Evaluation of a remote monitoring service for patients with COVID-19 discharged from University College London Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: In May 2020 a virtual ward for COVID-19 patients seen at University College London Hospital (UCLH) was established. The aim of this study was to see if specific factors can be used to predict the risk of deterioration and need for Emergency Department (ED) reattendance or admission. METHODS: We performed a service evaluation of the COVID-19 virtual ward service at UCLH between 24/10/2020 and 12/2/2021. 649 patients were included with data collected on vital signs, basic measurements, and blood tests from their initial ED attendance, allowing calculation of ISARIC-4C mortality scores. Outcomes of interest were ED reattendance, facilitation of this by virtual ward physician, level of care if admitted, and death within 28 days of the first COVID-19 virtual ward appointment. Analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Reattendance rate to ED was 17.3% (112/649) of which 8% (51/649) were admitted. Half of ED reattendances were facilitated by the virtual ward service. Overall mortality was 0.92%. Patients who reattended ED, facilitated by the virtual ward service, had a higher mean CRP (53.63 vs 41.67 mg/L), presented to ED initially later in their COVID-19 illness (8 vs 6.5 days) and had a higher admission rate (61 vs 39%). The mean ISARIC-4C score was higher in the reattendance group compared to the non-reattendance group (3.87 vs 3.48, difference of 0.179, p = 0.003). The mean ISARIC-4C score was higher in the admission group than the non-reattendance group (5.56 vs 3.48, difference of 0.115, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Identification of patient risk factors for reattendance following a diagnosis of COVID-19 in ED can be used to design a service to safely manage patients remotely. We found that the ISARIC -4C mortality score was associated with risk of hospital admission and could be used to identify those requiring more active remote follow up.

Relationship between ethnicity and multidisciplinary intervention for young people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.

Introduction: There is growing recognition of the impact of societal factors on health throughout a patient's lifespan. The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed the impact of racial disparity on health outcomes. Aims: We aimed to investigate the association between ethnicity and the multidisciplinary team (MDT) interventions for young people (YP) with complex care needs. Method: This retrospective, single-centre, cross-sectional study was conducted within the department of adolescent and young adult rheumatology at University College Hospital, London, between August 2019 and August 2021. We extracted demographic, clinical and laboratory data. The index of multiple deprivation was extracted from the Office for National Statistics database. R software was used for analysis. Results: We identified 310 YP referred to the MDT with a median age of 18 years (interquartile range 17-19). The female patient to male patient ratio was 2.4. Over a third of our cohort were from deprived areas. Comparison between Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) and White ethnic groups revealed significant differences in terms of referral for pain optimisation (p=0.006), social support (p<0.00001), and adherence and non-clinic attendance (p=0.0004). Conclusion: Our findings reveal the importance of quality data for early identification and support of vulnerable YP, particularly those from BAME communities.