Pathways to pulmonary hypertension in sickle cell disease: the search for prevention and early intervention.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) develops in a significant number of patients with sickle cell disease (SCD), resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. This review focuses on PH pathophysiology, risk stratification, and new recommendations for screening and treatment for patients with SCD. Areas covered: An extensive PubMed literature search was performed. While the pathophysiology of PH in SCD is yet to be fully deciphered, it is known that the etiology is multifactorial; hemolysis, hypercoagulability, hypoxemia, ischemic-reperfusion injury, oxidative stress, and genetic susceptibility all contribute in varying degrees to endothelial dysfunction. Hemolysis, in particular, seems to play a key role by inciting an imbalance in the regulatory axis of nitric oxide and arginine metabolism. Systematic risk stratification starting in childhood based on clinical features and biomarkers that enable early detection is necessary. Multi-faceted, targeted interventions, before irreversible vasculopathy develops, will allow for improved patient outcomes and life expectancy. Expert commentary: Despite progress in our understanding of PH in SCD, clinically proven therapies remain elusive and additional controlled clinical trials are needed. Prevention of disease starts in childhood, a critical window for intervention. Given the complex and multifactorial nature of SCD, patients will ultimately benefit from combination therapies that simultaneously targets multiple mechanisms.

Airway hyperreactivity is frequent in non-asthmatic children with sickle cell disease.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is associated with poorer outcomes in sickle cell disease (SCD). Whether AHR can exist in SCD as a distinct entity, separate and independent of asthma, is unknown. AIMS: Our goal was to elucidate the prevalence of AHR, as measured by a methacholine challenge test (MCT), in children with SCD who did not have concomitant asthma or any recent history of acute chest syndrome (ACS). To determine if AHR was associated with asthma-like symptoms, we compared the results of the MCT to a validated asthma questionnaire. We also examined if a correlation between AHR and inflammatory markers exists. METHODS: AHR was identified with a positive MCT defined as a provocation concentration (PC20 ) < 4 mg/ml. The children and/or their parents completed the ISAAC (International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Children) questionnaire. We obtained blood, urine, and exhaled breath condensate samples. We measured cysteinyl leukotriene levels in urine and exhaled breath condensate via enzyme immunoassay. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of forty children (72.5%) had a positive MCT. Nine (31.0%) also reported asthma-like symptoms on questionnaire. Inflammatory markers did not correlate with AHR. Among MCT positive subjects, those on hydroxyurea had significantly less severe AHR as quantified by PC20 (P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: In children with SCD, there is a high prevalence of AHR that is not associated with asthma-like symptoms. AHR may be a distinct entity in children with SCD, existing in the absence of concomitant asthma. Hydroxyurea therapy might lessen the severity of AHR in affected individuals. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016; 51:950-957. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.