Comparative effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in improvement of fatty liver index in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: A retrospective nationwide claims database study in Japan.

AIM: To date, there are limited clinical studies and real-world evidence investigating whether sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are associated with improved hepatic steatosis. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of SGLT2i compared with that of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) in improving the fatty liver index (FLI) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included new users of SGLT2i or DPP4i with T2DM and MASLD from a large claims database (JMDC Claims Database). The primary outcome was the incidence of improvement of the FLI. Cox proportional hazard models, weighted using propensity scores for predicting the initiation of treatment, were fitted to estimate hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Time-course changes in the FLI values were also assessed. RESULTS: This study included 9127 SGLT2i and 12 286 DPP4i initiators. SGLT2i showed a higher incidence of improvement in the FLI (≥30%, ≥40% and ≥50% reduction from baseline FLI) compared with DPP4i, and the weighted hazard ratios were 1.27 (95% CI 1.18-1.38), 1.24 (95% CI 1.13-1.37) and 1.19 (95% CI 1.05-1.33), respectively. SGLT2i indicated a greater decreased in FLI values compared with DPP4i at up to 3 years of the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: SGLT2is use appeared to be associated with a greater improvement of the FLI than DPP4i use in patients with T2DM and MASLD. In the absence of direct head-to-head comparisons from clinical studies, our study, using real-world data, may support physicians' decision-making in clinical practice.

Potential benefits of immunomodulator use with vedolizumab for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab treatment with or without concomitant immunomodulator use in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Among enrolled patients in a phase 3 study conducted in Japan (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02039505), data from patients allocated to 300-mg intravenous vedolizumab for induction and maintenance phases were used for this exploratory analysis. Efficacy endpoints were clinical response, clinical remission, and mucosal healing at week 10 and clinical remission and mucosal healing at week 60, and disease worsening and treatment failure during the maintenance phase. RESULTS: At week 10, the differences in clinical response, clinical remission, and mucosal healing rates between the subgroups (those with concomitant immunomodulator use minus those without) were 0.7 (95% confidence interval: -14.3, 15.7), 3.3 (95% confidence interval: -8.5, 15.2), and 1.8 (95% confidence interval: -13.0, 16.5), respectively. At week 60, the differences in clinical remission and mucosal healing between the subgroups with and without concomitant immunomodulator use were 26.1 (95% confidence interval: -3.5, 55.6) and 29.9 (95% confidence interval: 1.4, 58.4), respectively. The proportions of patients without treatment failure at day 330 of the maintenance phase were 90.7% with concomitant immunomodulator use and 73.7% without. No marked differences in incidence of infections were observed between subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested the possibility that concomitant immunomodulator use may be beneficial to maintain the clinical efficacy of vedolizumab.

Week 2 Symptomatic Response with Vedolizumab as a Predictive Factor in Japanese Anti-TNFα-Naive Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: A post hoc Analysis of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To evaluate the onset of symptomatic response with vedolizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis in Japan. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive vedolizumab 300 mg or placebo at Weeks 0, 2, and 6. Mayo subscores were analyzed in patients with baseline stool frequency (SF) ≥1 and rectal bleeding (RB) ≥1. In patients with baseline SF ≥2 and RB ≥1, the proportion who achieved SF ≤1 and RB = 0 was determined. RESULTS: Patients were randomized to vedolizumab (n = 164) or placebo (n = 82). Decrease from baseline in mean SF subscore was greater with vedolizumab versus placebo from Week 2 (-6.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -16.2, 3.0), with a greater difference in anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α-naive patients (vedolizumab vs. placebo, -13.2%; 95% CI, -29.7, 3.3). Mean percentage decrease from baseline RB subscore was numerically greater with vedolizumab versus placebo from Week 6 in anti-TNFα-naive patients (-10.7%; 95% CI, -33.0, 11.5). More patients in the anti-TNFα-naive subgroup achieved SF ≤1 and RB = 0 with vedolizumab versus placebo at Week 2 (14.8%; 95% CI, 2.5, 27.0) and Week 6 (20.3%; 95% CI, 4.4, 36.2). Patients with SF ≤1 and RB = 0 at Week 2 had higher clinical response, clinical remission, and mucosal healing rates at Week 10 than those without. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that vedolizumab induces a rapid symptomatic response, particularly in anti-TNFα-naive patients, and suggest that early symptomatic improvement predicts treatment response at Week 10 (NCT02039505).

Efficacy and safety of a new vedolizumab subcutaneous formulation in Japanese patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: A subgroup analysis was conducted in Japanese patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) enrolled in the phase 3 VISIBLE 1 study, which evaluated the safety and efficacy of a new vedolizumab subcutaneous (SC) formulation. METHODS: Eligible patients received open-label infusions of vedolizumab 300 mg intravenous (IV) at weeks 0 and 2 in the induction phase. Patients with clinical response by complete Mayo score at week 6 entered the double-blind maintenance phase and were randomized to vedolizumab 108 mg SC every 2 weeks, placebo, or vedolizumab 300 mg IV every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was clinical remission (complete Mayo score ≤ 2 points; no individual subscore > 1 point) at week 52. RESULTS: Of 49 patients who entered the induction phase, 22 out of 49 patients (45%) had clinical response at week 6 and were randomized to vedolizumab 108 mg SC (n = 10), placebo (n = 10), or vedolizumab 300 mg IV (n = 2). At week 52, 4 out of 10 patients (40%) who received vedolizumab SC had clinical remission versus 2 out of 10 patients (20%) who received placebo (difference: 20% [95% confidence interval, -27.9 to 61.8]). Two patients (2/10, 20%) who received vedolizumab SC experienced an injection-site reaction versus none who received placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the efficacy of vedolizumab SC in a subgroup of Japanese patients with UC are similar with those in the overall VISIBLE 1 study population, and with those established with vedolizumab IV. The safety and tolerability of vedolizumab SC were generally similar to that established for vedolizumab IV. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02611830; EudraCT 2015-000480-14).

Effects of vedolizumab in Japanese patients with Crohn's disease: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trial with exploratory analyses.

BACKGROUND: Vedolizumab is a gut-selective humanized antibody that binds the α4ß7 integrin. We evaluated efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: In this Phase 3, double-blind study (NCT02038920), 157 patients were randomized to receive intravenous vedolizumab 300 mg (n = 79) or placebo (n = 78) at Weeks 0, 2, and 6 (induction phase). Patients with CD activity index (CDAI)-70 response at Week 10 were randomized to receive vedolizumab 300 mg (n = 12) or placebo (n = 12) at Week 14, then every 8 weeks until Week 54 (maintenance phase). Primary endpoints were ≥ 100-point reduction in CDAI (CDAI-100 response) at Week 10 for induction, and clinical remission (CR: CDAI ≤ 150) at Week 60 for maintenance. RESULTS: At Week 10, 26.6% of patients who received vedolizumab and 16.7% who received placebo achieved CDAI-100 response (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval (CI)] 1.80 [0.82-3.96]; p = 0.145). At Week 60, 41.7% of vedolizumab-treated patients and 16.7% of placebo-treated patients achieved CR (OR [95% CI] 3.57 [0.53-23.95]; p = 0.178). The incidence of adverse events was similar in both treatment groups in both induction and maintenance phases. In patients without prior anti-TNFα exposure or with inadequate response to anti-TNFα, vedolizumab showed improved outcomes over placebo in the induction phase. Age might be a possible predictive factor of CR for future research. CONCLUSION: Vedolizumab showed a numerically greater efficacy versus placebo as induction therapy, but the difference was not statistically significant. Vedolizumab also showed a numerically greater efficacy in maintenance therapy, and was well tolerated.

Correction: Vedolizumab in Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis: A Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212989.].

Vedolizumab in Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis: A Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Vedolizumab safety and efficacy have been established in many populations all over the world, but have never been studied in Japan. We report results from a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of vedolizumab in Japanese patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: Patients with moderate-to-severe UC were enrolled into Cohort 1 (double-blinded) or Cohort 2 (open-label) in the induction phase. Cohort 1 was randomized 2:1 to receive 300 mg vedolizumab or placebo, while Cohort 2 received vedolizumab 300 mg only, at Weeks 0, 2, and 6. Patients from Cohorts 1 and 2 showing a clinical response to vedolizumab at Week 10 were randomized 1:1 to receive vedolizumab or placebo (double-blinded) at Week 14 and then every 8 weeks up to Week 54 as the maintenance phase. The primary endpoint was clinical response at Week 10, for the induction phase, and clinical remission at Week 60, for the maintenance phase. RESULTS: A total of 292 patients were enrolled into the induction phase (246 in Cohort 1, 46 in Cohort 2); 83 patients achieved response to vedolizumab and were subsequently enrolled into the maintenance phase. Clinical response rates at Week 10 were 39.6% (65/164) and 32.9% (27/82) in the vedolizumab and placebo groups in Cohort 1, respectively (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.37, 95% CI 0.779-2.399; p = 0.2722). In the maintenance phase, clinical remission rate at Week 60 was significantly higher in the vedolizumab group, at 56.1% (23/41), versus 31.0% (13/42) for placebo (AOR = 2.88, 95% CI 1.168-7.108; p = 0.0210). Most adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity, and no deaths occurred during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Vedolizumab showed numerically greater efficacy compared with placebo as induction therapy, but the difference was not statistically significant. Vedolizumab was significantly superior to placebo as maintenance therapy in Japanese patients with UC. Vedolizumab has favourable safety and tolerability in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02039505.