Consensus statement on the management of hyperkalaemia-An Asia-Pacific perspective.

Hyperkalaemia is an electrolyte imbalance that impairs muscle function and myocardial excitability, and can potentially lead to fatal arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. The prevalence of hyperkalaemia is estimated to be 6%-7% worldwide and 7%-10% in Asia. Hyperkalaemia frequently affects patients with chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and diabetes mellitus, particularly those receiving treatment with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors. Both hyperkalaemia and interruption of RAAS inhibitor therapy are associated with increased risks for cardiovascular events, hospitalisations, and death, highlighting a clinical dilemma in high-risk patients. Conventional potassium-binding resins are widely used for the treatment of hyperkalaemia; however, caveats such as the unpalatable taste and the risk of gastrointestinal side effects limit their chronic use. Recent evidence suggests that, with a rapid onset of action and improved gastrointestinal tolerability, novel oral potassium binders (e.g., patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate) are alternative treatment options for both acute and chronic hyperkalaemia. To optimise the care for patients with hyperkalaemia in the Asia-Pacific region, a multidisciplinary expert panel was convened to review published literature, share clinical experiences, and ultimately formulate 25 consensus statements, covering three clinical areas: (i) risk factors of hyperkalaemia and risk stratification in susceptible patients; (ii) prevention of hyperkalaemia for at-risk individuals; and (iii) correction of hyperkalaemia for at-risk individuals with cardiorenal disease. These statements were expected to serve as useful guidance in the management of hyperkalaemia for health care providers in the region.

Different glycaemia-related risk factors for incident Alzheimer's disease in men and women with type 2 diabetes-A sex-specific analysis of the Hong Kong diabetes database.

AIMS: Sexual dimorphism has been reported in the epidemiology, neurobiologic susceptibility and clinical presentation of Alzheimer's disease (AD). As poor glycaemic control is associated with increased risks of AD, we aimed to investigate whether glycaemia-related risk factors also differ between men and women, using a retrospective, sex-specific analysis of a large Chinese cohort with diabetes. MATERIALS & METHODS: A total of 85,514 Chinese individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D; 46,783 women and 38,731 men), aged ≥60 years, were identified from electronic health records and observed for incident AD. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the associations with incident AD of several glycaemia-related risk factors, including severe hypoglycaemia, mean HbA1c and indices of HbA1c variability, in men and women separately. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 6 years, women had a higher incidence of AD than men (2.3% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.001). Both men and women shared the same independent non-glycaemic clinical predictors, which included older age, lower body mass index and longer duration of diabetes. However, for glycaemia-related risk factors, we observed that severe hypoglycaemia and indices of HbA1c variability were independent predictors of incident AD in women but not in men, and the associations were irrespective of their baseline glycaemic control and duration of diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlighted that glycaemia-related risk factors for incident AD differ between men and women with T2D. Strategies to maintain glycaemic stability and avoid severe hypoglycaemia might be especially important to preserve healthy cognition in older women with diabetes.

The CEPHEUS Pan-Asian survey: high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment rate among hypercholesterolaemic patients undergoing lipid-lowering treatment in a Hong Kong regional centre.

OBJECTIVES. To evaluate attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals among hypercholesterolaemic patients undergoing lipid-lowering drug treatment in Hong Kong and to identify potential determinants of treatment outcomes. DESIGN. Cross-sectional observational study. SETTING. A single site in Hong Kong, as part of the CEPHEUS Pan-Asian survey. PATIENTS. Subjects with hypercholesterolaemia aged 18 years or above, who had been on lipid-lowering drug treatment for at least 3 months with no dose adjustment for at least 6 weeks. RESULTS. A total of 561 such patients (mean age, 65.3; standard deviation, 9.7 years) were evaluated. Most had major cardiovascular risk factors; 534 (95.2%) of 561 patients had coronary heart disease and 534 (95.4%) of 560 patients had low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals set at lower than 70 mg/dL. In all, 465 (82.9%) patients attained their respective low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals. Among 75 patients who had coronary heart disease or equivalent risk, and multiple risk factors with a 10-year coronary heart disease risk of over 20%, 62 (82.7%) attained their respective low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals. Significant predictors of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment included the patient's baseline lipid profile (total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels), blood pressure, and drugs (statin/non-statin) used for treatment. CONCLUSIONS. Hypercholesterolaemic patients undergoing lipid-lowering drug treatment in the present Hong Kong study were able to achieve a very high attainment rate for the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal, despite the fact that most of them had major cardiovascular risk factors.

Repurposing hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels as a novel therapy for breast cancer.

Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels are members of the voltage-gated cation channel family known to be expressed in the heart and central nervous system. Ivabradine, a small molecule HCN channel-blocker, is FDA-approved for clinical use as a heart rate-reducing agent. We found that HCN2 and HCN3 are overexpressed in breast cancer cells compared with normal breast epithelia, and the high expression of HCN2 and HCN3 is associated with poorer survival in breast cancer patients. Inhibition of HCN by Ivabradine or by RNAi, aborted breast cancer cell proliferation in vitro and suppressed tumour growth in patient-derived tumour xenograft models established from triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) tissues, with no evident side-effects on the mice. Transcriptome-wide analysis showed enrichment for cholesterol metabolism and biosynthesis as well as lipid metabolism pathways associated with ER-stress following Ivabradine treatment. Mechanistic studies confirmed that HCN inhibition leads to ER-stress, in part due to disturbed Ca2+ homeostasis, which subsequently triggered the apoptosis cascade. More importantly, we investigated the synergistic effect of Ivabradine and paclitaxel on TNBC and confirmed that both drugs acted synergistically in vitro through ER-stress to amplify signals for caspase activation. Combination therapy could suppress tumour growth of xenografts at much lower doses for both drugs. In summary, our study identified a new molecular target with potential for being developed into targeted therapy, providing scientific grounds for initiating clinical trials for a new treatment regimen of combining HCN inhibition with chemotherapy.

Hospitalization and Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure Treated With Sacubitril/Valsartan vs. Enalapril: A Real-World, Population-Based Study.

Background: The effect of sacubitril/valsartan on survival and hospitalization risk in older patients with heart failure has not been explored. We aimed to investigate the risk of hospitalization and mortality with the use of sacubitril/valsartan vs. enalapril in patients with heart failure. Methods: This was a population-based cohort study using the Hong Kong-wide electronic healthcare database. Patients diagnosed with heart failure and newly prescribed sacubitril/valsartan or enalapril between July 2016 and June 2019 were included. The risk of primary composite outcome of cardiovascular mortality or heart failure-related hospitalization, all-cause hospitalization, heart failure-related hospitalization, cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality were compared using Cox regression with inverse probability treatment weighting. Additional analysis was conducted by age stratification. Results: Of the 44,503 patients who received sacubitril/valsartan or enalapril, 3,237 new users (sacubitril/valsartan, n = 1,056; enalapril, n = 2,181) with a diagnosis of heart failure were identified. Compared with enalapril, sacubitril/valsartan users were associated with a lower risk of primary composite outcome [hazard ratio (HR) 0.58; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45-0.75], heart failure-related hospitalization (HR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.45-0.77), all-cause mortality (HR 0.51; 95% CI, 0.36-0.74) and borderline non-significant reductions in all-cause hospitalization (HR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.70-1.04) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.39-1.02). The treatment effect of sacubitril/valsartan remains unaltered in the patient subgroup age ≥ 65 years (73%). Conclusions: In real-world settings, sacubitril/valsartan was associated with improved survival and reduced heart failure-related hospitalization compared to enalapril in Asian patients with heart failure. The effectiveness remains consistent in the older population.

Antiplatelet Resumption after Antiplatelet-Related Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Hospital-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet resumption in patients who developed intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) while on antiplatelet therapy (antiplatelet-related ICH) represents an important medical dilemma. We aimed to study the long-term cardiovascular outcomes of antiplatelet-related ICH survivors, and the risk of recurrent ICH with antiplatelet resumption. METHODS: This was an observational study of 109 antiplatelet-related ICH survivors. The clinical end points were recurrent ICH, ischemic vascular events, and vascular death (fatal ICH or ischemic vascular events). Predictors of recurrent ICH and vascular death were derived using a multivariable Cox regression model. RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up was 3.5 years (interquartile range, 1.6-5.8 years). Ischemic vascular events were more common than recurrent ICHs (6.8 per 100 patient-years vs. 2.6 per 100 patient-years; P = 0.028). Antiplatelet use was not associated with an elevated risk of recurrent ICH (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-4.62). A mean follow-up systolic blood pressure of >140 mmHg increased the risk of both recurrent ICH (HR, 4.28; 95% CI, 1.01-18.11) and vascular death (HR, 11.14; 95% CI, 2.72-45.62). Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) was an independent predictor for recurrent ICH (HR, 24.34; 95% CI, 2.80-211.47). CONCLUSIONS: Antiplatelet resumption after antiplatelet-related ICH did not appear to carry a clinically significant risk of recurrent ICH, whereas inadequate blood pressure control and CAA contributed to a more robust risk. Antiplatelet resumption should be considered, especially in survivors with adequate blood pressure control and without CAA.

Non-vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Absolute Benefit and Harm Assessments Yield Novel Insights.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Benefits and/or harms (including costs) of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus warfarin therapy need appreciation in relative and absolute terms. METHODS: Accordingly, we derived clinically relevant relative and absolute benefit/harm parameters for NOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, edoxaban) compared to warfarin from four clinical trials involving atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. For each trial, we tabulated patient numbers enduring four important outcomes and calculated unadjusted relative risk reduction (RRR) and number needed to treat (NNT)/year values (and 95% confidence intervals) for the NAOC compared to warfarin. These outcomes were as follows: stroke/systemic embolism (primary endpoint), hemorrhagic stroke, major bleeds, and death. We also addressed drug acquisition costs. RESULTS: Each NOAC was noninferior to warfarin for primary-outcome prevention; RRRs were 12-33% and NNT/year values were 182-481, and all but one indicated statistically significant superiority. All the NOACs yielded statistically significant reductions in hemorrhagic stroke risk; RRRs were 42-74% and NNT/year values were 364-528. Major bleeding risk was comparable in both groups. Apixaban yielded a lower NNT/year for preventing death than for primary-outcome prevention. Compared to warfarin, NOAC acquisition costs were 70- to 140-fold greater. CONCLUSIONS: For the primary outcome, the absolute benefits of NOACs were modest (NNT/year values being large). Reduced hemorrhagic stroke rates with NOACs could be due to superior embolic infarct prevention and fewer consequential hemorrhagic transformations. Among apixaban recipients, the absolute mortality benefit exceeded that for the primary outcome, indicating prevention of additional unrelated deaths. The substantially greater NOAC acquisition costs need viewing against probable greater safety and the avoidance of monitoring bleeding risks.