Acetabular Reconstructions with Impaction Bone-Grafting and a Cemented Cup in Patients Younger Than 50 Years of Age: A Concise Follow-up, at 27 to 35 Years, of a Previous Report.

We present an update of 19 acetabular reconstructions, performed with a cemented total hip arthroplasty and impaction bone-grafting, in situ at the time of our previous report. At a mean follow-up of 30 years (range, 27 to 35 years), no additional patients were lost to follow-up. Two patients (3 reconstructions) died for reasons unrelated to the hip surgery. Five reconstructions (5 patients) were revised, 4 for aseptic loosening and 1 for septic loosening, after a mean of 24 years (range, 22 to 27 years), leaving 11 surviving hips (11 patients) that were clinically and radiographically evaluated. Kaplan-Meier survival at 30 years was 0.40 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.56) for revision for any reason, 0.56 (95% CI, 0.35 to 0.73) for aseptic loosening, and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.33 to 0.69) for radiographic loosening. Competing risk analysis showed that Kaplan-Meier analysis overestimates the revision risk by 18% for revision for any reason and 22% for aseptic loosening. Cemented impaction bone-grafting is a reasonable long-term solution for demanding primary and revision acetabular reconstructions in young patients with acetabular bone defects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision of the femoral component of a hip arthroplasty with use of an impaction bone-grafting technique and a cemented polished stem. METHODS: Thirty-three consecutive femoral reconstructions that were performed between March 1991 and February 1996 with use of the X-change femoral revision system, fresh-frozen morselized allograft, and a cemented polished Exeter stem were followed prospectively. Femoral bone stock defects were classified according to the Endoklinik classification. The average age of the patients at the time of the femoral component revision was sixty-three years. No patient was lost to follow-up, which was performed at a minimum of eight years, but eight patients had died. None of the deaths was related to the surgery. RESULTS: No femoral reconstruction had been rerevised at a mean of 10.4 years postoperatively. There was one unrecognized intraoperative fracture, which healed following nonoperative treatment. There were three postoperative femoral fractures, all through cortical defects at the level of the tip of the prostheses. All fractures healed after plate fixation, and all femoral implants were left in situ. The average subsidence of the stem within the cement mantle was 3 mm; seven stems migrated > or =5 mm. The average Harris hip score improved from 49 points prior to surgery to 85 points (range, 68 to 100 points) at the time of this review. Subsidence did not affect the Harris hip score. Kaplan-Meier analysis, with an end point of femoral revision for any reason, showed a survival rate of 100% (one-sided 95% confidence interval, 100% to 91.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Femoral revision with use of an impaction bone-grafting technique and a cemented polished stem resulted in an excellent prosthetic survival rate at eight to thirteen years postoperatively. The major problem that occurred was a femoral fracture in four patients.

Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old.

BACKGROUND: Acetabular bone deficiency can present a challenge during total hip arthroplasty, especially in young patients. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of primary and revision acetabular reconstruction with use of an impaction bone-grafting technique and a cemented polyethylene cup in young patients who had preexisting acetabular bone deficiency. METHODS: Forty-two consecutive acetabular reconstructions were performed in thirty-seven patients who were younger than fifty years old (average, 37.2 years old). The impaction bone-grafting technique was used for twenty-three primary and nineteen revision acetabular reconstructions. Twenty-eight patients (thirty-one hips) were available for review after a minimum duration of follow-up of fifteen years. Clinical and radiographic results were assessed, and survivorship analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Eight hips were revised at a mean of twelve years (range, three to twenty-one years) after a primary reconstruction (four hips) or revision reconstruction (four hips). The revision was performed because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component in four hips and because of culture-proven septic loosening in two. Two additional cups (both in hips that had had a revision reconstruction) were revised, during revision of the femoral stem, because of wear (one hip) or because of persistent intraoperative instability (one hip). Twenty-eight hips (in twenty-five patients) had retention of the acetabular component for a minimum of fifteen years. The mean Harris hip score for that group was 89 points. Twenty-six of these twenty-eight hips had no or slight pain. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a twenty-year survival rate of 80% (95% confidence interval, 67% to 94%) with acetabular revision for any reason as the end point and of 91% (95% confidence interval, 80% to 100%) with acetabular revision because of aseptic loosening as the end point. CONCLUSIONS: Acetabular reconstruction with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polyethylene cup is a reliable and durable technique that is associated with good long-term results in young patients with acetabular bone-stock defects.

Acetabular revision with impacted morselized cancellous bone graft and a cemented cup in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: three to fourteen-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Acetabular revision in patients with rheumatoid arthritis is often difficult because of the poor quality and quantity of the acetabular bone stock. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the midterm clinical and radiographic outcomes of acetabular revision with use of an impaction bone-grafting technique and a cemented polyethylene cup. METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive acetabular revisions were performed with impaction bone-grafting and use of a cemented cup in twenty-eight patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The average age at the revision was fifty-seven years. The minimum duration of follow-up of all reconstructions that were still functioning or that were followed until the time of death was three years (mean, 7.5 years; range, three to fourteen years). No patient was lost to follow-up, but five patients (six hips) died before the time of the review. The acetabular bone defects were classified as cavitary in twelve hips and as combined segmental-cavitary in twenty-three. RESULTS: The five patients (six hips) who died had been doing well at the time of their latest follow-up. Of the remaining patients, six (six hips) had a repeat revision. The average Harris hip score of the living patients with a surviving implant at the time of follow-up was 82 points, and there was no or only mild pain in twenty-one of the twenty-three hips. Radiographic analysis of all twenty-nine hips that had not been revised showed loosening in one hip and a nonprogressive radiolucent line in one zone in two others. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a prosthetic survival rate, with aseptic loosening as the end point, of 90% at eight years. CONCLUSION: Acetabular revision with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients with rheumatoid arthritis had acceptable results at an average of 7.5 years postoperatively.

Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem: a concise follow-up, at fifteen to twenty years, of a previous report.

We previously reported our results for thirty-three consecutive femoral component revisions with impaction bone-grafting, performed with the X-change femoral revision system and a cemented polished Exeter stem, at a minimum of eight years of follow-up. The present updated study shows the results after fifteen to twenty years. One stem was revised again for mechanical reasons during a rerevision of an acetabular cup. The probability of survival at seventeen years was 96% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72% to 99%) with a femoral rerevision for any reason as the end point and 100% (95% one-sided CI, 69% to 100%) with rerevision for aseptic loosening as the end point. The average subsidence was 3 mm and stable relative to our previous report. Although three early femoral fractures occurred after this surgery, in this update no additional fractures were seen. In conclusion, the probability of survival of femoral component revisions with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem was excellent at a mean of seventeen years.

Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old: a concise follow-up, at twenty to twenty-eight years, of a previous report.

In a previous report, we presented our results of forty-two acetabular reconstructions, performed with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polyethylene cup, in thirty-seven patients who were younger than fifty years and had a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up. The present update study shows the results after twenty to twenty-eight years. Eight additional cups had to be revised--four because of aseptic loosening, three because of wear, and one during a revision of the stem. Three additional cups were considered loose on radiographs. Survivorship of the acetabular reconstructions, with an end point of revision for any reason, was 73% after twenty years and 52% after twenty-five years. With revision for aseptic loosening as the end point, survival was 85% after twenty years and 77% after twenty-five years; for signs of loosening on radiographs, survival was 71% at twenty years and 62% at twenty-five years. In conclusion, our previous results have declined but the technique of using impacted morselized bone graft and a cemented cup is useful for the purpose of restoring bone stock in young patients whose acetabular defects require primary or revision total hip arthroplasty.

Acetabular revision with impacted morselized cancellous bone graft and a cemented cup in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A concise follow-up, at eight to nineteen years, of a previous report.

We previously reported our results at a minimum of three years after thirty-five revisions of total hip arthroplasty acetabular components in twenty-eight patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The revisions were performed with use of impacted morselized bone graft and a cemented cup. This update report presents the results at eight to nineteen years after the surgery, which, to our knowledge, is the longest follow-up available in the literature. No patient was lost to follow-up. Since our previous report, there were two additional cup failures due to aseptic loosening, at ten and sixteen years postoperatively. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed the probability of survival of the acetabular component at twelve years to be 80% (95% confidence interval, 65% to 95%) with removal of the cup for any reason as the end point and 85% (95% confidence interval, 71% to 99%) with aseptic loosening as the end point. Cup revisions performed with cement and use of impaction bone-grafting in patients with rheumatoid arthritis led to acceptable long-term prosthetic survival rates. This technique is attractive from a biological standpoint because of the possibility of maintaining acetabular bone stock.

Favorable survival of acetabular reconstruction with bone impaction grafting in dysplastic hips.

UNLABELLED: Acetabular bone loss hampers implantation of a total hip arthroplasty in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip. The bone impaction grafting technique in combination with a cemented total hip can restore the bone stock in these patients, but do these reconstructions yield satisfying long-term results? We used this technique in 28 hips (22 consecutive patients). The degree of dislocation was graded preoperatively as Crowe I in five hips, Crowe II in eight hips, Crowe III in nine hips, and Crowe IV in four hips. We present the long-term results of this bone impaction grafting technique a minimum of 10 years after surgery. Two patients died before the minimum followup of 10 years, leaving 20 patients (26 hips). Two cups were revised, one cup for a sciatic nerve palsy (at 2 years) and the other for aseptic loosening after 12 years. The cumulative survival of the cup with revision for any reason as the end point was 96% at 10 years and 84% at 15 years. There were no femoral revisions during followup. The bone impaction grafting technique in combination with a cemented cup is an effective technique for developmental dysplasia of the hip with favorable long-term results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem. Surgical technique.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision of the femoral component of a hip arthroplasty with use of an impaction bone-grafting technique and a cemented polished stem. METHODS: Thirty-three consecutive femoral reconstructions that were performed between March 1991 and February 1996 with use of the X-change femoral revision system, fresh-frozen morselized allograft, and a cemented polished Exeter stem were followed prospectively. Femoral bone stock defects were classified according to the Endoklinik classification. The average age of the patients at the time of the femoral component revision was sixty-three years. No patient was lost to follow-up, which was performed at a minimum of eight years, but eight patients had died. None of the deaths was related to the surgery. RESULTS: No femoral reconstruction had been rerevised at a mean of 10.4 years postoperatively. There was one unrecognized intraoperative fracture, which healed following nonoperative treatment. There were three postoperative femoral fractures, all through cortical defects at the level of the tip of the prostheses. All fractures healed after plate fixation, and all femoral implants were left in situ. The average subsidence of the stem within the cement mantle was 3 mm; seven stems migrated 5 mm. The average Harris hip score improved from 49 points prior to surgery to 85 points (range, 68 to 100 points) at the time of this review. Subsidence did not affect the Harris hip score. Kaplan-Meier analysis, with an end point of femoral revision for any reason, showed a survival rate of 100% (one-sided 95% confidence interval, 100% to 91.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Femoral revision with use of an impaction bone-grafting technique and a cemented polished stem resulted in an excellent prosthetic survival rate at eight to thirteen years postoperatively. The major problem that occurred was a femoral fracture in four patients.

Bone impaction grafting and a cemented cup after acetabular fracture at 3-18 years.

UNLABELLED: The outcome of total hip arthroplasty after acetabular fracture is compromised. We studied if the bone impaction grafting technique could provide long-term prosthesis survival in deformed and irregular acetabula. We studied 20 hips in 20 patients (mean age, 53.3 years; range, 35-75 years) that were reconstructed with acetabular bone impaction grafting and a cemented total hip prosthesis after acetabular fracture. No patient was lost to followup. At review the mean followup was 9.5 years (range, 3-18 years) and the average Harris hip score was 93 (range, 62-100). During followup there were two cup revisions: one after 14.5 years for septic loosening, and one after 15.3 years for aseptic loosening. The Kaplan-Meier survival rate of the cup with end-point revision for any reason was 100% at 10 years and 80% (95% CI; range, 62-98%) after 15 years. With end-point cup revision for aseptic loosening the survival rate was 100% at 10 years. Acetabular bone impaction grafting with a cemented cup is a biologically attractive technique with good long-term survival used to reconstruct bone stock loss after posttraumatic arthritis. The complication and reoperation rate was low in this relatively young group of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level IV (Case series--no, or historical control group). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The initial stability of an exeter femoral stem after impaction bone grafting in combination with segmental defect reconstruction.

Bone impaction grafting of the femur is associated with more complications when segmental defects are present. The effect of segmental defect repair on initial stem stability was studied in an in vitro study with fresh-frozen goat femora. A standardized medial segmental defect was reconstructed using a cortical strut or a metal mesh. As controls, we used intact femora and femora with a nonreconstructed defect. In all 4 groups, impacted bone grafting was performed in combination with a cemented Exeter stem. Each group contained 5 femora. Reconstructions were dynamically loaded up to 1,500 N. Migration was measured with Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. All cases with a nonreconstructed segmental defect failed into excessive varus rotation. None of the femora with a reconstructed defect failed. Cortical struts and metal meshes were equally effective in creating a stable stem construction (varus rotation, 2.89 +/- 2.27 and 2.27 +/- 0.57, respectively). Reconstructions with a metal mesh were more reproducible, although the obtained stability was significantly lower (P<.01) when compared with impaction grafting in an intact femur (varus rotation, 0.58 +/- 0.36).

Incorporation of morselized bone grafts: a study of 24 acetabular biopsy specimens.

Animal studies have shown almost complete incorporation of impacted morselized bone grafts. To determine whether this also is true in humans, 24 acetabular bone biopsy specimens from 21 hips of 20 patients were examined. Biopsy specimens were obtained 3 months to 15 years after acetabular reconstruction in primary and revision total hip arthroplasties in combination with a cemented cup. Histologic examination showed rapid revascularization of the graft, directly followed by osteoclastic resorption and woven bone formation on the graft remnants. New bone also was formed on fibrin accumulations or without any scaffold in the fibrous stroma tissue that had invaded the graft. Thereafter the mixture of graft, new bone, and fibrin was remodeled completely into a new trabecular structure, with normal lamellar bone and only scarce remnants of graft material. Localized areas of nonincorporated bone graft surrounded by fibrous tissue remained, irrespective of the followup period. Large nonincorporated fragments of cartilage also were found, particularly in cases in which femoral head bone chips were produced by a bone mill. In general, impacted trabecular bone chips incorporate by a mechanism that is similar to that previously observed in animal studies. In some patients, however, areas of nonincorporated bone graft remained and long-term alterations were found, probably related to the loosening process.

Rinsing morselized allografts improves bone and tissue ingrowth.

Bone defects in revision hip surgery can be reconstructed with impacted morselized bone grafts. Rinsing these trabecular allografts may enhance graft incorporation by washing out immunogenic factors present in blood, marrow, and fat. However, it has been proposed that impaction of the graft releases biologically active factors, which can provide sufficient activity to stimulate new bone formation. Rinsing before impaction could enhance bone allograft incorporation, but rinsing after impaction could diminish the incorporation process of impacted bone graft. To study the effect of rinsing and impaction of morselized bone grafts on bone ingrowth, a bone chamber study was done in goats. Autografts and allografts were divided into three treatment groups: (A) impacted; (B) rinsed and impacted; and (C) rinsed, impacted, rinsed, and impacted again. Ten goats received three bone chambers in each proximal tibia. The chambers were filled with either allograft or autograft, yielding six different implants per goat. After 6 weeks, histologic analyses were done and bone and tissue ingrowth were measured. New bone and total tissue ingrowth were higher in autografts than in allografts, especially in the nonrinsed group. With rinsing, total tissue ingrowth increased in the allograft group to approach that of autografts. Rinsing after impaction did not additionally alter bone ingrowth. The current findings show that incorporation of allografts can be improved by rinsing the grafts before impaction.

Particle size of bone graft and method of impaction affect initial stability of cemented cups: human cadaveric and synthetic pelvic specimen studies.

We determined the effect of bone graft particle size and impaction technique on the initial stability of cemented acetabular cups. First, acetabular reconstructions were performed in human cadaveric pelvic bones in which type 2 AAOS cavitary defects were created. Reconstructions were made with small bone grafts (average 2 mm) produced by a bone mill or large bone grafts (average 9 mm) produced by hand with a rongeur. All chips were made from freshly-frozen femoral heads. Impaction was done using acetabular impactors and a hammer. We did a loading experiment with a gradually increasing dynamic load up to 3000 N. We used radiostereometric analysis (RSA) to determine cup stability. The cups were more stable when large bone grafts were used. Because of limitations of the cadaver model, we developed a synthetic acetabular model. For validation of this model, we repeated the experiments using small and large bone grafts. The results with both models were similar. In the synthetic model, we compared impaction with hammer and impactors with the reversed reaming technique using manual compression on the reamer. The latter method resulted in more migration. We recommend firm impaction with a hammer of large bone grafts for optimal stability of the cup.

Treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis using bone impaction grafting.

Even in extensive osteonecrosis of the femoral head in younger patients, a femoral head-preserving method is preferable. We developed a new technique using the lateral approach as used in traditional core biopsy; the osteonecrotic lesion was removed and impacted bone grafts were used to regain sphericity and prevent collapse. In this prospective one surgeon study, we included 28 consecutive hips in 27 patients with extensive osteonecrotic lesions (ARCO classification Stage 2 [11 hips], Stage 3 [14 hips]; and Stage 4 [three hips]); 14 hips had preoperative collapse. The mean age of the patients was 33 years (range, 15-55 years). At a mean followup of 42 months (range, 24-119 months), eight hips (29%) were converted to a total hip arthroplasty (THA). Of the 20 reconstructions that were in situ, 18 were clinically successful (90%) and 70% were radiologically successful. Patients who were younger than 30 years at surgery had a radiologically significant better outcome, even patients with higher stages of osteonecrosis. Patients with preoperative collapse and use of corticosteroids had disappointing results. This method is attractive as a salvage procedure, is relatively simple and quick, and it does not interfere with an eventual future hip arthroplasty.