A Biomechanical Evaluation of Casting Technique and Cast Core Size Effect.

BACKGROUNDS: The goals of this study were to (1) compare the effect of casting technique on biomechanical function with different casting materials and different cast core diameters, and (2) compare the strength of a cast based on the number of layers in relation to the core diameter. METHODS: Two standardized cylindrical cast model sizes were used to simulate forearm and short leg casts (core diameter: 60 mm, 100 mm) with 2 different casting techniques (non-smoothing vs. smoothing with lamination), utilizing 2 casting materials [fiberglass and Plaster of Paris (POP)]. Each cast was created using 3 different layers (Fiberglass: 2 to 4 layers; POP: 3 to 5 layers). Ultimate load-to-failure and flexural rigidity were analyzed through cyclic 4-point bend testing. RESULTS: The biomechanical comparison between forearm and short leg casts were significantly different regardless of the same number of layers for both casting materials and between 2 casting techniques. Increased cast thickness significantly increased the ultimate load-to-failure and bending strength. An increased core diameter size significantly decreased the cast's ultimate load-to-failure (fiberglass: 50% to 108%; POP: 10% to 93%) and bending strength (fiberglass: 17% to 35%; POP: 37% to 49%). Casting technique with smoothing with lamination technique had a negative biomechanical effect on POP and a minimal effect on fiberglass. CONCLUSION: The number of layers to apply for a cast should be based on the size of the extremity. Smoothing and lamination technique did not significantly improve the cast mechanical behavior. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings of this study provide valuable evidence, analysis, and supplementary knowledge that helps guide physicians in proper casting technique.

The Effect of Bone Quality on Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures with Helical Blade Versus Lag Screw Fixation in Cephalomedulary Nails.

Introduction: The specific aim of this retrospective study was to determine whether bone quality has any effect on the complication rates or overall survivorship between helical blades and lag screws in cephalomedullary nails used for intertrochanteric hip fractures. Methods: The authors reviewed clinical charts and radiographic studies of patients between January 2012 and August 2019. We reviewed radiographic images (pre-, intra-, and post-operative) to evaluate fracture fixation type, fracture reduction grade, and post-operative complications. We collected dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scan results (T-score) and serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) isoenzyme activity values to evaluate patient bone quality. Results: We included 303 cases (helical: 197, screw: 106) in the study. Complications were found in 31 (16%) helical blade cases and 23 (22%) lag screw cases. No statistically significant difference was detected when comparing complication rates with patient bone quality between the two groups. These two groups had similar one-year implant survivorship with respect to T-score, the low ALP level group, and normal ALP level group. The helical blade had higher implant survivorship compared to lag screw in five-year survival rate with respect to osteoporotic group, high ALP level group, and normal ALP level group (osteoporotic: 77% vs 69%, high ALP: 73% vs 67%, normal ALP: 70% vs 64%). Conclusions: Similar complication rates were observed between helical blade and lag screw constructs in cephalomedullary femoral nails when accounting for patient bone quality. However, the helical blade design had a higher five-year survival rate.