Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for Early Treatment and Retreatment of Macular Edema Related to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: The Multicenter COBALT Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for macular edema (ME) following branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) in Korean patients. METHODS: We performed a prospective, open-label, multicenter study of 71 patients with ME for < 3 months. Retreatment was allowed ≥4 months from the last injection. RESULTS: At 6 and 12 months, mean ± SD best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement was 18.6 ± 12.9 and 15.3 ± 15.0 letters, respectively. Approximately 70% of maximum treatment response was observed after 1 week. Over the 12-month period, 32 and 49% of patients received 1 and 3 injections, respectively, with a mean ± SD interval of 20.0 ± 5.0 weeks. Patients who required 3 injections had higher central retinal thickness (CRT) and larger macular nonperfusion at baseline compared to those requiring only 1 injection. Adverse events included increased intraocular pressure (35%) and newly diagnosed cataract (16%). CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal dexamethasone treatment with an interval of ≥4 months provides rapid and significantly better improvement in BCVA and CRT in patients with BRVO-associated ME.

Tolerability and efficacy of bimatoprost 0.01 % in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension evaluated in the Taiwanese clinical setting: the Asia Pacific Patterns from Early Access of Lumigan 0.01 % (APPEAL Taiwan) study.

BACKGROUND: In randomized, controlled trials of open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT), bimatoprost 0.01 % improved tolerability while retaining the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of bimatoprost 0.03 %. Given geographic/racial differences in glaucoma presentation, the APPEAL study assessed the occurrence and severity of hyperemia produced by bimatoprost 0.01 %, and its efficacy, in the Taiwanese clinical setting. METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label, observational study, treatment-naïve and previously treated patients with OHT or OAG received once-daily bimatoprost 0.01 % for 12 weeks. Hyperemia (primary endpoint) was graded at baseline, week 6, and week 12 using a photonumeric scale (0, +0.5, +1, +2, +3), grouped (≤ +1, none to mild; ≥ +2, moderate to severe), and reported as unchanged from baseline, improved, or worsened. IOP assessments followed the same schedule. Supplemental efficacy analyses were conducted based on previous therapies. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat population (N = 312) included treatment-naïve (13.5 %) and previously treated (86.5 %) patients; mean age was 53.3 years. At baseline, 46.3 % of previously treated patients were receiving prostaglandin analog (PGA) monotherapy. At week 12, 91.2 %, 5.9 %, and 2.9 % of treatment-naïve patients exhibited unchanged, worsened, and improved hyperemia from baseline, respectively; 77.9 %, 12.9 %, and 9.2 % of previously treated patients showed no change, worsening, and improvement, respectively. There were no statistically significant shifts in hyperemia severity in either group, or in subgroups based on previous use of any PGA, any non-PGA, latanoprost, or travoprost monotherapies. In treatment-naïve patients, mean IOP reduction from baseline (18.0 ± 3.8 mm Hg) was 3.6 mm Hg at week 12 (P < 0.0001); 83.3 % had baseline IOP ≤ 21 mm Hg. In previously treated patients, mean additional IOP reduction from baseline (17.8 ± 3.9 mm Hg) was 2.6 mm Hg (P < 0.0001); similar results were observed in patient subgroups based on previous therapies. CONCLUSIONS: In the Taiwanese clinical setting, bimatoprost 0.01 % provided significant IOP lowering in treatment-naïve patients (regardless of baseline IOP) and previously treated patients (even those with relatively low IOP on other therapies), while causing no significant changes in hyperemia from baseline. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01814761 . Registered 18 March 2013.

Bimatoprost 0.01% in treatment-naïve patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: an observational study in the Korean clinical setting.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the efficacy and tolerability (ie, occurrence and severity of hyperemia) of bimatoprost 0.01% in treatment-naïve patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension in the Korean clinical setting. METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label, observational study, treatment-naïve patients with OAG, including patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG, defined as IOP ≤21 mm Hg), or ocular hypertension received bimatoprost 0.01% once daily. Hyperemia was assessed at baseline and weeks 6 and 12, graded by a masked evaluator using a photonumeric scale (0, +0.5, +1, +2, +3), and grouped as (0 to +1) and (+2 to +3). Shifts between groupings were reported as no change, improved ([+2 to +3] to [0 to +1]), or worsened ([0 to +1] to [+2 to +3]). Other adverse events were monitored. Mean IOP changes from baseline at weeks 6 and 12 were reported. Supplemental analyses were conducted for IOPs >21 versus ≤21 mm Hg. RESULTS: Of 295 treatment-naïve patients included in the intent-to-treat/safety population, 73 (24.7%) had baseline IOP >21 mm Hg (mean, 25.7 ± 5.0 mm Hg) and 222 (75.3%) had baseline IOP ≤21 mm Hg (mean, 16.3 ± 3.0 mm Hg); 96.3% had hyperemia graded none (36.3%) to mild (17.3%). At week 12, hyperemia was graded none to mild in 83.7% (n = 220). Worsening occurred in 12.3% of patients by week 6 and 12.7% by week 12. Small improvements occurred in 0.8% and 0.5% of patients at weeks 6 and 12, respectively. Hyperemia scores were generally low and the majority of patients had no change in severity during the study. Mean IOP at weeks 6 and 12 was reduced to 16.4 ± 4.0 mm Hg (-34.5%; P < 0.0001) and 16.7 ± 3.9 mm Hg (-32.0%; P < 0.001) in the baseline-IOP >21 mm Hg group versus 13.3 ± 2.6 mm Hg (-17.8%; P < 0.001) and 13.7 ± 2.8 mm Hg (-15.9%; P < 0.001) in the baseline-IOP ≤21 mm Hg group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In treatment-naïve patients, bimatoprost 0.01% induced low shifts in worsening of hyperemia and significant reductions in IOP, regardless of baseline IOP. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01594970.

Dexamethasone intravitreal implant in treatment-naïve diabetic macular oedema: findings from the prospective, multicentre, AUSSIEDEX study.

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg (DEX; Ozurdex) monotherapy in the patient subgroup of the AUSSIEDEX study with treatment-naïve diabetic macular oedema (DME). METHODS: The open-label, prospective, phase 4, real-world study included pseudophakic eyes and phakic eyes scheduled for cataract surgery that were treatment-naïve or non-responsive to antivascular endothelial growth factors. No eyes were excluded based on baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) or central subfield retinal thickness (CRT). After the initial DEX injection at the baseline visit, reinjection was permitted at ≥16-week intervals. Week-16 and week-52 visits were mandatory. Primary endpoints were changes in mean BCVA and CRT from baseline to 52 weeks. RESULTS: Of 200 eyes enrolled in the AUSSIEDEX study, 57 were treatment-naïve. Baseline mean BCVA was 58.8 letters and baseline mean CRT was 418.6 µm; changes in mean BCVA and CRT from baseline to 52 weeks in this subgroup were 3.4 letters (p=0.042) and -89.6 µm (p<0.001), respectively, with a mean 2.5 injections. The change in mean CRT from baseline was -55.8 µm at week 16 (p<0.001). The most common adverse event was increased intraocular pressure (IOP), with 20.0% of eyes requiring IOP-lowering medication. One patient was discontinued due to increased IOP. No eyes required filtration surgery. No serious, treatment-related ocular adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: In this largest prospective, real-world study of DEX monotherapy for DME to date, DEX significantly improved CRT and BCVA at 52 weeks in treatment-naïve eyes, without new safety concerns, supporting DEX use in treatment-naïve DME. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02731911.

CONTOUR Australia: Condition of Submental Fullness and Treatment Outcomes with Belkyra Registry.

Submental fat (SMF) contributes to an aged or overweight appearance that may negatively impact an individual's psychological well-being. Deoxycholic acid (ATX-101) is an injectable formulation of deoxycholic acid approved to treat SMF. The Condition of Submental Fullness and Treatment Outcomes Registry (CONTOUR) Australia study was designed to understand treatment patterns and outcomes with ATX-101 in Australia. Methods: CONTOUR Australia was a phase 4, prospective, observational, multicenter registry that enrolled adults considering treatment for SMF reduction. Results: The registry enrolled 86 patients from six sites. Significant changes from baseline through the end of treatment indicated improvement in mild to moderate fullness associated with SMF on the Clinician-Reported SMF Rating Scale and the Patient-Reported SMF Rating Scale, improvement in SMF-associated psychological impact after treatment on the Patient-Reported SMF Impact Scale, no overall worsening in skin laxity based on Submental Skin Laxity Grade, and increased patient satisfaction with the face/chin on the Subject Self-Rating Scale after receiving treatment. Adverse events were all mild and mostly related to the injection site (ie, bruising and swelling). Conclusion: CONTOUR Australia observed clinically meaningful and significant outcomes and further supports ATX-101 as a well-tolerated and effective treatment for SMF reduction.

Dexamethasone intravitreal implant in diabetic macular oedema refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factors: the AUSSIEDEX study.

AIM: To evaluate effectiveness of dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg (DEX) monotherapy in the AUSSIEDEX study non-responder subgroup, defined by diabetic macular oedema (DME) refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. METHODS: This prospective, open-label, observational, real-world study included pseudophakic and phakic (scheduled for cataract surgery) eyes that did not achieve a ≥5-letter best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) gain and/or clinically significant central subfield retinal thickness (CRT) improvement after 3-6 anti-VEGF injections for DME (N=143 eyes), regardless of baseline BCVA and CRT. After an initial DEX injection (baseline visit), reinjection was permitted at ≥16-week intervals. PRIMARY ENDPOINTS: changes in mean BCVA and CRT from baseline to week 52. Safety assessments included adverse events. RESULTS: Of 143 eyes, 53 (37.1%) and 89 (62.2%) switched to DEX after 3-6 (early) and >6 (late) anti-VEGF injections, respectively; 1 (0.7%) had missing information. With 2.3 injections (mean) over 52 weeks, the change in mean BCVA from a baseline of 57.8 letters was not significant at week 52. Mean CRT improved significantly from a baseline of 417.8 µm at week 52 (mean change -60.9 µm; p<0.001). Outcomes were similar in eyes switched to DEX early and late. No unexpected adverse events were reported; no filtration surgeries were required. CONCLUSION: To date, AUSSIEDEX is the largest prospective, real-world study of DEX monotherapy for treatment-naïve or anti-VEGF-refractory DME. Following early or late switch from anti-VEGF agents, DEX significantly improved anatomic outcomes at 52 weeks without new safety concerns, supporting use in anti-VEGF-refractory DME. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02731911.

Gel Stent Versus Trabeculectomy: The Randomized, Multicenter, Gold-Standard Pathway Study (GPS) of Effectiveness and Safety at 12 Months.

PURPOSE: To compare effectiveness and safety of the gel stent to trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma (OAG). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, multicenter, noninferiority study. METHODS: Patients with OAG and intraocular pressure (IOP) 15 to 44 mm Hg on topical IOP-lowering medication were randomized 2:1 to gel stent implantation or trabeculectomy. Primary end point (surgical success): percentage of patients at month 12 achieving ≥20% IOP reduction from baseline without medication increase, clinical hypotony, vision loss to counting fingers, or secondary surgical intervention (SSI) in a noninferiority test with 24% margins. Secondary end points (month 12) included mean IOP and medication count, postoperative intervention rate, visual recovery, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Safety end points included adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: At month 12, the gel stent was statistically noninferior to trabeculectomy (between-treatment difference [Δ], -6.1%; 95% CI, -22.9%, 10.8%); 62.1% and 68.2% achieved the primary end point, respectively (P=.487); mean IOP and medication count reductions from baseline were significant (P<.001); and the IOP change-related Δ (2.8 mm Hg) favored trabeculectomy (P=.024). The gel stent resulted in fewer eyes requiring in-office postoperative interventions (P=.024 after excluding laser suture lysis), faster visual recovery (P≤.048), and greater 6-month improvements in visual function problems (ie, PROs; P≤.022). The most common AEs were reduced visual acuity at any time (gel stent, 38.9%; trabeculectomy, 54.5%) and hypotony (IOP <6 mm Hg at any time) (gel stent, 23.2%; trabeculectomy, 50.0%). CONCLUSIONS: At month 12, the gel stent was statistically noninferior to trabeculectomy, per the percentage of patients achieving ≥20% IOP reduction from baseline without medication increase, clinical hypotony, vision loss to counting fingers, or SSI. Trabeculectomy achieved a statistically lower mean IOP, numerically lower failure rate, and numerically lower need for supplemental medications. The gel stent resulted in fewer postoperative interventions, better visual recovery, and fewer AEs.

Causes for treatment delays in dystonia and hemifacial spasm: a Canadian survey.

BACKGROUND: Dystonia must be accurately diagnosed so that treatment can be administered promptly. However, dystonia is a complex disorder, with variable presentation, which can delay diagnosis. METHODS: Data were gathered by questionnaire from 866 patients with dystonia or hemifacial spasm (HFS) treated in 14 movement disorders centres in Canada injecting botulinum toxin, to better understand the path to diagnosis, wait times and obstacles to treatment. RESULTS: Most participants were female (64.1%), mean age was 58 years, and patients consulted an average of 3.2 physicians before receiving a dystonia or HFS diagnosis. Many patients (34%) received other diagnoses before referral to a movement disorders clinic, most commonly "stress" (42.7%). A variety of treatments were often received without a diagnosis. The mean lag time between symptom onset and diagnosis was 5.4 years. After the decision to use botulinum toxin, patients waited a mean of 3.1 months before treatment. The most common diagnoses were cervical dystonia (51.6% of patients), HFS (20.0%) and blepharospasm (9.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Survey results show that diagnosis of dystonias or of HFS, and therefore, access to treatment, is delayed. An educational program for primary care physicians may be helpful to decrease the time to diagnosis and referral to a specialist centre for treatment.

Efficacy and safety of fixed-combination brimonidine tartrate/timolol maleate in primary open-angle glaucoma, including normal-tension glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To assess the 12-month efficacy and safety of fixed-combination brimonidine tartrate 0.2%/timolol maleate 0.5% (FCBT) with or without bimatoprost 0.01% (BIM) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), including normal-tension glaucoma (NTG). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, open-label study. METHODS: FCBT was self-administered twice daily after applicable washout (study eye). Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured at baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12. BIM could be added for IOP ≥ 21 mmHg, IOP reduction from baseline < 20%, or the investigator deemed it necessary. Primary endpoint: mean (11-a.m.) month-12 IOP change from baseline. Secondary endpoints included mean IOP changes from baseline at other visits, median time to achieving and patients (%) achieving target IOP reduction with FCBT, and visual field (VF) progression rate over 12 months. Safety was assessed at each visit. RESULTS: Of 118 eyes with POAG (NTG, n = 93), 87 used FCBT; 31 required FCBT + BIM. Mean IOP changes from baseline (16.8 and 15.3 mmHg) to month 12 were - 4.1 mmHg (FCBT, n = 62) and - 3.5 mmHg (FCBT + BIM, n = 15), respectively (both P < 0.0001). Patients who achieved target IOP reduction with FCBT did so in 1 month (median). VF progression rates were 0.17%/year (FCBT, P = 0.8367) and - 0.08%/year (FCBT + BIM, P = 0.9410). Ocular treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 42.5% (FCBT) and 71.0% (FCBT + BIM) of patients; most were mild and included ocular hyperemia (9.2% and 41.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Despite low mean baseline IOP, ≥ 20% IOP reduction from baseline persisted over 12 months with FCBT and FCBT + BIM, without clinically significant VF progression. Tolerability was consistent with reported drug safety profiles.

Breast augmentation surgery using an inframammary fold incision in Southeast Asian women: Patient-reported outcomes.

BACKGROUND: This analysis presents patient-reported outcomes of breast augmentation procedures performed in Singapore using an inframammary fold incision and the "5 Ps" best practice principles for breast augmentation. These data are the first of their kind in Southeast Asian patients. METHODS: Through a retrospective chart review, patients who underwent primary breast augmentation with anatomical form-stable silicone gel breast implants using an inframammary fold incision were followed for ≥6 months postoperatively. The BREAST-Q Augmentation Module (scores standardized to 0 [worst] - 100 [best]) and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS; 1 [normal skin] to 10 [worst scar imaginable]) were administered. Responses were summarized using descriptive statistics. Patient-reported events were collected. RESULTS: Twenty-two Southeast Asian patients (mean age, 35.1 years) completed ≥1 postoperative BREAST-Q and POSAS assessment and were assessed 11 months to 5.5 years postoperatively. The mean postoperative BREAST-Q satisfaction with breasts and psychosocial well-being scores were 69.2 and 84.0, respectively. The mean POSAS score for their overall opinion of the scar was 4.2; the mean scores for all scar characteristics ranged from 1.2 to 4.2. Over 90% of patients (20/22) said that they would recommend the procedure. Patient complaints following surgery included anisomastia (possibly pre-existing; n=2), sensory loss at the nipple (n=2) or around the nipple (n=3), scarring (n=4), and slight capsular contracture (n=1). No patients required reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Southeast Asian patients reported high long-term satisfaction scores on the BREAST-Q scale and with their scar characteristics following breast augmentation using an inframammary fold incision, and nearly all said they would recommend this procedure. No reoperations were necessary in patients assessed for up to 5.5 years postoperatively.

Effects of punctal occlusion on global tear proteins in patients with dry eye.

PURPOSE: To investigate effects of punctal occlusion on global tear protein levels in patients with dry eye. METHODS: In this prospective, longitudinal, single-center study, nonabsorbable punctal plugs were inserted bilaterally into the lower punctum of 30 patients with moderate dry eye. Dry eye symptoms, fluorescein corneal staining, Schirmer I test, tear film break-up time, and safety were assessed in the more severely affected eye. Tear proteins at weeks 1 and 3 were quantified by iTRAQ relative to baseline preocclusion levels. RESULTS: Of 29 patients who completed the study, 23 (mean age 49.8 years) had sufficient tear samples for analysis. After 3 weeks, punctal occlusion significantly upregulated tear proteins, including glutathione synthase (mean of 1.6-fold, P = 0.01) and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (1.7-fold, P = 0.032) and downregulated cholinergic receptor (neuronal) alpha-7 (0.79-fold, P = 0.039) and lymphocyte cytosolic protein-1 (0.66-fold, P = 0.012). Clustering analysis of global tear proteins revealed two clear profile changes; the first group of patients (cluster 1, n = 10) had a reduction in the inflammatory proteins (e.g., S100A8) and rise in lacrimal proteins supporting the ocular surface (e.g., lysozyme), whereas the second group (cluster 2, n = 13) had an increase in inflammatory proteins and a decrease in lacrimal proteins. Logistic regression analysis revealed that cluster 1 patients had significantly (P = 0.006) lower Schirmer scores at baseline (mean [standard deviation]: 4.3 [4.3] mm) than cluster 2 (6.8 [2.6] mm). CONCLUSIONS: Punctal plugs produced a beneficial pattern of tear protein change in patients with relatively low Schirmer scores within 3 weeks of punctal occlusion.

Impact of administrative restrictions on antibiotic use and expenditure in Ontario: time series analysis.

OBJECTIVE: In a potential attempt to guide antibiotic prescribing based on current clinical evidence and mitigate the spread of antibiotic resistance, in March 2001 the Ontario Drug Benefit programme restricted reimbursement of two fluoroquinolone antibiotics--ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin--to its beneficiaries. Our objective was to determine the impact of this policy on the volume and cost of antibiotic prescribing. METHOD: Weekly administrative data on antibiotic prescribing volumes and expenditures were analysed between January 1999 and September 2002 to estimate the effect of the policy changes using time series analysis. RESULTS: The policy changes were associated with a statistically significant shift downwards for the fluoroquinolones as a category (1905 fewer prescriptions each week, representing a saving of Can$105,707 a week), driven by a decrease in prescriptions for ciprofloxacin (2084 fewer prescriptions a week, saving Can$129,421 a week). Nitrofurantoin (200 more prescriptions a week, costing an extra Can$2082 a week) and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (532 more prescriptions a week, costing an extra Can$1473 a week) demonstrated a statistically significant shift upwards. The latter also showed a decrease in trend and nitrofurantoin an increase in trend during the time period. There was no statistically significant change in either the total number of antibiotic prescriptions or expenditures associated with the policy of limiting their use. CONCLUSIONS: Although no direct cause and effect can be shown with these observational data, the results suggest that the change in reimbursement policy to restrict prescribing of fluoroquinolones decreased their use and associated expenditures. These decreases were offset by increases in the use of other antibiotics. The balance of consequent benefit and harm of these shifts in prescribing patterns needs to be examined carefully. Alternative solutions to encourage appropriate use of antibiotics deserve exploration.

Effects of Punctal Occlusion on Clinical Signs and Symptoms and on Tear Cytokine Levels in Patients with Dry Eye.

PURPOSE: To investigate changes in signs, symptoms, and tear cytokines following punctal plug occlusion in patients with dry eye. METHODS: A single-center study was conducted at Singapore Eye Research Institute. Nonabsorbable punctal plugs were inserted in the lower punctum of both eyes in patients with moderate dry eye. Over 3 weeks, in the more severe eye, dry eye symptoms, fluorescein corneal staining, Schirmer I (without topical anesthesia) test, tear film breakup time (TFBUT), and safety were assessed. Cytokine and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) levels in tear samples were measured. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (mean age 49.8 years) with moderate dry eye were evaluated. At baseline, mean (standard deviation) global symptoms score was 53.8 (26.5), Schirmer I test score was 5.1 (2.8) mm, and TFBUT was 2.2 (0.6) seconds. After 3 weeks, punctal occlusion significantly reduced global irritation symptoms score (P<.001) and decreased fluorescein staining in all zones (P<.01) except the inferior zone (P=.42). No significant association between levels of cytokines or MMP-9 and either TFBUT or global irritation symptoms were observed at baseline. Levels of several cytokines and MMP-9 were higher in patients with Schirmer I test scores ≤8 mm at baseline. After 3 weeks of punctal occlusion, no significant changes in overall cytokine or MMP-9 levels were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Punctal plug occlusion provided symptomatic relief and reduced fluorescein staining in all except the inferior zone. However, insertion of punctal plugs had minimal effect on tear cytokines and MMP-9 levels, suggesting a need for earlier treatment with anti-inflammatory agents for management of dry eye disease.

Bimatoprost 0.01 % for previously treated patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension in the Korean clinical setting.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the occurrence of hyperemia with, and efficacy of, bimatoprost 0.01 % for patients in Korea previously treated for open-angle glaucoma (OAG; including normal tension glaucoma) or ocular hypertension (OHT). METHODS: In this multicenter, observational study (Asia Pacific Patterns from Early Access of Lumigan 0.01 % in Korea; APPEAL Korea), patients with unachieved target intraocular pressure (IOP) despite previous treatment received bimatoprost 0.01 % daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was incidence of hyperemia and its severity, graded using the standard 5-point photographic scale and grouped as "none to mild" and "moderate to severe". Hyperemia shifts were reported. IOP and adverse events (AEs) were recorded. RESULTS: Of 800 patients (intent-to-treat/safety population), 248 were switched from previous treatment to bimatoprost 0.01 % monotherapy. Hyperemia shifts from baseline at weeks 6 and 12 were unchanged (84.8, 89.8 %), improved (4.4, 4.8 %), or worsened (10.8, 5.4 %), respectively. The shift was significant at week 6 (P < 0.0001). Hyperemia did not worsen significantly in patients previously receiving a prostaglandin analog or prostamide (PGA/PSD). Baseline mean IOP ± SD was 17.0 ± 5.7 mmHg, decreasing to 14.6 ± 3.8 mmHg (P < 0.0001) after 6 weeks, and to 14.7 ± 3.6 mmHg (P < 0.0001) after 12 weeks. Patients switched from PGA or PSD (excluding bimatoprost 0.03 %) to bimatoprost 0.01 % experienced significant IOP reductions from baseline. Treatment-related ocular AEs were reported by 37 patients, the most common being hyperemia (7.3 %). CONCLUSIONS: This subanalysis of the APPEAL Korea study supports use of bimatoprost 0.01 % for previously treated patients with OAG (including normal tension glaucoma) or OHT who did not reach target IOP or were intolerant of previous treatment.

An observational study of bimatoprost 0.01% in patients on prior intraocular pressure-lowering therapy: the Canadian Lumigan(®) RC Early Analysis Review (CLEAR) trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ocular hyperemia and intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of bimatoprost 0.01% in subjects with elevated IOP due to primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) in a real-world clinical setting. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This open-label, 12-week, observational study was conducted at 67 centers in Canada. Subjects with elevated IOP due to POAG or OHT instilled bimatoprost 0.01% as monotherapy once daily. Ocular hyperemia was graded by the investigator at baseline, week 6, and week 12 using a standardized photographic 5-point grading scale. Change in IOP from baseline was also evaluated at these time points. This analysis includes the subgroup of 268 subjects who had been previously treated with latanoprost 0.005%, bimatoprost 0.03%, travoprost 0.004%, and travoprost 0.004% with SofZia™ or nonselective beta-adrenergic receptor blockers prior to the study. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment with 0.01% bimatoprost, ocular hyperemia was graded as none-to-mild hyperemia (grades 0, +0.5, or +1) for 94.1% of subjects and as moderate-to-severe hyperemia (grades +2 or +3) for 5.9%. No statistically significant shifts in ocular hyperemia ratings were observed at week 12 for any of the prior IOP-lowering therapies except bimatoprost 0.03%, in which 20.8% of subjects experienced an improvement. The mean percentage change from baseline IOP at week 12 following the switch to bimatoprost 0.01% monotherapy ranged from -2.3%±17.3% to -26.3%±12.4%. Furthermore, the decreased mean percentage change from baseline IOP was statistically significant across all prior IOP-lowering medications, except for bimatoprost 0.03% at the 6- and 12-week visits and travoprost 0.004% at the 6-week visit. CONCLUSION: This observational study demonstrates that bimatoprost 0.01% was well tolerated among POAG and OHT subjects who switched from prior IOP-lowering medication. Furthermore, a switch in ocular hypertensive treatment to bimatoprost 0.01% was associated with an additional 10%-15% reduction in IOP.

An observational study of bimatoprost 0.01% in treatment-naïve patients with primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: the CLEAR trial.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the occurrence and severity of ocular hyperemia in subjects with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) due to primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) following treatment with bimatoprost 0.01% in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS: This was an open-label, observational study conducted at 67 centers in Canada. Subjects with elevated IOP due to POAG or OHT instilled bimatoprost 0.01% topically as monotherapy once daily. Ocular hyperemia was graded by the investigator at baseline and weeks 6 and 12 using a photographic five-point grading scale. Change in IOP from baseline was also evaluated at these time points. This analysis includes only the subgroup of 522 subjects who were naïve to IOP-lowering medication prior to the study. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment with bimatoprost 0.01%, hyperemia was graded as none-to-mild (grades 0, +0.5, or +1) for 93.3% of subjects and as moderate-to-severe (grades +2 or +3) for 6.7%. At weeks 6 and 12, most subjects (93.2% and 93.5%) had no change in hyperemia grade from baseline. IOP was reduced by 7.4 mmHg (29.8%) at week 6 and 7.7 mmHg (30.9%) at week 12 from baseline. CONCLUSION: This real-world, observational study found that bimatoprost 0.01% instilled once daily reduced IOP by a mean of 30% from baseline without moderate or severe ocular hyperemia in 93% of treatment-naïve subjects with POAG or OHT.

Three-month, randomized, parallel-group comparison of brimonidine-timolol versus dorzolamide-timolol fixed-combination therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Fixed combinations of 0.2% brimonidine-0.5% timolol and 2% dorzolamide-0.5% timolol are used to lower intraocular pressure (IOP). The objective of this study was to evaluate the IOP-lowering efficacy and ocular tolerability of brimonidine-timolol compared with dorzolamide-timolol when used as monotherapy or as adjunctive therapy to a prostaglandin analog (PGA) in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Pooled data analysis of two randomized, investigator-masked, 3-month, parallel-group studies with identical protocols (ten sites). In all, 180 patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who were in need of lower IOP received topical brimonidine-timolol BID or dorzolamide-timolol BID as monotherapy (n = 101) or as adjunctive therapy to a PGA (latanoprost, bimatoprost, or travoprost) (n = 79). CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The studies are registered with the identifiers NCT00822081 and NCT00822055 at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: IOP was measured at 10 a.m. (peak effect) at baseline and at months 1 and 3. Tolerability/comfort was evaluated using a patient questionnaire. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant between-group differences in patient demographics. Most patients were Caucasian, and the mean age was 68 years. There were also no statistically significant differences between treatment groups in baseline IOP. At month 3, the mean (SD) reduction from baseline IOP for patients on fixed-combination monotherapy was 7.7 (4.2) mmHg (32.3%) with brimonidine-timolol versus 6.7 (5.0) mmHg (26.1%) with dorzolamide-timolol (p = 0.040). The mean reduction from PGA-treated baseline IOP for patients on fixed-combination adjunctive therapy was 6.9 (4.8) mmHg (29.3%) with brimonidine-timolol versus 5.2 (3.7) mmHg (23.5%) with dorzolamide-timolol (p = 0.213). Patients on brimonidine-timolol reported less burning (p < 0.001), stinging (p < 0.001), and unusual taste (p < 0.001) than patients on dorzolamide-timolol. CONCLUSIONS: Fixed-combination brimonidine-timolol provided the same or greater IOP lowering compared with fixed-combination dorzolamide-timolol. Both fixed-combination medications were safe and well-tolerated. Brimonidine-timolol received higher ratings of ocular comfort than dorzolamide-timolol. The duration of the studies was 3 months, and additional studies will be needed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of brimonidine-timolol and dorzolamide-timolol during long-term treatment.

Real-world utilization patterns of cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% within managed care.

BACKGROUND: Cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion (Restasis) is a treatment for dry eye disease. OBJECTIVES: To examine patients' cyclosporine 0.05% utilization patterns by analyzing prescription fill data. METHODS: A retrospective analysis with a large de-identified longitudinal patient database was conducted. Participants in the study had 1 prescription fill for cyclosporine 0.05% during a 3-month "enrollment" period from January 1 to March 31, 2004, and at least 1 refill within the following 12 months. Continuing patients had at least 1 cyclosporine 0.05% prescription fill, and new patients had none during 12 months prior to the "enrollment" period. Daily, monthly, and annual utilizations were assessed. RESULTS: 38,164 patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were female (82%), 50 years or older (77%), and new to therapy (59%). The FDA-recommended use is 2 vials daily (2 trays/month, each tray containing 32 vials) to receive the prescribed dosage of 1 drop in each eye twice daily. Prescription refill patterns demonstrated 73% of patients used 1 tray/month; similarly, 80% of the patients used 11 trays or less per year. Daily utilization differed between continuing and new patients. New patients had a bimodal use pattern. Over 30% were using > or = 1.75 vials/day and approximately 55% were using 0.25 to 1.25 vials/day. The majority of continuing patients (approximately 80%), however, used 0.25 to 1.25 vials/day. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients used about 1 vial per day, less than the labeled 2 per day. The cost to managed care for cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion may be less than anticipated. Key words: Cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion, longitudinal patient database, cost, utilization.