A Qualitative Exploration of the Use of Service Dogs in Veterans with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and Traumatic Brain Injury.

Objective: This qualitative research was conducted to add to the body of knowledge that supports the benefits of service dogs (SDs), as a tertiary treatment modality, to veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and/or traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: This grounded theory research design utilized open-ended, semi-structured interviews with veterans (n = 10) who were using SDs as a treatment modality for PTSD and/or TBI. Transcripts were analyzed using NVivo qualitative software until data saturation was achieved. Results: Results from the data analysis identified 4 major themes with concurrent subthemes. The most prominent themes were functional status, impact of a SD, recognition of symptoms of PTSD and/or TBI by the SD, and barriers and challenges to the acquisition of a SD. Participants reported that the SD increased socialization and was a positive adjunct to treatment modalities for PTSD and/or TBI. Conclusions: Our study highlights the benefits of using a SD as a tertiary treatment for PTSD and/or TBI in veterans. Veterans in our study articulated the benefits of using a SD as a tertiary treatment option, and the need to make this a standard treatment option for all veterans who suffer from PTSD and/or TBI.

The measurement of patient attitudes regarding prenatal and preconception genetic carrier screening and translational behavioral medicine: an integrative review.

Measurement of recessive carrier screening attitudes related to conception and pregnancy is necessary to determine current acceptance, and whether behavioral intervention strategies are needed in clinical practice. To evaluate quantitative survey instruments to measure patient attitudes regarding genetic carrier testing prior to conception and pregnancy databases examining patient attitudes regarding genetic screening prior to conception and pregnancy from 2003-2013 were searched yielding 344 articles; eight studies with eight instruments met criteria for inclusion. Data abstraction on theoretical framework, subjects, instrument description, scoring, method of measurement, reliability, validity, feasibility, level of evidence, and outcomes was completed. Reliability information was provided in five studies with an internal consistency of Cronbach's α >0.70. Information pertaining to validity was presented in three studies and included construct validity via factor analysis. Despite limited psychometric information, these questionnaires are self-administered and can be briefly completed, making them a feasible method of evaluation.

Public Perceptions of Recessive Carrier Testing in the Preconception and Prenatal Periods.

OBJECTIVE: To explore public perceptions of preconception and prenatal recessive carrier testing. DESIGN: Qualitative, descriptive. SETTING: Chat rooms located in four websites targeted to those who are pregnant or planning a pregnancy. PARTICIPANTS: Anonymous comments (N = 1925) in online chat rooms. METHODS: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Analytic validity, Clinical validity, Clinical utility, Ethical, legal, social implications Model Process (ACCE) for evaluating a genetic test guided this deductive-inductive content analysis. RESULTS: Participant perceptions of the clinical utility of recessive carrier screening with universal carrier panels are multidimensional. Data analysis revealed four a priori deductive themes present in the data. Secondary inductive analysis produced 20 themes, which exceeded the scope of the CDC's ACCE Model Process for assessing the clinical utility of a genetic test. CONCLUSION: Participant perceptions of carrier testing are important to consider in the clinical utility of carrier testing. Participant perceptions of clinical utility vary from those of the CDC's ACCE Model Process and should be considered in evaluation of the clinical utility of recessive carrier testing in the preconception and prenatal populations.