Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 125
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Fam Med ; 21(1): 46-53, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36690495

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Most patients are escorted to exam rooms (escorted rooming) although patients directing themselves to their exam room (self-rooming) saves patient and staff time while increasing patient satisfaction. This study assesses patient and staff perceptions after pragmatic implementation of self-rooming. METHODS: In October-December 2020, we surveyed patients and staff in 25 primary care clinics after our institution expanded self-rooming from 4 specially built clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Semi-structured surveys asked about rooming process used, rooming process preferred, and perceptions of self-rooming compared with escorted rooming. RESULTS: Most patients (n = 1,561) preferred self-rooming (86%), especially among patients aged <65 years and in family medicine clinics. Few patients felt less welcomed (10.6%), less cared about (6.8%), more isolated (15.6%), more lost/confused (7.6%), or more frustrated (3.2%) with self-rooming compared with escorted rooming. Early-adopter clinics that implemented self-rooming ≤2016 had even lower rates of patients feeling more isolated, lost/confused, or frustrated with self-rooming compared with escorted rooming.Over one-half of staff (n = 241; 180 clinical, 61 nonclinical) preferred self-rooming (59%) and thought most patients liked self-rooming (65.8%), especially among clinical staff and in early adopter clinics (≤2016). Few staff reported worse waiting times for patients (12.4%), medical assistants (MAs) (15.9%), and clinicians (16.4%) or worse crowding in waiting areas (1.7%) and hallways (10.1%). Unlike patient-reported confusion (7.6%), most staff thought self-rooming led to more patient confusion (63.8%), except in early-adopter clinics (44.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Self-rooming is a patient-centered innovation that is also acceptable to staff. We demonstrated that pragmatic implementation is feasible across primary care without expensive technology or specially designed buildings.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Salas de Espera , Humanos , Pandemias , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Atención Primaria de Salud
2.
J Med Internet Res ; 24(6): e29420, 2022 06 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35699983

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Impactability modeling promises to help solve the nationwide crisis in caring for high-need high-cost patients by matching specific case management programs with patients using a "benefit" or "impactability" score, but there are limitations in tailoring each model to a specific program and population. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the impact on Medicare accountable care organization savings from developing a benefit score for patients enrolled in a historic case management program, prospectively implementing the score, and evaluating the results in a new case management program. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal cohort study of 76,140 patients in a Medicare accountable care organization with multiple before-and-after measures of the outcome, using linked electronic health records and Medicare claims data from 2012 to 2019. There were 489 patients in the historic case management program, with 1550 matched comparison patients, and 830 patients in the new program, with 2368 matched comparison patients. The historic program targeted high-risk patients and assigned a centrally located registered nurse and social worker to each patient. The new program targeted high- and moderate-risk patients and assigned a nurse physically located in a primary care clinic. Our primary outcomes were any unplanned hospital events (admissions, observation stays, and emergency department visits), count of event-days, and Medicare payments. RESULTS: In the historic program, as expected, high-benefit patients enrolled in case management had fewer events, fewer event-days, and an average US $1.15 million reduction in Medicare payments per 100 patients over the subsequent year when compared with the findings in matched comparison patients. For the new program, high-benefit high-risk patients enrolled in case management had fewer events, while high-benefit moderate-risk patients enrolled in case management did not differ from matched comparison patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although there was evidence that a benefit score could be extended to a new case management program for similar (ie, high-risk) patients, there was no evidence that it could be extended to a moderate-risk population. Extending a score to a new program and population should include evaluation of program outcomes within key subgroups. With increased attention on value-based care, policy makers and measure developers should consider ways to incorporate impactability modeling into program design and evaluation.


Asunto(s)
Organizaciones Responsables por la Atención , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Hospitales , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Medicare , Estados Unidos
3.
Am J Public Health ; 111(12): 2111-2114, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34878860

RESUMEN

The University of Wisconsin Neighborhood Health Partnerships Program used electronic health record and influenza vaccination data to estimate COVID-19 relative mortality risk and potential barriers to vaccination in Wisconsin ZIP Code Tabulation Areas. Data visualization revealed four groupings to use in planning and prioritizing vaccine outreach and communication based on ZIP Code Tabulation Area characteristics. The program provided data, visualization, and guidance to health systems, health departments, nonprofits, and others to support planning targeted outreach approaches to increase COVID-19 vaccination uptake. (Am J Public Health. 2021;111(12):2111-2114. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306524).


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/prevención & control , Promoción de la Salud/organización & administración , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Confianza , Vacilación a la Vacunación , Wisconsin/epidemiología
4.
Telemed J E Health ; 27(9): 1021-1028, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33216697

RESUMEN

Background: Teleophthalmology is a validated method for diabetic eye screening that is underutilized in U.S. primary care clinics. Even when made available to patients, its long-term effectiveness for increasing screening rates is often limited. Introduction: We hypothesized that a stakeholder-based implementation program could increase teleophthalmology use and sustain improvements in diabetic eye screening. Materials and Methods:We used the NIATx Model to test a stakeholder-based teleophthalmology implementation program, I-SITE at one primary care clinic (Main) and compared teleophthalmology use and diabetic eye screening rates with those of other primary care clinics (Outreach) within a U.S. multipayer health system where teleophthalmology was underutilized.Results:Teleophthalmology use increased post-I-SITE implementation (odds ratio [OR] = 5.73 [p < 0.001]), and was greater at the Main than at the Outreach clinics (OR = 10.0 vs. 1.69, p < 0.001). Overall diabetic eye screening rates maintained an increase from 47.4% at baseline to 60.2% and 64.1% at 1 and 2 years post-I-SITE implementation, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients who were younger (OR = 0.98 per year of age, p = 0.02) and men (OR = 1.98, p = 0.002) were more likely to use teleophthalmology than in-person dilated eye examinations for diabetic eye screening.Discussion: Our stakeholder-based implementation program achieved a significant increase in overall teleophthalmology use and maintained increased post-teleophthalmology diabetic eye screening rates. Conclusion: Stakeholder-based implementation may increase the long-term reach and effectiveness of teleophthalmology to reduce vision loss from diabetes. Our approach may improve integration of telehealth interventions into primary care.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Retinopatía Diabética , Oftalmología , Telemedicina , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Retinopatía Diabética/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Atención Primaria de Salud
5.
Med Care ; 57(7): 560-566, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31157707

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Machine learning is increasingly used for risk stratification in health care. Achieving accurate predictive models do not improve outcomes if they cannot be translated into efficacious intervention. Here we examine the potential utility of automated risk stratification and referral intervention to screen older adults for fall risk after emergency department (ED) visits. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated several machine learning methodologies for the creation of a risk stratification algorithm using electronic health record data and estimated the effects of a resultant intervention based on algorithm performance in test data. METHODS: Data available at the time of ED discharge were retrospectively collected and separated into training and test datasets. Algorithms were developed to predict the outcome of a return visit for fall within 6 months of an ED index visit. Models included random forests, AdaBoost, and regression-based methods. We evaluated models both by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, also referred to as area under the curve (AUC), and by projected clinical impact, estimating number needed to treat (NNT) and referrals per week for a fall risk intervention. RESULTS: The random forest model achieved an AUC of 0.78, with slightly lower performance in regression-based models. Algorithms with similar performance, when evaluated by AUC, differed when placed into a clinical context with the defined task of estimated NNT in a real-world scenario. CONCLUSION: The ability to translate the results of our analysis to the potential tradeoff between referral numbers and NNT offers decisionmakers the ability to envision the effects of a proposed intervention before implementation.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes por Caídas/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Aprendizaje Automático , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Anciano , Algoritmos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
Support Care Cancer ; 27(3): 857-865, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30062586

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Health literacy is the ability to perform basic reading and numerical tasks to function in the healthcare environment. The purpose of this study is to describe how health literacy is related to perceived coordination of care reported by breast cancer patients. METHODS: Data were retrieved from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute-sponsored "Share Thoughts on Breast Cancer" Study including demographic factors, perceived care coordination and responsiveness of care, and self-reported health literacy obtained from a mailed survey completed by 62% of eligible breast cancer survivors (N = 1221). Multivariable analysis of variance was used to characterize the association between presence of a single healthcare professional that coordinated care ("care coordinator") and perceived care coordination, stratified by health literacy level. RESULTS: Health literacy was classified as low in 24% of patients, medium in 34%, and high in 42%. Women with high health literacy scores were more likely to report non-Hispanic white race/ethnicity, private insurance, higher education and income, and fewer comorbidities (all p < 0.001). The presence of a care coordinator was associated with 17.1% higher perceived care coordination scores among women with low health literacy when compared to those without a care coordinator, whereas a coordinator modestly improved perceived care coordination among breast cancer survivors with medium (6.9%) and high (6.2%) health literacy. CONCLUSION: The use of a single designated care coordinator may have a strong influence on care coordination in patients with lower levels of health literacy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/normas , Alfabetización en Salud , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/etnología , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Estudios de Cohortes , Escolaridad , Femenino , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Renta , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Kansas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Grupos Raciales/etnología , Autoinforme , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
7.
J Surg Res ; 221: 196-203, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29229128

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Readmission within 30 d of an acute hospital stay is frequent, costly, and increasingly subject to penalties. Early readmission is most common after vascular surgery; these patients are often discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), making postacute care an essential partner in reducing readmissions. We characterize 30-day readmissions among vascular surgery patients discharged to SNF to provide evidence for this understudied segment of readmission after specialty surgery. METHODS: We utilize the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Chronic Conditions Warehouse, a longitudinal 5% national random sample of Medicare beneficiaries to study 30-day readmission or death after discharge to SNF following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair or lower extremity revascularization from 2005-2009. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression with Least Adaptive Shrinkage and Selection Operator were used for analysis. RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred ninety-seven patients underwent an abdominal aortic aneurysm procedure or lower extremity revascularization at 686 hospitals and discharged to 1714 SNFs. Eight hundred (36%) were readmitted or had died at 30 d. In adjusted analysis, predictors of readmission or death at 30 d included SNF for-profit status (OR [odds ratio] = 1.2; P = 0.032), number of hospitalizations in the previous year (OR = 1.06; P = 0.011), number of comorbidities (OR = 1.06; P = 0.004), emergent procedure (OR = 1.69; P < 0.001), renal complication (OR = 1.38; P = 0.003), respiratory complication (OR = 1.45; P < 0.001), thromboembolic complication (OR = 1.57; P = 0.019), and wound complication (OR = 0.70; P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Patients discharged to SNF following vascular surgery have exceptionally high rates of readmission or death at 30 d. Many factors predicting readmission or death potentially modify decision-making around discharge, making early detection, discharge planning, and matching patient needs to SNF capabilities essential to improving outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Alta del Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
8.
J Emerg Med ; 55(4): 512-521, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30149998

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal approach to outpatient antibiotic use after surgical drainage of abscesses is unclear given conflicting clinical trial results. OBJECTIVE: Our primary objective was to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of outpatient antibiotic prescribing after surgical drainage of cutaneous abscesses on reducing treatment failure. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study using data extracted from the electronic health record of a single academic health care system. All emergency department (ED) visits that resulted in discharge with a surgical drainage of a cutaneous abscess procedure code were included in the sample. All visits were categorized into having received or not having received an antibiotic prescription at the index visit. Outcome frequencies were compared using Pearson's chi-squared test. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to estimate the odds of treatment failure among those who did and did not receive an antibiotic prescription at their index ED visit. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 421 index ED visits, of which 303 (72%) received an antibiotic prescription. Treatment with antibiotics after drainage did not significantly reduce the odds of composite treatment failure within 30 days when controlling for sociodemographic and clinical encounter variables (odds ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.23-1.21). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world, comparative effectiveness analysis did not demonstrate any significant reduction in treatment failure with the use of antibiotics after drainage of abscesses in the ED. It is unclear if the clinical benefit observed under controlled trial conditions will carry over to routine clinical practice where varied antibiotic regimens are the norm and local bacterial resistance patterns vary.


Asunto(s)
Absceso/tratamiento farmacológico , Atención Ambulatoria/normas , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Ampicilina/farmacología , Ampicilina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Clindamicina/farmacología , Clindamicina/uso terapéutico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Paracentesis/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sulbactam/farmacología , Sulbactam/uso terapéutico , Vancomicina/farmacología , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico
9.
Ann Surg ; 265(2): 424-430, 2017 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28059972

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether endovascular or open revascularization provides an advantageous approach to symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) over the longer term. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The optimal revascularization strategy for symptomatic lower extremity PAD is not established. METHODS: We evaluated amputation-free survival, overall survival, and relative rate of subsequent vascular intervention after endovascular or open lower extremity revascularization for propensity-score matched cohorts of Medicare beneficiaries with PAD from 2006 through 2009. RESULTS: Among 14,685 eligible patients, 5928 endovascular and 5928 open revascularization patients were included in matched analysis. Patients undergoing endovascular repair had improved amputation-free survival compared with open repair at 30 days (7.4 vs 8.9%, P = 0.002). This benefit persisted over the long term: At 4 years, 49% of endovascular patients had died or received major amputation compared with 54% of open patients (P < 0.001). An endovascular procedure was associated with a risk-adjusted 16% decreased risk of amputation or death compared with open over the study period (hazard ratio: 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.89; P < 0.001). The amputation-free survival benefit associated with an endovascular revascularization was more pronounced in patients with congestive heart failure or ischemic heart disease than in those without (P = 0.021 for interaction term). The rate of subsequent intervention at 30 days was 7.4% greater for the endovascular vs the open revascularization cohort. At 4 years, this difference remained stable at 8.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Using population-based data, we demonstrate that an endovascular approach is associated with improved amputation-free survival over the long term with only a modest relative increased risk of subsequent intervention.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Análisis por Apareamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Puntaje de Propensión , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Radiology ; 284(3): 717-724, 2017 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28696184

RESUMEN

Purpose To compare overall colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates for patients who were eligible and due for CRC screening and who were with and without insurance coverage for computed tomographic (CT) colonography for CRC screening. Materials and Methods The institutional review board approved this retrospective cohort study, with a waiver of consent. This study used longitudinal electronic health record data from 2005 through 2010 for patients managed by one of the largest multispecialty physician groups in the United States. It included 33 177 patients under age 65 who were eligible and due for CRC screening and managed by the participating health system. Stratified Cox regression models provided propensity-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the relationship between CT colonography coverage and CRC screening. Results After adjustment, patients who had insurance coverage for CT colonography and were due for CRC screening had a 48% greater likelihood of being screened for CRC by any method compared with those without coverage who were due for CRC screening (HR, 1.48; 95% CI: 1.41, 1.55). Similarly, patients with CT colonography coverage had a greater likelihood of being screened with CT colonography (HR, 8.35; 95% CI: 7.11, 9.82) and with colonoscopy (HR, 1.38; 95% CI: 1.31, 1.45) but not with fecal occult blood test (HR, 1.00; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.10) than those without such insurance coverage. Conclusion Insurance coverage of CT colonography for CRC screening was associated with a greater likelihood of a patient being screened and a greater likelihood of being screened with a test that helps both to detect cancer and prevent cancer from developing (CT colonography or colonoscopy). © RSNA, 2017.


Asunto(s)
Colonografía Tomográfica Computarizada/economía , Colonografía Tomográfica Computarizada/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/economía , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
11.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 24(3): 683-691, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27709403

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The current guidelines do not delineate the types of providers that should participate in early breast cancer follow-up care (within 3 years after completion of treatment). This study aimed to describe the types of providers participating in early follow-up care of older breast cancer survivors and to identify factors associated with receipt of follow-up care from different types of providers. METHODS: Stages 1-3 breast cancer survivors treated from 2000 to 2007 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End results Medicare database (n = 44,306). Oncologist (including medical, radiation, and surgical) follow-up and primary care visits were defined using Medicare specialty provider codes and linked American Medical Association (AMA) Masterfile. The types of providers involved in follow-up care were summarized. Stepped regression models identified factors associated with receipt of medical oncology follow-up care and factors associated with receipt of medical oncology care alone versus combination oncology follow-up care. RESULTS: Oncology follow-up care was provided for 80 % of the patients: 80 % with a medical oncologist, 46 % with a surgeon, and 39 % with a radiation oncologist after radiation treatment. The patients with larger tumor size, positive axillary nodes, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive status, and chemotherapy treatment were more likely to have medical oncology follow-up care than older patients with higher Charlson comorbidity scores who were not receiving axillary care. The only factor associated with increased likelihood of follow-up care with a combination of oncology providers was regular primary care visits (>2 visits/year). CONCLUSIONS: Substantial variation exists in the types of providers that participate in breast cancer follow-up care. Improved guidance for the types of providers involved and delineation of providers' responsibilities during follow-up care could lead to improved efficiency and quality of care.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Oncología Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Oncología por Radiación/estadística & datos numéricos , Oncología Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Visita a Consultorio Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Programa de VERF , Factores de Tiempo , Carga Tumoral , Estados Unidos
12.
HPB (Oxford) ; 19(5): 465-472, 2017 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28237627

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is used for pancreatic adenocarcinoma staging and obtaining a tissue diagnosis. The objective was to determine patterns of preoperative EUS and the impact on downstream treatment. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Medicare-linked database was used to identify patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The staging period was the first staging procedure within 6 months of surgery until surgery. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with preoperative EUS. The main outcome was EUS in the staging period, with secondary outcomes including number of staging tests and time to surgery. RESULTS: 2782 patients were included, 56% were treated at an academic hospital (n = 1563). 1204 patients underwent EUS (43.3%). The factors most associated with receipt of EUS were: earlier year of diagnosis, SEER area, and a NCI or academic hospital (all p < 0.0001). EUS was associated with a longer time to surgery (17.8 days; p < 0.0001), and a higher number of staging tests (40 tests/100 patients; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Factors most associated with receipt of EUS are geographic, temporal, and institutional, rather than clinical/disease factors. EUS is associated with a longer time to surgery and more preoperative testing, and additional study is needed to determine if EUS is overused.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Endosonografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Pancreatectomía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Programa de VERF , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
13.
Crit Care Med ; 44(6): 1091-7, 2016 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26841105

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Surgical patients often receive routine postoperative mechanical ventilation with excellent outcomes. However, older patients who receive prolonged mechanical ventilation may have a significantly different long-term trajectory not fully captured in 30-day postoperative metrics. The objective of this study is to describe patterns of mortality and hospitalization for Medicare beneficiaries 66 years old and older who have major surgery with and without prolonged mechanical ventilation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Hospitals throughout the United States. PATIENTS: Five percent random national sample of elderly Medicare beneficiaries (age ≥ 66 yr) who underwent 1 of 227 operations previously defined as high risk during an inpatient stay at an acute care hospital between January 1, 2005, and November 30, 2009. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified 117,917 episodes for older patients who had high-risk surgery; 4% received prolonged mechanical ventilation during the hospitalization. Patients who received prolonged mechanical ventilation had higher 1-year mortality rate than patients who did not have prolonged ventilation (64% [95% CI, 62-65%] vs 17% [95% CI, 16.4-16.9%]). Thirty-day survivors who received prolonged mechanical ventilation had a 1-year mortality rate of 47% (95% CI, 45-48%). Thirty-day survivors who did not receive prolonged ventilation were more likely to be discharged home than patients who received prolonged ventilation 71% versus 10%. Patients who received prolonged ventilation and were not discharged by postoperative day 30 had a substantially increased 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.39 [95% CI, 3.29-5.85]) compared with patients discharged home by day 30. Hospitalized 30-day survivors who received prolonged mechanical ventilation and died within 6 months of their index procedure spent the majority of their remaining days hospitalized. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients who require prolonged mechanical ventilation after high-risk surgery and survive 30 days have a significant 1-year risk of mortality and high burdens of treatment. This difficult trajectory should be considered in surgical decision making and has important implications for surgeons, intensivists, and patients.


Asunto(s)
Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Respiración Artificial/mortalidad , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/mortalidad , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
14.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 23(9): 2788-94, 2016 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27026436

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Re-excision surgeries for the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) put a strain on patients and healthcare resources; however, intraoperative pathologic assessment of DCIS may lead to a reduction in these additional surgeries. This study examined the relationship between intraoperative pathologic assessment and subsequent operations in patients with a diagnosis of DCIS. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare patients diagnosed with DCIS from 1999 to 2007 who initially underwent partial mastectomy, without axillary surgery, were included in this study. Use of intraoperative frozen section or touch preparation during the initial surgery was assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to describe the relationship between the use of intraoperative pathologic assessment and any subsequent mastectomy or partial mastectomy within 90 days of the initial partial mastectomy. RESULTS: Of 8259 DCIS patients, 3509 (43 %) required a second surgery, and intraoperative pathologic assessment was performed for 2186 (26 %). Intraoperative pathologic assessment had no statistically significant effect on whether or not a subsequent breast surgery occurred (adjusted odds ratio 1.07, 95 % confidence interval 0.95-1.21; p = 0.293). Patient residence in a rural area, tumor size ≥2 cm, and poorly differentiated tumor grade were associated with a greater likelihood of subsequent surgery, while age 80 years and older was associated with a lower likelihood of subsequent surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The use of intraoperative frozen section or touch preparation during partial mastectomy from 1999 to 2007 was not associated with a reduction in subsequent breast operations in women with DCIS. These results highlight the need to identify cost-effective tools and strategies to reduce the need for additional surgery in patients with DCIS.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/patología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/cirugía , Secciones por Congelación/estadística & datos numéricos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Periodo Intraoperatorio , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Clasificación del Tumor , Estudios Retrospectivos , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Programa de VERF , Carga Tumoral , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos
15.
J Med Internet Res ; 18(12): e332, 2016 12 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28003173

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The majority of health care utilization decisions in the United States are made by persons with multiple chronic conditions. Existing public reports of health system quality do not distinguish care for these persons and are often not used by the consumers they aim to reach. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to determine if tailoring quality reports to persons with diabetes mellitus and co-occurring chronic conditions would increase user engagement with a website that publicly reports the quality of diabetes care. METHODS: We adapted an existing consumer-focused public reporting website using adult learning theory to display diabetes quality reports tailored to the user's chronic condition profile. We conducted in-depth cognitive interviews with 20 individuals who either had diabetes and/or cared for someone with diabetes to assess the website. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed, then analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Three themes emerged that suggested increased engagement from tailoring the site to a user's chronic conditions: ability to interact, relevance, and feeling empowered to act. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that tailoring can be used to improve public reporting sites for individuals with chronic conditions, ultimately allowing consumers to make more informed health care decisions.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Internet , Satisfacción del Paciente , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Investigación Cualitativa , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Estados Unidos
16.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 54(8): 1415-9, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25731768

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: RA increases vascular disease and angiogenesis, yet a 1964 Lancet report paradoxically linked RA to lower diabetic retinopathy. Our objective was to examine RA as a risk factor for diabetic retinopathy compared with other vascular risk factors. METHODS: This cohort study compared the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in diabetes patients with and without RA in a 5% Medicare sample. We analysed the impact of RA on the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy using multivariate logistic regression calculating adjusted rate ratios (ARRs) controlling for sociodemographics, co-morbidity and health utilization. Sensitivity analysis examined eye exam rates. RESULTS: Among 256 331 Medicare diabetes patients, 5572 (2%) had RA. Diabetic retinopathy was less prevalent in patients with RA compared with those without RA (13.7% vs 16.1%, P ≤ 0.01). Compared with patients without RA, the adjusted model demonstrated that patients with diabetes and RA were 28% less likely to have diabetic retinopathy and 4% more likely to receive an eye exam [ARR 0.72 (95% CI 0.67, 0.77), ARR 1.04 (95% CI 1.02, 1.06)]. CONCLUSION: Findings support the 1964 paradox observing decreased diabetic retinopathy in patients with RA. These findings pose new questions regarding whether RA physiology or treatments protect against diabetic retinopathy and how intraocular factors vary in contrast to adverse vascular changes elsewhere.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide/complicaciones , Artritis Reumatoide/fisiopatología , Retinopatía Diabética/epidemiología , Retinopatía Diabética/fisiopatología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios de Cohortes , Retinopatía Diabética/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos
17.
J Gen Intern Med ; 30(6): 768-76, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25650264

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Early hypertension control reduces the risk of cardiovascular complications among patients with diabetes mellitus. There is a need to improve hypertension management among patients with diabetes mellitus. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate rates and associations of hypertension diagnosis and treatment among patients with diabetes mellitus and incident hypertension. DESIGN: This was a 4-year retrospective analysis of electronic health records. PARTICIPANTS: Adults ≥ 18 years old (n = 771) with diabetes mellitus, who met criteria for incident hypertension and received primary care at a large, Midwestern academic group practice from 2008 to 2011 were included MAIN MEASURES: Cut-points of 130/80 and 140/90 mmHg were used to identify incident cases of hypertension. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated the probability of receiving: 1) an initial hypertension diagnosis and 2) antihypertensive medication at specific time points. Cox proportional-hazard frailty models (HR; 95 % CI) were fit to identify associations of time to hypertension diagnosis and treatment. KEY RESULTS: Among patients with diabetes mellitus who met clinical criteria for hypertension, 41 % received a diagnosis and 37 % received medication using the 130/80 mmHg cut-point. At the 140/90 mmHg cut-point, 52 % received a diagnosis and 49 % received medication. Atrial fibrillation (HR 2.18; 1.21-4.67) was associated with faster diagnosis rates; peripheral vascular disease (HR 0.18; 0.04-0.74) and fewer primary care visits (HR 0.93; 0.88-0.98) were associated with slower diagnosis rates. Atrial fibrillation (HR 3.07; 1.39-6.74) and ischemic heart disease/congestive heart failure (HR 2.16; 1.24-3.76) were associated with faster treatment rates; peripheral vascular disease (HR 0.16; 0.04-0.64) and fewer visits (HR 0.93; 0.88-0.98) predicted slower medication initiation. Diagnosis and treatment of incident hypertension were similar using cut-points of 130/80 and 140/90 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with diabetes mellitus, even using a cut-point of 140/90 mmHg, approximately 50 % remained undiagnosed and untreated for hypertension. Future interventions should target patients with multiple comorbidities to improve hypertension and diabetes clinical care.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Presión Sanguínea , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
18.
J Gen Intern Med ; 30(5): 556-64, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25373831

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Only 38% of young adults with hypertension have controlled blood pressure. Lifestyle education is a critical initial step for hypertension control. Previous studies have not assessed the type and frequency of lifestyle education in young adults with incident hypertension. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine patient, provider, and visit predictors of documented lifestyle education among young adults with incident hypertension. DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective analysis of manually abstracted electronic health record data. PARTICIPANTS: A random selection of adults 18-39 years old (n = 500), managed by a large academic practice from 2008 to 2011 and who met JNC 7 clinical criteria for incident hypertension, participated in the study. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was the presence of any documented lifestyle education during one year after meeting criteria for incident hypertension. Abstracted topics included documented patient education for exercise, tobacco cessation, alcohol use, stress management/stress reduction, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, and weight loss. Clinic visits were categorized based upon a modified established taxonomy to characterize patients' patterns of outpatient service. We excluded patients with previous hypertension diagnoses, previous antihypertensive medications, or pregnancy. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of documented education. KEY RESULTS: Overall, 55% (n = 275) of patients had documented lifestyle education within one year of incident hypertension. Exercise was the most frequent topic (64%). Young adult males had significantly decreased odds of receiving documented education. Patients with a previous diagnosis of hyperlipidemia or a family history of hypertension or coronary artery disease had increased odds of documented education. Among visit types, chronic disease visits predicted documented lifestyle education, but not acute or other/preventive visits. CONCLUSIONS: Among young adults with incident hypertension, only 55% had documented lifestyle education within one year. Knowledge of patient, provider, and visit predictors of education can help better target the development of interventions to improve young adult health education and hypertension control.


Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/terapia , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Intervalos de Confianza , Dieta , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Sexuales , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
19.
BMC Fam Pract ; 16: 42, 2015 Mar 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25887080

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The vast majority of patients with diabetes have multiple chronic conditions, increasing complexity of care; however, clinical practice guidelines, interventions, and public reporting metrics do not adequately address the interaction of these multiple conditions. To advance the understanding of diabetes clinical care in the context of multiple chronic conditions, we must understand how care overlaps, or doesn't, between diabetes and its co-occurring conditions. This study aimed to determine which chronic conditions are concordant (share care goals with diabetes) and discordant (do not share care goals) with diabetes care, according to primary care provider expert opinion. METHODS: Using the Delphi technique, we administered an iterative, two-round survey to 16 practicing primary care providers in an academic practice in the Midwestern USA. The expert panel determined which specific diabetes care goals were also care goals for other chronic conditions (concordant) and which were not (discordant). Our diabetes care goals were those commonly used in quality reporting, and the conditions were 62 ambulatory-relevant condition categories. RESULTS: Sixteen experts participated and all completed both rounds. Consensus was reached on the first round for 94% of the items. After the second round, 12 conditions were concordant with diabetes care and 50 were discordant. Of the concordant conditions, 6 overlapped in care for 4 of 5 diabetes care goals and 6 overlapped for 3 of 5 diabetes care goals. Thirty-one discordant conditions did not overlap with any of the diabetes care goals, and 19 overlapped with only 1 or 2 goals. CONCLUSIONS: This study significantly adds to the number of conditions for which we have information on concordance and discordance for diabetes care. The results can be used for future studies to assess the impact of concordant and discordant conditions on diabetes care, and may prove useful in developing multimorbidity guidelines and interventions.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crónica/terapia , Técnica Delphi , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Comorbilidad , Médicos Generales , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud
20.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 21(6): 1781-91, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24643898

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy is established for stage III colon cancer; however, uncertainty exists for stage II patients. Tumor heterogeneity, specifically microsatellite instability (MSI), which is more common in right-sided cancers, may be the reason for this observation. We examined the relationship between adjuvant chemotherapy and overall 5-year mortality for stage II colon cancer by location (right- vs left-side) as a surrogate for MSI. METHODS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data, we identified Medicare beneficiaries from 1992 to 2005 with AJCC stage II (n = 23,578) and III (n = 17,148) primary adenocarcinoma of the colon who underwent surgery for curative intent. Overall 5-year mortality was examined with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression with propensity score weighting. RESULTS: It was found that 18 % of stage II patients (n = 2941) with right-sided cancer and 22 % (n = 1693) with left-sided cancer received adjuvant chemotherapy. After adjustment, overall 5-year survival benefit from chemotherapy was observed only for stage III patients (right-sided: hazard ratio [HR], 0.64; 95 % CI, 0.59-0.68; p < .001 and left-sided: HR, 0.61; 95 % CI, 0.56-0.68; p < .001). No survival benefit was observed for stage II patients with either right-sided (HR, 0.97; 95 % CI, 0.87-1.09; p = .64) or left-sided cancer (HR, 0.97; 95 % CI, 0.84-1.12; p = .68). CONCLUSIONS: Among Medicare patients with stage II colon cancer, a substantial number receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve overall 5-year survival for either right- or left-sided colon cancers. Our results reinforce existing guidelines and should be considered in treatment algorithms for older adults with stage II colon cancer.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Colon Ascendente , Colon Descendente , Colon Sigmoide , Colon Transverso , Neoplasias del Colon/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Programa de VERF/estadística & datos numéricos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA