Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Fam Pract ; 37(2): 248-254, 2020 03 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31690941

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: General Practitioners' (GPs') workload has been suggested to increase in many countries; how does this impact patient follow-up? OBJECTIVE: To investigate trends in GP consultation patterns for adults according to baseline hypertension and anxiety/depression symptoms and attribution of the GP to trend differences. METHODS: Prospective cohort study, linking survey data and clinical measurements from the Norwegian HUNT3 study (2006-08) with national administrative data on GP list assignment and consultations with GP services. We grouped participants aged 40-59 years according to sex and their baseline status regarding hypertension and anxiety/depression symptoms. We registered GP consultations in 2007-16 and used general estimation equation models to estimate the level of GP consultations per month per year during follow-up. We used multilevel models with participants nested in their assigned regular GP to calculate GP-level intra-class correlation coefficients, reflecting to what extent patients' consultation patterns could be attributed to the individual GP. RESULTS: In total, 47 550 HUNT3 participants were registered with 102 different GPs in Nord-Trøndelag County, Norway, in 2007. Adjusted for age, we observed an overall increase in GP consultations in 2007-16, particularly in those with a better health status at baseline. About 2% of the variance of patient consultations could be attributed to differences between GPs and 10% to the use of lengthy consultations. Out-of-hours consultations did not change much in the study period 2007-16. CONCLUSION: Increased use of GP consultations, mainly among the healthiest participants, encourage further research into whether these patients displace patients with heavier and more complex needs.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Medicina General , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Derivación y Consulta , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega/epidemiología , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Carga de Trabajo , Adulto Joven
2.
Scand J Prim Health Care ; 37(3): 283-293, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31286825

RESUMEN

Objectives: To assess contacts with general practitioners (GPs), both regular GPs and out-of-hours GP services (OOH) during the year before an emergency hospital admission. Design: Longitudinal design with register-based information on somatic health care contacts and use of municipality health care services. Setting: Four municipalities in central Norway, 2012-2013. Subjects: Inhabitants aged 50 and older admitted to hospital for acute myocardial infarction, hip fracture, stroke, heart failure, or pneumonia. Main outcome measures: GP contact during the year and month before an emergency hospital admission. Results: Among 66,952 identified participants, 720 were admitted to hospital for acute myocardial infarction, 645 for hip fracture, 740 for stroke, 399 for heart failure, and 853 for pneumonia in the two-year study period. The majority of these acutely admitted patients had contact with general practitioners each month before the emergency hospital admission, especially contacts with a regular GP. A general increase in GP contact was observed towards the time of hospital admission, but development differed between the patient groups. Patients admitted with heart failure had the steepest increase of monthly GP contact. A sizable percentage did not contact the regular GP or OOH services the last month before admission, in particular men aged 50-64 admitted with myocardial infarction or stroke. Conclusion: The majority of patients acutely admitted to hospital for different common severe emergency diagnoses have been in contact with GPs during the month and year before the admission. This points towards general practitioners having an important role in these patients' health care. KEY MESSAGES There is scarce knowledge about primary health care contact before an emergency hospital admission. The percentage of patients with contacts differed between patient groups, and increased towards hospital admission for most diagnoses, particularly heart failure. More than 50% having monthly general practitioner contact before admission underscores the general practitioners' role in these patients' health care. Our results underscore the need to consider medical diagnosis when talking about the role of general practitioners in preventing emergency hospital admissions.


Asunto(s)
Urgencias Médicas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Médicos Generales , Hospitalización , Médicos de Atención Primaria , Atención Primaria de Salud , Rol Profesional , Atención Posterior , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Atención a la Salud , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/terapia , Medicina General , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Neumonía/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Derivación y Consulta
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA