Further to the right: Viewing distance modulates attentional asymmetries ('pseudoneglect') during visual exploration.

Previous studies showed that the small leftward bias found in healthy humans' spatial judgments of lines ("pseudoneglect") shifts to the right with increasing distance between stimuli and observer. In this study, we investigated whether such a modulation of attentional asymmetry can also be observed in free visual exploration. Participants freely explored photographs of naturalistic scenes for 7 s in near (60 cm) and far (140 cm) space. After an initial leftward bias, followed by a compensatory rightward bias, gaze positions were significantly more leftward in near compared to far space (around 4 s from scene onset). Our results show that the modulation of attentional asymmetries by viewing distance previously reported for spatial judgments generalizes to free visual exploration, and we revealed the temporal dynamics of these asymmetries by fine-grained eye movement analysis. In contrast, an effect of viewing distance was reduced or absent when eye movements are under strong top-down control, as in systematic serial visual search (Sensitive Negelct Test). Finally, there was no effect of viewing distance in the landmark task (as also reported in a minority of other studies), suggesting that this effect may depend on specific, yet unidentified task characteristics.

Early is left and up: Saccadic responses reveal horizontal and vertical spatial associations of serial order in working memory.

Maintaining serial order in working memory is crucial for cognition. Recent theories propose that serial information is achieved by positional coding of items on a spatial frame of reference. In line with this, an early-left and late-right spatial-positional association of response code (SPoARC) effect has been established. Various theoretical accounts have been put forward to explain the SPoARC effect (the mental whiteboard hypothesis, conceptual metaphor theory, polarity correspondence, or the indirect spatial-numerical association effect). Crucially, while all these accounts predict a left-to-right orientation of the SPoARC effect, they make different predictions regarding the direction of a possible vertical SPoARC effect. In this study, we therefore investigated SPoARC effects along the horizontal and vertical spatial dimension by means of saccadic responses. We replicated the left-to-right horizontal SPoARC effect and established for the first time an up-to-down vertical SPoARC effect. The direction of the vertical SPoARC effect was in contrast to that predicted by metaphor theory, polarity correspondence, or by the indirect spatial-numerical association effect. Rather, our results support the mental whiteboard-hypothesis, according to which positions can be flexibly coded on an internal space depending on the task demands. We also found that the strengths of the horizontal and vertical SPoARC effects were correlated, showing that some people are more prone than others to use spatial references for position coding. Our results therefore suggest that context templates used for position marking are not necessarily spatial in nature but depend on individual strategy preferences.