Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(9): e367-e372, 2021 05 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32772069

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome resulting from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are unclear. In this study, we evaluated the association between use of methylprednisolone and key clinical outcomes. METHODS: Clinical outcomes associated with the use of methylprednisolone were assessed in an unmatched, case-control study; a subset of patients also underwent propensity-score matching. Patients were admitted between 1 March and 12 April, 2020. The primary outcome was ventilator-free days by 28 days after admission. Secondary outcomes included extubation, mortality, discharge, positive cultures, and hyperglycemia. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients met inclusion criteria. Propensity matching yielded a cohort of 42 well-matched pairs. Groups were similar except for hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin use, which were more common in patients who did not receive methylprednisolone. Mean ventilator-free days were significantly higher in patients treated with methylprednisolone (6.21 ±â€…7.45 vs 3.14 ±â€…6.22; P = .044). The probability of extubation was also increased in patients receiving methylprednisolone (45% vs 21%; P = .021), and there were no significant differences in mortality (19% vs 36%; P = .087). In a multivariable linear regression analysis, only methylprednisolone use was associated with a higher number of ventilator-free days (P = .045). The incidence of positive cultures and hyperglycemia were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Methylprednisolone was associated with increased ventilator-free days and higher probability of extubation in a propensity-score matched cohort. Randomized, controlled studies are needed to further define methylprednisolone use in patients with COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Metilprednisolona , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Metilprednisolona/uso terapéutico , Respiración Artificial , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33495224

RESUMEN

The role of procalcitonin in identifying community-associated bacterial infections among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 is not yet established. In 2,443 patients of whom 148 had bacterial coinfections, mean procalcitonin levels were significantly higher with any bacterial infection (13.16 ± 51.19 ng/ml; P = 0.0091) and with bacteremia (34.25 ± 85.01 ng/ml; P = 0.0125) than without infection (2.00 ± 15.26 ng/ml). Procalcitonin (cutoff, 0.25 or 0.50 ng/ml) did not reliably identify bacterial coinfections but may be useful in excluding bacterial infection.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , COVID-19/microbiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Polipéptido alfa Relacionado con Calcitonina/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/virología , Coinfección/tratamiento farmacológico , Coinfección/microbiología , Coinfección/virología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
3.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 76(2): 380-384, 2021 01 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33202023

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with COVID-19 may be at increased risk for secondary bacterial infections with MDR pathogens, including carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE). OBJECTIVES: We sought to rapidly investigate the clinical characteristics, population structure and mechanisms of resistance of CPE causing secondary infections in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: We retrospectively identified CPE clinical isolates collected from patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March and April 2020 at our medical centre in New York City. Available isolates underwent nanopore sequencing for rapid genotyping, antibiotic resistance gene detection and phylogenetic analysis. RESULTS: We identified 31 CPE isolates from 13 patients, including 27 Klebsiella pneumoniae and 4 Enterobacter cloacae complex isolates. Most patients (11/13) had a positive respiratory culture and 7/13 developed bacteraemia; treatment failure was common. Twenty isolates were available for WGS. Most K. pneumoniae (16/17) belonged to ST258 and encoded KPC (15 KPC-2; 1 KPC-3); one ST70 isolate encoded KPC-2. E. cloacae isolates belonged to ST270 and encoded NDM-1. Nanopore sequencing enabled identification of at least four distinct ST258 lineages in COVID-19 patients, which were validated by Illumina sequencing data. CONCLUSIONS: While CPE prevalence has declined substantially in New York City in recent years, increased detection in patients with COVID-19 may signal a re-emergence of these highly resistant pathogens in the wake of the global pandemic. Increased surveillance and antimicrobial stewardship efforts, as well as identification of optimal treatment approaches for CPE, will be needed to mitigate their future impact.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/microbiología , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Anciano , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/enzimología , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/genética , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/complicaciones , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiología , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Secuenciación de Nanoporos , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Filogenia , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , beta-Lactamasas/genética , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19
5.
Ethn Dis ; 33(1): 1-8, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38846265

RESUMEN

Objective: To compare clinical characteristics and examine in-hospital length of stay (LOS) differences for COVID-19 patients who received remdesivir, by race or ethnicity. Design: Retrospective descriptive analysis comparing cumulative LOS as a proxy of recovery time. Setting: A large academic medical center serving a minoritized community in Northern Manhattan, New York City. Participants: Inpatients (N=1024) who received remdesivir from March 30, 2020-April 20, 2021. Methods: We conducted descriptive analyses among patients who received remdesivir. Patients were described by proxies of social determinants of health (SDOH): race and ethnicity, residence, insurance coverage, and clinical characteristics. We calculated median hospital LOS as the cumulative incidence of hospitalized patients who were discharged alive, and tested differences between groups by using the Gray test. Patients who died or were discharged to hospice were censored at 29 days. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was hospital LOS. The secondary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Results: Median LOS was 11.9 days (95% CI, 10.8-13.2) overall, with Black patients having the shortest (10.0 days, 95% CI, 8.0-13.2) and Asian patients having the longest (16.2 days, 95% CI, 8.3-27.2) LOS. A total of 214 patients (21%) died or were discharged to hospice, ranging from 16.5% to 23.7% of patients who identified as Black and Other (multiracial, biracial, declined), respectively. Conclusions: COVID-19 has disproportionately burdened communities of color. We observed no difference in median LOS between racial or ethnic groups, which supports the notion that the heterogeneous effect of remdesivir in the literature may be explained in part by underrecruitment or participation of Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients in clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Adenosina Monofosfato , Alanina , Antivirales , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Tiempo de Internación , Humanos , Ciudad de Nueva York , Femenino , Masculino , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Alanina/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Adenosina Monofosfato/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/etnología , COVID-19/etnología , COVID-19/mortalidad , SARS-CoV-2 , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Transplantation ; 105(7): 1445-1448, 2021 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33606483

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal duration of transmission-based precautions among immunocompromised patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is unknown. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with solid organ transplant with positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction result from nasopharyngeal specimens admitted to the hospital between March 13, 2020 and May 15, 2020. RESULTS: Twenty-one percent of solid organ transplant recipients with positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction detected ≥20 d after symptom onset (or after first positive test among asymptomatic individuals) had a low cycle threshold (ie, high viral load). The majority of these patients were asymptomatic or symptomatically improved. CONCLUSIONS: Solid organ transplant recipients may have prolonged high viral burden of SARS-CoV-2. Further data are needed to understand whether cycle threshold data can help inform strategies for prevention of healthcare-associated transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and for appropriate discontinuation of transmission-based precautions.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de COVID-19 , COVID-19/virología , Trasplante de Órganos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/virología , Carga Viral , Adulto , Anciano , Infecciones Asintomáticas , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/transmisión , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
BMJ Open ; 11(6): e049488, 2021 06 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34083350

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To characterise the long-term outcomes of patients with COVID-19 admitted to a large New York City medical centre at 3 and 6 months after hospitalisation and describe their healthcare usage, symptoms, morbidity and mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort through manual chart review of the electronic medical record. SETTING: NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, a quaternary care academic medical centre in New York City. PARTICIPANTS: The first 1190 consecutive patients with symptoms of COVID-19 who presented to the hospital for care between 1 March and 8 April 2020 and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on reverse transcriptase PCR assay. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Type and frequency of follow-up encounters, self-reported symptoms, morbidity and mortality at 3 and 6 months after presentation, respectively; patient disposition information prior to admission, at discharge, and at 3 and 6 months after hospital presentation. RESULTS: Of the 1190 reviewed patients, 929 survived their initial hospitalisation and 261 died. Among survivors, 570 had follow-up encounters (488 at 3 months and 364 at 6 months). An additional 33 patients died in the follow-up period. In the first 3 months after admission, most encounters were telehealth visits (59%). Cardiopulmonary symptoms (35.7% and 28%), especially dyspnoea (22.1% and 15.9%), were the most common reported symptoms at 3-month and 6-month encounters, respectively. Additionally, a large number of patients reported generalised (26.4%) or neuropsychiatric (24.2%) symptoms 6 months after hospitalisation. Patients with severe COVID-19 were more likely to have reduced mobility, reduced independence or a new dialysis requirement in the 6 months after hospitalisation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients hospitalised with SARS-CoV-2 infection reported persistent symptoms up to 6 months after diagnosis. These results highlight the long-term morbidity of COVID-19 and its burden on patients and healthcare resources.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Hospitalización , Humanos , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
8.
J Clin Med ; 10(16)2021 Aug 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34441819

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The progression of clinical manifestations in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) highlights the need to account for symptom duration at the time of hospital presentation in decision-making algorithms. METHODS: We performed a nested case-control analysis of 4103 adult patients with COVID-19 and at least 28 days of follow-up who presented to a New York City medical center. Multivariable logistic regression and classification and regression tree (CART) analysis were used to identify predictors of poor outcome. RESULTS: Patients presenting to the hospital earlier in their disease course were older, had more comorbidities, and a greater proportion decompensated (<4 days, 41%; 4-8 days, 31%; >8 days, 26%). The first recorded oxygen delivery method was the most important predictor of decompensation overall in CART analysis. In patients with symptoms for <4, 4-8, and >8 days, requiring at least non-rebreather, age ≥ 63 years, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio ≥ 5.1; requiring at least non-rebreather, IL-6 ≥ 24.7 pg/mL, and D-dimer ≥ 2.4 µg/mL; and IL-6 ≥ 64.3 pg/mL, requiring non-rebreather, and CRP ≥ 152.5 mg/mL in predictive models were independently associated with poor outcome, respectively. CONCLUSION: Symptom duration in tandem with initial clinical and laboratory markers can be used to identify patients with COVID-19 at increased risk for poor outcomes.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA