CEFTO-CURE study: CEFTObiprole Clinical Use in Real-lifE - a multi-centre experience in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Ceftobiprole is approved in Europe for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and non-ventilator-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in adults. Real-world data are limited. METHODS: This multi-centre, observational, ambispective investigator-initiated study was undertaken in Italy from January 2018 to December 2019 in order to evaluate the use of ceftobiprole in a real-world setting. RESULTS: Overall, 195 patients from 10 centres were evaluated (68% retrospectively). Male sex was prevalent (n=121, 62%). Median age was 67 [interquartile range (IQR) 53-75] years. Median Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 5 (IQR 3-7). The most common indication was pneumonia (151/195, 77%), especially HAP. Other uses were skin and soft tissue infections (5%), endocarditis (4%) and bone infections (4%). Ceftobiprole was usually an empiric choice (65%), in combination with other drugs (66%) and as second-line therapy (58%). A causative agent was found in 39% of cases. A diagnosis of sepsis was made in 59 cases (30%). Success in the clinically evaluable population (excluding 12 cases due to isolation of pathogens outside ceftobiprole's spectrum of activity) was obtained in 79% of cases, with all-cause mortality of 20%. On multi-level analysis, three predictors were positively associated with clinical success: male gender, pneumonia and detection of causal agent. Sepsis was a negative predictor. Nine factors were independently associated, favourably or unfavourably, with fatal outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftobiprole is a safe and effective therapeutic choice, even in a real-world setting. More data are needed to establish its efficacy in patients with sepsis.

High Incidence of Infections in HIV-positive Patients Treated for Lymphoproliferative Disorders.

BACKGROUND: Lymphoproliferative disorders are frequently diagnosed in HIV-positive patients and severe infections may occur during antineoplastic treatments: the incidence and impact of such events are not well-characterized. OBJECTIVE: To describe the occurrence and mortality of incident infections in HIV-positive individuals treated for lymphoproliferative disorders. METHODS: A retrospective study in HIV-positive adults with lymphoproliferative disorders (2000- 2012) who were hospitalised to receive antineoplastic chemotherapy; antimicrobial prophylaxis with alternate day co-trimoxazole (800/160 mg) was administered to all individuals. RESULTS: 103 patients were included: mostly males (81, 78.6%), Caucasians (101, 98.1%), with a median age of 43 years (39-51). Fifty-eight (56.3%) patients had non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), thirty-two (29.1%) had Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and ten patients (9.7%) had Burkitt's lymphoma (BL). Five year survival was 63.1%: the best survival rates were reported in HL (78.1%), followed by NHL (58.6%) and BL (50%). Forty-four patients (42.7%) developed 82 infections during follow up: identified causative agents were bacteria (35, 42.7%), viruses (28, 34.1%), mycobacteria (7, 8.5%), protozoa (7, 8.5%) and fungi (5, 6.1%). Cytomegalovirus infections (n=17, including 5 endorgan diseases) emerged 53 days after the diagnosis: multivariate analysis showed CD4+ cell count <100/uL as the only independently associated factor (p<0.001, aOR=23.5). Two factors were associated with mortality risk: an IPI/IPS-score of >2 (p=0.004, aOR=6.55) and the presence of CMV disease (p=0.032, aOR=2.73). CONCLUSION: HIV positive patients receiving treatment for lymphoproliferative disorders suffer from a high incidence of infections and associated mortality risk. Tailored prophylactic strategies need to be considered in this setting.