A Randomized Clinical Trial of Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program versus Crisis Counseling in Preventing Repeat Suicide Attempts: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study.

INTRODUCTION: The Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program (ASSIP) is a brief psychotherapeutic intervention, and a pivotal study found it to be remarkably effective in reducing repeat suicide attempts. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of ASSIP to crisis counseling (CC) in a randomized clinical trial (ISRCTN13464512). METHODS: Adult patients receiving treatment for a suicide attempt in a Helsinki City general hospital emergency room in 2016-2017 were eligible to participate. We excluded psychotic or likely non-adherent substance-abusing or substance-dependent patients. Eligible patients (n = 239) were randomly allocated to one of two interventions. (a) ASSIP comprised three visits, including a videotaped first visit, a case formulation, and an individualized safety plan, plus letters from the therapist every 3 months for 1 year, and then, every 6 months for the next year. (b) CC typically involved 2-5 (median 3) face-to-face individual sessions. In addition, all participants received their usual treatment. One and 2 years after baseline, information related to participants' suicidal thoughts and attempts, and psychiatric treatment received was collected via telephone and from medical and psychiatric records. RESULTS: Among randomized patients, two-thirds initiated either ASSIP (n = 89) or CC (n = 72), with 73 (82%) completing ASSIP and 58 (81%) CC. The proportion of patients who attempted suicide during the 2-year follow-up did not differ significantly between ASSIP and CC (29.2% [26/89] vs. 35.2% [25/71], OR 0.755 [95% Cl 0.379-1.504]). CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in the effectiveness of the two brief interventions to prevent repeat suicide attempts.

A randomized clinical trial of the ASSIP vs. crisis counselling in preventing suicide attempt repetition: a two-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: ASSIP (Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program) is a brief psychotherapeutic intervention found remarkably effective in reducing rate of suicide attempt repetition in the pivotal study in Bern, Switzerland. We compared effectiveness of the ASSIP to usual crisis counselling (CC) in a randomized trial (ISRCTN13464512). METHODS: Adult patients receiving somatic treatment for a suicide attempt at the Helsinki City general hospital emergency rooms in 2016-2017 were requested to participate. Psychotic or likely nonadherent substance abusing or dependent patients were excluded. Consenting, eligible patients (N = 239) were randomly allocated to two interventions. (a) The ASSIP comprised three visits, including a videotaped first visit, a case formulation, individualized safety plan, plus letters from their therapist every 3 months for 1 year and then every 6 months for the next year. (b) The CC involved on average four face-to-face individual sessions. In addition, all participants received treatments as usual. One and two years after the baseline, the participants' suicidal thoughts and attempts and psychiatric treatments received during the follow-up were investigated by telephone and from psychiatric records. RESULTS: Of patients randomized, two thirds initiated either ASSIP (n = 89) or CC (n = 72), with 73 (82%) completing the ASSIP and 58 (81%) the CC. There was no significant difference between the ASSIP vs. the CC patients having at least one suicide attempt during the 2-year follow-up (29.2% (26/89) vs. 35.2% (25/71), χ21 = 0.654, p = 0.419). CONCLUSION: We found no evidence for a difference in effectiveness of the two active interventions in preventing the repetition of suicide attempts.