Effect of Early Versus Late Oral Feeding on Postoperative Complications and Recovery Outcomes for Patients with Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Evaluation and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effect of early oral feeding (EOF) versus late oral feeding (LOF) on postoperative complications and rehabilitation outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer. METHODS: This study searched relevant literature published up to March 2023 by computer retrieval of PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. A meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 software to compare the effects of EOF and LOF on postoperative complications and recovery outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer. RESULTS: The study included 14 articles, including 9 retrospective studies, 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and 1 prospective study. The 2555 patients included in the study comprised 1321 patients who received EOF and 1234 patients who received LOF. The results of the meta-analysis showed that compared with the LOF group, the EOF group has a shorter time to the first flatus postoperatively (mean difference [MD], - 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], (- 1.25 to - 1.00; P < 0.00001), a shorter time to the first defecation postoperatively (MD, - 1.31; 95% CI, - 1.67 to - 0.95;, P < 0.00001], and a shorter hospital stay postoperatively (MD, - 2.87; 95% CI, - 3.84 to - 1.90; P < 0.00001). The two groups did not differ significantly statistically in terms of postoperative anastomotic leakage rate (P = 0.10), postoperative chyle leakage rate (P = 0.10), or postoperative pneumonia rate (P = 0.15). CONCLUSION: Early oral feeding after esophageal cancer surgery can shorten the time to the first flatus and the first defecation postoperatively, shorten the hospital stay, and promote the recovery of patients. Moreover, it has no significant effect on the incidence of postoperative complications.

Efficacy of Using Maryland Forceps Versus Electrocoagulation Hooks in RATS Lung Cancer Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

BACKGROUND: Here we compare the difference in recent outcomes between the use of Maryland forceps (MF) and electrocoagulation hooks (EH) in robotic-assisted thoracoscopic radical lung cancer resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyze the clinical data of 247 patients with lung cancer who underwent robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery from February 2018 to December 2022. On the basis of the intraoperative use of energy devices, we divided the clinical data into two groups, including 84 cases in the MF group and 163 cases in the EH group, respectively. The patients in the two groups were matched with propensity score matching analysis, and further, the perioperative clinical data of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: Compared with the EH group, patients in the MF group had shorter operative time, lesser intraoperative bleeding, shorter postoperative drainage time, and shorter postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.05). By comparing the intraoperative and postoperative complications in the two groups, it was found that the incidence of intraoperative lymph node fragmentation, the incidence of postoperative celiac disease, and the incidence of postoperative food choking were significantly lower in the MF group than that in the EH group. The increase of CRP, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α levels in the MF group was less than that in the EH group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of MF in robotic-assisted thoracoscopic radical lung cancer surgery is safe and effective, with advantages in lymph node dissection, reduced surgical trauma, and fewer postoperative complications.

Effects of da Vinci robot versus thoracoscopic surgery on body trauma and lymphocyte subsets in lung cancer patients: A propensity score matching study.

BACKGROUND: To assess the impact of da Vinci robot versus thoracoscopic surgery on body trauma and lymphocyte subsets in lung cancer patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 352 patients with lung cancer treated by minimally invasive surgery completed by the same operator in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Gansu Provincial People's Hospital from October 2019 to October 2022. According to the surgical procedure, the patients were divided into a robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) group (n = 159) and a video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group (VATS) (n = 193), respectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed in both groups, and perioperative indicators were recorded. Levels of inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, CRP; interleukin-6, IL-6) and lymphocyte subsets (CD3+ , CD4+ , CD8+ , and CD4+ /CD8+ ) were measured 1 day before surgery and 1, 3, and 5 days after surgery, respectively. To compare the effects of the two surgical procedures on the trauma and lymphocyte subsets of the patient's organism. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-eight patients in each group after PSM. Compared with the VATS group, the RATS group had shorter operative time (p < 0.001), less intraoperative bleeding (p < 0.001), less postoperative chest drainage (p = 0.029), shorter postoperative chest drainage time (p = 0.008), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.005). The levels of CRP and IL-6 increased in both groups after surgery compared with those before surgery, and the increase was less in the RATS group than that in the VATS group. Postoperative T-lymphocyte levels were lower in both groups compared with preoperative levels, and T-lymphocyte levels were significantly lower in the VATS group compared with the RATS group. CONCLUSION: Compared with VATS for treating lung cancer, RATS has advantages in short-term efficacy, and smaller surgical trauma to patients, which can reduce the body's inflammatory response. It also has less impact on T lymphocyte subpopulations, which can better protect patients' immune function.

Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus laparoscopic myomectomy: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Systematic evaluation of the efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RALM) versus laparoscopic myomectomy (LM). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science database were searched by computer to seek relevant literature in order to compare the efficacy and safety of RALM with that of LM from the establishment of the databases to January 2023, and Review Manager 5.4 software was utilized to perform a meta-analysis on the literature. RESULTS: A total of 15 retrospective clinical controlled studies were included. There exists a total of 45,702 patients, among 11,618 patients in the RALM group and the remaining 34,084 patients in the LM group. Meta-analysis results revealed that RALM was associated with lesser intraoperative bleeding (MD = - 32.03, 95%CI - 57.24 to - 6.83, P = 0.01), lower incidence of blood transfusions (OR = 0.86, 95%CI 0.77 to 0.97, P = 0.01), shorter postoperative hospital stay (MD = - 0.11, 95%CI - 0.21 to - 0.01, P = 0.03), fewer transitions to open stomach (OR = 0.82, 95%CI 0.73 to 0.92, P = 0.0006), and lower incidence of postoperative complications (OR = 0.58, 95%CI 0.40 to 0.86, P = 0.006) than LM, whereas LM is more advantageous in terms of operative time (MD = 38.61, 95%CI 19.36 to 57.86, P < 0.0001). There was no statistical difference between the two surgical methods in terms of maximum myoma diameter (MD = 0.26, 95%CI - 0.17 to 0.70, P = 0.24). CONCLUSION: In the aspects of intraoperative bleeding, lower incidence of blood transfusions, postoperative hospital stay, transit open stomach rate, and postoperative complications, RALM has a unique advantage than that of LM, while LM has advantages over RALM in terms of operative time.

Meta analysis of the diagnostic value of circulating miRNA in benign and malignant pulmonary nodules.

OBJECTIVE: A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the impact of miRNAs in circulation on diagnosing benign and malignant pulmonary nodules (BPNs and MPNs). METHODS: Electronic databases such as Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library were utilized for diagnostic tests of circulating miRNAs to diagnose BPNs and MPNs from the library creation to February 2023. Meta-analysis of the included literature was performed using Stata 16, Meta-Disc 1.4, and Review Manager 5.4 software. This study determined the combined sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic ratio (DOR), positive/negative likelihood ratios (PLR/NLR), as well as value of area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 14 publications and 17 studies. According to our findings, the pooled sensitivity for miRNA in diagnosing benign and malignant pulmonary nodules was 0.82 [95% CI (0.74, 0.88)], specificity was 0.84 [95% CI (0.79, 0.88)], whereas the DOR was 22.69 [95% CI (13.87, 37.13)], PLR was 5.00 [95% CI (3.87, 6.46)], NLR was 0.22 [95% CI (0.15, 0.32)], and the area under the working characteristic curve (AUC) of the subject was 0.89 [95% CI (0.86, 0.91)]. CONCLUSION: Circulating miRNAs could be used with sensitivity, specificity, DOR, PLR, NLR, and AUC as biomarkers to diagnose pulmonary nodules (PNs). However, more research is needed to determine the optimum miRNA combinations for diagnosing PNs due to the significant heterogeneity on previous studies.

Comparison of three-dimensional reconstruction and CT-guided Hook-wire segmental resection for pulmonary nodules: a propensity score matching study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze and compare the clinical application value of three-dimensional reconstruction and computed tomography (CT)-guided Hook-wire localization for row lung segment resection of pulmonary nodules. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 204 patients suffering from pulmonary nodules admitted to the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Gansu Provincial People's Hospital from June 2016 to December 2022. According to the preoperative positioning method, the group was divided into a 3D reconstruction group (98 cases) and a Hook-wire group (106 cases), respectively. The two groups of patients were propensity score matching (PSM) to compare their perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: All patients in both groups underwent successful surgeries without perioperative deaths. After PSM, 79 patients were successfully matched in each group. Two cases of pneumothorax, three cases of hemothorax, and four cases of decoupling occurred in the Hook-wire group; no complications of pneumothorax, hemothorax, and decoupling occurred in the 3D reconstruction group. Compared to the Hook-wire group, the 3D reconstruction group has shorter operative time (P = 0.001), less intraoperative bleeding (P < 0.001), less total postoperative chest drainage (P = 0.003), shorter postoperative tube placement time (P = 0.001), shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.026), and postoperative complications (P = 0.035). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of pathological type, TNM staging, and number of lymph node dissection. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional reconstruction and localization of pulmonary nodules enables safe and effective individualized thoracoscopic anatomical lung segment resection with a low complication rate, which has good clinical application value.

Efficacy of using Maryland forceps versus electrocoagulation hooks in da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection.

BACKGROUND: To compare the difference of short-term curative effect between the use of Maryland forceps (MF) and electrocoagulation hooks (EH) in da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection. METHODS: Retrospectively analyze 84 patients with mediastinal tumors who underwent robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) at the Department of Thoracic Surgery in Gansu Provincial Hospital from February 2019 to February 2023. Two groups were divided according to the intraoperative use of energy devices, including 41 cases in the MF group and 43 cases in the EH group. Perioperative clinical data was gathered to compare the short-term efficacy of patients in both groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics such as sex (P = 0.685), age (P = 0.165), and tumor size (P = 0.339) between the two groups. Compared with the EH group, patients in the MF group have shorter operative time (P = 0.030), less intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.010), less total postoperative drainage volume (P = 0.001), shorter postoperative drainage time (P = 0.022), shorter hospital stay (P = 0.019), and lower levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and cortisol. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of total hospitalization costs (P = 0.123), postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores (P = 0.064), and postoperative complications (P = 0.431). CONCLUSION: Using MF in RATS for mediastinal tumor is safe and effective, which can reduce the amount of bleeding, reduce the degree of inflammatory reaction, and conducive to the quick recovery of patients.

Clinical efficacy of robot-assisted subxiphoid versus lateral thoracic approach in the treatment of anterior mediastinal tumors.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative efficacy and safety of da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for treating anterior mediastinal tumors through the subxiphoid and lateral thoracic approaches under the anesthesia of nontracheal intubation (i.e., laryngeal mask airway). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 116 patients with anterior mediastinal tumors treated by RATS under laryngeal mask anesthesia completed by the same operator in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Gansu Provincial People's Hospital, from October 2016 to October 2022. There were a total of 52 patients including 24 males and 28 females, with an average age of 45.40±4.94 years, in the subxiphoid approach (subxiphoid group). On the other hand, there were a total of 64 patients including 34 males and 30 females, with a mean age of 46.86±5.46 years in the lateral thoracic approach (lateral thoracic group). Furthermore, we have detailedly compared and analyzed the operating time, intraoperative bleeding, and total postoperative drainage in the two groups. RESULTS: All patients in both groups successfully completed resection of the anterior mediastinal tumor without occurring perioperative death. Compared with the lateral thoracic group, the subxiphoid group has more advantages in terms of total postoperative drainage (P=0.035), postoperative drainage time (P=0.015), postoperative hospital stay (P=0.030), and visual analog scale (VAS) pain on postoperative days 2 (P=0.006) and 3 (P=0.002). However, the lateral thoracic group has more advantages in the aspect of docking time (P=0.020). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of operative time (P=0.517), total operative time (P=0.187), postoperative day 1 VAS pain score (P=0.084), and postoperative complications (P=0.715). CONCLUSION: The subxiphoid approach of RATS under laryngeal mask anesthesia is safe and feasible for resecting anterior mediastinal tumors. Compared with the lateral thoracic approach, the subxiphoid approach has advantages in terms of rapid postoperative recovery and postoperative patient pain, and patient acceptance is also higher and thus is worth promoting in hospitals where it is available.

A comparative study of robotic surgery and thoracoscopic surgery for mediastinal cysts.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in the treatment of mediastinal cysts. METHODS: Retrospective analysis on clinical data of 70 cases of minimally invasive surgery for mediastinal cysts completed in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Gansu Provincial People's Hospital from April 2014 to December 2022. There were 34 cases in the RATS group with a cyst diameter of (3.70 ± 1.16) cm and 36 cases in the VATS group with a cyst diameter of (4.07 ± 1.20) cm. All cysts were evaluated preoperatively using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or chest computed tomography (CT) localization. Surgery-related indices were compared among the two groups. RESULTS: All patients in two groups successfully completed resection of mediastinal cysts without perioperative deaths. Compared with the VATS group, the RATS group possessed shorter operative time [(75.32 ± 17.80) min vs. (102.22 ± 19.80) min, P < 0.001], lesser intraoperative bleeding [10 (5.00, 26.00) ml vs. 17.50 (5.00, 50.50) ml, P = 0.009], shorter postoperative chest drainage time [2 (1.00, 6.00) ml vs. 3 (2.00, 6.50) ml, P = 0.006] and shorter postoperative hospital stay [3 (2.00, 6.50) d vs. 4 (3.00, 7.50) d, P = 0.001]. There was no statistically significant discrepancy in intermediate openings and complications in both groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with VATS, RATS is safety and effectivity in the treatment of mediastinal cysts and thus has advantages in operative time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative chest drainage time and postoperative hospital stay.

Comparison of the efficacy of ETS with different segments for palmar, axillary and plantar hyperhidrosis.

BACKGROUND: To compare the near and long-term outcomes of endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy (ETS) for palmar, axillary and plantar hyperhidrosis. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 218 patients with hyperhidrosis who were admitted to the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Gansu Provincial People's Hospital for surgical treatment from April 2014 to August 2021. The patients were divided into three groups according to the method of ETS and the perioperative clinical data and postoperative follow-up data were collected to compare the near and long term outcomes of the three groups. RESULTS: There were 197 eligible patients at follow-up, 60 patients in the R4 cut-off group, 95 patients in the R3 + R4 cut-off group and 42 patients in the R4 + R5 cut-off group. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline indicators such as sex, age and positive family history among the three groups (P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in terms of operative time (P = 0.148), intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.308) and postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.407). Postoperatively, all three groups showed significant relief of palmar hyperhidrosis symptoms, with the R3 + R4 group having an advantage in terms of relief of axillary hyperhidrosis symptoms, patient satisfaction and quality of life index at 6 months postoperatively and the R4 + R5 group having an advantage in terms of relief of plantar hyperhidrosis symptoms. The difference in compensatory hyperhidrosis at 12 months postoperatively was not statistically significant among the three groups (P = 0.867), but the incidence was higher in the R3 + R4 and R4 + R5 groups than that in the R4 group. CONCLUSION: Patients with simple palmar hyperhidrosis can first consider R4 cut-off treatment; R3 + R4 cut-off is more effective in treating palmar hyperhidrosis combined with axillary hyperhidrosis; R4 + R5 cut-off is more effective in treating palmar hyperhidrosis combined with plantar hyperhidrosis. However, patients need to be informed that R3 + R4 and R4 + R5 dissection may increase the risk of severe compensatory hyperhidrosis after surgery.

Analysis of the efficacy of the da Vinci robot in surgery for posterior mediastinal neurogenic tumors.

BACKGROUND: The present research is designed to evaluate the short-term outcome of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for the treatment of posterior mediastinal neurogenic tumors. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data on 39 consecutive patients with mediastinal neurogenic tumors after RATS treatment completed by the same operator in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Gansu Provincial People's Hospital from January 2016 to September 2022. There were 22 males and 17 females with a mean age of (35.1 ± 6.9) years in this analysis report. The tumors of the patients were localized and evaluated preoperatively using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or enhanced CT. RESULTS: All 39 patients successfully underwent the resection of posterior mediastinal neurogenic tumors under RATS, and no conversion to thoracotomy occurred during the operations. The average operative time was (62.1 ± 17.2) min, the average docking time was (10.1 ± 2.5) min, the average intraoperative bleeding was (32.8 ± 19.5) ml, the average 24-h postoperative chest drainage was (67.4 ± 27.9) ml, the average postoperative chest drainage time was (2.2 ± 1.3) days and the average post-operative hospital stay was (3.2 ± 1.3) days. Postoperative complications occurred in 3 patients, including 2 patients with transient Horner's syndrome after surgery and 1 patient with transient anhidrosis of the affected upper limb after surgery. CONCLUSION: RATS for posterior mediastinal neurogenic tumors is safe, effective, feasible and bring the superiority of robotic surgical system into full play.

Comparison of clinical efficacy of da Vinci robot-assisted lung cancer surgery with two-, three- and four-hole approaches.

Orifice reduction strategies for da Vinci robotic surgery have been a hot topic of research in recent years. We retrospectively analyzed the perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) with two, three, and four-hole approaches in radical lung cancer surgery. Our results revealed that the two-hole group has advantages in terms of operative time, postoperative 3-day drainage, postoperative drainage time, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative day 3 visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores. There were no significant differences between the three groups in terms of intraoperative bleeding, number of lymph nodes dissected, VAS pain scores on postoperative days 1 and 2, and postoperative complications. In addition, the two-hole group was superior to the three-hole and four-hole groups in terms of C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT) and interleukin 10 (IL-10). In summary, the RATS two-hole approach has advantages in operation time, rapid recovery after operation and some postoperative inflammatory indicators, and is worth promoting in hospitals that are skilled in three-hole and four-hole da Vinci robot surgery and have conditions.

Corrigendum: Efficacy of modified thoraco-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis versus traditional thoraco-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis for esophageal cancer: propensity score-matched analysis.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1076014.].

Efficacy of modified thoraco-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis versus traditional thoraco-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis for esophageal cancer: Propensity score-matched analysis.

Objective: To compare the clinical results of the modified Ivor-Lewis procedure, which preserves the azygous vein, thoracic duct and surrounding tissues, with the traditional Ivor-Lewis procedure, which removes these tissues, for treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and evaluating whether the azygous vein, thoracic duct and surrounding tissues are required to be removed for the surgery of esophageal cancer. Methods: To retrospectively analyze the clinical data of patients suffering from esophageal cancer treated by thoracic-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis procedure admitted to the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Gansu Provincial People's Hospital from September 2017 to September 2019. According to the surgical method, they were divided into the modified thoracolaparoscopic Ivor-Lewis (modified group) and the traditional thoracolaparoscopic Ivor-Lewis (traditional group). Propensity score matching analysis (PSM) was applied to reduce the selection bias of confounding factors. Results: A total of 245 patients who suffered from esophageal cancer and underwent thoracic-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis were enrolled in the study. There were 124 cases in the modified group and 121 cases in the traditional group. The discrepancies in the age and T-stage among patients in the traditional and modified groups were statistically significant. After PSM, the above-mentioned factors became statistically insignificant. There were 86 patients in each group after PSM. Compared with the traditional group, the modified group has shorter operative time (p=0.007), less intraoperative bleeding (p=0.003) and less postoperative 3 days chest drainage(p=0.001), with a statistically significant difference. No significant difference in local recurrence (p=0.721) and distant metastasis (p=0.742) after surgery were found in the two groups, and the difference was not statistically significant. There was also no statistically significant difference in the 3-year postoperative survival rate (44.2% vs. 41.9%, p=0.605) between the modified and traditional groups. Conclusion: The modified Ivor-Lewis procedure, which preserves the azygous vein, thoracic duct, and surrounding tissue, reduces surgical trauma in esophageal cancer, has not increased postoperative recurrent metastases, while achieved the same long-term outcomes as expanded surgery.