ZNF687 Mutations in Severe Paget Disease of Bone Associated with Giant Cell Tumor.

Paget disease of bone (PDB) is a skeletal disorder characterized by focal abnormalities of bone remodeling, which result in enlarged and deformed bones in one or more regions of the skeleton. In some cases, the pagetic tissue undergoes neoplastic transformation, resulting in osteosarcoma and, less frequently, in giant cell tumor of bone (GCT). We performed whole-exome sequencing in a large family with 14 PDB-affected members, four of whom developed GCT at multiple pagetic skeletal sites, and we identified the c.2810C>G (p.Pro937Arg) missense mutation in the zinc finger protein 687 gene (ZNF687). The mutation precisely co-segregated with the clinical phenotype in all affected family members. The sequencing of seven unrelated individuals with GCT associated with PDB (GCT/PDB) identified the same mutation in all individuals, unravelling a founder effect. ZNF687 is highly expressed during osteoclastogenesis and osteoblastogenesis and is dramatically upregulated in the tumor tissue of individuals with GCT/PDB. Interestingly, our preliminary findings showed that ZNF687, indicated as a target gene of the NFkB transcription factor by ChIP-seq analysis, is also upregulated in the peripheral blood of PDB-affected individuals with (n = 5) or without (n = 6) mutations in SQSTM1, encouraging additional studies to investigate its potential role as a biomarker of PDB risk.

Detection of SQSTM1/P392L post-zygotic mutations in Paget's disease of bone.

Paget's disease of bone (PDB) is transmitted, in one-third of cases, in an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance with incomplete penetrance. The SQSTM1/P392L germinal mutation is the most common mutation associated with PDB. Given the focal nature of PDB, one team of investigators showed that SQSTM1/P392L somatic mutations could occur in pagetic bone lesions in the absence of germinal mutations detectable in the peripheral blood. The objectives of this study were to develop a reliable method to detect SQSTM1/P392L post-zygotic mutations, by optimizing a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-clamping method reported to be effective in detecting post-zygotic mutations in peripheral blood from patients with fibrous dysplasia; and to evaluate the frequency of this post-zygotic mutation in PDB patients. We used a locked nucleic acid (LNA) specifically designed for the SQSTM1/P392L mutation, which blocks the wild-type allele amplification during the PCR. DNA from 376 pagetic patients and 297 controls, all without any SQSTM1/P392L germinal mutation, was analyzed. We found that 4.8 % of PDB patients and 1.4 % of controls were carriers of this post-zygotic mutation [p = 0.013, OR 3.68 (1.23; 11.00)]. PDB patient carriers of a post-zygotic mutation had a lower number of affected bones and Renier's index than patients carrying a germinal mutation, suggesting a lower disease extension. We also demonstrated that this post-zygotic mutation was restricted to the monocytic lineage. These results confirmed that LNA PCR clamping is effective for the detection of SQSTM1/P392L post-zygotic mutations, which may occur in patients with PDB.

Obesity, health-care utilization, and health-related quality of life after fracture in postmenopausal women: Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW).

Fractures may be associated with higher morbidity in obese postmenopausal women than in nonobese women. We compared health-care utilization, functional status, and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in obese, nonobese, and underweight women with fractures. Information from the GLOW study, started in 2006, was collected at baseline and at 1, 2, and 3 years. In this subanalysis, self-reported incident clinical fractures, health-care utilization, HRQL, and functional status were recorded and examined. Women in GLOW (n = 60,393) were aged ≥55 years, from 723 physician practices at 17 sites in 10 countries. Complete data for fracture and body mass index were available for 90 underweight, 3,270 nonobese, and 941 obese women with one or more incident clinical fractures during the 3-year follow-up. The median hospital length of stay, adjusted for age, comorbidities, and fracture type, was significantly greater in obese than nonobese women (6 vs. 5 days, p = 0.017). Physical function and vitality score were significantly worse in obese than in nonobese women, both before and after fracture; but changes after fracture were similar across groups. Use of antiosteoporosis medication was significantly lower in obese than in nonobese or underweight women. In conclusion, obese women with fracture undergo a longer period of hospitalization for treatment and have poorer functional status and HRQL than nonobese women. Whether these differences translate into higher economic costs and adverse effects on longer-term outcomes remains to be established.

Osteoporosis treatment prevents hip fracture similarly in both sexes: the FOCUS observational study.

Randomized trials have not been performed, and may never be, to determine if osteoporosis treatment prevents hip fracture in men. Addressing that evidence gap, we analyzed data from an observational study of new hip fractures in a large integrated healthcare system to compare the reduction in hip fractures associated with standard-of-care osteoporosis treatment in men versus women. Sampling from 271 389 patients age ≥ 65 who had a hip-containing computed tomography scan during care between 2005-2018, we selected all who subsequently had a first hip fracture (cases) after the CT scan (start of observation) and a sex-matched equal number of randomly selected patients. From those, we analyzed all who tested positive for osteoporosis (DXA-equivalent hip bone mineral density T-score ≤ -2.5, measured from the CT scan using VirtuOst). We defined "treated" as at least six months of any osteoporosis medication by prescription fill data during follow up; "not-treated" was no prescription fill. Sex-specific odds ratios of hip fracture for treated versus not-treated patients were calculated by logistic regression; adjustments included age, BMD T-score, a BMD-treatment interaction, body mass index, race/ethnicity, and seven baseline clinical risk factors. At two-year follow-up, 33.9% of the women (750/2211 patients) and 24.0% of the men (175/728 patients) were treated, primarily with alendronate; 51.3% and 66.3%, respectively, were not-treated; and 721 and 269, respectively, had a first hip fracture since the CT scan. Odds ratio of hip fracture for treated versus not-treated was 0.26 (95% confidence interval: 0.21-0.33) for women and 0.21 (0.13-0.34) for men; the ratio of these odds ratios (men:women) was 0.81 (0.47-1.37), indicating no significant sex effect. Various sensitivity and stratified analyses confirmed these trends, including results at five-year follow-up. Given these results and considering the relevant literature, we conclude that osteoporosis treatment prevents hip fracture similarly in both sexes.

Much evidence suggests that osteoporosis treatment should prevent hip fracture similarly in both sexes. However, because of their expense, randomized clinical trials to demonstrate that definitively have not been performed and may never be. As a result, osteoporosis testing and treatment is not as widely adopted for men as it is for women. Addressing that evidence gap, we analyzed data from over 250 000 patients in the Kaiser Permanente healthcare system in Southern California. Sampling a subset of all patients over a 13-year period who had had a computed tomography (CT or CAT) scan as part of their medical care for any reason, we measured bone mineral density from the CT scans to identify all patients who had osteoporosis at the hip and then used data from the electronic health records to determine statistically the risk of a future hip fracture for those who were treated for osteoporosis versus those who were not treated. We found that the reduction in risk of hip fracture associated with treatment did not differ between the sexes. These results demonstrate that treating osteoporosis in patients at high risk of hip fracture should reduce the risk of hip fracture similarly in both sexes.

An increased rate of falling leads to a rise in fracture risk in postmenopausal women with self-reported osteoarthritis: a prospective multinational cohort study (GLOW).

OBJECTIVES: Patients with osteoarthritis have increased bone mass but no decrease in fractures. The association between self-reported osteoarthritis and incident falls and fractures was studied in postmenopausal women. METHODS: The Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women is a prospective multinational cohort of 60,393 non-institutionalised women aged ≥55 years who had visited primary care practices within the previous 2 years. Questionnaires were mailed at yearly intervals. Patients were classified as having osteoarthritis if they answered yes to the question, 'Has a doctor or other health provider ever said that you had osteoarthritis or degenerative joint disease?', and this was validated against primary care records in a subsample. Information on incident falls, fractures and covariates was self-reported. Cox and Poisson models were used for incident fractures and number of falls, respectively, to compute hazard ratios (HRs) and rate ratios (RRs) for baseline osteoarthritis status. RESULTS: Of 51 386 women followed for a median of 2.9 years (interquartile range 2.1-3.0), 20 409 (40%) reported osteoarthritis. The adjusted HR for osteoarthritis predicting fracture was 1.21 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.30; p<0.0001) and the adjusted RR for falls was 1.24 (95% CI 1.22 to 1.26; p<0.0001). However, the association between osteoarthritis and fracture was not significant after adjustment for incident falls (HR 1.06 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.15; p=0.13)). CONCLUSIONS: Postmenopausal women with self-reported osteoarthritis have a 20% increased risk of fracture and experience 25% more falls than those without osteoarthritis. These data suggest that increased falls are the causal pathway of the association between osteoarthritis and fractures.

Genetic association study of Dickkopf-1 and sclerostin genes with paget disease of bone.

Increased expression of DKK1 gene was reported in pagetic osteoblasts and stromal cells, and increased serum levels of DKK1 and SOST proteins were reported in patients with Paget disease of bone (PDB). This study aimed at identifying rare genetic variants of the DKK1 and SOST genes and at testing for genetic association with PDB in the French-Canadian population. Exons, promoters, and exon-intron junctions of these genes were sequenced in patients with PDB and healthy controls. An association study of Tag SNPs of both genes was also performed in 239 pagetic patients and 297 healthy individuals. Three rare variants were identified in this study, all located in the DKK1 gene: one variant in the second exon leading to alteration in a highly conserved amino acid (p.R120L), one in the 5'-untranslated region (-50 C/A), and one in a splice site of intron 1 (IVS1 184 T/C), although none of these rare variants were associated with PDB. A genetic association of a Tag SNP of the DKK1 gene was found: the G allele of rs1569198 was significantly decreased in patients in comparison to controls (42 vs. 49 %, uncorrected P = 0.03, OR = 0.77, 95 % CI 0.61-0.98). In conclusion, this study identified three rare genetic variants in DKK1 in the French-Canadian population. In addition, a weak genetic association of a common variant of DKK1, rs1569198, which is located on a predicted new acceptor site for splicing of this gene, was observed in PDB, whereas no rare variant or genetic association was found in the SOST gene.

Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

BACKGROUND: Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody to the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand (RANKL) that blocks its binding to RANK, inhibiting the development and activity of osteoclasts, decreasing bone resorption, and increasing bone density. Given its unique actions, denosumab may be useful in the treatment of osteoporosis. METHODS: We enrolled 7868 women between the ages of 60 and 90 years who had a bone mineral density T score of less than -2.5 but not less than -4.0 at the lumbar spine or total hip. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either 60 mg of denosumab or placebo subcutaneously every 6 months for 36 months. The primary end point was new vertebral fracture. Secondary end points included nonvertebral and hip fractures. RESULTS: As compared with placebo, denosumab reduced the risk of new radiographic vertebral fracture, with a cumulative incidence of 2.3% in the denosumab group, versus 7.2% in the placebo group (risk ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 0.41; P<0.001)--a relative decrease of 68%. Denosumab reduced the risk of hip fracture, with a cumulative incidence of 0.7% in the denosumab group, versus 1.2% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.97; P=0.04)--a relative decrease of 40%. Denosumab also reduced the risk of nonvertebral fracture, with a cumulative incidence of 6.5% in the denosumab group, versus 8.0% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.95; P=0.01)--a relative decrease of 20%. There was no increase in the risk of cancer, infection, cardiovascular disease, delayed fracture healing, or hypocalcemia, and there were no cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw and no adverse reactions to the injection of denosumab. CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab given subcutaneously twice yearly for 36 months was associated with a reduction in the risk of vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip fractures in women with osteoporosis. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00089791.)

Bone mineral density in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer: a prospective cohort study.

Estrogen may have opposing effects on health, namely increasing the risk of breast cancer and improving bone health by increasing bone mineral density (BMD). The objective of this study was to compare dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) BMD between women newly diagnosed with breast cancer and matched controls without breast cancer. Women newly diagnosed with breast cancer treated between April 2012 and October 2017 were prospectively enrolled. A control group was established of women with negative mammography or breast ultrasound, matched 1:1 by age, body mass index, parity, and the use of hormone replacement therapy. All those included had DXA BMD, and lab assessments at enrollment. Of 869 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, 464 signed informed consent. Of the 344 who completed the study protocol, 284 were matched to controls. Overall, the mean age was 58 years. Compared to the control group, for the breast cancer group, the mean vitamin D level was lower (48.9 ± 19.0 vs. 53.8 ± 28.8 nmol/L, p = 0.022); and mean values were higher of total hip BMD (0.95 ± 0.14 vs. 0.92 ± 0.12 g/cm2, p = 0.002), T score (-0.38 ± 1.17 vs. -0.68 ± 0.98, p = 0.002), and Z score (0.32 ± 1.09 vs. 0.01 ± 0.88, p < 0.001). Among the women with breast cancer, no correlations were found of baseline BMD with tumor size or grade, nodal involvement, or breast cancer stage. We concluded that women with newly diagnosed breast cancer tend to have higher BMD than women with similar characteristics but without breast cancer. This implies that BMD might be considered a biomarker for breast cancer risk.

Diabetes and bone health: the relationship between diabetes and osteoporosis-associated fractures.

It is well established that osteoporosis and diabetes are prevalent diseases with significant associated morbidity and mortality. The relationship between diabetes and bone disease is less well defined but recent data seem to suggest that diabetes and the complications associated with it can be detrimental to bone health. Furthermore, it appears that thiazolidinediones, medications used in the treatment of diabetes, can also cause bone loss and increase the risk of fracture. This article will review the relationship between diabetes and bone health.

A meta-analysis of osteoporotic fracture risk with medication nonadherence.

OBJECTIVES: Therapy for osteoporosis reduces the risk of fracture in clinical trials; real-world adherence to therapy is suboptimal and may reduce the effectiveness of intervention. The objective was to assess the fracture risk among patients nonadherent versus adherent to therapy for osteoporosis. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and CINAHL were searched for English-language publications of observational studies (January 1998-February 2009). Proceedings from two recent meetings of five relevant conferences were hand searched. Prospective and retrospective observational studies of patients with osteoporosis receiving bisphosphonates, parathyroid hormone, or selective estrogen receptor modulators denosumab were included. Studies were required to consider both fracture risk and adherence (compliance and/or persistence); any definition of adherence/fracture was acceptable. Data were analyzed using pooled comparisons of the odds and hazard ratios of fracture in noncompliance versus compliance and nonpersistence versus persistence. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine the effect of clinical heterogeneity on the results. RESULTS: Twenty-seven citations were identified, the majority of which were retrospective database analyses considering the effect of adherence to bisphosphonate therapy on fracture at any skeletal site. The absolute frequency of fracture ranged from 6% to 38% with noncompliance and from 5% to 19% with nonpersistence (104-159 weeks). Meta-analysis indicates that fracture risk increases by approximately 30% with noncompliance (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.29 [1.22-1.38]; hazard ratio 1.28 [1.18-1.38]) and by 30% to 40% with nonpersistence (odds ratio 1.40 [1.29-1.52]; hazard ratio 1.32 [1.23-1.42]). CONCLUSIONS: Poor medication adherence is associated with a significantly increased risk of fracture versus optimal adherence. Improving medication adherence in patients with osteoporosis may lead to a greater reduction in fracture.

Bisphosphonate treatment and the risk of atypical femoral fracture among patients participating in a Fracture Liaison Service of a tertiary medical center.

Bisphosphonates are common treatment for osteoporosis. Among patients admitted with hip fracture, atypical femoral fractures (AFF) were more prevalent in those who were treated with Bisphosphonates for five or more years. Five years of Bisphosphonates treatment may signify an increased risk for AFF, though the absolute risk remains very low. PURPOSE: Atypical femoral fractures (AFF) are a rare complication of bisphosphonate (BP) treatment. We evaluated the correlation between BP exposure and AFF risk among hip fracture patients. METHODS: This retrospective nested case-control study included patients over age 50 years, operated for osteoporotic hip fracture between July 2014 and November 2018, who attended our Fracture Liaison Service. We classified fracture radiographs and compared demographic, clinical, biochemical, and drug purchase data between patients with AFF and those with typical osteoporotic hip fracture (controls). To correct for the younger age of patients with AFF, we matched each case (AFF) with three controls according to age ([Formula: see text] 1 year) and sex and performed a conditional logistic regression model. RESULTS: Of 989 patients, 31 (3%) had AFF. Patients with AFF were younger than those with inter-trochanteric fractures (mean ± SD: 72.3 ± 10.3 vs. 80.2 ± 9.6 years, p < 0.001). Following matching, the mean Charlson's Comorbidity Index (CCI) was lower in the AFF than in the control group (2.9 ± 3.7 vs. 4.7 ± 4.2; p = 0.030) and a higher proportion of them were treated with BP for 5 years or more (58.1 vs. 16.0%; p < 0.001). Among patients admitted with hip fracture who were treated with BP for 5 years or more, the odds ratio of this fracture being atypical was significantly higher compared with no BP treatment (21.7; 95% CI-4.1-113.9). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AFF compared to typical hip fractures showed better baseline medical conditions irrespective of their younger age. Five years of BP treatment may be associated with an increased risk for AFF, though the absolute risk remains very low.

Favorable skeletal benefit/risk of long-term denosumab therapy: A virtual-twin analysis of fractures prevented relative to skeletal safety events observed.

Antiresorptive therapies reduce fracture risk; however, long-term bone turnover inhibition may raise concerns about rare, but serious, skeletal adverse events-atypical femoral fracture (AFF) and osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against RANKL, has demonstrated sustained low vertebral and nonvertebral fracture rates with low skeletal adverse event rates in the 3-year FREEDOM trial and its 7-year Extension (in which all subjects received open-label denosumab). In this analysis, we aimed to estimate fractures prevented relative to skeletal adverse events observed with 10 years of denosumab therapy. We modeled a hypothetical placebo group using the virtual-twin method, thereby allowing calculation of fractures prevented with denosumab treatment (relative to the virtual-placebo group) in the context of AFF or ONJ events observed in the long-term denosumab group. Estimated virtual-placebo and observed long-term denosumab exposure-adjusted fracture rates per 100,000 subject-years were calculated for fractures classified as clinical (3180 and 1777, respectively), major osteoporotic (2699 and 1525), vertebral (1879 and 901), and nonvertebral (2924 and 1528), and compared with observed AFF and ONJ in the long-term denosumab group (5 and 35 per 100,000 subject-years, respectively). The skeletal benefit/risk ratio (fractures prevented per adverse event observed) for clinical fractures was 281 (AFF) and 40 (ONJ). Based on this model, denosumab treatment for up to 10 years has a favorable skeletal benefit/risk profile when comparing fractures prevented per skeletal adverse event observed. Clinical trial registration: NCT00089791, NCT00523341.

Estimation of Long-Term Efficacy of Denosumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis: A FRAX- and Virtual Twin-Based Post Hoc Analysis From the FREEDOM and FREEDOM Extension Trials.

The 3-year placebo-controlled FREEDOM (Fracture REduction Evaluation of Denosumab in Osteoporosis Every 6 Months) trial established the antifracture efficacy of denosumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The 7-year open-label extension demonstrated that denosumab treatment for up to 10 years was associated with low rates of adverse events and low fracture incidence. The extension lacked a long-term control group, thus limiting the ability to fully evaluate long-term efficacy. This analysis provides a quantitative estimate of the long-term antifracture efficacy of denosumab based on two approaches: comparison with FRAX®- (Fracture Risk Assessment Tool-) and virtual twin-estimated 10-year fracture rates. Subjects who were randomized to denosumab in the FREEDOM trial, continued into the Extension study, completed the 10-year visit, and missed ≤1 dose in the FREEDOM trial and ≤1 dose in the Extension (n = 1278) were included in the analysis. The 10-year observed cumulative incidence of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fractures was compared with the 10-year fracture probability predicted at baseline by FRAX, a computer-based fracture risk algorithm, and with that estimated for a hypothetical cohort of 10-year placebo controls (virtual twins). The observed 10-year fracture incidence was lower than the 10-year probability predicted by FRAX for both MOF (10.75% [95% CI, 9.05 to 12.46] versus 15.63% [95% CI, 15.08 to 16.18], respectively), and hip fractures (1.17% [95% CI, 0.58 to 1.76] versus 5.62% [95% CI, 5.28 to 5.97], respectively). The observed fracture incidence was also lower than the fracture rate estimated in a hypothetical cohort of 10-year placebo controls for MOF (23.13% [95% CI, 17.76 to 28.87]; relative risk 0.49 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.64]). These data support the long-term efficacy of denosumab in reducing MOF and hip fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. © 2020 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Alternative indications for bisphosphonate therapy.

Bisphosphonates are currently used in the treatment of osteoporosis (postmenopausal and steroid-induced), hypercalcemia of malignancy, Paget's disease of bone, multiple myeloma, and skeletally related events associated with metastatic bone disease in breast, prostate, lung, and other cancers. There are, however, numerous other conditions where a decrease in bone remodeling by bisphosphonates might aid in disease management. The focus of this review will be to discuss a select group of conditions for which bisphosphonate therapy may be efficacious. In this review we present several cases where bisphosphonates have been used as a primary or adjunctive treatment for giant cell lesions of the jaws. Use of bisphosphonate therapy for giant cell tumors of the appendicular skeleton, pediatric osteogenesis imperfecta, fibrous dysplasia, Gaucher's disease, and osteomyelitis will be discussed. Finally, we will review previous in vivo studies on the use of bisphosphonates to augment integration and to treat osteolysis surrounding failing orthopedic implants.

The natural history of primary hyperparathyroidism with or without parathyroid surgery after 15 years.

CONTEXT: Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) often presents without classical symptoms such as overt skeletal disease or nephrolithiasis. We previously reported that calciotropic indices and bone mineral density (BMD) are stable in untreated patients for up to a decade, whereas after parathyroidectomy, normalization of biochemistries and increases in BMD ensue. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to provide additional insights in patients with and without surgery for up to 15 yr. DESIGN: The study had an observational design. SETTING: The setting was a referral center. PATIENTS: Patients included 116 patients (25 men, 91 women); 99 (85%) were asymptomatic. INTERVENTION: Fifty-nine patients (51%) underwent parathyroidectomy and 57 patients were followed up without surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: BMD was measured. RESULTS: Lumbar spine BMD remained stable for 15 yr. However, BMD started to fall at cortical sites even before 10 yr, ultimately decreasing by 10 +/- 3% (mean +/- sem; P < 0.05) at the femoral neck, and 35 +/- 5%; P < 0.05 at the distal radius, in the few patients observed for 15 yr. Thirty-seven percent of asymptomatic patients showed disease progression (one or more new guidelines for surgery) at any time point over the 15 yr. Meeting surgical criteria at baseline did not predict who would have progressive disease. BMD increases in patients who underwent surgery were sustained for the entire 15 yr. CONCLUSIONS: Parathyroidectomy led to normalization of biochemical indices and sustained increases in BMD. Without surgery, PHPT progressed in one third of individuals over 15 yr; meeting surgical criteria at the outset did not predict this progression. Cortical bone density decreased in the majority of subjects with additional observation time points and long-term follow-up. These results raise questions regarding how long patients with PHPT should be followed up without intervention.

Osteoporosis and Hip Fracture Risk From Routine Computed Tomography Scans: The Fracture, Osteoporosis, and CT Utilization Study (FOCUS).

Methods now exist for analyzing previously taken clinical computed tomography (CT) scans to measure a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-equivalent bone mineral density (BMD) at the hip and a finite element analysis-derived femoral strength. We assessed the efficacy of this "biomechanical CT" (BCT) approach for identifying patients at high risk of incident hip fracture in a large clinical setting. Using a case-cohort design sampled from 111,694 women and men aged 65 or older who had a prior hip CT scan, a DXA within 3 years of the CT, and no prior hip fracture, we compared those with subsequent hip fracture (n = 1959) with randomly selected sex-stratified controls (n = 1979) and analyzed their CT scans blinded to all other data. We found that the age-, race-, and body mass index (BMI)-adjusted hazard ratio (HR; per standard deviation) for femoral strength was significant before (women: HR = 2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-3.5; men: 2.8, 2.1-3.7) and after adjusting also for the (lowest) hip BMD T-score by BCT (women: 2.1, 1.4-3.2; men: 2.7, 1.6-4.6). The hazard ratio for the hip BMD T-score was similar between BCT and DXA for both sexes (women: 2.1, 1.8-2.5 BCT versus 2.1, 1.7-2.5 DXA; men: 2.8, 2.1-3.8 BCT versus 2.5, 2.0-3.2 DXA) and was higher than for the (lowest) spine/hip BMD T-score by DXA (women: 1.6, 1.4-1.9; men: 2.1, 1.6-2.7). Compared with the latter as a clinical-practice reference and using both femoral strength and the hip BMD T-score from BCT, sensitivity for predicting hip fracture was higher for BCT (women: 0.66 versus 0.59; men: 0.56 versus 0.48), with comparable respective specificity (women: 0.66 versus 0.67; men: 0.76 versus 0.78). We conclude that BCT analysis of previously acquired routine abdominal or pelvic CT scans is at least as effective as DXA testing for identifying patients at high risk of hip fracture. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Evaluation of a Multimodal, Direct-to-Patient Educational Intervention Targeting Barriers to Osteoporosis Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Osteoporosis treatment rates are declining, even among those with past fractures. Novel, low-cost approaches are needed to improve osteoporosis care. We conducted a parallel group, controlled, randomized clinical trial evaluating a behavioral intervention for improving osteoporosis medication use. A total of 2684 women with self-reported fracture history after age 45 years not using osteoporosis therapy from US Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW) sites were randomized 1:1 to receive a multimodal, tailored, direct-to-patient, video intervention versus usual care. The primary study outcome was self-report of osteoporosis medication use at 6 months. Other outcomes included calcium and vitamin D supplementation, bone mineral density (BMD) testing, readiness for behavioral change, and barriers to treatment. In intent-to-treat analyses, there were no significant differences between groups (intervention versus control) in osteoporosis medication use (11.7% versus 11.4%, p = 0.8), calcium supplementation (31.8% versus 32.6%, p = 0.7), vitamin D intake (41.3% versus 41.9%, p = 0.8), or BMD testing (61.8% versus 57.1%, p = 0.2). In the intervention group, fewer women were in the precontemplative stage of behavior change, more women reported seeing their primary care provider, had concerns regarding osteonecrosis of the jaw, and difficulty in taking/remembering to take osteoporosis medications. We found differences in BMD testing among the subgroup of women with no prior osteoporosis treatment, those who provided contact information, and those with no past BMD testing. In per protocol analyses, women with appreciable exposure to the online intervention (n = 257) were more likely to start nonbisphosphonates (odds ratio [OR] = 2.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-5.79) compared with the usual care group. Although our intervention did not increase the use of osteoporosis therapy at 6 months, it increased nonbisphosphonate medication use and BMD testing in select subgroups, shifted participants' readiness for behavior change, and altered perceptions of barriers to osteoporosis treatment. Achieving changes in osteoporosis care using patient activation approaches alone is challenging. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Maintaining the trust of physicians and the public in the medical literature: report of a task force on scientific publishing of clinical trials.

In 2006, the American Society of Bone and Mineral Research and the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research convened a task force to consider whether and how to change our editorial policies to assure complete and unbiased reporting of clinical trials. We invited editors of journals that publish research on osteoporosis and disorders of bone and mineral metabolism and presidents of related societies to participate. The task force was charged to consider whether journals should (1) adopt the Principles for Protecting Integrity in the Conduct and Reporting of Clinical Trials published in 2006 by the American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) and should (2) require authors and sponsors of industry-funded clinical trials to provide a jointly signed letter that states that the authors had full access to all the data and analyses on which the manuscript was based. The AAMC Principles recommend that multicenter trials should designate a Lead Investigator, Steering Committee, and Publication and Analysis (P&A) Committee, which should consist of a majority of academic investigators who are not sponsor employees. The P&A Committee should have the right to access any data generated during a study and to conduct its own statistical analyses. A majority of task force members voted to support the AAMC Principles, to require a letter jointly signed by academic investigators and industry sponsor stating that the authors had access to the data on which the submission was based, and to recommend adoption of these requirements to their respective societies and journals. Broad-based adoption of the AAMC Principles and requirement of a jointly signed attestation of data access by journals that publish clinical trials in diseases of bone and mineral metabolism should improve the position of academic clinical investigators in their interactions with industry and other funding sources.