Randomized Trial of a Palliative Care Intervention to Improve End-of-Life Care Discussions in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Studies show that early, integrated palliative care (PC) improves quality of life (QoL) and end-of-life (EoL) care for patients with poor-prognosis cancers. However, the optimal strategy for delivering PC for those with advanced cancers who have longer disease trajectories, such as metastatic breast cancer (MBC), remains unknown. We tested the effect of a PC intervention on the documentation of EoL care discussions, patient-reported outcomes, and hospice utilization in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with MBC and clinical indicators of poor prognosis (n=120) were randomly assigned to receive an outpatient PC intervention (n=61) or usual care (n=59) between May 2, 2016, and December 26, 2018, at an academic cancer center. The intervention entailed 5 structured PC visits focusing on symptom management, coping, prognostic awareness, decision-making, and EoL planning. The primary outcome was documentation of EoL care discussions in the electronic health record (EHR). Secondary outcomes included patient-report of discussions with clinicians about EoL care, QoL, and mood symptoms at 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks after baseline and hospice utilization. RESULTS: The rate of EoL care discussions documented in the EHR was higher among intervention patients versus those receiving usual care (67.2% vs 40.7%; P=.006), including a higher completion rate of a Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment form (39.3% vs 13.6%; P=.002). Intervention patients were also more likely to report discussing their EoL care wishes with their doctor (odds ratio [OR], 3.10; 95% CI, 1.21-7.94; P=.019) and to receive hospice services (OR, 4.03; 95% CI, 1.10-14.73; P=.035) compared with usual care patients. Study groups did not differ in patient-reported QoL or mood symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: This PC intervention significantly improved rates of discussion and documentation regarding EoL care and delivery of hospice services among patients with MBC, demonstrating that PC can be tailored to address the supportive care needs of patients with longer disease trajectories. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02730858.

Predictors of Disruptions in Breast Cancer Care for Individuals with Schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Patients with schizophrenia experience markedly increased breast cancer mortality, yet reasons for this disparity are poorly understood. We sought to characterize disruptions in breast cancer care for patients with schizophrenia and identify modifiable predictors of those disruptions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a medical record review of 95 patients with schizophrenia and breast cancer treated at an academic cancer center between 1993 and 2015. We defined cancer care disruptions as processes that interfere with guideline-concordant cancer care, including delays to diagnosis or treatment, deviations from stage-appropriate treatment, and interruptions in treatment. We hypothesized that lack of psychiatric treatment at cancer diagnosis would be associated with care disruptions. RESULTS: Half of patients with schizophrenia experienced at least one breast cancer care disruption. Deviations in stage-appropriate treatment were associated with breast cancer recurrence at 5 years (p = .045). Patients without a documented psychiatrist experienced more delays (p = .016), without documented antipsychotic medication experienced more deviations (p = .007), and with psychiatric hospitalizations after cancer diagnosis experienced more interruptions (p < .0001). Independent of stage, age, and documented primary care physician, lack of documented antipsychotic medication (odds ratio [OR] = 4.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.90, 12.98) and psychiatric care (OR = 4.56, 95% CI = 1.37, 15.15) predicted cancer care disruptions. CONCLUSION: Disruptions in breast cancer care are common for patients with schizophrenia and are associated with adverse outcomes, including cancer recurrence. Access to psychiatric treatment at cancer diagnosis may protect against critical disruptions in cancer care for this underserved population. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Disruptions in breast cancer care are common for patients with schizophrenia, yet access to mental health treatment is rarely integrated into cancer care. When oncologists documented a treating psychiatrist and antipsychotic medication, patients had fewer disruptions in breast cancer care after adjusting for age, cancer stage, and access to primary care. Addressing psychiatric comorbidity at breast cancer diagnosis may increase the likelihood that patients with schizophrenia receive timely, stage-appropriate cancer treatment. Comanagement of schizophrenia and breast cancer at cancer diagnosis may be one key strategy to decrease inequities in cancer treatment and improve cancer survival in this underserved population.

Retrospective evaluation of palliative care and hospice utilization in hospitalized patients with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalizations in patients with metastatic cancer occur commonly at the end of life but have not been well-described in individuals with metastatic breast cancer. AIM: To describe the reasons for admission and frequency of palliative care and hospice utilization in hospitalized patients with metastatic breast cancer. DESIGN: This was a retrospective chart review of patients who had their first hospitalization with a diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2010. To standardize follow-up time, we collected data for 3 years post the index hospitalization. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: We identified 123 consecutive patients who were hospitalized for the first time with a diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer at a single, tertiary care center. RESULTS: Uncontrolled symptoms accounted for half (50%, 62/123) of index admissions. The majority of patients died during the follow-up period (76%, 94/123), and the median time from index admission to death was 6 months (range: 0-34 months). Approximately half (53%, 50/94) died in the hospital or within 14 days of last hospital discharge, and less than one-third (29%, 27/94) were referred to hospice after their last hospitalization. The inpatient palliative care team evaluated 57% (54/94) of those who died at least once during an admission, but only 17% (16/94) of patients attended an outpatient palliative care appointment. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized patients with metastatic breast cancer are commonly admitted for uncontrolled symptoms and have a poor prognosis. However, only a minority receive outpatient palliative care or are referred to hospice during their last hospitalization prior to death.

Quality of life and mood of patients and family caregivers during hospitalization for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a study to investigate the impact of hospitalization for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) on the quality of life (QOL) and mood of patients and family caregivers (FC). METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal study of patients who were hospitalized for HCT and their FC. We assessed QOL (using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplantation) and mood (using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) at baseline (6 days before HCT), day +1, and day +8 of HCT. We administered the Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey Short Form-36 to examine FC QOL (Physical Component Scale and Mental Component Scale). To identify predictors of changes in QOL, we used multivariable linear mixed models. RESULTS: We enrolled 97% of eligible patients undergoing autologous (30 patients), myeloablative (30 patients), or reduced intensity (30 patients) allogeneic HCT. Patients' QOL markedly declined (mean Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplantation score, 109.6 to 96.0; P<.0001) throughout hospitalization. The percentage of patients with depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression score of >7) more than doubled from baseline to day +8 (15.6% to 37.8%; P<.0001), whereas the percentage of patients with anxiety remained stable (22.2%; P = .8). These results remained consistent when data were stratified by HCT type. Baseline depression (ß, -2.24; F, 42.2 [P<.0001]) and anxiety (ß, -0.63; F, 4.4 [P =.03]) were found to independently predict worse QOL throughout hospitalization. FC QOL declined during the patient's hospitalization (physical component scale: 83.1 to 79.6 [P =.03] and mental component scale: 71.6 to 67.4 [P =.04]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing HCT reported a steep deterioration in QOL and substantially worsening depression during hospitalization. Baseline anxiety and depression predicted worse QOL during hospitalization, underscoring the importance of assessing pre-HCT psychiatric morbidity.

Framework for Considering Primary and Subspecialty Palliative Care and Guiding Serious Illness Communication for Patients With Breast Cancer.

Palliative care is a comprehensive approach aimed at enhancing the quality of life of patients and their families living with serious illnesses such as breast cancer. This approach includes assessing and managing pain and other physical symptoms, attending to psychosocial and spiritual aspects of care, fostering effective communication and decision making, and providing support in coordinating care that upholds a person's values and preferences from the time of diagnosis throughout the illness trajectory. This type of care can be provided by palliative care specialists (ideally an interprofessional team) working alongside the oncology team, referred to as subspecialty palliative care. Conversely, the fundamental aspects of this approach, which we sometimes call primary palliative care, are provided by all clinicians caring for patients with breast cancer. Given that access to subspecialty palliative care can vary globally, especially in rural and resource-constrained settings, it is imperative for all oncology clinicians to receive training in the core components of palliative care. This study aims to provide a basic framework to recognize what the core primary palliative care skills are in routine oncology practice, to delineate basic serious illness communication strategies, and to introduce when to consider the integration of subspecialty palliative care into the care of patients with breast cancer.

Qualitative Study of Patients' and Caregivers' Perceptions and Information Preferences About Hospice.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to assess perceptions about hospice among patients with metastatic cancer and their caregivers (i.e., family and/or friends). DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 adult patients with a prognosis ≤12 months and 7 of their caregivers. The interviews focused on perceptions, knowledge, and information preferences about hospice. Two raters coded interviews independently (κ > 0.85). We used a framework approach for data analysis. RESULTS: Participants showed variable gaps in understanding about hospice, including who would benefit from hospice care and the extent of services provided. They all perceived that hospice involves a psychological transition to accepting imminent death and often referred to hospice from a relatively cognitive distance, using hypothetical scenarios of others for whom hospice would be more relevant. Participants' attitudes about hospice reflected their concerns about suffering, loss of dignity, and death, as well as their perceived understanding of hospice services. These attitudes along with the psychological barriers to projecting a need for hospice and lack of knowledge were all perceived as important barriers to hospice utilization. All participants felt they needed more information about hospice, yet they were mixed regarding the optimal timing of this information. CONCLUSIONS: Study participants had misunderstandings about hospice and perceived end-of-life (EOL) concerns such as fear of suffering, loss of dignity, and death, as well as lack of knowledge as the main barriers to hospice utilization. Interventions are needed to educate patients and their families about hospice and to address their EOL concerns.

Quality of Life, Mood, and Prognostic Understanding in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women in the United States, few studies focus on the supportive care needs of patients living with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). OBJECTIVE: We studied quality of life (QOL), depression, anxiety, and prognostic understanding of patients with MBC. DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 140 patients with MBC, stratified by receipt of endocrine therapy or chemotherapy. MEASUREMENTS: We evaluated anxiety and depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). We assessed QOL using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B), specifically measuring the FACT-B Trial Outcome Index (TOI), which includes physical and functional well-being and breast cancer-specific symptoms. Higher FACT-B TOI scores represent better QOL. We used a 12-item questionnaire to assess patients' perceptions of their prognosis and goals of therapy. RESULTS: Compared to those taking endocrine therapy (n = 40), patients receiving chemotherapy (n = 100) reported lower scores on the FACT-B TOI (66.1 versus 72.5, p < 0.01) and more depression symptoms (HADS-D >7; 22% versus 7.5%, p = 0.03). Higher scores on the FACT-B TOI were associated with lower depression (ß, -0.16; p < 0.01) and anxiety (ß, -0.11; p < 0.01), and patients who reported frequent prognostic conversations with their oncologists had less depression (ß, -1.28; p < 0.01). Thirty-nine percent (54/140) reported that their cancer was likely curable. CONCLUSION: Patients with MBC, particularly those treated with chemotherapy, may benefit from interventions to address their physical, functional, and breast cancer-related symptoms. Many do not report accurate prognostic understanding, and more frequent prognostic conversations might address this information gap.

Dyspnea and panic among patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer.

CONTEXT: Among patients with lung cancer, dyspnea is associated with psychological distress, fatigue, and poor coping. Respiratory symptoms are also a common trigger for panic attacks in the general population. Minimal research has addressed the prevalence of panic disorder or the association of dyspnea with the risk of panic disorder in lung cancer. OBJECTIVES: We explored the frequency of panic disorder symptoms and the association of dyspnea with the risk of panic disorder symptoms among patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: During 2006-2010, consecutive patients presenting for initial consultation at a thoracic oncology clinic completed a survey of current symptoms, including dyspnea and panic disorder symptoms. We evaluated the frequency of panic disorder symptoms. Logistic regression was used to test the association of dyspnea with the risk of panic disorder symptoms, adjusting for age, gender, disease stage, performance status, and major depression symptoms. RESULTS: Among 624 patients (mean age=63.7; standard deviation=12.1; 52.6% female), 48.1% reported that breathing was at least somewhat difficult and 11.2% endorsed panic disorder symptoms. Dyspnea was independently associated with higher risk of panic disorder symptoms (odds ratio=2.19, 95% confidence interval=1.11-4.31, P=0.02). Younger age and major depression symptoms also were associated with higher risk (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Almost half of the patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer reported dyspnea, and patients with dyspnea were more than twice as likely to endorse panic disorder symptoms relative to patients without dyspnea. Results highlight the need to differentiate panic disorder symptoms among patients who report dyspnea, particularly those who are younger or experiencing major depression symptoms.