Characteristics of patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer who benefited from immune checkpoint inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are less effective in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. However, a small percentage of patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC do respond, and the characteristics of these patients are not known. Here, we identify the characteristics of patients who may respond to ICI therapy for EGFR-mutant NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations who received PD-1/PD-L1 antibody monotherapy at nine institutions were reviewed. RESULTS: In total, 58 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC were analyzed. Various clinical factors such as smoking history and EGFR mutation type were not associated with progression-free survival (PFS) of ICIs, while the PFS of prior EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was inversely associated with that of ICIs. Patients who responded to prior EGFR TKIs for > 10 months exhibited a significantly shorter response to ICIs compared to those who had responded for ≤ 10 months (PFS of ICI: 1.6 vs. 1.9 months; hazard ratio: 2.54; 95% confidence interval 1.26-5.12; p = 0.009). However, patients who responded to ICIs for > 6 months responded to prior EGFR TKIs for significantly shorter periods compared to those who responded to ICIs for ≤ 6 months (PFS of prior EGFR TKI: 5.3 vs. 12.1 months; log-rank test: p = 0.0025). CONCLUSION: The duration of response to prior EGFR TKIs could be a predictive marker of ICI therapy in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients.

Impact of previous thoracsic radiation therapy on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-smasll-cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Studies investigating the association between radiation therapy and the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer have provided inconsistent results, likely due to relatively small cohort sizes. This study investigated the effect of previous thoracic radiation therapy on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in a large non-small-cell lung cancer cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from 531 non-small-cell lung cancer patients who received monotherapy with programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors at nine institutions. The effects of thoracic radiation therapy on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 531 non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors were included in this study. The progression-free survival period was significantly longer in patients that had received thoracic radiation therapy before immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy compared to those without previous thoracic radiation therapy (median progression-free survival 5.0 vs. 3.0 months, P = 0.0013). A multivariate analysis showed that thoracic radiation therapy was an independent predictive factor of improved progression-free survival (hazard ratio of progression-free survival: 0.79, P = 0.049). In contrast, extra-thoracic radiation therapy was associated with inferior outcomes (median progression-free survival 3.0 vs. 4.2 months, P = 0.0008). CONCLUSION: Previous thoracic radiation therapy, but not prior extra-thoracic radiation therapy, enhanced the efficacy of anti-programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Clinical Characteristics of Severe Refractory Asthma Associated with the Effectiveness of Bronchial Thermoplasty.

We investigated the clinical characteristics of refractory asthma associated with the effectiveness of bronchial thermoplasty (BT). We retrospectively evaluated data from 10 patients who underwent BT between June 2016 and December 2017 at Okayama Medical Center. The following were measured before and 6 months post-BT: forced expiratory volume in 1.0 s (FEV1), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), immunoglobulin E (IgE) level, blood eosinophil counts (Eosi), Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score, and preventive medication use. At baseline, the mean post-bronchodilator FEV1 was 80.9% of the predicted value (range 45.6-115.7%). All patients were being treated with moderate- or high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting ß2 agonists. The AQLQ improved from 4.26±1.67 at baseline to 5.59±0.94 at 6 months post-BT (p<0.05). The %FEV1, FeNO, IgE, and Eosi did not change significantly between baseline and 6 months post-BT. No severe complications were reported. BT was effective for non-allergic and non-eosinophilic in 3 patients, and allergic or eosinophilic in 4 patients. Their AQLQ improved by > 0.5 points post-BT. For both allergic and eosinophilic asthmatics following mepolizumab, BT was not useful. BT was effective for non-allergic and non-eosinophilic or allergic asthmatics, but insufficient for both allergic and eosinophilic following mepolizumab.

Successful ultrathin bronchoscopy with cryobiopsy for diagnosing and removing mucus plugs in allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis mimicking lung cancer.

In patients presenting with abnormal pulmonary nodules, especially those with a history of asthma, allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis should be considered. Eosinophil counts and IgE levels should be checked in such patients.

Large-vessel vasculitis induced by pegfilgrastim and immune checkpoint inhibitor in a patient with small-cell lung cancer.

A 75-year-old woman with stage IVB (cT3N3M1c) extensive disease small-cell lung cancer was treated with carboplatin, etoposide, and atezolizumab. Ten days after pegfilgrastim initiation, during the second chemotherapy cycle, she experienced back pain. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed soft tissue thickening around the descending aorta and brachiocephalic artery. She was diagnosed with atezolizumab and pegfilgrastim-induced large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) and was treated with prednisolone, which was tapered and discontinued after 14 weeks, with no symptom recurrence. LVV should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients with nonspecific body pain when pegfilgrastim and immune checkpoint inhibitors are used in combination.

Effectiveness of AERO Stent Placement for Malignant Airway Disorder in Patients with a Poor Performance Status.

Objective Airway stenting is an established procedure for treating various airway disorders. The AERO stent (Merit Medical Systems, South Jordan, UT, USA) is a fully covered self-expandable metallic stent approved for use in Japan in 2014. However, its effectiveness in treating malignant airway disorders in patients with a poor performance status remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the safety and efficacy of the AERO stent in patients with malignant airway disorders and a poor performance status. Patients and Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent AERO stent placement at our institute between April 2016 and March 2022, and 21 patients underwent 25 procedures for malignant airway disorders. All AERO stenting procedures were performed using an over-the-wire delivery system with flexible and/or rigid bronchoscopy. Results Eighteen of the 21 patients (85.7%) had a poor general condition (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 3 or 4). AERO stents were successfully placed in 23 of the 25 procedures and migrated in the remaining 2 cases. Complications occurred in 10 cases, with infection being the most common (3 cases). Fourteen patients (66.6%) showed an improvement in their performance status. In addition, 5 of the 6 intubated patients were extubated following AERO stenting, and 11 patients subsequently received anticancer treatment. Conclusion The placement of the AERO stent is useful in patients with a poor performance status, including those who are intubated and afflicted with malignant airway disorders.

Autopsy case of meningoencephalitis induced by nivolumab and ipilimumab in a patient being treated for non-small cell lung cancer.

A 75-year-old woman with stage IVB (cT2bN3M1b) lung adenocarcinoma was administered nivolumab, ipilimumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel. Fourteen days after receiving chemotherapy, she experienced an impaired consciousness and a cerebrospinal fluid analysis revealed high protein levels and pleocytosis. She was diagnosed with nivolumab- and ipilimumab-induced encephalitis and was treated with corticosteroids which were tapered to 10 mg/day, with no symptom recurrence. She died 18 weeks after the initial presentation, as the cancer worsened. An autopsy showed encephalitis and CD8+ lymphocyte infiltration around the blood vessels. Thus, immune-related adverse events should be suspected and treatment should be initiated for patients presenting with an impaired consciousness when concurrently being treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab.

Secondary Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis Development during the Treatment for Anti-aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase Antibody-positive Interstitial Lung Disease.

A 70-year-old woman with anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (ARS) antibody-positive interstitial lung disease (ARS-ILD) received daily medications and regular cyclophosphamide cycles for recurring exacerbations. Approximately four years after immunosuppression initiation, the patient was admitted for progressive dyspnea on exertion. Chest computed tomography (CT) findings were suggestive of acute exacerbation. Despite intensified immunosuppressive treatment, the radiographic findings worsened, and serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) levels increased. A bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) examination revealed amorphous globules and alveolar macrophages with eosinophilic granules. Owing to negative anti-GM-CSF antibody tests, a diagnosis of secondary pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) was established.

Airway stenosis secondary to mediastinal lymph node metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma treated with AERO stent and osimertinib: A case report.

A woman in her mid-50s was admitted to our hospital with airway stenosis secondary to mediastinal lymph node enlargement. An AERO stent was placed under rigid bronchoscopy. Immediately after stent placement, tissue sampling was performed on the lymph nodes. Metastatic lesions were found to have an EGFR mutation (exon 19 deletion). Consequently, osimertinib treatment was initiated 15 days after stent placement. The tumour partially responded to osimertinib, and the airway stenosis improved. The patient underwent stent removal 66 days after stent placement. Our findings indicate that temporary oncological emergencies due to airway stenosis may be bridged by airway stenting.

Clinical characteristics of allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis caused by Schizophyllum commune.

BACKGROUND: Allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis (ABPM) is an allergic disease caused by type I and type III hypersensitivity to environmental fungi. Schizophyllum commune, a basidiomycete fungus, is one of the most common fungi that causes non-Aspergillus ABPM. OBJECTIVE: Herein, we attempted to clarify the clinical characteristics of ABPM caused by S. commune (ABPM-Sc) compared with those of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA). METHODS: Patients with ABPM-Sc or ABPA were recruited from a nationwide survey in Japan, a multicenter cohort, and a fungal database at the Medical Mycology Research Center of Chiba University. The definition of culture-positive ABPM-Sc/ABPA is as follows: (1) fulfills five or more of the 10 diagnostic criteria for ABPM proposed by Asano et al., and (2) positive culture of S. commune/Aspergillus spp. in sputum, bronchial lavage fluid, or mucus plugs in the bronchi. RESULTS: Thirty patients with ABPM-Sc and 46 with ABPA were recruited. Patients with ABPM-Sc exhibited less severe asthma and presented with better pulmonary function than those with ABPA (p = 0.008-0.03). Central bronchiectasis was more common in ABPM-Sc than that in ABPA, whereas peripheral lung lesions, including infiltrates/ground-glass opacities or fibrotic/cystic changes, were less frequent in ABPM-Sc. Aspergillus fumigatus-specific immunoglobulin (Ig)E was negative in 10 patients (34%) with ABPM-Sc, who demonstrated a lower prevalence of asthma and levels of total serum IgE than those with ABPM-Sc positive for A. fumigatus-specific IgE or ABPA. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical characteristics of ABPM-Sc, especially those negative for A. fumigatus-specific IgE, differed from those of ABPA.

Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome Recurrence Induced by Pembrolizumab in a Patient with Non-small-cell Lung Cancer.

A 73-year-old woman in complete remission from localized small-cell lung cancer associated with Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) 22 years earlier was referred to our hospital and diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer. After three courses of pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, the patient complained of muscle weakness, fatigue, ptosis, and dysarthria. The anti-voltage-gated calcium channel antibody level was elevated, and waxing was observed on a high-frequency repetitive stimulation test using an electromyogram. We diagnosed her with recurrence of LEMS as an immune-related adverse event (irAE) induced by pembrolizumab. After intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, the patient's symptoms improved, and she was discharged.

Successful Treatment with Mepolizumab for Coronary Spastic Angina Associated with Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis.

A 46-year-old man with a history of bronchial asthma and chronic sinusitis presented to our hospital with chest pain. We suspected angina evoked by epicardial coronary spasm and performed an ergonovine provocation test to diagnose coronary spastic angina (CSA). The patient also met the diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) and was treated with 60 mg prednisolone (PSL) for EGPA-associated CSA. After PSL administration, eosinophils decreased, and angina attacks disappeared. However, when PSL was tapered to 12.5 mg, chest pain recurred. We administered mepolizumab subcutaneously and chest pain disappeared. Additional mepolizumab may be effective for EGPA with CSA.

Survival Impact of Second-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Older Patients With Advanced Squamous-Cell NSCLC: Post Hoc Analysis of the CAPITAL Study.

Introduction: In the CAPITAL study, a randomized phase 3 study, wherein carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel treatment was compared with docetaxel treatment for older patients with squamous-cell lung cancer, the former became the new standard of care for such patients. Our study aimed to evaluate whether the efficacy of second-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) affected the primary analysis of overall survival (OS). Methods: Herein, we performed a post hoc analysis of the impact of second-line ICIs on OS, safety in each group of participants aged more than 75 years, and intracycle nab-paclitaxel skip status. Results: Patients were randomly allocated to the carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel (nab-PC) arm (n = 95) or the docetaxel (D) arm (n = 95). Of these patients, 74 of 190 (38.9%) were transferred to ICIs for second-line treatment (nab-PC arm: 36, D arm: 38). A survival benefit was numerically observed only for patients for whom first-line therapy was terminated owing to disease progression (median OS [nab-PC arm]: with and without ICIs, 321 and 142 d, respectively; median OS [D arm]: with and without ICIs, 311 and 256 d, respectively). The OS among patients who received ICI after adverse events was similar in the two arms. In the D arm, a significantly higher frequency of grade greater than or equal to 3 adverse events was observed among patients aged more than or equal to 75 years (86.2%) than among those aged less than 75 years (65.6%, p = 0.041), including a significantly higher frequency of neutropenia (84.6% versus 62.5%, p = 0.032); no such differences were observed in the nab-PC arm. Conclusions: We found that second-line ICI treatment seemed to have a little impact on OS.

A randomized phase II study of afatinib alone or combined with bevacizumab for treating chemo-naïve patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations.

BACKGROUND: Adding bevacizumab to first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) prolonged the progression-free survival (PFS), but limited data are available for second-generation EGFR-TKIs. AfaBev-CS is a randomized, phase II trial comparing afatinib plus bevacizumab and afatinib alone as first-line treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Untreated patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations (Del19 or L858R) were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either afatinib (30 mg) plus bevacizumab (AfaBev group) or afatinib (40 mg) monotherapy (Afa group). The primary endpoint was PFS. The power was >50% under the assumptions of a median PFS of 12 months for the Afa group and hazard ratio (HR) of 0.6 for the AfaBev group. RESULTS: Between August 2017 and September 2019, 100 patients were enrolled. There was no significant difference in PFS between the groups. The median PFS was 16.3 and 16.1 months for the AfaBev and Afa groups, respectively, with an HR of 0.865 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.539 to 1.388; p = 0.55). In terms of overall survival, there was no significant difference between the groups (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.83; p = 0.67). The overall response rate was 82.6% and 76.6% in the AfaBev and Afa groups, respectively (p = 0.61). Grade ≥ 3 diarrhea, hypertension, acneiform rash, paronychia, and stomatitis were frequently observed in the AfaBev group. CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to show efficacy of AfaBev over Afa for improving PFS in untreated patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Phase II study of irinotecan and amrubicin in patients with relapsed non-small cell lung cancer: Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 0402.

BACKGROUND: The survival advantage achieved by existing anti-cancer agents as second-line therapy for relapsed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is modest and further improvement of treatment outcome is desired. Combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and amrubicin for advanced NSCLC has not been fully evaluated. METHODS: The primary endpoint of this phase II clinical trial was objective response. Patients with NSCLC who had been treated previously with one or two chemotherapy agents were enrolled. Irinotecan and amrubicin were both administered on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle, at doses of 100 mg/m(2) and 40 mg/m(2), respectively. RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2006, 31 patients received a total of 101 courses; the median number of courses administered was three (range, one to six). Objective response was obtained in nine of the 31 patients (29.0% response rate; 95% confidence interval (CI), 12.1-46.0%). With a median follow-up time of 43.9 months, median survival time and the median progression-free survival time were 14.2 and 4.0 months, respectively. Myelosuppression was the most frequently observed adverse event, with grade 3/4 neutropenia in 51% of patients. Febrile neutropenia developed after nine courses (9%) and resulted in one treatment-related death. Cardiac toxicity and diarrhea, possibly specific for both agents, were infrequent and manageable. CONCLUSION: Combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and amrubicin is effective in patients with NSCLC but showed moderate toxicities in second- or third-line settings.

First and repeat rebiopsy for detecting EGFR T790M mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer: CS-Lung-003 prospective observational registry study.

PURPOSE: Osimertinib is still essential for the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-T790M-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) even in a relapsed setting, which suggests the importance of rebiopsy. The clinical value of repeat rebiopsy in patients with NSCLC who are T790M-negative on a first rebiopsy remains unclear. In this study, we examined the status of the first rebiopsy and evaluated the frequency of repeat rebiopsy of T790M-negative tumors detected by the first rebiopsy. METHODS: We reviewed 144 patients with NSCLC with major EGFR mutations, but not T790M, who received first- or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), registered in the prospective, umbrella-type lung cancer patient registry (CS-Lung-003). RESULTS: Overall, 63 patients (44%) underwent the first rebiopsy. In the first rebiopsy, 51 (81%) and 12 (19%) of 63 underwent histological/cytological rebiopsy and liquid biopsy with the blood sampling, respectively. In the repeat rebiopsy, 23 (85%) and 4 (15%) of 27 underwent histological/cytological rebiopsy and liquid biopsy, respectively. The most frequently rebiopsied site was a pulmonary lesion (n = 24, 38.7%). Overall, 29 (46.0%) of 63 patients harbored the T790M mutation. Interestingly, a high detection rate of cancer cells did not necessarily indicate a high detection rate of the T790M mutation (p < 0.01). Among 34 patients with T790M-negative tumors confirmed on the first rebiopsy, 20 (58.8%) underwent repeat rebiopsies following interval therapy, revealing that seven (36.8%) had T790M-positive tumors. Osimertinib yielded median progression-free survival of 11.8 and 16.2 months in patients with the 790M mutation detected by the first rebiopsy and repeat rebiopsy, respectively. CONCLUSION: In our prospective cohort, the T790M mutation was detected in 46% of patients who underwent the first rebiopsy. Repeat rebiopsy may increase the ability to detect the T790M mutation positivity rate.

Acute eosinophilic pneumonia caused by nicotine-free vaping in an adolescent patient: A case report.

An 18-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with pneumonia 4 days after he initiated vaping. The patient did not show improvement after ceftriaxone and azithromycin treatment. The cell count of the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) revealed 64% eosinophils and 18% lymphocytes. Based on the BALF findings, the patient met the current diagnostic criteria and was diagnosed with vaping-induced acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP). AEP caused by nicotine-free vaping is rare in Japan. Thus, in cases of AEP, the patient's history of cigarette smoking as well as vaping should be considered.

Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter trial for the effects of a polyherbal remedy, Yokukansan (YiganSan), in smokers with depressive tendencies.

BACKGROUND: Smoking and depression are closely related and form a vicious cycle. Yokukansan (YiganSan) is a polyherbal remedy that has the effect of calming neuropsychiatric symptoms such as anger and irritation. To examine the efficacy of Yokukansan during smoking cessation (SC) therapy in smokers with depressive tendencies but without major depressive disorders requiring pharmacotherapy. METHODS: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group comparison trial was conducted between June 2016 and May 2020 at 12 centers of the National Hospital Organization, Japan. This trial targeted smokers who first visited the SC outpatient clinics, did not receive any pharmacological treatment at the psychiatric or psychosomatic department, and scored 39 or more on the self-rating depression scale (SDS). Participants (n = 198) were randomly assigned to either the Yokukansan or placebo groups. The trial drug was initiated with the start of the SC treatment and continued for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the high success rate of the SC treatment, and the secondary outcomes included changes in scores of the SDS and the Profile of Mood States (POMS) instrument. RESULTS: The success rate of the SC treatment was similar between the placebo (63%) and Yokukansan (67%) groups (P = .649). The SDS scores (placebo: mean difference [MD] = -3.5, 95% confidence interval [CI][-5.8, -1.2], d = 0.42; Yokukansan: MD = -4.6, 95%CI[-6.8, -2.3], d = 0.55), and the "tension-anxiety" POMS-subscale scores (placebo: MD = -1.6, 95%CI[-2.5, -0.7], d = 0.52; Yokukansan: MD = -1.6, 95%CI[-2.9, -0.3], d = 0.36) showed significant improvement in both groups after the SC treatment. However, "depression-dejection" improved in the Yokukansan group (MD = -1.9, 95%CI[-3.1, -0.7], d = 0.44) but not in the placebo group (MD = -0.1, 95%CI[-1.0, 0.7], d = 0.04). Significant improvement in "fatigue" was noted in the Yokukansan group (MD = -2.1, 95%CI[-3.4, -0.9], d = 0.47) but not in the placebo group (MD = -0.5, 95%CI[-1.8, 0.8], d = 0.11). The time × group interaction on the improvement in "depression-dejection" was significant (P = .019). CONCLUSIONS: Yokukansan does not increase the SC treatment's success rate but has additional positive effects on the psychological states due to the SC treatment in smokers with depressive tendencies but without apparent mental disorders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ID: UMIN000027036. Retrospectively registered at UMIN on April 18, 2017.

Prospective analysis of factors precluding the initiation of durvalumab from an interim analysis of a phase II trial of S-1 and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy followed by durvalumab for unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Japan (SAMURAI study).

Background: The standard of care for unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by durvalumab, based on the PACIFIC trial. Disease progression and pneumonitis were reported as the main reasons to preclude the initiation of durvalumab in multiple retrospective studies. However, the transition rate and the reasons for failure to proceed to consolidation therapy with durvalumab after CRT were not evaluated prospectively. Although phase II studies in Japan have shown high efficacy and tolerability of CRT with cisplatin + S-1 (SP), no prospective study using durvalumab after SP-based CRT has yet been reported. We therefore conducted a phase II study to verify the efficacy and safety of durvalumab following SP-based CRT. In this interim analysis, we report the transition rate and the reasons for its failure. Methods: In treatment-naïve LA-NSCLC, cisplatin (60 mg/m2, day 1) and S-1 (80-120 mg/body, days 1-14) were administered with two 4-week cycles with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (60 Gy) followed by durvalumab every 2 weeks for up to 12 months. The primary endpoint was 12 month progression-free survival rate. Results: Fifty-nine patients were enrolled, of whom 86.4% (51/59) proceeded to durvalumab. All of them initiated durvalumab within 42 days after CRT [median 18 days (range: 3-38)], including 27.5% (14/51) in <14 days. Common reasons for failure to proceed to durvalumab were disease progression (2/59, 3.4%) and adverse events (6/59, 10.2%). Among the latter cases, four resumed treatment and proceeded to durvalumab within 42 days on off-protocol. The objective response rate and the disease control rate were 62.7% and 93.2%, respectively. The incidences of ⩾grade 3 pneumonitis, febrile neutropenia, and esophagitis were 0%, 8.5%, and 3.4%, respectively. Conclusion: Regarding durvalumab after CRT, this interim analysis of the SAMURAI study clarified the high transition rate, early introduction, and reasons for failure to proceed to consolidation therapy, which were not determined in the PACIFIC trial. Trial registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs031190127, registered 1 November, 2019, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs031190127.