Esophagus ; 31(8)2018 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29617744

RESUMEN

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a chronic immune-mediated esophageal disorder. For its timely diagnosis, clinicians must recognize common symptoms, and understand differences in symptoms across patient groups. The aim of this study is to systematically review the epidemiology and natural history of eosinophilic esophagitis. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from 1974 to February 2017 for studies describing the epidemiology and natural history of eosinophilic esophagitis. Congress abstracts from 2014 to 2016 were also searched. Search results were screened against predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria by two independent reviewers, and data extraction was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Of 1376 articles identified, 47 met the inclusion criteria: 20 on epidemiology and 27 on natural history. Incidence and prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis varied widely across North America and Europe, and increased over time. Incidence increased 131-fold in the Netherlands (1996-2010), 20-fold in Denmark (1997-2006), and 5.1-fold in Calgary, Canada (2004-2008). The most commonly reported symptoms were emesis and abdominal pain in children, and dysphagia and food impaction in adults. Age at diagnosis was 5.9-12.0 years in children, and approximately 30 years in adults. Time between symptom onset and diagnosis was 1.2-3.5 years in children and 3.0-8.0 years in adults. Diagnostic delay was associated with an increased risk of endoscopic features of fibrostenosis. Symptoms of eosinophilic esophagitis differed significantly by age and race. In conclusion, there is an increasing incidence and prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis. The considerable delay between symptom onset and diagnosis suggests that clinicians do not readily recognize the disease, which may have important clinical ramifications.


Asunto(s)
Esofagitis Eosinofílica/epidemiología , Esófago/patología , Diagnóstico Tardío , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Endoscopía , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/complicaciones , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Prevalencia
6.
Dis Esophagus ; 31(11)2018 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29635420

RESUMEN

In a prior study, baseline mutational load (ML) predicted progression to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in Barrett's esophagus (BE) with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95. We aimed to validate the test characteristics of this predictive biomarker panel using crude DNA lysates in a larger well-characterized cohort. We performed a nested case-control study of BE patients from three tertiary referral centers in the Netherlands. Cases had baseline nondysplastic BE (NDBE) and developed HGD/EAC ≥ 2 years later. Controls were matched 2:1, had baseline NDBE, and no progression. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based mutational analysis was performed on crude lysates from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. ML was calculated from loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and microsatellite instability (MSI) at 10 genomic loci. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were created to assess the diagnostic utility of various cutoffs of ML for progression. Of 159 subjects, 58 were progressors and 101 were nonprogressors, there was no difference in mean ML in preprogression tissue in progressors and nonprogressors (ML = 0.73 ± 0.69 vs. ML = 0.74 ± 0.61, P = 0.93). ROC curves showed poor discrimination of ML in predicting progression with AUC of 0.50 at ML ≥ 1. AUC did not vary with different ML cut-points. The utility of the ML to stratify BE patients for risk of progression was not confirmed in this study. The etiology for discrepancies between this and prior studies showing high predictiveness is likely due to the use of crude lysates in this study, but requires further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genética , Esófago de Barrett/genética , Neoplasias Esofágicas/genética , Esófago/patología , Proteínas de Neoplasias/análisis , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Área Bajo la Curva , Esófago de Barrett/complicaciones , Esófago de Barrett/patología , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Biopsia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Análisis Mutacional de ADN , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperplasia/genética , Pérdida de Heterocigocidad , Masculino , Inestabilidad de Microsatélites , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Curva ROC , Valores de Referencia
7.
Dis Esophagus ; 31(4)2018 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29528378

RESUMEN

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the only known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Based on striking aggregation of breast cancer and BE/EAC within families as well as shared risk factors and molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis, we hypothesized that BE may be associated with breast cancer. Pedigree analysis of families identified prospectively at multiple academic centers as part of the Familial Barrett's Esophagus Consortium (FBEC) was reviewed and families with aggregation of BE/EAC and breast cancer are reported. Additionally, using a matched case-control study design, we compared newly diagnosed BE cases in Caucasian females with breast cancer (cases) to Caucasian females without breast cancer (controls) who had undergone upper endoscopy (EGD). Two familial pedigrees, meeting a stringent inclusion criterion, manifested familial aggregation of BE/EAC and breast cancer in an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern with incomplete penetrance. From January 2008 to October 2016, 2812 breast cancer patient charts were identified, of which 213 were Caucasian females who underwent EGD. Six of 213 (2.82%) patients with breast cancer had pathology-confirmed BE, compared to 1 of 241 (0.41%) controls (P-value < 0.05). Selected families with BE/EAC show segregation of breast cancer. A breast cancer diagnosis is marginally associated with BE. We postulate a common susceptibility between BE/EAC and breast cancer.


Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/genética , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Linaje , Estudios Prospectivos , Población Blanca/genética
8.
Dis Esophagus ; 30(4): 1-5, 2017 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28375487

RESUMEN

The best-defined primary esophageal motor disorder is achalasia. However, symptoms such as dysphagia, regurgitation and chest pain can be caused by other esophageal motility disorders such as Diffuse Esophageal Spasm (DES), Nutcracker Esophagus (NE) and the Hypertensive Lower Esophageal Sphincter (HTN-LES). Most patients with DES and HTN-LES who complain of dysphagia improve after a myotomy. Patients with NE whose main complaint is chest pain, often do not have relief of the pain and can even develop dysphagia as a consequence of the myotomy. POEM is a relatively new procedure, and there are no studies with long-term follow-up and no prospective and randomized trials comparing it to surgical myotomy. Overall, the key to success is based on a complete evaluation and a careful patient selection. The best results, regardless of the technique, are in fact obtained in patients with outflow obstruction and impaired esophageal emptying, a picture similar to achalasia.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Motilidad Esofágica/cirugía , Espasmo Esofágico Difuso/cirugía , Esófago/cirugía , Hipertensión/cirugía , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/métodos , Esfínter Esofágico Inferior/cirugía , Fundoplicación/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Boca/cirugía
9.
Dis Esophagus ; 30(7): 1-7, 2017 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29206905

RESUMEN

It is unknown if successful control of esophageal inflammation in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) decreases the need for subsequent esophageal dilation. We aimed to determine whether histologic response to topical steroid treatment decreases the likelihood and frequency of subsequent esophageal dilation. We conducted a retrospective cohort study. Patients with an incident diagnosis of EoE were included if they had an initial esophageal dilation, received topical steroids, and had a subsequent endoscopy with biopsies. The number of dilations performed in each group was determined, and histologic responders (<15 eos/hpf) were compared to nonresponders. The 55 EoE patients included (27 responders and 28 nonresponders) underwent a mean of 3.0 dilations over a median follow-up of 19 months. Responders required fewer dilations than nonresponders (1.6 vs. 4.6, P = 0.03), after adjusting for potential confounders. Despite undergoing significantly fewer dilations, responders achieved a similar increase in esophageal diameter with dilation (4.9 vs. 5.0 mm; P = 0.92). In EoE patients undergoing esophageal dilation at baseline, control of inflammation with topical steroids was associated with a 65% decrease in the number of subsequent dilations to maintain the same esophageal caliber. This suggests that inflammation control is an important goal in patients with fibrostenotic changes of EoE.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/tratamiento farmacológico , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/patología , Estenosis Esofágica/terapia , Administración Tópica , Adulto , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Biopsia , Budesonida/uso terapéutico , Dilatación , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/complicaciones , Estenosis Esofágica/etiología , Esófago/patología , Femenino , Fluticasona/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
10.
Dis Esophagus ; 30(11): 1-7, 2017 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28881903

RESUMEN

Although surgery is traditionally the standard of care for esophageal cancer, esophagectomy carries significant morbidity. Alternative endoscopic therapies are needed for patients who are not candidates for conventional treatment. The objective of this study is to assess the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of spray cryotherapy of esophageal adenocarcinoma. This study includes patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma who had failed or were not candidates for conventional therapy enrolled retrospectively and prospectively in an open-label registry and patients in a retrospective cohort from 11 academic and community practices. Endoscopic spray cryotherapy was performed until biopsy proven local tumor eradication or until treatment was halted due to progression of disease, patient withdrawal or comorbidities. Eighty-eight patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (median age 76, 80.7% male, mean length 5.1 cm) underwent 359 treatments (mean 4.4 per patient). Tumor stages included 39 with T1a, 25 with T1b, 9 with unspecified T1, and 15 with T2. Eighty-six patients completed treatment with complete response of intraluminal disease in 55.8%, including complete response in 76.3% for T1a, 45.8% for T1b, 66.2% for all T1, and 6.7% for T2. Mean follow-up was 18.4 months. There were no deaths or perforations related to spray cryotherapy. Strictures developed in 12 of 88 patients (13.6%) but were present before spray cryotherapy in 3 of 12. This study suggests that endoscopic spray cryotherapy is a safe, well-tolerated, and effective treatment option for early esophageal adenocarcinoma.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Crioterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Dis Esophagus ; 29(3): 241-7, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25708903

RESUMEN

Retrospective series have shown the efficacy of endoscopic spray cryotherapy in eradicating high-grade dysplasia (HGD) in Barrett's esophagus (BE); however, prospective data are lacking, and efficacy for low-grade dysplasia (LGD) is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of spray cryotherapy in patients with LGD or HGD. A multicenter, prospective open-label registry enrolled patients with dysplastic BE. Spray cryotherapy was performed every 2-3 months until there was no endoscopic evidence of BE and no histological evidence of dysplasia, followed by surveillance endoscopies up to 2 years. Primary outcome measures were complete eradication of dysplasia (CE-D) and complete eradication of all intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM). Ninety-six subjects with Barrett's dysplasia (67% HGD; 65% long-segment BE; mean length 4.5 cm) underwent 321 treatments (mean 3.3 per subject). Mean age was 67 years, 83% were male. Eighty patients (83%) completed treatment with follow-up endoscopy (mean duration 21 months). In patients with LGD, rate of CE-D was 91% (21/23) and rate of CE-IM was 61% (14/23). In HGD, CE-D rate was 81% (46/57) and CE-IM was 65% (37/57). In patients with short-segment BE (SSBE) with any dysplasia, CE-D was achieved in 97% (30/31) and CE-IM in 77% (24/31). There were no esophageal perforations or related deaths. One subject developed a stricture, which did not require dilation. One patient was hospitalized for bleeding in the setting of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use. In the largest prospective cohort to date, data suggest endoscopic spray cryotherapy is a safe and effective modality for eradication of BE with LGD or HGD, particularly with SSBE.


Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett/cirugía , Crioterapia/métodos , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nitrógeno/administración & dosificación , Nitrógeno/química , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Dis Esophagus ; 29(6): 537-43, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26121935

RESUMEN

The effects of preceding endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) on the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treatment of nodular Barrett's esophagus (BE) is poorly understood. Prior studies have been limited to case series from individual tertiary care centers. We report the results of a large, multicenter registry. We assessed the effects of preceding EMR on the efficacy and safety of RFA for nodular BE with advanced neoplasia (high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma) using the US RFA Registry, a nationwide study of BE patients treated with RFA at 148 institutions. Safety outcomes included stricture, gastrointestinal bleeding, and hospitalization. Efficacy outcomes included complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CEIM), complete eradication of dysplasia (CED), and number of RFA treatments needed to achieve CEIM. Analyses comparing patients with EMR before RFA to patients undergoing RFA alone were performed with Student's t-test, Chi-square test, logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Four hundred six patients were treated with EMR before RFA for nodular BE, and 857 patients were treated with RFA only for non-nodular BE. The total complication rates were 8.4% in the EMR-before-RFA group and 7.2% in the RFA-only group (P = 0.48). Rates of stricture, bleeding, and hospitalization were not significantly different between patients treated with EMR before RFA and patients treated with RFA alone. CEIM was achieved in 84% of patients treated with EMR before RFA, and 84% of patients treated with RFA only (P = 0.96). CED was achieved in 94% and 92% of patients in EMR-before-RFA and RFA-only group, respectively (P = 0.17). Durability of eradication did not differ between the groups. EMR-before-RFA for nodular BE with advanced neoplasia is effective and safe. The preceding EMR neither diminished the efficacy nor increased complication rate of RFA treatment compared to patients with advanced neoplasia who had RFA with no preceding EMR. Preceding EMR is not associated with poorer outcomes in RFA.


Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Estenosis Esofágica/epidemiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa , Esofagoscopía , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/epidemiología , Reoperación , Seguridad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
13.
Dis Esophagus ; 27(5): 409-17, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23016606

RESUMEN

The clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for staging patients with Barrett's esophagus and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or intramucosal carcinoma (IMC) prior to endoscopic therapy is unclear. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with HGD or IMC referred to an American medical center for endoscopic treatment between 2004 and 2010. All patients had pretreatment staging by EUS. We examined the frequency that EUS findings consistent with advanced disease (tumor invasion into the submucosa, lymph node involvement, or regional metastasis) led to a change in management. The analysis was stratified by nodularity and pre-EUS histology. We identified one hundred thirty-five patients with HGD (n = 106, 79%) or IMC (n = 29, 21%) had staging by EUS (79 non-nodular, 56 nodular). Pathologic lymph nodes or metastases were not found by EUS. There were no endosonographic abnormalities noted in any patient with non-nodular mucosa (0/79). Abnormal EUS findings were present in 8/56 patients (14%) with nodular neoplasia (five IMC, three HGD). Endoscopic mucosal resection was performed in 44 patients with a nodule, with 13% (6/44) having invasive cancer. In nodular neoplasia, the EUS and endoscopic mucosal resection were abnormal in 24% (5/21) and 40% (6/15) of those with IMC and 9% (3/35) and 0% (0/29) of those with HGD, respectively. In this study we found that EUS did not alter management in patients with non-nodular HGD or IMC. Because the diagnostic utility of EUS in subjects with non-nodular Barrett's esophagus is low, the value of performing endoscopic mucosal resection in this setting is questionable. For patients with nodular neoplasia, resection of the nodule with histological examination had greater utility than staging by EUS.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Esófago de Barrett/diagnóstico por imagen , Toma de Decisiones , Endosonografía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Esofagoscopía , Lesiones Precancerosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Anciano , Esófago de Barrett/patología , Esófago de Barrett/cirugía , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Membrana Mucosa/patología , Membrana Mucosa/cirugía , Lesiones Precancerosas/patología , Lesiones Precancerosas/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos
14.
Dis Esophagus ; 27(8): 703-8, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24215617

RESUMEN

The use of administrative databases to conduct population-based studies of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in the United States is limited because it is unknown whether the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) code for EoE, 530.13, accurately identifies those who truly have the disease. The aim of this retrospective study was to validate the ICD-9 code for identifying cases of EoE in administrative data. Confirmed cases of EoE as per consensus guidelines (symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and ≥15 eosinophils per high-power field on biopsy after 8 weeks of twice daily proton pump inhibitor therapy) were identified in the University of North Carolina (UNC) EoE Clinicopathologic Database from 2008 to 2010; 2008 was the first year in which the 530.13 code was approved. Using the Carolina Data Warehouse, the administrative database for patients seen in the UNC system, all diagnostic and procedure codes were obtained for these cases. Then, with the EoE cases as the reference standard, we re-queried the Carolina Data Warehouse over the same time frame for all patients seen in the system (n=308,372) and calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the ICD-9 code 530.13 as a case definition of EoE. To attempt to refine the case definition, we added procedural codes in an iterative fashion to optimize sensitivity and specificity, and restricted our analysis to privately insured patients. We also conducted a sensitivity analysis with 2011 data to identify trends in the operating parameters of the code. We identified 226 cases of EoE at UNC to serve as the reference standard. The ICD-9 code 530.13 yielded a sensitivity of 37% (83/226; 95% confidence interval: 31-43%) and specificity of 99% (308,111/308,146; 95% confidence interval: 98-100%). These operating parameters were not substantially altered if the case definition required a procedure code for endoscopy or if cases were limited to those with commercial insurance. However, in 2011, the sensitivity of the code had increased to 61%, while the specificity remained at 99%. The ICD-9 code for EoE, 530.13, had excellent specificity for identifying cases of EoE in administrative data, although this high specificity was achieved at an academic center. Additionally, the sensitivity of the code appears to be increasing over time, and the threshold at which it will stabilize is not known. While use of this administrative code will still miss a number of cases, those identified in this manner are highly likely to have the disease.


Asunto(s)
Esofagitis Eosinofílica/clasificación , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Centros Médicos Académicos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Bases de Datos Factuales , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto Joven
15.
Dis Esophagus ; 26(2): 105-12, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22458738

RESUMEN

Esophageal foreign body impaction (EFBI) often requires urgent evaluation and treatment, but characteristics of emergency department (ED) care such as timing of presentation and therapeutic procedures and costs of care are unknown. We aimed to study health-care utilization for patients with EFBI presenting to the ED. Cases of EFBI from 2002 to 2009 were identified by querying three different databases from the University of North Carolina Hospitals for all records with ICD-9 CM code 935.1: 'foreign body in the esophagus.' Charts were reviewed to confirm EFBI and extract pertinent data related to the ED visit, including time of presentation, length of ED stay, medications administered, type of procedure performed, characteristics of procedures, and time to therapeutic procedure. Hospital charges for EFBI encounters and consult fees were determined from the Physicians' Fee Reference 2010, and were compiled to estimate costs. Of the 548 cases of EFBI identified, 351 subjects (64%) presented to the ED. A total of 118 (34%) patients received a medication to treat EFBI, which was only effective in 8% of those patients. Two hundred ninety (83%) subjects underwent a procedure including esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) (n=206) or ear, nose, and throat surgery (ENT)-performed laryngoscopy/esophagoscopy (n=138). Admission to the hospital occurred in 162 (46%) of cases. There was no relationship between ED arrival time and time-to-procedure or total time in ED. There was also no significant relationship between delivery of ED medications and likelihood of undergoing a procedure, or between ED arrival time and delivery of medications. The charges associated with a typical EFBI episode ranged from $2284-$6218. In conclusion, the majority of patients with EFBI at our institution presented to the ED. Medical management was largely ineffective. A therapeutic procedure was required to clear the EFBI in most patients. Time of ED arrival made no difference in time-to-procedure, indicating that gastroenterology and ENT specialists recognize the urgency of treating EFBI regardless of time of day.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Esófago , Cuerpos Extraños/terapia , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Precios de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Laringoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/economía , Honorarios Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Cuerpos Extraños/diagnóstico , Cuerpos Extraños/economía , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/economía , Hospitales Universitarios/economía , Hospitales Universitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Laringoscopía/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
16.
Dis Esophagus ; 26(2): 113-6, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22394268

RESUMEN

To assess the incidence of esophageal intra-epithelial eosinophilic infiltration following endoscopic ablation of Barrett's esophagus (BE), a retrospective study of consecutive cases of endoscopic ablation of BE with dysplasia or cancer using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and spray cryotherapy at two centers in the United States was performed. Post-ablation eosinophilia was defined as ≥ 5 eosinophils per high power field during post-treatment surveillance. Twenty of 122 patients (16%) undergoing ablation developed esophageal eosinophilia after ablation, including 8/77 (10%) treated with RFA and 12/44 (27%) treated with cryotherapy. No patient had clinical or endoscopic findings of or risk factors for eosinophilic esophagitis. Esophageal eosinophilia persisted in 30% over a median of 20.2 months. On multivariate analysis, post-ablation eosinophilia was independently associated with increasing BE segment length (adjusted odds ratio 1.46 for every 2-cm increase, 95% confidence interval 1.24-1.71) and cryotherapy as the ablation modality (adjusted odds ratio 5.23, 95% confidence interval 1.67-16.39). Esophageal eosinophilic infiltration after endoscopic ablation with RFA and cryotherapy is common and is associated with the BE segment length and treatment modality. The clinical significance of post-ablation eosinophilia is unclear.


Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter , Criocirugía , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Dis Esophagus ; 25(2): 166-74, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21819482

RESUMEN

The pathogenesis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is incompletely understood. In certain eosinophilic diseases, activation of tyrosine kinase after fusion of the Fip1-like-1 and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α genes (F-P fusion gene) mediates eosinophilia via downstream effectors such as extracellular-regulated kinase (ERK1/2) and signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT5). This mechanism has not been examined in EoE. Our aim was to detect the F-P fusion gene, pERK1/2, and pSTAT5 in esophageal tissue from patients with EoE, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and normal controls. We performed a cross-sectional pilot study comparing patients with steroid-responsive and steroid-refractory EoE, to GERD patients and normal controls. EoE cases were defined by consensus guidelines. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed to detect the F-P fusion gene and immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to detect pERK1/2 and pSTAT5 in esophageal biopsies. Twenty-nine subjects (median age 30 years [range 1-59]; 16 males; 24 Caucasians) were included: eight normal, six GERD, and 15 EoE (five steroid-refractory). On FISH, 98%, 99%, and 99% of the nuclei in the normal, GERD, and EoE groups, respectively, were normal (P= 0.42). On IHC, a median of 250, 277, and 479 nuclei/mm(2) stained for pERK 1/2 in the normal, GERD, and EoE groups, respectively (P= 0.07); the refractory EoE patients had the highest degree pERK 1/2 staining (846 nuclei/mm(2); P= 0.07). No trend was seen for pSTAT5. In conclusion, the F-P fusion gene was not detected with increased frequency in EoE. Patients with EoE had a trend toward higher levels of pERK 1/2, but not STAT5, in the esophageal epithelium, with highest levels in steroid-refractory EoE patients.


Asunto(s)
Esofagitis Eosinofílica/metabolismo , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/metabolismo , Proteína Quinasa 1 Activada por Mitógenos/metabolismo , Receptor alfa de Factor de Crecimiento Derivado de Plaquetas/genética , Factor de Transcripción STAT5/metabolismo , Adolescente , Adulto , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/genética , Femenino , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/genética , Humanos , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Lactante , Sistema de Señalización de MAP Quinasas/fisiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Receptor alfa de Factor de Crecimiento Derivado de Plaquetas/metabolismo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factor de Transcripción STAT5/genética , Adulto Joven
18.
Endoscopy ; 42(10): 790-9, 2010 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20886398

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The impact of the diagnosis and treatment of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus on quality of life (QoL) is poorly understood. This study assessed the influence of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus on QoL and evaluated whether endoscopic treatment of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) improves QoL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed changes in QoL in the AIM Dysplasia Trial, a multicenter study of patients with dysplastic Barrett's esophagus who were randomly allocated to RFA therapy or a sham intervention. We developed a 10-item questionnaire to assess the influence of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus on QoL. The questionnaire was completed by patients at baseline and 12 months. RESULTS: 127 patients were randomized to RFA (n = 84) or sham (n = 43). At baseline, most patients reported worry about esophageal cancer (71 % RFA, 85 % sham) and esophagectomy (61 % RFA, 68 % sham). Patients also reported depression, impaired QoL, worry, stress, and dissatisfaction with the condition of their esophagus. Of those randomized, 117 patients completed the study to the 12-month end point. Compared with the sham group, patients treated with RFA had significantly less worry about esophageal cancer ( P=0.003) and esophagectomy ( P =0.009). They also had significantly reduced depression ( P=0.02), general worry about the condition of their esophagus ( P≤0.001), impact on daily QoL ( P=0.009), stress ( P=0.03), dissatisfaction with the condition of their esophagus ( P≤0.001), and impact on work and family life ( P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion in the treatment group of this randomized, sham-controlled trial of RFA was associated with improvement in disease-specific health-related quality of life. This improvement appears secondary to a perceived decrease in the risk of cancer.


Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett/psicología , Esófago de Barrett/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Anciano , Ansiedad/etiología , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Neoplasias Esofágicas/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Lesiones Precancerosas/prevención & control , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
19.
Gut ; 58(12): 1583-9, 2009 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19570765

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Barrett's oesophagus is associated with abdominal obesity. Adiponectin is a peptide that is secreted from adipocytes and circulates in three multimeric forms: low molecular weight (LMW), middle molecular weight (MMW), and high molecular weight (HMW). The anti-inflammatory effects of adiponectin are specific to individual multimers, with LMW being most anti-inflammatory. We postulated that circulating levels of adiponectin and its multimers would be associated with the risk of Barrett's oesophagus. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Outpatient clinic in North Carolina, USA. PATIENTS: Cases of Barrett's oesophagus and controls undergoing upper endoscopy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adjusted odds ratios of plasma adiponectin levels and its multimers for Barrett's oesophagus. RESULTS: There were 112 cases of Barrett's oesophagus and 199 GORD controls. Total adiponectin was not associated with Barrett's oesophagus (3(rd) tertile vs 1(st) tertile adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.44 to 1.78). High levels of LMW adiponectin were associated with a decreased risk of Barrett's oesophagus (3(rd) tertile vs 1(st) tertile aOR = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.69), and a high LMW/total ratio appeared particularly inversely associated with Barrett's oesophagus (3(rd) tertile vs 1(st) tertile aOR = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: High levels of LMW adiponectin are associated with a decreased risk of Barrett's oesophagus among patients with GORD. Further human studies are required to confirm these findings, and in vitro studies are needed to understand if there is a mechanism whereby adiponectin may affect Barrett's metaplasia.


Asunto(s)
Adiponectina/sangre , Esófago de Barrett/sangre , Adiponectina/química , Adulto , Anciano , Antropometría/métodos , Esófago de Barrett/etiología , Biomarcadores/sangre , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/complicaciones , Humanos , Hiperinsulinismo/sangre , Hiperinsulinismo/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Peso Molecular , Distribución por Sexo , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA