Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 71
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(9): 5483-5486, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39003374

RESUMEN

This is an executive summary of the most recent American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) guidelines on use of partial breast irradiation in early-stage breast cancer.In the conscientious pursuit of "right-sizing" the management of patients with early-stage breast cancer, there has been an emphasis on judicious de-escalation of therapy. A component of this paradigm shift is partial breast irradiation (PBI), an approach characterized by targeted radiation therapy (RT) to lumpectomy cavity margins rather than to the whole breast (i.e., whole breast irradiation [WBI]) after breast conservation surgery (BCS). The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) recently completed a revision of its evidence-based guidelines for the application of PBI.1To accomplish this, recent PBI data were reviewed by panel members, including representatives of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), in collaboration with the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO), which provided representatives and peer reviewers. The guideline was approved by the ASTRO Board of Directors and endorsed by the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology, European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, and the Society of Surgical Oncology.The recommendations focused on indications for PBI as an alternative to WBI and technical considerations specific to PBI. This editorial provides a summary and comments on the updated ASTRO PBI guidelines, offering insights into the implications of these findings for clinical practice and multidisciplinary decision-making while underscoring technical considerations for optimal incorporation of PBI into patient care.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Oncología por Radiación/normas , Radioterapia Adyuvante/normas , Radioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Sociedades Médicas , Oncología Quirúrgica/normas
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(4): 2212-2223, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38261126

RESUMEN

Rates of contralateral mastectomy (CM) among patients with unilateral breast cancer have been increasing in the United States. In this Society of Surgical Oncology position statement, we review the literature addressing the indications, risks, and benefits of CM since the society's 2017 statement. We held a virtual meeting to outline key topics and then conducted a literature search using PubMed to identify relevant articles. We reviewed the articles and made recommendations based on group consensus. Patients consider CM for many reasons, including concerns regarding the risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC), desire for improved cosmesis and symmetry, and preferences to avoid ongoing screening, whereas surgeons primarily consider CBC risk when making a recommendation for CM. For patients with a high risk of CBC, CM reduces the risk of new breast cancer, however it is not known to convey an overall survival benefit. Studies evaluating patient satisfaction with CM and reconstruction have yielded mixed results. Imaging with mammography within 12 months before CM is recommended, but routine preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging is not; there is also no evidence to support routine postmastectomy imaging surveillance. Because the likelihood of identifying an occult malignancy during CM is low, routine sentinel lymph node surgery is not recommended. Data on the rates of postoperative complications are conflicting, and such complications may not be directly related to CM. Adjuvant therapy delays due to complications have not been reported. Surgeons can reduce CM rates by encouraging shared decision making and informed discussions incorporating patient preferences.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Oncología Quirúrgica , Neoplasias de Mama Unilaterales , Humanos , Femenino , Mastectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de Mama Unilaterales/cirugía , Oncología Médica
3.
J Surg Res ; 302: 585-592, 2024 Aug 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39181025

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Radiation therapy (RT) omission is acceptable in older women with early-stage estrogen receptor + breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET). However, RT rates in this population remain high, causing concern for overtreatment. Conversely, patients who omit RT and do not complete a course of AET are at risk of undertreatment. In the Pre-Operative Window of Endocrine Therapy to Inform Radiation Therapy Decisions (POWER) trial, participants receive 90 days of preoperative endocrine therapy to assess tolerance before deciding about RT. This study aimed to determine the rates of undertreatment and overtreatment institutionally and among POWER trial participants. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from medical records of women aged ≥ 65 years diagnosed with invasive, estrogen receptor +/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- breast cancer, ≤ 3 cm, who had BCS between 2012 and 2022. Patients were categorized as undertreated (BCS alone), overtreated (BCS + RT + AET), or appropriately treated (BCS + RT or BCS + AET). RESULTS: The cohort included 478 patients, of whom 62 (12.97%) were undertreated, 202 (42.26%) were overtreated, and 214 (44.77%) were appropriately treated. Appropriately treated patients were more likely to be aged 70-79 years (P < 0.0001) and have high health literacy (P = 0.0003). Of the 37 patients (7.71%) in the POWER trial, more were appropriately treated than patients not in the POWER trial (81.1% versus 44.8%) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite long-standing guideline changes, RT utilization remains high. This study highlights how a novel patient-centered approach to guide adjuvant therapy decisions may increase the number of appropriately treated patients.

4.
J Surg Res ; 301: 499-503, 2024 Jul 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39042978

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Health literacy (HL) is a patient's capacity to understand health information. Low HL is associated with worse cancer outcomes and adherence to treatment regimens. This study aimed to test physicians' ability to predict their patients' HL after an initial consultation to determine if routine HL screening is valuable. METHODS: From February 2023 through June 2023, patients seen at an academic breast clinic completed a validated, self-reported HL assessment. Surgical and medical oncologists estimated their patients' HL by answering the same HL questionnaire based on their perception of the patient visit. Patient and physician scores were compared using an intraclass correlation coefficient. Linear regression was used to evaluate associations between physicians' ability to predict HL and other variables. RESULTS: The cohort included 210 patient HL scores with corresponding physician scores for each. Most patients (75.7%) had adequate HL. There was moderate agreement between the patient and physician HL scores (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.677, P < 0.01), meaning physicians could somewhat predict their patient's HL. Physicians were worse at predicting HL when patients had low HL. There was no difference in physicians' ability to predict HL based on patient age (P = 0.09) or race (P = 0.29). Additionally, we found no difference in the ability to predict HL based on the physician's specialty (P = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: After an initial consultation, physicians cannot accurately predict patient HL, particularly in patients with lower HL. Given the impact of low HL on a patient's ability to make treatment decisions and adhere to treatment plans, using a validated tool to measure HL is necessary.

5.
J Surg Res ; 298: 277-290, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38636184

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Despite national guidelines against contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) in low- to moderate-risk breast cancer, CPM use continues to rise. Breast reconstruction improves health-related quality of life and satisfaction among women undergoing mastectomy. Given the lack of data regarding factors associated with reconstruction after CPM and the known benefits of reconstruction, we sought to investigate whether disparities exist in receipt of reconstruction after CPM. METHODS: The 2004-2017 National Cancer Database was queried to identify women diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent unilateral mastectomy with CPM. Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent planned reconstruction at any timepoint and those who did not. A secondary analysis comparing types of reconstruction (tissue, implant, combined) was conducted. Patient, tumor, and demographic characteristics were analyzed using chi-square test and odds ratios were calculated using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: The cohort included 1,73,249 women: 95,818 (55.3%) underwent reconstruction and 77,431 (45.7%) did not. Both the rate CPM and the proportion of women undergoing reconstruction after CPM increased between 2004 and 2017. Of the women who had reconstruction, 40,840 (51.7%) received implants, 29,807 (37.7%) had tissue, and 8352 (10.6%) had combined reconstruction. After adjusted analysis, factors associated with reconstruction were young age, Hispanic ethnicity, private insurance, and living in an area with the highest education and median income (P < 0.01). Patients who underwent reconstruction were less likely to have radiation (P < 0.01) and chemotherapy (P < 0.01), more likely to have stage I disease (P < 0.01), and to be treated at an integrated cancer center (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction after CPM is disproportionately received by younger women, Hispanics, those with private insurance, and higher socioeconomic status and education. While the rate of reconstruction after CPM is increasing, there remain significant disparities. Conscious efforts must be made to eliminate these disparities, especially given the known benefits of reconstruction after mastectomy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Mamoplastia , Mastectomía Profiláctica , Humanos , Femenino , Mastectomía Profiláctica/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mamoplastia/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
6.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 30(10): 6034-6040, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37454014

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Pre-Operative Window of Endocrine Therapy to Inform Radiation Therapy Decisions (POWER, NCT04272801) trial aims to determine whether 3 months of preoperative endocrine therapy (pre-ET) informs adjuvant radiation therapy decisions among older women with early stage, ER-positive breast cancer. We propose the POWER Pathologic Assessment and Ki-67 (POWER-PAK) scoring system to characterize the histologic effects of pre-ET. METHODS: Histologic evaluation was performed on core biopsy and lumpectomy specimens from 37 POWER trial participants who completed pre-ET and surgery. The POWER-PAK score consists of tumor regression, decrease in Ki-67 expression, and ER expression, each ranging from 0 to 2. Scores were aggregated to create the POWER-PAK score with a range from 0 to 6. Participants with no residual tumor were labelled 6-NRT. RESULTS: ER expression did not decrease after pre-ET. Ki-67 decreased from 13% in biopsy specimens to 5% in the lumpectomy specimens (p < 0.001). Cellularity decreased from 40% to 23% (p < 0.001). There was heterogeneity of POWER-PAK scores ranging from 2 to 6-NRT: score of 2, n = 2 (5.4%); 4, n = 8 (21.6%); 5, n = 4 (10.8%); 6, n = 16 (43.2%); and 6-NRT, n = 7 (18.9%). Participants with a score ≥ 5 were more likely to have smaller tumors after pre-ET compared with those with a score < 5 (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The tumor responses following treatment with pre-ET are heterogenous. We propose that the POWER-PAK scoring system can be used to quantify response to pre-ET. Future studies will explore the use of POWER-PAK to support informed decision-making for adjuvant therapy options for older women with early stage breast cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Terapia Combinada , Antígeno Ki-67
7.
J Surg Res ; 283: 514-522, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36436288

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Precision breast intraoperative radiation therapy (PB-IORT) incorporates computed tomography-guided treatment planning and high dose rate brachytherapy to deliver a single dose of highly conformal radiational therapy. The purpose of this study is to determine factors associated with poor cosmetic outcomes after treatment with PB-IORT. METHODS: The study included all consecutive participants enrolled in an ongoing phase II clinical trial that had completed a minimum of 12 mo of follow-up. A poor cosmetic outcome was defined as scoring "fair" or "poor" on the Harvard Cosmesis evaluation, or "some" or "very much" on any of the three general cosmesis categories. Statistical analysis was performed utilizing R. RESULTS: The final cohort included 201 participants, of which 181 (90%) had an overall good/excellent cosmetic outcome. Group 1 consisted of 162 (81%) participants who reported only excellent/good cosmetic outcomes. Group 2 consisted of 39 (19%) participants who reported some aspect of a poor cosmetic outcome. On multivariable analysis, participants with ductal carcinoma in situ were significantly more likely to experience a poor cosmetic outcome (odds ratio 2.45, 95% confidence interval 1.03-5.82, P = 0.04), and those who received subsequent whole breast irradiation were also more likely to have a poor cosmetic outcome (odds ratio 10.20, 95% confidence interval CI 1.04-99.95, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with need for further radiation after PB-IORT are at increased risk for a poor cosmetic outcome. Larger balloon volume and distance between the skin do not have deleterious effects on cosmetic outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Neoplasias de la Mama , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante , Femenino , Humanos , Braquiterapia/métodos , Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/cirugía , Estudios Longitudinales , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto
8.
J Cancer Educ ; 38(5): 1405-1412, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37202597

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to numerous delays in cancer-related care and cancer-specific screening, but the extent is not fully understood. For those that experience a delay or disruption in care, health related self-management is required to re-engage in care pathways and the role of health literacy in this pathway has not been explored. The purpose of this analysis is to (1) report the frequency of self-reported delays in cancer treatment and preventative screening services at an academic, NCI-designated center during the COVID-19 pandemic and (2) investigate cancer-related care and screening delays among those with adequate and limited health literacy. A cross-sectional survey was administered from an NCI-designated Cancer Center with a rural catchment area during November 2020 through March 2021. A total of 1,533 participants completed the survey, and nearly 19 percent of participants were categorized as having limited health literacy. Twenty percent of those with a cancer diagnosis reported a delay in cancer-related care; and 23-30% of the sample reported a delay in cancer screening. In general, the proportions of delays among those with adequate and limited health literacy were similar with the exception of colorectal cancer screening. There was also a notable difference in the ability to re-engage in cervical cancer screening among those with adequate and limited health literacy. Thus, there is a role for those engaged in cancer-related education and outreach to offer additional navigation resources for those at risk to cancer-related care and screening disruptions. Future study is warranted to investigate the role of health literacy on cancer care engagement.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Alfabetización en Salud , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Femenino , Humanos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Estudios Transversales , Pandemias , Tiempo de Tratamiento
9.
Support Care Cancer ; 30(6): 4935-4944, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35178587

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Ensuring there are clear standards for addressing cancer-related sexual side effects is important. Currently, there are differences in two leading sets of clinical guidelines regarding the inclusion of survivors' romantic partners into clinical discussions between survivors and their providers about this issue. To help refine guidelines, we examine breast cancer survivor, partner, and oncology provider perspectives about including partners in discussions about cancer-related sexual side effects in a secondary analysis of a broader qualitative study. METHODS: Partnered female breast cancer survivors (N = 29) completed online surveys, and intimate partners of breast cancer survivors (N = 12) and breast oncology providers (N = 8) completed semi-structured interviews. Themes were derived from thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Among survivors who reported a discussion with their provider, fewer than half indicated their partner had been present, despite most survivors expressing it was - or would have been - helpful to include their partner. Partners also largely indicated being included was or would have been helpful, when welcomed by the survivor. Providers similarly emphasized the importance of survivors' autonomy in deciding whether to discuss sexual concerns in the presence of a partner. CONCLUSIONS: Partners were infrequently included in conversations about cancer-related sexual side effects, even though survivors, partners, and providers alike expressed value in these discussions occurring with the couple together - when that is the survivor's preference. Findings suggest future clinical guidelines should emphasize that incorporating partners into clinical discussions about sexual concerns is important for many breast cancer patients. Soliciting and enacting patients' preferences is essential for truly patient-centered care.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Supervivientes de Cáncer , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Conducta Sexual , Parejas Sexuales , Sobrevivientes
10.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 189(1): 237-246, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34032985

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: In order to facilitate targeted outreach, we sought to identify patient populations with a lower likelihood of returning for breast cancer screening after COVID-19-related imaging center closures. METHODS: Weekly total screening mammograms performed throughout 2019 (baseline year) and 2020 (COVID-19-impacted year) were compared. Demographic and clinical characteristics, including age, race, ethnicity, breast density, breast cancer history, insurance status, imaging facility type used, and need for interpreter, were compared between patients imaged from March 16 to October 31 in 2019 (baseline cohort) and 2020 (COVID-19-impacted cohort). Census data and an online map service were used to impute socioeconomic variables and calculate travel times for each patient. Logistic regression was used to identify patient characteristics associated with a lower likelihood of returning for screening after COVID-19-related closures. RESULTS: The year-over-year cumulative difference in screening mammogram volumes peaked in week 21, with 2962 fewer exams in the COVID-19-impacted year. By week 47, this deficit had reduced by 49.4% to 1498. A lower likelihood of returning for screening after COVID-19-related closures was independently associated with younger age (odds ratio (OR) 0.78, p < 0.001), residence in a higher poverty area (OR 0.991, p = 0.014), lack of health insurance (OR 0.65, p = 0.007), need for an interpreter (OR 0.68, p = 0.029), longer travel time (OR 0.998, p < 0.001), and utilization of mobile mammography services (OR 0.27, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Several patient factors are associated with a lower likelihood of returning for screening mammography after COVID-19-related closures. Knowledge of these factors can guide targeted outreach to vulnerable patients to facilitate breast cancer screening.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , COVID-19 , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Humanos , Mamografía , Tamizaje Masivo , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2
11.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 28(12): 7395-7403, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33982163

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Cancer and Leukemia Group-B 9343 (CALGB 9343) trial demonstrated that women aged ≥ 70 years with early-stage breast cancer can safely omit radiation therapy (RT) and be treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) alone. AET adherence is low, leaving an undertreated cohort who may be at increased risk of recurrence and death. We hypothesized that AET adherence and adjuvant treatment choice impact recurrence and survival among CALGB 9343 eligible women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: SEER-Medicare was used to identify CALGB 9343 eligible women who underwent BCS between 2007 and 2016. Medicare claims were used to identify AET use, and the proportion of days covered by AET was used to categorize adherent (PDC ≥ 0.80) versus nonadherent patients (PDC < 0.80). Recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: In total, 10,719 women were identified, of whom 780 (7.3%) underwent BCS alone, 1490 (13.9%) underwent BCS + RT, 1663 (15.5%) underwent BCS + AET, and 6786 (63.3%) had BCS + RT + AET. Among women treated with BCS + AET, adherent patients had lower recurrence than did nonadherent patients (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.50-0.85). With respect to adjuvant treatment combinations, there was no recurrence difference between the BCS + RT + AET group and BCS + AET group (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.54-1.21). There was equivalent cancer-specific but worse overall survival in the BCS + AET group versus the BCS + AET + RT group. CONCLUSIONS: While BCS + RT + AET may represent overtreatment for some, AET nonadherent women who omit RT are at risk for worse outcomes. Treatment decisions regarding RT omission should be tailored to the individual patient, taking into consideration the chances of AET nonadherence and the patients' own risk tolerance.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Medicare , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Estados Unidos
12.
J Surg Oncol ; 124(1): 16-24, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33788957

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are at elevated risk of secondary malignancies (SM). Enhanced screening for SM is recommended, but compliance is poor. We hypothesized that CCS with adult-onset SM (colorectal cancer [CRC], melanoma, or breast cancer [BC]) would present with more advanced disease and have decreased overall survival (OS). METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program was queried for patients diagnosed with cancer at age less than or equal to 18 also diagnosed with adult-onset CRC, melanoma, or BC. A cohort without a history of prior malignancy was likewise identified. Tumor features and clinical outcomes were compared. RESULTS: CCS with a SM (n = 224) were compared with patients without a childhood cancer history (n = 1,392,670). CCS were diagnosed younger (BC = 37.6 vs. 61.3, p < 0.01, CRC = 35.0 vs. 67.1, p < 0.01, melanoma = 29.6 vs. 61.3 years old, p < 0.01). CCS with BC were more likely to have Stage III or IV disease (25.2% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.01). Hormone-receptor expression also differed; CCS were less likely to develop Luminal A-type tumors (48.6% vs. 66.9%, p = 0.01). After age-adjustment, CCS had worse OS (Hazard ratio: CRC = 2.449, p < 0.01, melanoma = 6.503, p < 0.01, BC = 3.383, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: CCS were younger when diagnosed with a SM. After age-adjustment, OS was diminished. Heightened surveillance may be necessary for CCS diagnosed with SM.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Supervivientes de Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Melanoma/mortalidad , Programa de VERF/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/patología , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
13.
Support Care Cancer ; 29(12): 7451-7460, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34080054

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Sexual side effects after breast cancer treatment are common and distressing to both survivors and their intimate partners, yet few receive interventions to address cancer-related sexual concerns. To direct intervention development, this qualitative study assessed the perceptions of female breast cancer survivors, intimate partners of breast cancer survivors, and breast cancer oncology providers about how an Internet intervention for couples may address breast cancer-related sexual concerns. METHODS: Survivors (N = 20) responded to online open-ended surveys. Partners (N = 12) and providers (N = 8) completed individual semi-structured interviews. Data were inductively coded using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Three primary intervention content areas were identified by the key stakeholder groups: (1) information about and strategies to manage physical and psychological effects of cancer treatment on sexual health, (2) relationship and communication support, and (3) addressing bodily changes and self-image after treatment. Survivors and partners tended to express interest in some individualized intervention private from their partner, although they also emphasized the importance of opening communication about sexual concerns within the couple. Survivors and partners expressed interest in an intervention that addresses changing needs across the cancer trajectory, available from the time of diagnosis and through survivorship. CONCLUSION: Internet intervention for couples to address cancer-related sexual concerns, particularly one that provides basic education about treatment side effects and that evolves with couples' changing needs across the cancer trajectory, was perceived as a valuable addition to breast cancer care by survivors, partners, and providers.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Supervivientes de Cáncer , Intervención basada en la Internet , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Conducta Sexual , Sobrevivientes
14.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 184(3): 805-816, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32920742

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The CALGB 9343 trial demonstrated that women age 70 or older with early-stage, estrogen receptor positive (ER +) breast cancer (BC) may safely forgo radiation therapy (RT) and be treated with breast conserving surgery followed by adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) alone. However, most patients in this population still undergo RT in part because AET adherence is low. We sought to develop a predictive model for AET initiation and adherence in order to improve decision-making with respect to RT omission. METHODS: Women ages 70 and older with early-stage, ER + BC were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Comorbidities, socioeconomic measures, prescription medications, and demographics were collected as potential predictors. Bivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with AET initiation and adherence. Stepwise selection of significant predictors was used to develop logistic regression classifiers for initiation and adherence. Model performance was evaluated using the c-statistic and other measures. RESULTS: 11,037 patients met inclusion criteria. Within the cohort, 8703 (78.9%) patients initiated AET and 6685 (60.6%) were adherent to AET over 1 year. Bivariate predictors of AET initiation were similar to predictors of adherence. The best AET initiation and adherence classifiers were poorly predictive with c-statistics of 0.65 and 0.60, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The best models in the present study were poorly predictive, demonstrating that the reasons for initiation and adherence to AET are complex and individual to the patient, and therefore difficult to predict. Initiation and adherence to AET are important factors in decision-making regarding whether or not to forgo adjuvant RT. In order to better formulate treatment plans for this population, future work should focus on improving individual prediction of AET initiation and adherence.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Anciano , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Femenino , Humanos , Medicare , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Estados Unidos
15.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 27(9): 3458-3465, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32270421

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Using long-term survival data from the C9343 trial as a temporal reference point, this study aimed to determine radiation therapy (RT) treatment trends for older patients with early-stage breast cancer. The study also examined rates of adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET). METHODS: The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-medicare database was used to identify women with a diagnosis of breast cancer from 2007 through 2016. Bivariate associations were calculated to determine variable characteristics by time frame (group 1: 2007-2012 vs. group 2: 2013-2016). Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of group on the RT use and AET adherence. The temporal rates for both RT and AET adherence over time were plotted. RESULTS: The final study cohort included 12,210 Medicare beneficiaries. Use of RT differed significantly between the groups, with a higher proportion omitting RT in the later period (25% of group 2 vs. 20% of group 1; p < 0.001). In both groups, after adjustment for covariates, the patients with RT omitted were statistically less likely to adhere to AET [group 1: odds ratio (OR), 0.74; p < 0.001 vs. group 2: OR, 0.66; p < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: This study, 15 years after publication of the of the C9343 trial results, showed minimal change in practice, with most older women receiving RT. Importantly, AET adherence was significantly lower in the non-RT group. For women who meet the criteria to have adjuvant RT omitted, nonadherence to AET could result in undertreatment of their breast cancer, and RT should not be considered overtreatment.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Hormonales/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Mama , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Radioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Terapia Combinada/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia Combinada/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/tendencias , Radioterapia Adyuvante/tendencias , Programa de VERF/estadística & datos numéricos , Programa de VERF/tendencias , Estados Unidos
16.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 27(4): 985-990, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31965373

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The opioid epidemic in the United States is a public health crisis. Breast surgeons are obligated to provide good pain control for their patients after surgery but also must minimize administration of narcotics to prevent a surgical episode of care from becoming a patient's gateway into opioid dependence. METHODS: A survey to ascertain pain management practice patterns after breast surgery was performed. A review of currently available literature that was specific to breast surgery was performed to create recommendations regarding pain management strategies. RESULTS: A total of 609 surgeons completed the survey and demonstrated significant variations in pain management practices, specifically within regards to utilization of regional anesthesia (e.g., nerve blocks), and quantity of prescribed narcotics. There is excellent data to guide the use of local and regional anesthesia. There are, however, fewer studies to guide narcotic recommendations; thus, these recommendations were guided by prevailing practice patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Pain management practices after breast surgery have significant variation and represent an opportunity to improve patient safety and quality of care. Multimodality approaches in conjunction with standardized quantities of narcotics are recommended.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía/efectos adversos , Bloqueo Nervioso , Manejo del Dolor , Dimensión del Dolor , Sociedades Médicas , Cirujanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
17.
J Surg Res ; 256: 577-583, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32805580

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The results of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 9343 trial showed that radiation therapy (RT) did not improve survival for women older than 70 y with early-stage estrogen receptor + breast cancer treated with breast conserving surgery and adjuvant endocrine therapy. In 2005, guidelines were modified to allow for RT omission; however, minimal change in clinical practice has occurred. The aim of this study was to determine if CALGB long-term follow-up data have affected RT utilization, and to characterize the population still receiving RT after breast conserving surgery. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database was used to identify women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer from 2004 to 2015 who matched the CALGB 9343 inclusion criteria. Multivariate logistic regression was carried out to identify the factors that affect the receipt of radiation therapy. We also plotted the overall use of RT over time juxtaposed with the temporal trends of CALGB 9343 clinical trial data, guideline recommendations, and publishing of long-term survival data. RESULTS: The study cohort included 25,723 Medicare beneficiaries, of whom 20,328 (79%) received RT and 5395 (21%) did not receive RT. In a multivariate model, the frequency of RT omission increased over time, with those diagnosed in year 2015 being 2.72 times more likely to omit RT compared with those diagnosed in 2004 (95% confidence interval 2.31-3.19). CONCLUSIONS: This study investigated the impact of long-term CALGB 9343 data on clinical practice. The results of this study support results from previous studies, extend the dates of analysis, and indicate that after long-term follow-up of CALGB 9343 data, RT was less used, but overall trends did not dramatically decrease.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Mastectomía Radical/estadística & datos numéricos , Mastectomía Segmentaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Mama/patología , Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Esperanza de Vida , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Radioterapia Adyuvante/normas , Radioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Programa de VERF/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
18.
J Surg Res ; 247: 52-58, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31787317

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Metformin use has been linked to pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for several malignancies. We aimed to investigate the association of diabetes mellitus (DM) and metformin use with pCR in breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy during June 2013-October 2016 at two academic medical centers were identified. A retrospective cohort study evaluated patients who did and did not achieve pCR. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of pCR, specifically looking at metformin use and DM. RESULTS: The study group included 351 breast cancer patients, with 90 (25.6%) achieving pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The rate of DM did not differ between those with and without pCR, nor did the rate of metformin use. Multivariable logistic regression identified HER2-positive tumors and smaller preoperative tumor size as predictors of pCR. The estrogen receptor (ER) positivity was associated with an absence of pCR. Importantly, neither DM nor metformin use was predictive of pCR. CONCLUSIONS: This study by the two institutions supports previous data of tumor-related factors known to be associated with pCR; however, the current analysis found neither DM nor metformin to be independently associated with pCR. Thus, additional prospective study is warranted prior to validating metformin as an antitumor agent.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Metformina/administración & dosificación , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Mama/efectos de los fármacos , Mama/patología , Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Pronóstico , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Breast J ; 26(7): 1308-1315, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31876106

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare radiation dose to organs at risk in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and intraoperative radiation therapy with CT-guided HDR brachytherapy (precision breast IORT; PB-IORT) and those treated with external beam whole breast irradiation (WB-DIBH) or partial breast irradiation (PB-DIBH) with deep inspiratory breath hold. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 52 consecutive patients with left-sided breast cancers treated with either PB-IORT (n = 17, 76% outer breast) on a phase I clinical trial, adjuvant PB-DIBH (n = 18, 56% outer breast, 6% cavity boost), or WB-DIBH (n = 17, 76% outer breast, 53% with lumpectomy cavity boost). Conventional (2 Gy/fraction) or moderate hypofractionation (2.66 Gy/fraction) was prescribed for the external beam cohorts and 12.5 Gy in 1 fraction to 1 cm from the balloon surface was prescribed to the HDR brachytherapy cohort. CT-based planning was used for all patients. Organ at risk doses and excess risk ratios (ERR) for secondary lung cancers, contralateral breast cancers, and cardiac toxicity were compared between treatment techniques. RESULTS: Compared to WB-DIBH and PB-DIBH, PB-IORT resulted in lower ipsilateral lung V5, V10, V20, mean, and max dose (P < .05). Mean ipsilateral lung BED3Gy was as follows: 1.32 Gy for PB-IORT, 4.33 Gy for WB-DIBH, 3.35 Gy for PB-DIBH. The ERR for lung cancer was lowest for PB-IORT (P < .001). There was significantly higher contralateral breast max dose but lower mean BED3Gy for WB-DIBH compared with PB-IORT (P = .012, P = .011, respectively). Mean contralateral breast BED3Gy was as follows: 0.10 Gy for PB-IORT, 0.06 Gy for WB-DIBH, and 0.08 Gy for PB-DIBH. The ERR for contralateral breast cancer was low for all breast techniques, but WB-DIBH showed lower ERR compared to PB-IORT (P = .019). Mean heart BED2Gy was higher with PB-IORT at 1.26 Gy compared to 0.48 Gy and 0.24 Gy for WB-DIBH and PB-DIBH, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with PB-IORT and with tissue-sparing external beam techniques all received low organ at risk doses, but PB-IORT resulted in far lower ipsilateral lung dose compared with external beam techniques. Our data indicate the lowest mean contralateral breast BED in the WB-DIBH group, likely due to the simplicity of the field design in low-risk patients using tangential whole breast radiation. External beam using DIBH results in lowest heart dose, but all techniques were well within recommended heart constraints.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias de Mama Unilaterales , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Femenino , Corazón , Humanos , Órganos en Riesgo , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , Estudios Retrospectivos
20.
Breast J ; 25(6): 1198-1205, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31310402

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Obesity and breast density are associated with breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Bariatric surgery effectively treats morbid obesity, with sustainable weight loss and reductions in cancer incidence. We evaluated changes in qualitative and quantitative density; hypothesizing breast density would increase following bariatric surgery. METHODS: Women undergoing bariatric surgery from 1990 to 2015 were identified, excluding patients without a mammogram performed both before and after surgery. Changes in body mass index (BMI), time between mammograms and surgery, and American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) scores were assessed. VolparaDensity™ automated software calculated volumetric breast density (VBD), fibroglandular volume (FGV), and total breast volume for the 82 women with digital data available. Differences between pre- and postsurgery values were assessed. RESULTS: One hundred eighty women were included. Median age at surgery was 50.0 years, with 8.8 months between presurgery mammogram and surgery and 62.3 months between surgery and postsurgery mammogram. Median BMI significantly decreased over the study period (46.0 vs 35.4 kg/m2 ; P < 0.001). No change in BI-RADS scores was seen between the pre- and postsurgery mammograms. Eighty-two women had VolparaDensity™ data available. While VBD increased in these patients, FGV and total breast volume both decreased following bariatric surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Increased VBD, decreased FGV, and decreased total breast volume were seen following bariatric surgery-induced weight loss. There was no difference in qualitative breast density, highlighting the discrepancy between BI-RADS and VolparaDensity™ measurements. Further investigation will be required to determine how differential changes in components of breast density may affect breast cancer risk.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Densidad de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Mama , Obesidad Mórbida , Cirugía Bariátrica/métodos , Cirugía Bariátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Trayectoria del Peso Corporal , Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador , Mamografía/métodos , Mamografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/diagnóstico , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Tamaño de los Órganos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA