Detection of genetic prognostic markers in uveal melanoma biopsies using fluorescence in situ hybridization.

PURPOSE: In uveal melanoma, specific chromosomal abnormalities are known to correlate with the risk of metastases; changes in chromosomes 3 and 8q correlate strongly with a decreased survival of the patient, whereas chromosome 6 abnormalities are associated with a better prognosis. Usually, karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis are used to detect these abnormalities in resected tumor tissues. However, the evaluation of these chromosomal changes is compromised in patients treated with eye-retaining treatment protocols because of the lack of tumor material. The purpose of this study was to validate the use of FISH for the analysis of genetic prognostic markers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We analyzed 40 uveal melanoma fine needle aspiration biopsies (FNABs) and the corresponding main tumor with FISH. RESULTS: All biopsies were found to contain tumor cells, and FISH analyses of the samples were successful in all cases. Statistical analysis showed very good agreement between the FISH results from the biopsies and those from the main tumor. In only 2 of 249 hybridizations did we find a small variation that could have led to a misclassification. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the application of FISH to FNABs is a reliable method for assaying genetic prognostic parameters such as chromosome 3 loss and/or chromosome 8q gain. Implementation of this method in a diagnostic setting means that we are able to identify patients at risk of developing metastatic disease, not only in enucleated patients but also in cases treated with conservative treatment modalities such as radiotherapy.

21q22 balanced chromosome aberrations in therapy-related hematopoietic disorders: report from an international workshop.

The International Workshop on the relationship between prior therapy and balanced chromosome aberrations in therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes (t-MDS) and therapy-related acute leukemia (t-AL) identified 79 of 511 (15.5%) patients with balanced 21q22 translocations. Patients were treated for their primary disease, including solid tumors (56%), hematologic malignancy (43%), and juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (single case), by radiation therapy (5 patients), chemotherapy (36 patients), or combined-modality therapy (38 patients). 21q translocations involved common partner chromosomes in 81% of cases: t(8;21) (n = 44; 56%), t(3;21) (n = 16; 20%), and t(16;21) (n = 4; 5%). Translocations involving 15 other partner chromosomes were also documented with involvement of AML1(CBFA2/RUNX1), identifying a total of 23 different 21q22/AML1 translocations. The data analysis was carried out on the basis of five subsets of 21q22 cases, that is, t(8;21) with and without additional aberrations, t(3;21), t(16;21), and other 21q22 translocations. Dysplastic features were present in all 21q22 cases. Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) at presentation was highest in t(8;21) (82%) and lowest in t(3;21) (37.5%) patients. Cumulative drug dose exposure scores for alkylating agents (AAs) and topoisomerase II inhibitors indicated that t(3;21) patients received the most intensive therapy among the five 21q22 subsets, and the median AA score for patients with secondary chromosome 7 aberrations was double the AA score for the entire 21q22 group. All five patients who received only radiation therapy had t(8;21) t-AML. The median latency and overall survival (OS) for 21q22 patients were 39 and 14 months (mo), compared to 26 and 8 mo for 11q23 patients, 22 and 28 mo for inv(16), 69 and 7 mo for Rare recurring aberrations, and 59 and 7 mo for Unique (nonrecurring) balanced aberration (latency P < or = 0.016 for all pairwise comparisons; OS, P < or = 0.018 for all pairwise comparisons). The percentages of 21q22 patients surviving 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years were 58%, 33%, and 18%, respectively. Noticeable differences were observed in median OS between 21q22 patients (n = 7) receiving transplant (BMT) (31 mo) compared to 21q22 patients who received intensive non-BMT therapy (n = 46) (17 mo); however, this was nonsignificant because of the small sample size (log-rank, P = 0.33). t-MDS/t-AML with balanced 21q22 aberrations was associated with prior exposure to radiation, epipodophyllotoxins, and anthracyclines, dysplastic morphologic features, multiple partner chromosomes, and longer latency periods when compared to 11q23 and inv(16) t-MDS/AML Workshop subgroups. In general, patients could be divided into two prognostic risk groups, those with t(8;21) (median OS, 19 mo) and those without t(8;21) (median OS, 7 mo) leukemia (log-rank, P = 0.0007).

Sensitivity to L-asparaginase is not associated with expression levels of asparagine synthetase in t(12;21)+ pediatric ALL.

The (12;21) translocation resulting in TEL/AML1 gene fusion is present in about 25% of childhood precursor B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and is associated with a good prognosis and a high cellular sensitivity to L-asparaginase (L-Asp). ALL cells are thought to be sensitive to L-Asp due to lower asparagine synthetase (AS) levels. Resistance to L-Asp may be caused by an elevated cellular level of AS or by the ability of resistant cells to rapidly induce the expression of the AS gene on L-Asp exposure. AS may be a target regulated by t(12;21). We studied the relationship between t(12;21) and the mRNA level of AS to investigate a possible mechanism underlying L-Asp sensitivity. Real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis surprisingly revealed that 30 patients positive for t(12;21) expressed 5-fold more AS mRNA compared with 17 patients negative for t(12;21) (P =.008) and 11 samples from healthy controls (P =.016). The mRNA levels of AS between t(12;21)(-) ALL and healthy controls did not differ. No difference was found between ALL patients positive or negative for t(12;21) in the capacity to up-regulate AS after in vitro L-Asp exposure, excluding a defective capacity for t(12;21) cells in up-regulating AS on L-Asp exposure. Moreover, no correlation was observed between AS mRNA expression and sensitivity to L-Asp. We conclude that the sensitivity of t(12;21)(+) childhood ALL to L-Asp is not associated with the expression level of the AS gene. Furthermore, we contradict the general thought that leukemic cells specifically lack AS compared with normal bone marrow and blood cells.

Cellular drug resistance in childhood acute myeloid leukemia is related to chromosomal abnormalities.

Specific cytogenetic abnormalities predict prognosis in childhood acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, it is unknown why they are predictive and whether this is related to drug resistance. We previously reported that Down syndrome (DS) AML was associated with favorable resistance profiles. Here, we successfully analyzed drug resistance and (cyto-) genetic abnormalities of 109 untreated childhood AML samples using the 4-day total cell-kill methyl-thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT) assay. Patients were classified according to the genetic abnormalities in the leukemic cells: t(8;21), inv(16), t(15;17), t(9;11), other 11q23 translocations, abnormalities of chromosome 5/7, trisomy 8 alone, normal karyotype, single random, and multiple (defined as 2 or more) abnormalities. The DS AML samples were excluded from the subgroup analysis. Samples with chromosome 5/7 abnormalities were median 3.9-fold (P =.01) more resistant to cytarabine than other AML samples. The t(9;11) samples were more sensitive to cytarabine (median 2.9-fold, P =.002), etoposide (13.1-fold, P =.001), the anthracyclines (2.9- to 8.0-fold, P <.01), and 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (10.0-fold, P =.002) than other AML samples. The trisomy 8 and t(15;17) groups were too small for meaningful analysis. All other genetic subgroups did not show specific resistance profiles. Overall, we found no differences in drug resistance in samples taken at diagnosis between patients remaining in continuous complete remission (CCR) versus the refractory/relapsed patients. Within several genetic subgroups, however, relapsed/refractory patients were more cytarabine resistant when compared with patients remaining in CCR, but numbers were small and the results were not significant. We conclude that some, but not all, cytogenetic subgroups in childhood AML display specific drug-resistance profiles.

LAF4, an AF4-related gene, is fused to MLL in infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with MLL gene rearrangements is characterized by a proB phenotype and a poor clinical outcome. We analyzed an infant proB ALL with t(2;11)(p15;p14) and an MLL rearrangement on Southern blot analysis. Rapid amplification of cDNA ends-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and reverse transcriptase-PCR identified the LAF4 gene mapped on chromosome region 2q11.2-q12 as a fusion partner of the MLL gene. The LAF4 gene was identified previously by its high sequence homology to the AF4 protein and encodes a protein of 1,227 amino acids. The t(4;11)(q21;q23), creating the MLL-AF4 chimeric transcripts, is the predominant 11q23 chromosome translocation in infant ALL and is associated with an extremely poor prognosis. Our findings further suggest that fusion of MLL to one of the AF4 family members (AF4/LAF4/AF5Q31) might determine a proB-cell phenotype in infant leukemia.

High EVI1 expression predicts poor survival in acute myeloid leukemia: a study of 319 de novo AML patients.

The proto-oncogene EVI1 encodes a DNA binding protein and is located on chromosome 3q26. The gene is aberrantly expressed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients carrying 3q26 abnormalities. Two mRNAs are transcribed from this locus: EVI1 and a fusion of EVI1 with MDS1 (MDS1-EVI1), a gene located 5' of EVI1. The purpose of this study was to investigate which of the 2 gene products is involved in transformation in human AML. To discriminate between EVI1 and MDS1-EVI1 transcripts, distinct real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays were developed. Patients with 3q26 abnormalities often showed high EVI1 and MDS1-EVI1 expression. In a cohort of 319 AML patients, 4 subgroups could be distinguished: EVI1(+) and MDS1-EVI1(-) (6 patients; group I), EVI1(+) and MDS1-EVI1(+) (26 patients; group II), EVI1(-) and MDS1-EVI1(+) (12 patients; group III), and EVI1(-) and MDS1-EVI1(-) (275 patients; group IV). The only 4 patients with a 3q26 aberration belonged to groups I and II. Interestingly, high EVI1 and not MDS1-EVI1 expression was associated with unfavorable karyotypes (eg, -7/7q-) or complex karyotypes. Moreover, a significant correlation was observed between EVI1 expression and 11q23 aberrations (mixed lineage leukemia [MLL] gene involvement). Patients from groups I and II had significantly shorter overall and event-free survival than patients in groups III and IV. Our data demonstrate that high EVI1 expression is an independent poor prognostic marker within the intermediate- risk karyotypic group.

Overall and event-free survival are not improved by the use of myeloablative therapy following intensified chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma: a prospective randomized phase 3 study.

We compared the efficacy of intensified chemotherapy followed by myeloablative therapy and autologous stem cell rescue with intensified chemotherapy alone in patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma. There were 261 eligible patients younger than 66 years with stage II/III multiple myeloma who were randomized after remission induction therapy with vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone (VAD) to receive intensified chemotherapy, that is, melphalan 140 mg/m(2) administered intravenously in 2 doses of 70 mg/m(2) (intermediate-dose melphalan [IDM]) without stem cell rescue (n = 129) or the same regimen followed by myeloablative therapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, total body irradiation, and autologous stem cell reinfusion (n = 132). Interferon-alpha-2a was given as maintenance. Of the eligible patients, 79% received both cycles of IDM and 79% of allocated patients actually received myeloablative treatment. The response rate (complete remission [CR] plus partial remission [PR]) was 88% in the intensified chemotherapy group versus 95% in the myeloablative treatment group. CR was significantly higher after myeloablative therapy (13% versus 29%; P =.002). With a median follow-up of 33 months (range, 8-65 months), the event-free survival (EFS) was not different between the treatments (median 21 months versus 22 months; P =.28). Time to progression (TTP) was significantly longer after myeloablative treatment (25 months versus 31 months; P =.04). The overall survival (OS) was not different (50 months versus 47 months; P =.41). Intensified chemotherapy followed by myeloablative therapy as first-line treatment for multiple myeloma resulted in a higher CR and a longer TTP when compared with intensified chemotherapy alone. However, it did not result in a better EFS and OS.