Carcinogenicity assessment of tegoprazan in Sprague-Dawley (Crl:CD) rats and ICR (Crl:CD1) mice.

Tegoprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) that reversibly inhibits the proton pump in gastric parietal cells and has been approved for the treatment of acid-related diseases in Korea. This study aimed to evaluate the carcinogenic potential of tegoprazan in Sprague-Dawley rats and CD-1 mice. Tegoprazan was administered daily by oral gavage to rats for up to 94 weeks and mice for up to 104 weeks. Evidence of carcinogenic potential of tegoprazan was identified in rats only and was limited to benign and/or malignant neuroendocrine cell tumors at exposures >7-fold of the recommended human dose. Glandular stomach findings were considered secondary to the expected pharmacology of tegoprazan, characterized by their location in the fundic and body regions of the stomach. Overall, tegoprazan induced gastric enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cell tumors in SD rats, but did not produce any treatment-related statistically significant increase in the incidence of neoplasms relevant to humans when administered to SD rats and CD-1 mice by gavage at doses up to 300 and 150 mg/kg/day, respectively. Gastric ECL cell tumors are thought to be induced by the exaggerated indirect pharmacological effect of tegoprazan, similar to that reported for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and other P-CABs.

Night-time gastric acid suppression by tegoprazan compared to vonoprazan or esomeprazole.

AIMS: Nocturnal acid breakthrough has been considered an unmet need of proton-pump inhibitors. Tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, is expected to show improved properties for this unmet need. This study was aimed to compare night-time acid suppression by tegoprazan with that by vonoprazan or esomeprazole, and to explore the effect of CYP2C19 phenotypes on acid-suppressive effects. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, 3-period, 6-sequence crossover study was conducted. A single oral dose of tegoprazan 50 mg, vonoprazan 20 mg or esomeprazole 40 mg was administered at night in each period. Continuous intragastric pH was monitored at baseline and after each dosing. RESULTS: Sixteen healthy subjects (6 CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers, 5 intermediate metabolizers, 5 poor metabolizers) completed the study. After a single dose of tegoprazan, intragastric pH increased more rapidly to over 4 at approximately 1 hour compared to the other treatments, and elevated intragastric pH was maintained stably at night. Tegoprazan exhibited night-time acid suppression for slightly but not significantly longer than vonoprazan, and greater than esomeprazole; % time at pH ≥ 4 at night was 66.0%, 60.5% and 36.1% for tegoprazan, vonoprazan and esomeprazole, respectively. Night-time acid suppression by tegoprazan and vonoprazan was not dependent on CYP2C19 phenotypes, while that by esomeprazole tended to be influenced by CYP2C19 phenotypes. CONCLUSION: Tegoprazan produced more rapid, potent and well sustained night-time acid suppression vs. vonoprazan or esomeprazole when administered at night. Furthermore, tegoprazan showed no CYP2C19 phenotype dependency in acid suppression. It suggests the potential of tegoprazan, especially in preventing nocturnal acid breakthrough.

Effects of Tegoprazan, a Novel Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker, on Rat Models of Gastric Acid-Related Disease.

Tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), is a next-generation therapeutics developed for the treatment of acid-related gastrointestinal diseases such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and peptic ulcers. In the present study, the in vitro and in vivo pharmacological properties of tegoprazan were compared with those of esomeprazole, a representative proton pump inhibitor. In vitro enzyme assays were performed using ion-leaky vesicles containing gastric H+/K+-ATPases isolated from pigs. The in vivo efficacies of tegoprazan were evaluated in rat models of GERD and peptic ulcer. Tegoprazan inhibited the activity of porcine H+/K+-ATPase with an IC50 value of 0.53 µM in a reversible manner, whereas esomeprazole showed weak and irreversible inhibition with an IC50 value of 42.52 µM. In a GERD model, tegoprazan showed dose-dependent efficacy in inhibiting esophageal injury and gastric acid secretion with an ED50 of 2.0 mg/kg, which was 15-fold more potent than that of esomeprazole. In peptic ulcer models, tegoprazan exhibited superior antiulcer activity compared with esomeprazole. The ED50 of tegoprazan in the naproxen-, ethanol-, and water-immersion restraint stress-induced peptic ulcer models were 0.1, 1.4, and 0.1 mg/kg, respectively. In the acetic acid-induced peptic ulcer model, the curative ratio of tegoprazan at 10 mg/kg was higher than that of esomeprazole at 30 mg/kg (44.2% vs. 32.7%, respectively), after 5 days of repeated oral administration. Thus, tegoprazan is a novel P-CAB that shows potent and reversible inhibition of gastric H+/K+-ATPase and may provide stronger efficacy compared with previous proton pump inhibitors.

Pharmacodynamic effects of voglibose administered alone, administered with metformin, and administered with metformin in a fixed-dose combination in healthy Korean subjects
.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at exploring the effects of metformin on the pharmacodynamics of voglibose, while investigating the pharmacodynamics between a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of voglibose/metformin and coadministered doses of voglibose and metformin tablets in healthy Korean subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, open-label, 2×3×3 crossover study with a 9-day washout period was conducted in 30 healthy subjects. All subjects received orally administered voglibose alone, individual voglibose and metformin tablets, or FDC 3 times daily for 5 days. Oral sucrose was administered on day -1 (pretreatment) and at 10 minutes after the morning dose of the study drug on day 5 of each period. Plasma glucose and serum insulin were measured over the course of 2 hours following sucrose loading. RESULTS: 21 subjects completed the study. The geometric mean ratios (GMR) of ΔCmax and the AUC of glucose for voglibose plus metformin vs. voglibose alone were 0.995 (90% CI, 0.800 - 1.237) and 0.969 (90% CI, 0.949 - 0.990), respectively; the GMRs for individual tablets vs. FDC were 1.118 (90% CI, 0.930 - 1.344) and 1.010 (90% CI, 0.974 - 1.048), respectively. A relatively smaller number of subjects experienced adverse events when receiving voglibose alone compared to those administered FDC or metformin and voglibose. There were no significant differences in adverse events between individual voglibose and metformin tablets and FDC. CONCLUSION: Coadministered metformin did not have statistically or clinically significant effects on the pharmacodynamics of voglibose in healthy subjects. Glucose levels following sucrose loading seem not to be clinically different between FDC and individual tablets of voglibose and metformin.
.

Pharmacokinetic study of metformin to compare voglibose/metformin fixed-dose combination with coadministered voglibose and metformin.

The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic characteristics of metformin between a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of voglibose/metformin and coadministered individual voglibose and metformin tablets in healthy Korean volunteers under fasting conditions. A randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-treatment, two-way crossover study with a 7-day wash-out period was conducted. Plasma samples were collected for up to 24 hours and were analyzed for metformin using a validated liquid chromatography tandem mass-spectrometry (LC/MS). A noncompartmental method was used to calculate the pharmacokinetic parameters. Vital signs and adverse events were monitored, and physical examinations and laboratory tests were conducted to evaluate safety. In total, 28 subjects completed the study. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) and the 90% confidence interval (CIs) of Cmax and AUC0-t of metformin were 102.4 (94.5-111.0) and 107.1 (100.1-114.7), respectively. In total, 7 adverse drug reactions occurred in 4 subjects during the study; of these, 3 cases were from 3 subjects in the test treatment group, and 4 cases were from 3 subjects in the reference treatment group. All adverse drug reactions had been reported previously, and all subjects recovered fully without any sequelae. In conclusion, the pharmacokinetic profiles of metformin in two different study treatments, a voglibose/metformin FDC vs. the coadministration of the individual formulations, met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence in healthy Korean subjects under fasting conditions. There was no significant difference in safety profiles between the two treatments.

Pharmacokinetic comparison of amlodipine adipate/valsartan fixed-dose combination with amlodipine besylate/valsartan fixed-dose combination in healthy volunteers.

The aim of this study was to compare pharmacokinetic characteristics of fixed-dose combination (FDC) of two different salt form of amlodipine, amlodipine adipate/valsartan and amlodipine besylate/ valsartan, in healthy Korean volunteers under fasting conditions. A randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-treatment, two-way crossover study with a 14-day wash-out period was conducted. Plasma samples were collected for up to 144 hours for amlodipine and 24 hours for valsartan. Plasma concentrations of amlodipine and valsartan were analyzed using a validated ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass-spectrometry. A non-compartmental method was used to calculate pharmacokinetic parameters. Vital signs and adverse events were monitored and physical examinations, laboratory tests, and electrocardiograms were conducted to evaluate safety. 44 subjects completed the study. The 90% CIs for the geometric mean ratio of Cmax and the AUC0-t were 93.5 - 100.4% and 93.2 - 98.3% for amlodipine, and 92.1 - 121.3% and 94.1 - 115.2% for valsartan, respectively. 17 adverse events occurred in 15 subjects during the study; 5 and 7 adverse drug reactions from the 5 and 6 subjects were considered to probably be related to the test and reference treatments respectively. All adverse drug reactions were in line with those known for the reference drug. All subjects recovered fully with no sequelae. A FDC of amlodipine adipate/valsartan and amlodipine besylate/valsartan combination tablets met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence. In addition, no significant difference was observed in the safety assessments between two treatments. Thus, the newly developed FDC of amlodipine adipate/valsartan seems to be interchangeable with amlodipine besylate valsartan combination.

Effect of voglibose on the pharmacokinetics of metformin in healthy Korean subjects.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of voglibose on the pharmacokinetics of metformin. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, two-way crossover study with a 7-day washout period was conducted. All subjects were given an oral dose of metformin with or without voglibose 3 x daily for 7 days. Plasma concentrations of metformin on day 7 were measured using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with UV detection for pharmacokinetic assessment Vital signs and adverse events were monitored, and physical examinations and laboratory tests were conducted to evaluate safety. RESULTS: 22 subjects completed the study. The geometric mean ratios for C(ss,max) of metformin (metformin plus voglibose vs. metformin only) were 0.98 (90% CI, 0.92 - 1.05; p > 0.05) and for AUC-τ, the ratio was 0.99 (90% CI, 0.92 - 1.06; p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in adverse drug reactions between metformin with and without voglibose. However, the incidence of adverse events was higher in period 1 than in period 2 (16 cases vs. 1 case, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Co-administration of metformin and voglibose had no statistically or clinically significant effects on the pharmacokinetics of metformin in healthy subjects. The pharmacodynamic interaction study to evaluate the effect of metformin on the pharmacodynamics of voglibose is in progress.

Effects of Tegoprazan Versus Esomeprazole on Nighttime Heartburn and Sleep Quality in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Multicenter Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background/Aims: Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) frequently experience nighttime heartburn and sleep disturbance. Tegoprazan is a new potassium-competitive acid blocker that can rapidly block acid secretion. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of tegoprazan compared with esomeprazole in relieving nighttime heartburn and sleep disturbances. Methods: Patients with erosive esophagitis, nighttime heartburn, and sleep disturbances were randomized to receive tegoprazan 50 mg or esomeprazole 40 mg for 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was time to first nighttime heartburn-free interval. The percentage of nighttime heartburn-free days was also compared between the 2 groups. Results: A total of 46 patients were enrolled in this study. Time to the first nighttime heartburn-free interval was shorter with tegoprazan than with esomeprazole but the difference was not statistically significant (1.5 days vs 3 days, P = 0.151). The percentage of nighttime heartburn-free days was higher in the tegoprazan group but the difference was insignificant (57.8% vs 43.1%, P = 0.107). Adverse events occurred in 2 patients. They were mild in severity. Conclusions: Tegoprazan may induce faster relief of nighttime heartburn symptoms and may improve sleep disorders associated with nighttime heartburn. Further large-scale studies are required to validate our findings.

Evaluation of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between tegoprazan and clarithromycin in healthy subjects.

Tegoprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker that treats gastric acid-related diseases. Clarithromycin was widely used as one of various regimens for eradicating Helicobacter pylori. This study compared the pharmacokinetic and safety profile of tegoprazan and clarithromycin between combination therapy and monotherapy to evaluate the potential drug-drug interaction. An open-label, randomized, 6-sequence, 3-period crossover study was conducted in 24 healthy subjects. According to the assigned sequence, the subject was administered the assigned treatment during 5 days in each period. PK parameters of tegoprazan and clarithromycin administered in combination were compared with those of the respective monotherapies. The co-administration of tegoprazan with clarithromycin increased maximum steady-state plasma concentration (Css,max) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve in dosing interval at steady-state (AUCss,tau) of tegoprazan (1.6-fold in Css,max and 2.5-fold in AUCss,tau) and M1 (2.0-fold in Css,max, 2.5-fold in AUCss,tau) than tegoprazan alone. The Css,max and AUCss,tau of 14-hydroxyclarithromycin increased 1.8- and 2.0-fold in co-administration, respectively. The AUCss.tau of clarithromycin was slightly increased in co-administration, but Css,max was not changed. Combination of tegoprazan and clarithromycin and those of the respective monotherapies were tolerated in 24 healthy subjects. There may exist drug interaction that lead to reciprocal increase in plasma drug concentrations when tegoprazan and clarithromycin were administrated in combination and no safety concerns were raised. It is suggested that an in-depth analysis of the concentration-response relationship is necessary to determine whether these concentration changes warrant clinical action. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02052336.

Comparison of Pharmacodynamics between Tegoprazan and Dexlansoprazole Regarding Nocturnal Acid Breakthrough: A Randomized Crossover Study.

Background/Aims: Tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, is expected to overcome the limitations of proton pump inhibitors and effectively control nocturnal acid breakthrough. To evaluate the pharmacodynamics of tegoprazan versus dexlansoprazole regarding nocturnal acid breakthrough in healthy subjects. Methods: In a randomized, open-label, single-dose, balanced incomplete block crossover study, 24 healthy male volunteers were enrolled and randomized to receive oral tegoprazan (50, 100, or 200 mg) or dexlansoprazole (60 mg) during each of two administration periods, separated by a 7- to 10-day washout period. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic parameter analysis; gastric monitoring was performed for pharmacodynamic parameter evaluation. Results: All 24 subjects completed the study. Average maximum plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve, and mean time with gastric pH >4 and pH >6 for tegoprazan demonstrated dose-dependent incremental increases. All the tegoprazan groups reached mean pH ≥4 within 2 hours, whereas the dexlansoprazole group required 7 hours after drug administration. Based on pharmacodynamic parameters up to 12 hours after evening dosing, 50, 100, and 200 mg of tegoprazan presented a stronger acid-suppressive effect than 60 mg of dexlansoprazole. Moreover, the dexlansoprazole group presented a comparable acid-suppressive effect with the tegoprazan groups 12 hours after dosing. Conclusions: All the tegoprazan groups demonstrated a significantly faster onset of gastric pH increase and longer holding times above pH >4 and pH >6 up to 12 hours after evening dosing than the dexlansoprazole group.

New phytopharmaceutical agent CJ-20001 modulates stress-induced inflammatory infiltration into gastric mucosa.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: CJ-20001 is a phytopharmaceutical agent and currently being investigated in a Phase II trial for the treatment of acute and chronic gastritis patients in Korea. In this study we addressed the protective effects of CJ-20001 against water immersion restraint stress (WIRS)-induced gastric injury in rats and studied the underlying mechanisms. METHODOLOGY: To evaluate the protective effect of CJ-20001 on stress-induced gastric lesions, rats were exposed to water immersion restraint stress. Inflammatory infiltration into gastric mucosa was examined by immunohistochemistry and in vitro invasion assay. Expression of proinflammatory cytokines was detected with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). RESULTS: Pretreatment with CJ-20001 dose-dependently attenuated the WIRS-induced gastric lesions as demonstrated by gross pathology and histology. WIRS increased infiltration of mast cells and macrophages into the gastric mucosa and submucosal layer, whereas the inflammatory infiltration was markedly inhibited by CJ-20001 administration. An in vitro cell invasion assay showed that treatment with CJ-20001 decreased the migration of macrophages. CJ-20001 suppressed the expression of proinflammatory cytokines, IL-18, IP-10 and GRO/KC, in lipopolysaccharides (LPS)-treated macrophages. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that novel phytopharmaceutical agent CJ-20001 has the potent anti-inflammatory properties through inhibition of inflammatory infiltration in psycho-physiological stress-induced gastric injury.

Prediction of Drug-Drug Interaction Potential of Tegoprazan Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation.

This study aimed to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of tegoprazan and to predict the drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential between tegoprazan and cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 perpetrators. The PBPK model of tegoprazan was developed using SimCYP Simulator® and verified by comparing the model-predicted pharmacokinetics (PKs) of tegoprazan with the observed data from phase 1 clinical studies, including DDI studies. DDIs between tegoprazan and three CYP3A4 perpetrators were predicted by simulating the difference in tegoprazan exposure with and without perpetrators, after multiple dosing for a clinically used dose range. The final PBPK model adequately predicted the biphasic distribution profiles of tegoprazan and DDI between tegoprazan and clarithromycin. All ratios of the predicted-to-observed PK parameters were between 0.5 and 2.0. In DDI simulation, systemic exposure to tegoprazan was expected to increase about threefold when co-administered with the maximum recommended dose of clarithromycin or ketoconazole. Meanwhile, tegoprazan exposure was expected to decrease to ~30% when rifampicin was co-administered. Based on the simulation by the PBPK model, it is suggested that the DDI potential be considered when tegoprazan is used with CYP3A4 perpetrator, as the acid suppression effect of tegoprazan is known to be associated with systemic exposure.

Co-Administration of Vonoprazan, Not Tegoprazan, Affects the Pharmacokinetics of Atorvastatin in Healthy Male Subjects.

Potassium-competitive acid blocker is a new class of drugs inhibiting gastric acid. It is controversial that vonoprazan showed the inhibitory activities of cytochrome P450 3A4. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of atorvastatin and safety when atorvastatin was administered alone and co-administered with vonoprazan or tegoprazan. An open-label, multiple-dose, 3-intervention, 4-sequence, 4-period, partial replicate crossover study was conducted, and three interventions were; one is orally administered atorvastatin 40 mg alone once daily for 7 days, another is atorvastatin co-administered with vonoprazan 20 mg, and the other is atorvastatin co-administered with tegoprazan 50 mg. PK blood samples were collected up to 24 h after the last dose, and PK parameters for atorvastatin, 2-hydroxyatorvastatin and atorvastatin lactone were estimated by a non-compartmental method. Safety was evaluated, including adverse events and clinical laboratory tests. A total of 28 subjects completed the study. When atorvastatin was co-administered with vonoprazan, the systemic exposures of atorvastatin and atorvastatin lactone significantly increased, and the metabolic ratio of 2-hydroxyatorvastatin significantly decreased. Hypergastrinemia only occurred when atorvastatin was co-administered with vonoprazan. However, the plasma concentration profiles of atorvastatin, 2-hydroxyatorvastatin and atorvastatin lactone were similar when atorvastatin was administered alone or co-administered with tegoprazan. In conclusion, after multiple doses of atorvastatin co-administered with vonoprazan in healthy subjects, the systemic exposure of atorvastatin and the incidence of hypergastrinemia increased. With tegoprazan, however, those interactions were not observed.

Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of a Single Oral Dose of Tegoprazan.

PURPOSE: Tegoprazan is a potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) that is designed to treat acid-related diseases through a fundamentally different mechanism than that of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Because PPIs inhibit only activated parietal cell H+/K+ adenosine triphosphatase, stimulation of parietal cells by a meal is necessary for optimal results. In contrast, P-CABs can inactivate proton pumps without acid activation and bind to both activated and inactivated adenosine triphosphatase. This study evaluates the effect of food consumption on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of tegoprazan after a single oral dose in healthy men. METHODS: In this open-label, 2-period crossover study, 24 healthy men were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment sequence groups: administration of tegoprazan under the fasting condition and administration of tegoprazan under the fed condition. The dosing periods of both sequence groups were separated by a washout period of 7 days. At each dosing period, the participants received a single dose of 200 mg of tegoprazan followed by pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis. FINDINGS: After the oral administration of 200 mg tegoprazan, the Cmax was decreased and delayed under the fed condition compared with that of the fasting condition. However, no significant differences were observed in the AUC and the time of gastric acid suppression (inhibition of integrated acidity) during 24 hours. IMPLICATIONS: The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of tegoprazan are independent of food effect; thus, tegoprazan could be administered regardless of the timing of food consumption in patients. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01830309.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions between Tegoprazan and Metronidazole/Tetracycline/Bismuth and Safety Assessment in Healthy Korean Male Subjects.

PURPOSE: Tegoprazan is a potassium-competitive acid blocker used for gastric acid suppression, which may be used with Helicobacter pylori eradication therapies. The goal of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction between tegoprazan and triple-antibiotic therapy containing metronidazole, tetracycline, and bismuth. METHODS: An open-label, 2-cohort, randomized, multiple-dose, crossover study was conducted in healthy subjects. In cohort 1, tegoprazan (100 mg/d) was administered orally with or without triple-antibiotic therapy (1500 mg/d metronidazole, 2000 mg/d tetracycline, and 1200 mg/d bismuth) for 7 days in each period. In cohort 2, triple-antibiotic therapy was administered orally with or without tegoprazan for 7 days in each period. Pharmacokinetic blood samples were collected within 24 h after the last dose. Safety assessments were performed. FINDINGS: Eleven cohort 1 subjects and ten cohort 2 subjects were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis. The AUCτ and Cmax at steady state geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) were 0.78 (0.73-0.83) and 0.75 (0.68-0.82) for tegoprazan; 0.77 (0.68-0.88) and 0.84 (0.72-0.98) for tegoprazan metabolite M1; 1.03 (0.98-1.08) and 1.08 (0.99-1.18) for metronidazole; 0.63 (0.56-0.70) and 0.64 (0.56-0.74) for tetracycline; and 1.55 (0.99-2.44) and 1.38 (0.72-2.66) for bismuth, respectively. All reported adverse events were mild. IMPLICATIONS: Changes in the tegoprazan, tetracycline, and bismuth pharmacokinetic parameters were detected after concurrent administration. These changes were considered mainly due to the pharmacodynamic effect of tegoprazan. The adverse events were predictable and reported as frequent adverse events during triple-antibiotic therapy. There were no significant differences in safety or tolerability between quadruple therapy, including tegoprazan and triple-antibiotic therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04066257.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Tegoprazan Coadministered With Amoxicillin and Clarithromycin in Healthy Subjects.

This clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tegoprazan when coadministered with amoxicillin/clarithromycin in healthy subjects. Cohort 1 was an open-label, randomized multiple-dose study to evaluate the mutual interaction of tegoprazan and amoxicillin/clarithromycin on the disposition of 3 tested drugs including tegoprazan M1 metabolite and 14-hydroxyclarithromycin (14-OH-clarithromycin). Cohort 2 was an open-label, randomized, active-controlled, parallel multiple-dose study to compare the intragastric pH profile after multiple oral doses of 50 or 100 mg tegoprazan coadministered with amoxicillin/clarithromycin 1000/500 mg for 7 days and pantoprazole-based triple therapy as the comparator arm. The coadministration of tegoprazan with amoxicillin/clarithromycin increased Css,max (2.2-fold) and AUCτ (2.7-fold) of tegoprazan and M1 (2.1- and 2.2-fold for Css,max and AUCτ , respectively) compared with administration of tegoprazan alone. The Css,max and AUCτ of 14-OH-clarithromycin increased by 1.7- and 1.8-fold, respectively; the disposition of amoxicillin and clarithromycin were not significantly changed. On days 1 and 7 of treatment, tegoprazan-based therapies (both 50- and 100-mg therapies) maintained pH above 6 for more than 88% of the 24-hour period, which was significantly longer compared with pantoprazole-based therapy. Tegoprazan either alone or in combination with amoxicillin/clarithromycin was well tolerated in healthy subjects. In conclusion, the exposure of tegoprazan was increased after coadministration of amoxicillin/clarithromycin, which led to increase pharmacodynamic response measured by intragastric pH compared with tegoprazan alone. Therefore, tegoprazan-based triple therapy would be effective therapeutic regimen to manage intragastric pH in terms of gastric or duodenal ulcers healing, treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, and Helicobacter pylori eradication.

Randomised clinical trial: comparison of tegoprazan and placebo in non-erosive reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Tegoprazan is a novel, fast- and long-acting potassium-competitive acid blocker that suppresses gastric acid secretion, which could benefit patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), a type of gastroesophageal reflux disease. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of tegoprazan compared with those of a placebo in Korean patients with NERD. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study, 324 Korean patients with NERD were randomised into three treatment groups: tegoprazan 50 mg, tegoprazan 100 mg and placebo. These drugs were provided once daily for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with complete resolution of major symptoms (both heartburn and regurgitation) for the last 7 days of the 4-week treatment period. Other outcomes related to efficacy, safety and tolerability were also evaluated. RESULTS: Among all, 42.5% (45/106), 48.5% (48/99) and 24.2% (24/99) of patients showed complete resolution of major symptoms at week 4 after receiving tegoprazan 50 mg, tegoprazan 100 mg, and placebo, respectively. Both doses of tegoprazan showed superior efficacy than the placebo (P = 0.0058 and P = 0.0004, respectively). The complete resolution rates of heartburn and proportions of heartburn-free days (as other efficacy outcomes) were significantly higher in both tegoprazan groups than in the placebo group (P < 0.05 for all). No significant difference in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Tegoprazan 50 and 100 mg showed superior therapeutic efficacy compared with the placebo, as well as a favourable safety profile in patients with NERD. Registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02556021.

Pharmacodynamics of tegoprazan and revaprazan after single and multiple oral doses in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are emerging as novel treatments for acid-related disorders including gastroesophageal reflux disease. Tegoprazan and revaprazan are approved P-CABs in South Korea, but the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of the two drugs have never been compared. AIMS: To evaluate the pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability of tegoprazan and revaprazan after single and multiple oral doses METHODS: A randomised, open-label, active-controlled study was conducted in Helicobacter pylori-negative healthy Korean male subjects. Tegoprazan 50 mg or revaprazan 200 mg was administered orally, once daily for 7 days; 24-h intragastric pH monitoring and serum gastrin were measured for pharmacodynamic evaluation. Safety parameters including serum microRNA-122 (miR-122) level were also collected. RESULTS: After a single dose, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (54.5% vs 25.1%). After multiple doses, the %Time pH ≥4 for tegoprazan was also greater than that for revaprazan (68.2% vs 25.3%). %Time pH ≥4 during 12 hours at nighttime for tegoprazan was greater than that for revaprazan (71.8% vs 31.9%). The changes in the serum gastrin were not clinically significant for either drug. Despite the slight increases of serum miR-122 for each drug, tegoprazan and revaprazan were well tolerated considering other safety parameters including AST and ALT levels. CONCLUSION: Tegoprazan 50 mg showed stronger gastric acid suppression than revaorazan 200 mg. Both drugs were well tolerated.

Randomised clinical trial: tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, or lansoprazole in the treatment of gastric ulcer.

BACKGROUND: Tegoprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker for the treatment of acid-related disorders. AIMS: To assess whether tegoprazan is non-inferior to lansoprazole in terms of efficacy and safety in patients with gastric ulcers. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, active control, multicentre study, 306 gastric ulcer patients were randomised to one of three treatment groups: tegoprazan 50 mg, tegoprazan 100 mg and lansoprazole 30 mg once daily for 4 or 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the cumulative proportion of patients with healed ulcers confirmed by endoscopy up to 8 weeks from treatment initiation. Symptoms and safety were assessed. RESULTS: In the full analysis set, the cumulative healing rates at week 8 were 94.8% (91/96) for the tegoprazan 50 mg, 95.0% (94/99) for the tegoprazan 100 mg and 95.7% (89/93) for the lansoprazole 30 mg groups. At week 4, the respective healing rates were 90.6% (87/96), 91.9% (91/99), and 89.2% (83/93). In per protocol analysis, 4-week healing rates were 95.4% (84/88), 94.6% (88/93) and 92.9% (79/85) for tegoprazan 50 mg, tegoprazan 100 mg and lansoprazole 30 mg, respectively. Both doses of tegoprazan were non-inferior to lansoprazole in ulcer healing at 4 and 8 weeks. The incidence of drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events did not differ among groups. The increase in serum gastrin concentration was not higher in tegoprazan-treated patients than in lansoprazole-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Tegoprazan 50 or 100 mg were not inferior to lansoprazole 30 mg once daily in the treatment of gastric ulcers.

Comparison of pharmacokinetic characteristics of two Tegoprazan (CJ-12420) formulations in healthy male subjects.

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are effectively used to treat acid-related diseases, including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, many unmet medical needs still exist. As a new treatment option, potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), such as tegoprazan, have been developed. This study was performed to compare the pharmacokinetics (PKs) between two formulations (test and reference drugs) of tegoprazan 100 mg tablets. A randomized, single oral dose, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence study was conducted with 12 healthy subjects. Each subject received the test drug or reference drug in the first period and the alternative treatment in the second period. For PK evaluation, blood samples were collected up to 48 hours post-dose in each period. The plasma concentrations of tegoprazan and its active metabolite (M1) were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. PK parameters, including maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve from zero to the last measurable time (AUClast), were estimated using a non-compartmental method. The plasma concentration-time profiles of the two formulations were comparable. The geometric mean ratios [90% confidence intervals (CIs)] of the test drug to the reference drug for Cmax and AUClast were 0.98 (0.85-1.12) and 1.03 (0.93-1.13), respectively. The corresponding values of M1 were 0.99 (0.89-1.11) and 1.01 (0.93-1.09), respectively. The two formulations of tegoprazan exhibited comparable PK profiles, fulfilling the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence.