Extracellular nucleic acid scavenging rescues rats from sulfur mustard analog-induced lung injury and mortality.

Sulfur mustard (SM) is a highly toxic war chemical that causes significant morbidity and mortality and lacks any effective therapy. Rats exposed to aerosolized CEES (2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide; 10% in ethanol), an analog of SM, developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which is characterized by increased inflammation, hypoxemia and impaired gas exchange. We observed elevated levels of extracellular nucleic acids (eNA) in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of CEES-exposed animals. eNA can induce inflammation, coagulation and barrier dysfunction. Treatment with hexadimethrine bromide (HDMBr; 10 mg/kg), an eNA neutralizing agent, 2 h post-exposure, reduced lung injury, inhibited disruption of alveolar-capillary barrier, improved blood oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2 ratio), thus reversing ARDS symptoms. HDMBr treatment also reduced lung inflammation in the CEES-exposed animals by decreasing IL-6, IL-1A, CXCL-1 and CCL-2 mRNA levels in lung tissues and HMGB1 protein in BALF. Furthermore, HDMBr treatment also reduced levels of lung tissue factor and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 indicating reduction in clot formation and increased fibrinolysis. Fibrin was reduced in BALF of the HDMBr-treated animals. This was further confirmed by histology that revealed diminished airway fibrin, epithelial sloughing and hyaline membrane in the lungs of HDMBr-treated animals. HDMBr completely rescued the CEES-associated mortality 12 h post-exposure when the survival rate in CEES-only group was just 50%. Experimental eNA treatment of cells caused increased inflammation that was reversed by HDMBr. These results demonstrate a role of eNA in the pathogenesis of CEES/SM-induced injury and that its neutralization can serve as a potential therapeutic approach in treating SM toxicity.

The Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Microelectrode Recordings of the Subthalamic Nucleus during Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The placement of subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes can be facilitated by intraoperative microelectrode recording (MER) of the STN. OBJECTIVES: Optimal anesthetic management during surgery remains unclear because of a lack of quantitative data of the effect of anesthetics on MER. Therefore, we measured the effects of dexmedetomidine (DEX) on MER measures of the STN commonly taken intraoperatively. METHODS: MER from 45 patients was retrospectively compared between patients treated with remifentanil (REMI) alone or both REMI and DEX, which are the 2 main standards of care at our center. The measures examined were population activity, such as root mean square, STN length, and number of passes yielding STN, and the single-neuron measures of firing rate and variability. RESULTS: The addition of DEX does not affect population measures (number of passes: DEX+REMI, n = 68, REMI only, n = 154), or neuronal firing rates (number of neurons: DEX+REMI, n = 64, REMI only, n = 72), but firing rate variability was reduced. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, population-based measures routinely used for electrode placement in the STN were unaffected by DEX when added to REMI. Neuronal firing rates were also unaffected, but their variability was reduced, even beyond 20 min after cessation.

Latency of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation-evoked cortical activity as a potential biomarker for postoperative motor side effects.

OBJECTIVE: Here, we investigate whether cortical activation predicts motor side effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) and whether these potential biomarkers have utility under general anesthesia. METHODS: We recorded scalp potentials elicited by DBS during surgery (n = 11), both awake and under general anesthesia, and in an independent ambulatory cohort (n = 8). Across a range of stimulus configurations, we measured the amplitude and timing of short- and long-latency response components and linked them to motor side effects. RESULTS: Regardless of anesthesia state, in both cohorts, DBS settings with capsular side effects elicited early responses with peak latencies clustering at <1 ms. This early response was preserved under anesthesia in all participants (11/11). In contrast, the long-latency components were suppressed completely in 6/11 participants. Finally, the latency of the earliest response could predict the presence of postoperative motor side effects both awake and under general anesthesia (84.8% and 75.8% accuracy, awake and under anesthesia, respectively). CONCLUSION: DBS elicits short-latency cortical activation, both awake and under general anesthesia, which appears to reveal interactions between the stimulus and the corticospinal tract. SIGNIFICANCE: Short-latency evoked cortical activity can potentially be used to aid both DBS lead placement and post-operative programming.