The effect of community based-academic partnerships on student knowledge about plastic surgery and interest in medicine.

BACKGROUND: Programs specific to plastic surgery are necessary to dispel common myths and increase interest in the field. In a previous publication by the authors, a community outreach program was developed for these reasons for middle school students. In the current study, we expanded on the previous research and collected objective data to assess students' initial interest in medicine and knowledge about plastic surgery, compared to their interest and knowledge afterward. METHODS: The program previously developed by the authors was modified and performed for the students at various community outreach events and included a PowerPoint presentation, case didactics, and hands-on activities. A test about plastic surgery and questionnaire about interest in the medical field and becoming a doctor was given to each student before and after the program. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-nine students participated in the program from 2009 to 2013. The pretest mean score was 6.50 of 12 questions whereas the posttest mean score was 9.72 (P = <0.001). After participation in the program, 27% of students that answered "no" or "unsure" about interest in the medical field on the pretest changed their answer to "yes," on the posttest, and 17% of students that answered "no" or "unsure" about interest in becoming a doctor on the pretest changed their answer to "yes," on the posttest (P = <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A plastic surgery community outreach program is beneficial in increasing students' interest in the field of medicine as a whole, and more specifically in the field of plastic surgery.

Validation of Clinical Criteria for Obtaining Maxillofacial Computed Tomography in Patients With Trauma.

BACKGROUND: More than 180,000 patients present annually with facial trauma to emergency rooms in the United States. Maxillofacial computed tomography is the gold standard in identifying facial fractures. Providers must evaluate patients quickly; therefore, they use decision instruments to determine which patients need imaging. We previously developed a decision instrument that identified patients with trauma at low risk for facial fracture who could avoid imaging. The present study aims to perform an internal validation of that tool. METHODS: The decision instrument used 5 criteria: bony step-off or instability, periorbital swelling or contusion, Glasgow Coma Scale <14, malocclusion, and tooth absence. The presence of any 1 finding placed the patient at high risk for fracture. In the present study, a retrospective review was conducted on all of the patients with trauma evaluated at a Level I trauma center for >1 year. Inclusion criteria were maxillofacial physical examination, head and maxillofacial computed tomography at presentation. Physical examination findings were collected and imaging reviewed to determine whether the decision tool could accurately detect the presence of a facial fracture in a different patient population from which it was derived. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-nine patients met enrollment criteria. Facial fractures occurred in 81% of patients (n = 145). The decision instrument was 97.4% sensitive (95% confidence interval, 93.8-99.3) for the presence of facial fracture. The negative predictive value was 81.3% (95% confidence interval, 55.0-95.0). Application of the instrument resulted in a missed injury rate of 2.6% (n = 3). All of the missed fractures were nondisplaced and managed nonoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed decision tool identifies patients with trauma at low risk for facial fracture who can avoid maxillofacial imaging. Validation in a prospective study is warranted.

Use of Lumbar Perforator Recipient Vessels for Salvage Chest Wall Reconstruction: A Case Report.

Abdominal-based free flaps are commonly used for breast reconstruction, and the internal mammary or thoracodorsal vessels are typically used as recipient sites. Conversely, free tissue transfer is less commonly used for chest wall reconstruction in the setting of chest wall recurrence, in part, because of a paucity of recipient vessels. Here, we describe a case of a 68-year-old female smoker with metastatic breast cancer, who presented with a chest wall recurrence. There was a large area of chronic ulceration with foul smelling drainage, in addition to radiation-induced tissue injury, and palliative resection was performed. The area was reconstructed with a free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap using lumbar perforators as recipient vessels, because conventional recipient sites were unavailable because of scarring from radiation and residual tumor. This case demonstrates that uncommon recipient vessels such as lumbar perforators may allow for successful palliative chest wall reconstruction. We hypothesize that the tumor burden, previous surgeries, and radiation may have rendered the recipient field relatively ischemic, thereby inducing hypertrophy of the lumbar perforators, similar to a delay phenomenon.

The New Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Next Accreditation System Milestones Evaluation System: What Is Expected and How Are Plastic Surgery Residency Programs Preparing?

BACKGROUND: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Next Accreditation System milestones were implemented for plastic surgery programs in July of 2014. Forward progress through the milestones is an indicator of trainee-appropriate development, whereas regression or stalling may indicate the need for concentrated, targeted training. METHODS: Online software at www.surveymonkey.com was used to create a survey about the program's approaches to milestones and was distributed to program directors and administrators of 96 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-approved plastic surgery programs. RESULTS: The authors had a 63.5 percent response rate (61 of 96 plastic surgery programs). Most programs report some level of readiness, only 22 percent feel completely prepared for the Next Accreditation System milestones, and only 23 percent are completely satisfied with their planned approach for compliance. Seventy-five percent of programs claim to be using some form of electronic tracking system. Programs plan to use multiple tools to capture and report milestone data. Most programs (44.4 percent) plan to administer evaluations at the end of each rotation. Over 70 percent of respondents believe that the milestones approach would improve the quality of resident training. However, programs were less than confident that their current compliance systems would live up to their full potential. CONCLUSIONS: The Next Accreditation System has been implemented nationwide for plastic surgery training programs. Milestone-based resident training is a new paradigm for residency training evaluation; programs are in the process of making this transition to find ways to make milestone data meaningful for faculty and residents.

Patient safety in the operating room: I. Preoperative.

BACKGROUND: Beyond the controlled trauma of surgery, the operating room can be a hazardous place for patients and health care workers alike. Modern plastic surgery requires a thorough knowledge of various perioperative risks and methods to minimize these risks. As the importance of teamwork becomes more evident, clear communication skills preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively become equally critical. To facilitate an improvement in perioperative patient safety, this article will review aspects of communication, including crew resource management, root cause analysis, and surgical-site verification. In addition, the authors will discuss patient positioning, antiseptic hand and patient preparations, and barriers, such as surgical scrubs, gowns, gloves, and drapes. METHODS: The authors reviewed the literature regarding operating room safety, both primary research and secondary reviews, via multiple PubMed queries and literature searches. Topics most relevant to inpatient plastic surgery were included in the final analysis and summarized, as a full review of each topic is beyond the scope of this article. RESULTS: Many possible interventions were identified, with the goal of reducing perioperative complications, such as wrong site surgery, neuropathies, myopathies, compartment syndromes, pressure ulcers, surgical-site infections, and blood-borne disease transmissions among plastic surgeons and their patients. CONCLUSIONS: There are ample opportunities for the reduction of preventable adverse events in plastic surgery. This article aims to provide its reader with the tools to research adverse events and a basic education in avoiding specific preoperative events. A second article addressing intraoperative and postoperative patient safety follows.

Patient safety in the operating room: II. Intraoperative and postoperative.

BACKGROUND: The perioperative environment can be hazardous to patients and providers alike. Although many risks are best addressed preoperatively, some hazards require constant attention by the surgeon, anesthesiologist, and staff in the operating room. In a previous article, the authors discussed preoperative aspects of patient safety. In this article, the authors review intraoperative and postoperative risks and techniques to decrease these risks. METHODS: The authors reviewed the literature regarding operating room safety, both primary research and secondary reviews, via multiple PubMed queries and literature searches. Topics most relevant to inpatient plastic surgery were included in the final analysis and summarized, as a full review of each topic is beyond the scope of this article. RESULTS: Several intraoperative and postoperative risks were identified, in addition to methods designed to decrease the incidence of those risks, complications, and other adverse events among plastic surgeons and their patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this article covering intraoperative and postoperative hazards, the authors build upon a previous article addressing preoperative risks to patients during inpatient plastic surgery. Although neither article covers an exhaustive list of potential risks, the goal is to provide the modern plastic surgeon with the means to prevent common adverse events, as well as the tools to research new hazards.

National bariatric surgery and massive weight loss body contouring survey.

BACKGROUND: As bariatric surgery has become more popular, plastic surgeons have seen increases in post-bariatric surgery body contouring procedures. The aim of the authors' survey was to better understand perspectives of bariatric surgeons toward body contouring procedures and referral patterns to plastic surgeons. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 500 surgeon members of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Questions focused on bariatric surgery practices, perspectives toward massive weight loss body contouring, and referral patterns. One hundred eighty-eight surveys were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-four percent of surgeons surveyed reported that patients ask about body contouring procedures before bariatric procedures. Only 54 percent reported routine counseling on the potential functional and aesthetic consequences of bariatric surgery. Ninety-six percent of bariatric surgeons have access to plastic surgeons, but only 7 percent of bariatric surgeons always refer their patients to a plastic surgeon and 33 percent rarely refer to a plastic surgeon. Fifty-one percent of surgeons report that patients who have undergone body contouring procedures are overall more satisfied with their decision to undergo bariatric surgery versus bariatric patients who have not had body contouring. Seventy-five percent of surgeons reported that patients rarely express any concern regarding their decision to undergo plastic surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery requires multispecialty care from bariatric and plastic surgeons. Results and outcomes can be improved with body contouring procedures, especially with regard to better self-image, self-confidence, and satisfaction. However, there are deficiencies in pre-bariatric surgery counseling regarding outcomes and discussions of body contouring procedures. Therefore, better methods of referrals to plastic surgeons need to be identified.