Volumetric Analysis: Effect on Diagnosis and Management of Indeterminate Solid Pulmonary Nodules in Routine Clinical Practice.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of volumetric analysis on the diagnosis and management of indeterminate solid pulmonary nodules in routine clinical practice. METHODS: This was a retrospective study with 107 computed tomography (CT) cases of solid pulmonary nodules (range, 6-15 mm), 57 pathology-proven malignancies (lung cancer, n = 34; metastasis, n = 23), and 50 benign nodules. Nodules were evaluated on a total of 309 CT scans (average number of CTs/nodule, 2.9 [range, 2-7]). CT scans were from multiple institutions with variable technique. Nine radiologists (attendings, n = 3; fellows, n = 3; residents, n = 3) were asked their level of suspicion for malignancy (low/moderate or high) and management recommendation (no follow-up, CT follow-up, or care escalation) for baseline and follow-up studies first without and then with volumetric analysis data. Effect of volumetry on diagnosis and management was assessed by generalized linear and logistic regression models. RESULTS: Volumetric analysis improved sensitivity (P = 0.009) and allowed earlier recognition (P < 0.05) of malignant nodules. Attending radiologists showed higher sensitivity in recognition of malignant nodules (P = 0.03) and recommendation of care escalation (P < 0.001) compared with trainees. Volumetric analysis altered management of high suspicion nodules only in the fellow group (P = 0.008). κ Statistics for suspicion for malignancy and recommended management were fair to substantial (0.38-0.66) and fair to moderate (0.33-0.50). Volumetric analysis improved interobserver variability for identification of nodule malignancy from 0.52 to 0.66 (P = 0.004) only on the second follow-up study. CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric analysis of indeterminate solid pulmonary nodules in routine clinical practice can result in improved sensitivity and earlier identification of malignant nodules. The effect of volumetric analysis on management recommendations is variable and influenced by reader experience.

Hepatocellular Adenomas: Molecular Basis and Multimodality Imaging Update.

Hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) are a family of liver tumors that are associated with variable prognoses. Since the initial description of these tumors, the classification of HCAs has expanded and now includes eight distinct genotypic subtypes based on molecular analysis findings. These genotypic subtypes have unique derangements in their cellular biologic makeup that determine their clinical course and may allow noninvasive identification of certain subtypes. Multiphasic MRI performed with hepatobiliary contrast agents remains the best method to noninvasively detect, characterize, and monitor HCAs. HCAs are generally hypointense during the hepatobiliary phase; the ß-catenin-mutated exon 3 subtype and up to a third of inflammatory HCAs are the exception to this characterization. It is important to understand the appearances of HCAs beyond their depictions at MRI, as these tumors are typically identified with other imaging modalities first. The two most feared related complications are bleeding and malignant transformation to hepatocellular carcinoma, although the risk of these complications depends on tumor size, subtype, and clinical factors. Elective surgical resection is recommended for HCAs that are persistently larger than 5 cm, adenomas of any size in men, and all ß-catenin-mutated exon 3 HCAs. Thermal ablation and transarterial embolization are potential alternatives to surgical resection. In the acute setting of a ruptured HCA, patients typically undergo transarterial embolization with or without delayed surgical resection. This update on HCAs includes a review of radiologic-pathologic correlations by subtype and imaging modality, related complications, and management recommendations. © RSNA, 2023 Online supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

Multidisciplinary Approach to Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Role of Radiologists.

Management of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) should be determined by a multidisciplinary team, ideally at a specialized CTEPH referral center. Radiologists contribute to this multidisciplinary process by helping to confirm the diagnosis of CTEPH and delineating the extent of disease, both of which help determine a treatment decision. Preoperative assessment of CTEPH usually employs multiple imaging modalities, including ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scanning, echocardiography, CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA), and right heart catheterization with pulmonary angiography. Accurate diagnosis or exclusion of CTEPH at imaging is imperative, as this remains the only form of pulmonary hypertension that is curative with surgery. Unfortunately, CTEPH is often misdiagnosed at CTPA, which can be due to technical factors, patient-related factors, radiologist-related factors, as well as a host of disease mimics including acute pulmonary embolism, in situ thrombus, vasculitis, pulmonary artery sarcoma, and fibrosing mediastinitis. Although V/Q scanning is thought to be substantially more sensitive for CTEPH compared with CTPA, this is likely due to lack of recognition of CTEPH findings rather than a modality limitation. Preoperative evaluation for pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) includes assessment of technical operability and surgical risk stratification. While the definitive therapy for CTEPH is PTE, other minimally invasive or noninvasive therapies also lead to clinical improvements including greater survival. Complications of PTE that can be identified at postoperative imaging include infection, reperfusion edema or injury, pulmonary hemorrhage, pericardial effusion or hemopericardium, and rethrombosis. ©RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Nyquist sampling theorem and Bosniak classification, version 2019: effect of thin axial sections on categorization and agreement.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if CT axial images reconstructed at current standard of care (SOC; 2.5-3 mm) or thin (≤ 1 mm) sections affect categorization and inter-rater agreement of cystic renal masses assessed with Bosniak classification, version 2019. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study, 3 abdominal radiologists reviewed 131 consecutive cystic renal masses from 100 patients performed with CT renal mass protocol from 2015 to 2021. Images were reviewed in two sessions: first with SOC and then the addition of thin sections. Individual and overall categorizations are reported, latter of which is based on majority opinion with 3-way discrepancies resolved by a fourth reader. Major categorization changes were defined as differences between classes I-II, IIF, or III-IV. RESULTS: Thin sections led to a statistically significant major category change with class II for all readers individually (p = 0.004-0.041; McNemar test), upgrading 10-17% of class II masses, most commonly to class IIF followed by III. Modal reason for upgrades was due to identification of additional septa followed by larger measurement of enhancing features. Masses categorized as class I, III, or IV on SOC sections were unaffected, as were identification of protrusions. Inter-rater agreements using weighted Cohen's kappa were 0.679 for SOC and 0.691 for thin sections (both substantial). CONCLUSION: Thin axial sections upgraded up to one in six class II masses to IIF or III through identification of additional septa or larger feature. Other classes, including III-IV, were unaffected. Inter-rater agreements were substantial regardless of section thickness. KEY POINTS: • Thin axial sections (≤ 1 mm) compared to standard of care sections (2.5-3 mm) led to identification of additional septa but did not affect identification of protrusions. • Thin axial sections (≤ 1 mm) compared to standard of care sections (2.5-3 mm) can upgrade a small proportion of cystic renal masses from class II to IIF or III when applying Bosniak classification, version 2019. • Inter-rater agreements were substantial regardless of section thickness.

Growth Kinetics and Progression Rate of Bosniak Classification Version 2019 Class III and IV Cystic Renal Masses on Imaging Surveillance.

BACKGROUND. Active surveillance is increasingly used as first-line management for localized renal masses. Triggers for intervention primarily reflect growth kinetics, which have been poorly investigated for cystic masses defined by the Bosniak classification version 2019 (v2019). OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine growth kinetics and incidence rates of progression of class III and IV cystic renal masses, as defined by the Bosniak classification v2019. METHODS. This retrospective study included 105 patients (68 men, 37 women; median age, 67 years) with 112 Bosniak v2019 class III or IV cystic renal masses on baseline renal mass protocol CT or MRI examinations performed from January 2005 to September 2021. Mass dimensions were measured. Progression was defined as any of the following: linear growth rate (LGR) of 5 mm/y or greater (representing the clinical guideline threshold for intervention), volume doubling time less than 1 year, T category increase, or N1 or M1 disease. Class III and IV masses were compared. Time to progression was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curve analysis. RESULTS. At baseline, 58 masses were class III and 54 were class IV. Median follow-up was 403 days. Median LGR for class III masses was 0.0 mm/y (interquartile range [IQR], -1.3 to 1.8 mm/y) and for class IV masses was 2.3 mm/y (IQR, 0.0-5.7 mm/y) (p < .001). LGR was at least 5 mm/y in four (7%) class III masses and 15 (28%) class IV masses (p = .005). Two patients, both with class IV masses, developed distant metastases. Incidence rate of progression for class III masses was 11.0 (95% CI, 4.5-22.8) and for class IV masses 73.6 (95% CI, 47.8-108.7) per 100,000 person-days of follow-up. Median time to progression was undefined for class III masses given the small number of progression events and 710 days for class IV masses. Hazard ratio of progression for class IV relative to class III masses was 5.1 (95% CI, 2.5-10.8; p < .001). CONCLUSION. During active surveillance of cystic masses evaluated using the Bosniak classification v2019, class IV masses grew faster and were more likely to progress than class III masses. CLINICAL IMPACT. In comparison with current active surveillance guidelines that treat class III and IV masses similarly, future iterations may incorporate relatively more intensive surveillance for class IV masses.

CT Angiography of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Imaging plays a central role in the workup of thromboembolic events and bleeding complications in patients treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (VA-ECMO), and radiologists should be familiar with the expected hemodynamic changes and flow-related artifacts associated with the VA-ECMO system. VA-ECMO is a form of temporary mechanical circulatory support for critically ill patients with acute, refractory cardiac or cardiopulmonary failure. As the use of VA-ECMO continues to increase, it is important to be aware of associated hemodynamic changes and challenges at imaging. Patients treated with VA-ECMO are at high risk for thromboembolic events and bleeding complications and, thus, often require evaluation with CT angiography (CTA). VA-ECMO can be implemented by using central or peripheral cannulation. The peripheral femorofemoral VA-ECMO circuit in particular alters the sequence and direction of contrast medium enhancement substantially, resulting in flow-related artifacts that can mimic or obscure disease at CTA. Nonopacification can be mistaken for spurious thrombus or simulate complete vascular occlusion, while mixing artifacts can mimic dissections. Misinterpretation of flow-related CTA artifacts can lead to inappropriate surgical or medical intervention. A methodical and multiphasic approach should be taken to CTA imaging strategies and interpretation for patients treated with VA-ECMO. There is no universal CTA protocol for patients on VA-ECMO. Each protocol must be designed for the study indication, with consideration of the configuration of the ECMO cannulas, contrast material injection site, region of interest, native cardiac output, and ECMO flow rate. The authors provide examples of common and unusual VA-ECMO-related artifacts, with a focus on strategies for optimizing CTA image acquisition. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2021.

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection: Pre- and Postprocedural Imaging.

Aortic dissection is a chronic disease that requires lifelong clinical and imaging surveillance, long after the acute event. Imaging has an important role in prognosis, timing of repair, device sizing, and monitoring for complications, especially in the endovascular therapy era. Important anatomic features at preprocedural imaging include the location of the primary intimal tear and aortic zonal and branch vessel involvement, which influence the treatment strategy. Challenges of repair in the chronic phase include a small true lumen in conjunction with a stiff intimal flap, complex anatomy, and retrograde perfusion from distal reentry tears. The role of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) remains controversial for treatment of chronic aortic dissection. Standard TEVAR is aimed at excluding the primary intimal tear to decrease false lumen perfusion, induce false lumen thrombosis, promote aortic remodeling, and prevent aortic growth. In addition to covering the primary intimal tear with an endograft, several adjunctive techniques have been developed to mitigate retrograde false lumen perfusion. These techniques are broadly categorized into false lumen obliteration and landing zone optimization strategies, such as the provisional extension to induce complete attachment (PETTICOAT), false lumen embolization, cheese-wire fenestration, and knickerbocker techniques. Familiarity with these techniques is important to recognize expected changes and complications at postintervention imaging. The authors detail imaging options, provide examples of simple and complex endovascular repairs of aortic dissections, and highlight complications that can be associated with various techniques. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.

The RSNA International COVID-19 Open Radiology Database (RICORD).

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a global health care emergency. Although reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction testing is the reference standard method to identify patients with COVID-19 infection, chest radiography and CT play a vital role in the detection and management of these patients. Prediction models for COVID-19 imaging are rapidly being developed to support medical decision making. However, inadequate availability of a diverse annotated data set has limited the performance and generalizability of existing models. To address this unmet need, the RSNA and Society of Thoracic Radiology collaborated to develop the RSNA International COVID-19 Open Radiology Database (RICORD). This database is the first multi-institutional, multinational, expert-annotated COVID-19 imaging data set. It is made freely available to the machine learning community as a research and educational resource for COVID-19 chest imaging. Pixel-level volumetric segmentation with clinical annotations was performed by thoracic radiology subspecialists for all COVID-19-positive thoracic CT scans. The labeling schema was coordinated with other international consensus panels and COVID-19 data annotation efforts, the European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics, the American College of Radiology, and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Study-level COVID-19 classification labels for chest radiographs were annotated by three radiologists, with majority vote adjudication by board-certified radiologists. RICORD consists of 240 thoracic CT scans and 1000 chest radiographs contributed from four international sites. It is anticipated that RICORD will ideally lead to prediction models that can demonstrate sustained performance across populations and health care systems.

Prevalence of Malignancy and Histopathological Association of Bosniak Classification, Version 2019 Class III and IV Cystic Renal Masses.

PURPOSE: Bosniak Classification, version 2019 (v2019) describes 2 types of class III and IV masses each: 1) thick, wall/septa ≥4 mm (III-WS), 2) obtuse protrusion ≤3 mm (III-OP), 3) obtuse protrusion ≥4 mm (IV-OP), and 4) acute protrusion of any size (IV-AP). The purposes of this study were to determine the prevalence of malignancy and histopathological features of class III and IV masses and subclasses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this institutional review board-approved and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study, 3 fellowship-trained abdominal radiologists (R1-3) reviewed cystic renal masses that had tissue pathology and preoperative renal mass protocol computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Classes based on v2019 and prior classification systems were retrospectively re-assigned and associated with malignancy, aggressive histologic features (necrosis or high Fuhrman grade) and radiological progression following resection. RESULTS: The final sample included 79 masses (59 malignant, 20 benign) from 74 patients. Based on v2019, prevalence of malignancy ranged from 56% to 61% (mean 60%) for class III and 83% to 83% (mean 83%) for class IV (p=0.036, 0.013, 0.036 for 3 fellowship-trained abdominal radiologists). Prevalence of malignancy within subclasses were: III-WS (overall 49%; range 47%-53%); III-OP (76%; 71%-85%); IV-OP (78%; 75%-87%); IV-AP (87%; 82%-95%; p=0.029, 0.001, 0.005). All readers were more likely to classify malignancies with aggressive histologic features as class IV (88% to 100%) rather than class III (0% to 12%; p=0.012, <0.001, 0.002), corresponding to a negative predictive value of 96% to 100%. After treatment (mean followup length 1,210 days), 1 patient developed metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Bosniak Classification, version 2019 can help risk stratification of class III-IV masses by identifying those likely to be malignant and have aggressive histologic features.

Bosniak Classification of Cystic Renal Masses Version 2019: Comparison of Categorization Using CT and MRI.

BACKGROUND. Bosniak classification version 2019 proposed refinements for cystic renal mass characterization and now formally incorporates MRI, which may improve concordance with CT. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare concordance of CT and MRI in evaluation of cystic renal masses using Bosniak classification version 2019. METHODS. Three abdominal radiologists retrospectively reviewed 68 consecutive cystic renal masses from 45 patients assessed with both CT and MRI renal mass protocols within a year between 2005 and 2019. CT and MRI were reviewed independently and in separate sessions, using both the original and 2019 versions of Bosniak classification systems. RESULTS. Using Bosniak classification version 2019, cystic renal masses were classified into 12 category I, 19 category II, 13 category IIF, four category III, and 20 category IV by CT and eight category I, 15 category II, 23 category IIF, nine category III, and 13 category IV by MRI. Among individual features, MRI showed more septa (p < 0.001, p = 0.046, p = 0.005; McNemar test) for all three radiologists, although both CT and MRI showed a similar number of protrusions (p = 0.823, p = 1.0, p = 0.302) and maximal septa and wall thickness (p = 1.0, p = 1.0, p = 0.145). Of the discordant cases with version 2019, MRI led to a higher categorization in 12 masses. The reason for upgrade was most commonly because of protrusions identified only on MRI (n = 4), an increased number of septa (n = 3), and a new category: heterogeneously T1-weighted hyperintensity (n = 3). Neither modality was more likely to lead to a categorization change for either version 2019 (p = 0.502; McNemar test) or the original (p = 0.823) Bosniak classification system. Overall interrater agreement was substantial for both CT (κ = 0.745) and MRI (κ = 0.655) using version 2019 and was slightly higher than that of the original system for CT (κ = 0.707) and MRI (κ = 0.623). CONCLUSION. CT and MRI were concordant in the majority of cases using Bosniak classification version 2019, and category changes by modality were not statistically significant. Interrater agreements were substantial for both CT and MRI. CLINICAL IMPACT. Bosniak classification version 2019 as applied to cystic renal masses has substantial interrater agreement and does not lead to systematic category upgrades with either CT or MRI.

Bosniak Classification Version 2019 of Cystic Renal Masses Assessed With MRI.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine how use of Bosniak classification version 2019 affects categorization and overall accuracy of MRI evaluation of cystic renal masses with tissue pathologic analysis as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS. MR images of 50 consecutively registered patients with tissue pathologic results from 2005 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed by two abdominal radiologists. Each radiologist independently assigned a category based on the original and Bosniak classification version 2019 systems. Interreader agreements (kappa statistic) for both were calculated, and consensus reading was performed. Tissue pathologic analysis was used as the reference standard to determine whether a lesion was benign or renal cell carcinoma. RESULTS. Fifty-nine cystic renal masses were characterized as 38 renal cell carcinomas and 21 benign lesions on the basis of the results of tissue pathologic analysis. By consensus, according to the original Bosniak criteria, the renal masses were classified into three category I, five category II, four category IIF, 25 category III, and 22 category IV lesions. By consensus, according to the version 2019 criteria, the renal masses were classified into three category I, two category II, 12 category IIF, 18 category III, and 24 category IV lesions. Overall sensitivity and specificity for identifying renal cell carcinoma were 95% and 81%, respectively, with the original classification system and 100% and 86%, respectively, with version 2019. Weighted interreader agreement was moderate for both the original system (κ = 0.57) and version 2019 (κ = 0.55). CONCLUSION. Use of Bosniak classification version 2019 system improves sensitivity and specificity for malignancy among cystic renal masses characterized with MRI. Most lesions that changed categories were reclassified as Bosniak category IIF.

Gastrointestinal devices: common and uncommon foreign bodies.

Devices for the gastrointestinal tract are widely available and constantly advancing with less invasive techniques. They play a crucial role in diagnostic and therapeutic interventions and are commonly placed by interventional radiologists, gastroenterologists, and surgeons. These devices frequently appear in imaging studies, which verify their proper placement, identify any complications, or may be incidentally detected. Radiologists must be able to identify these devices at imaging and understand their intended purpose to assess their efficacy, detect complications such as incorrect positioning, and avoid misinterpreting them as abnormalities. Furthermore, many patients with these devices may require MRI, making assessing compatibility essential for safe patient care. This review seeks to provide a succinct and practical handbook for radiologists regarding both common and uncommon gastrointestinal devices. In addition to textual descriptions of clinical indications, imaging findings, complications, and MRI compatibility, the review incorporates a summary table as a quick reference point for key information and illustrative images for each device.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Preprocedural Planning for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: 2023 Update.

This document discusses preprocedural planning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement, evaluating the imaging modalities used in initial imaging for preprocedure planning under two variants 1) Preintervention planning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: assessment of aortic root; and 2) Preintervention planning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: assessment of supravalvular aorta and vascular access. US echocardiography transesophageal, MRI heart function and morphology without and with IV contrast, MRI heart function and morphology without IV contrast and CT heart function and morphology with IV contrast are usually appropriate for assessment of aortic root. CTA chest with IV contrast, CTA abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast, CTA chest abdomen pelvis with IV contrast are usually appropriate for assessment of supravalvular aorta and vascular access. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Congenital or Acquired Heart Disease.

Pediatric heart disease is a large and diverse field with an overall prevalence estimated at 6 to 13 per 1,000 live births. This document discusses appropriateness of advanced imaging for a broad range of variants. Diseases covered include tetralogy of Fallot, transposition of great arteries, congenital or acquired pediatric coronary artery abnormality, single ventricle, aortopathy, anomalous pulmonary venous return, aortopathy and aortic coarctation, with indications for advanced imaging spanning the entire natural history of the disease in children and adults, including initial diagnosis, treatment planning, treatment monitoring, and early detection of complications. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pulsatile Abdominal Mass, Suspected Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: 2023 Update.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is defined as abnormal dilation of the infrarenal abdominal aortic diameter to 3.0 cm or greater. The natural history of AAA consists of progressive expansion and potential rupture. Although most AAAs are clinically silent, a pulsatile abdominal mass identified on physical examination may indicate the presence of an AAA. When an AAA is suspected, an imaging study is essential to confirm the diagnosis. This document reviews the relative appropriateness of various imaging procedures for the initial evaluation of suspected AAA. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Imaging Challenges in Chronic Dissection.

Chronic aortic dissection comprises a heterogeneous group of unrepaired and repaired disease requiring lifelong clinical and imaging surveillance. CT and MRI are the main imaging modalities for longitudinal surveillance, with growing interest in emerging imaging techniques for prognostic potential. Imaging difficulties span technical and diagnostic challenges, some of which are unique to the repaired aorta, with specific complications depending on the type of repair. This review describes existing and emerging imaging techniques, outlines the technical and diagnostic challenges encountered at CT and MRI, and highlights the diagnostic pitfalls of chronic aortic dissection.

Colonoscopy Versus Catheter Angiography for Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding After Localization on CT Angiography.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare catheter angiography (CA) and colonoscopy outcomes after successful CT angiographic (CTA) localization for patients with overt lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB). METHODS: Seventy-one consecutive patients from two institutions between 2010 and 2020 had both contrast extravasation on CTA imaging in the lower gastrointestinal tract and subsequent CA or colonoscopy. The primary outcome was confirmation of active bleeding during CA or colonoscopy (defined as confirmation yield). The secondary outcomes were to determine therapeutic yield (hemostatic therapy), time to procedure, rebleeding rate, and adverse outcome rates (defined as surgery, acute kidney injury, initiation of dialysis, and overall mortality). Univariate analyses and multivariable analyses with P < .05 were used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: Forty-four patients underwent CA and 27 underwent colonoscopy. CA had higher overall confirmation yield (55% vs 26%, P = .026), whereas therapeutic yields were similar (70% vs 56%, P = .214). Time to procedure was 5.1 ± 3.4 hours for CA and 15.5 ± 13.6 hours for colonoscopy (P < .001). On multivariable analysis, shorter time to procedure was the only statistically significant predictor of confirmation yield (P = .037) and therapeutic yield (P = .013), whereas procedure, hemoglobin, transfusions, and hemodynamic instability were not. Adverse events and rebleeding were not statistically different between patients who underwent CA and colonoscopy (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Shorter time to procedure was the only statistically significant predictor of confirmation and therapeutic yield after CTA localization of LGIB. Because CA can be performed sooner than colonoscopy without increased rates of adverse outcomes or rebleeding, CA may be a reasonable first-line treatment option in patients with CTA localization of LGIB.

Extravasation Volume at Computed Tomography Angiography Correlates With Bleeding Rate and Prognosis in Patients With Overt Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the identification of active extravasation on computed tomography angiography (CTA) in patients with overt gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), a large proportion do not have active bleeding or require hemostatic therapy at endoscopy, catheter angiography, or surgery. The objective of our proof-of-concept study was to improve triage of patients with GIB by correlating extravasation volume of first-pass CTA with bleeding rate and clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who presented with overt GIB and active extravasation on CTA from January 2014 to July 2019 were reviewed in this retrospective, institutional review board-approved and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study. Extravasation volume was assessed using 3-dimensional software and correlated with hemostatic therapy (primary endpoint) and with intraprocedural bleeding, blood transfusions, and mortality as secondary endpoints using logistic regression models (P < 0.0125 indicating statistical significance). Odds ratios were used to determine the effect size of a threshold extravasation volume. Quantitative data (extravasation volume, aorta attenuation, extravasation attenuation and time) were input into a mathematical model to calculate bleeding rate. RESULTS: Fifty consecutive patients including 6 (12%) upper, 18 (36%) small bowel, and 26 (52%) lower GIB met inclusion criteria. Forty-two underwent catheter angiography, endoscopy, or surgery; 16 had intraprocedural active bleeding, and 24 required hemostatic therapy. Higher extravasation volumes correlated with hemostatic therapy (P = 0.007), intraprocedural active bleeding (P = 0.003), and massive transfusion (P = 0.0001), but not mortality (P = 0.936). Using a threshold volume of 0.80 mL or greater, the odds ratio of hemostatic therapy was 8.1 (95% confidence interval, 2.1-26), active bleeding was 11.8 (2.6-45), and massive transfusion was 18 (2.3-65). With mathematical modeling, extravasation volume had a direct and linear relationship with bleeding rate, and the lowest calculated detectable bleeding rate with CTA was less than 0.1 mL/min. CONCLUSIONS: Larger extravasation volumes correlate with higher bleeding rates and may identify patients who require hemostatic therapy, have intraprocedural bleeding, and require blood transfusions. Current CTAs can detect bleeding rates less than 0.1 mL/min.