Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs ; 47(5): 459-469, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32970031

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs) in hospitalized pediatric patients. DESIGN: A prospective, descriptive study. SAMPLE/SUBJECTS AND SETTING: The sample comprised 625 patients cared for in 8 US pediatric hospitals. Participants were aged preterm to 21 years, on bed rest for at least 24 hours, and had a medical device in place. METHODS: Two nursing teams, blinded to the other's assessments, worked in tandem to assess pressure injury risk, type of medical devices in use, and preventive interventions for each medical device. They also identified the presence, location, and stage of MDRPI. Subjects were observed up to 8 times over 4 weeks, or until discharge, whichever occurred first. RESULTS: Of 625 enrolled patients, 42 (7%) developed 1 or more MDRPIs. Two-thirds of patients with MDRPIs were younger than 8 years. Patients experiencing MDRPIs had higher acuity scores on hospital admission, were more frequently cognitively and/or functionally impaired, or were extreme in body mass index. Respiratory devices caused the most injuries (6.19/1000 device-days), followed by immobilizers (2.40/1000 device-days), gastric tubes (2.24/1000 device-days), and external monitoring devices (1.77/1000 device-days). Of the 6336 devices in place, 36% did not have an MDRPI preventive intervention in place. Clinical variables contributing to MDRPI development included intensive care unit care (odds ratio [OR] 8.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-43.6), use of neuromuscular blockade (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.7-7.8), and inotropic/vasopressor medications (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.7-4.3). Multivariable analysis indicated that Braden QD scores alone predicted MDRPI development. CONCLUSION: Medical devices are common in hospitalized infants and children and these medical devices place patients at risk for MDRPI.


Asunto(s)
Equipos y Suministros/normas , Úlcera por Presión/terapia , Centros Médicos Académicos/organización & administración , Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/prevención & control , Equipos y Suministros/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pediatría/instrumentación , Pediatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Úlcera por Presión/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo
2.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 20(11): 1048-1056, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31385861

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To explore the prevalence, location, and clinical factors associated with hospital-acquired pressure injuries among pediatric patients with congenital heart disease. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from a multicenter prospective cohort study of pediatric pressure injury risk, including patients with congenital heart disease. SETTING: Eight acute care academic pediatric hospitals. PATIENTS: Patients were preterm to 21 years old with congenital heart disease and on bed rest for at least 24 hours after hospital admission with a medical device attached to or traversing the skin or mucous membrane. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were evaluated for a maximum of eight observations during a 4-week period to identify Braden QD risk and pressure injury development. Hospital-acquired pressure injuries were staged according to the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel guidelines. Stepwise logistic regression was used to explore risk factors associated with hospital-acquired pressure injuries development, accounting for site as a cluster variable using generalized estimating equations. Overall, 279 pediatric cardiac patients provided 919 observations (median, 2 per patient [interquartile range, 2-5 per patient]). Thirty-eight hospital-acquired pressure injuries occurred in 27 patients (9.7%). Most injuries (28/38 [74%]) were related to medical devices. The most common medical devices that caused injury were oxygen saturation probes. The remaining hospital-acquired pressure injuries were immobility-related pressure injuries (10/38 [26%]) located primarily on the buttock, sacrum, or coccyx (5/10 [50%]). In multivariable analyses, being non-Hispanic white (odds ratio, 3.54; 95% CI, 2.15-5.84), experiencing operating room time greater than 4 hours (odds ratio, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.13-7.49), having oxygen saturation levels less than 85% (odds ratio, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.01-6.96), and having worse Braden QD scores (odds ratio, 1.25 per 1 point increase; 95% CI, 1.17-1.34) were significantly associated with hospital-acquired pressure injuries development. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter observational study of pediatric patients with congenital heart disease, we describe a hospital-acquired pressure injury prevalence of 9.7% with approximately 75% of injuries related to medical devices. These data can be used to inform practice and target interventions to decrease pressure injury risk and prevent pressure injuries in this vulnerable pediatric population.


Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías Congénitas/complicaciones , Enfermedad Iatrogénica/epidemiología , Úlcera por Presión/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Masculino , Úlcera por Presión/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
3.
J Pediatr ; 192: 189-195.e2, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29246340

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and initial testing of the Braden QD Scale to predict both immobility-related and medical device-related pressure injury risk in pediatric patients. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter, prospective cohort study enrolling hospitalized patients, preterm to 21 years of age, on bedrest for at least 24 hours with a medical device in place. Receiver operating characteristic curves using scores from the first observation day were used to characterize Braden QD Scale performance, including areas under the curve (AUC) with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Eight centers enrolled 625 patients. A total of 86 hospital-acquired pressure injures were observed in 49 (8%) patients: 22 immobility-related pressure injuries in 14 (2%) patients and 64 medical device-related pressure injuries in 42 (7%) patients. The Braden QD Scale performed well in predicting immobility-related and medical device-related pressure injuries in the overall sample, with an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI 0.73-0.84). At a cutoff score of 13, the AUC was 0.72 (95% CI 0.67-0.78), providing a sensitivity of 0.86 (95% CI 0.76-0.92), specificity of 0.59 (95% CI 0.55-0.63), positive predictive value of 0.15 (95% CI 0.11-0.19), negative predictive value of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.99), and a positive likelihood ratio of 2.09 (95% CI 0.95-4.58). CONCLUSIONS: The Braden QD Scale reliably predicts both immobility-related and device-related pressure injuries in the pediatric acute care environment and will be helpful in monitoring care and in guiding resource use in the prevention of hospital-acquired pressure injuries.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Úlcera por Presión/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Área Bajo la Curva , Reposo en Cama/efectos adversos , Niño , Preescolar , Equipos y Suministros/efectos adversos , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Úlcera por Presión/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA