RESUMEN
Background: There were more than 1 million new cases of stomach cancer concerning oesophageal cancer, there were more than 600,000 new cases of oesophageal cancer in 2020. After a successful resection in these cases, the role of early oral feeding (EOF) was questionable, due to the possibility of fatal anastomosis leakage. It is still debated whether EOF is more advantageous compared to late oral feeding. Our study aimed to compare the effect of early postoperative oral feeding and late oral feeding after upper gastrointestinal resections due to malignancy. Methods: Two authors performed an extensive search and selection of articles independently to identify randomized control trials (RCT) of the question of interest. Statistical analyses were performed including mean difference, odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals, statistical heterogeneity, and statistical publication bias, to identify potential significant differences. The Risk of Bias and the quality of evidence were estimated. Results: We identified 6 relevant RCTs, which included 703 patients. The appearance of the first gas (MD = -1.16; p = 0.009), first defecation (MD = -0.91; p < 0.001), and the length of hospitalization (MD = -1.92; p = 0.008) favored the EOF group. Numerous binary outcomes were defined, but significant difference was not verified in the case of anastomosis insufficiency (p = 0.98), pneumonia (p = 0.88), wound infection (p = 0.48), bleeding (p = 0.52), rehospitalization (p = 0.23), rehospitalization to the intensive care unit (ICU) (p = 0.46), gastrointestinal paresis (p = 0.66), ascites (p = 0.45). Conclusion: Early postoperative oral feeding, compared to late oral feeding has no risk of several possible postoperative morbidities after upper GI surgeries, but has several advantageous effects on a patient's recovery. Systematic Review Registration: identifier, CRD 42022302594.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The outcomes of surgical interventions for achalasia treatment improved with the advent of minimally invasive surgery. Robotic-assisted Heller-Dor's (RAHD) procedure established over the last years, provides important advantages to surgeons, such as binocular three-dimensional vision and improvement of fine motor control. METHOD: Between October and December of 2022, first in Hungary, 3 patients (37-year-old man, 55- and 72-year-old women) underwent RAHD procedure for achalasia at the Clinical Centre of the University of Pécs using the da Vinci Xi system. RESULTS: RAHD procedure was feasible without any particular problems and the postoperative course of all three patients was uneventful. The operation times were 198, 204 and 238 minutes, including 23, 19 and 14 minutes for the setup time of the robot. By the last patient, due to an accompanying hiatal hernia, an additional hiatal reconstruction was also performed. In the first 2 cases, the patients were discharged on the 4th postoperative day, while in the last case, with the additional hiatal reconstruction, the patient was emitted on the 6th postoperative day. DISCUSSION: There are several published studies about RAHD cardiomyotomy. The general conclusion is that, in experienced hands, RAHD procedure is easy to perform, ensures a meticulous esophageal and gastric myotomy, allowing to visualize and divide each muscle fiber with a significantly lower rate of mucosal perforations. However, by RAHD procedure, the overall costs are higher, including a longer operation time during the learning curve. At the same time, the avoidance of mucosal lacerations and their possible consequences has to be weighed against the higher overall costs. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cardiomyotomy is the first standard upper-gastrointestinal operation where a clear advantage of the use of a surgical robot has been proven. Thus, wherever this equipment is available, it should be preferred for this procedure. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(14): 542-547.