Achievements, challenges and unmet needs for haemophilia patients with inhibitors: Report from a symposium in Paris, France on 20 November 2014.

Over the past 20 years, there have been many advances in haemophilia treatment that have allowed patients to take greater control of their disease. However, the development of factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors is the greatest complication of the disease and a challenge in the treatment of haemophilia making management of bleeding episodes difficult and surgical procedures very challenging. A meeting to discuss the unmet needs of haemophilia patients with inhibitors was held in Paris on 20 November 2014. Topics discussed were genetic and non-genetic risk factors for the development of inhibitors, immunological aspects of inhibitor development, FVIII products and inhibitor development, generation and functional properties of engineered antigen-specific T regulatory cells, suppression of immune responses to FVIII, prophylaxis in haemophilia patients with inhibitors, epitope mapping of FVIII inhibitors, current controversies in immune tolerance induction therapy, surgery in haemophilia patients with inhibitors and future perspectives for the treatment of haemophilia patients with inhibitors. A summary of the key points discussed is presented in this paper.

National haemophilia programme development in the Republic of Georgia.

After the dissolution of Soviet Union in 1991, haemophilia care in the Republic of Georgia was negatively affected because of the expense of treatment products, lack of clinical and diagnostic facilities, and the need for trained personnel throughout the country. In 2001, the Georgian Government, working through the Ministry of Health, in collaboration with Georgian Association of Haemophilia and Donors, the Institute of Haematology and Transfusion, and the World Federation of Haemophilia, initiated a National Haemophilia Programme. As part of this programme the first Georgian Haemophilia Treatment Centre (HTC) was established. In this paper, we will describe (i) our outreach efforts to identify patients with haemophilia (PWH), (ii) the diagnostic and clinical services provided to patients by the HTC, and (iii) the results of a patient survey designed to assess patient satisfaction with the care provided. Total of 216 PWH were diagnosed, mean age was 25 years (range 4 months to 75 years); 43% had severe, 33% had moderate and 24% had mild haemophilia A or B. Overall, 183 (85%) had haemophilia A and 33 (15%) had haemophilia B, giving a ratio of 5.6. During the 2-year period, 77% of the expected number of PWH was identified by our outreach programme. Vast majority had comprehensive evaluation including joint assessment and over 60% were tested for blood-borne infections within a year and half period. Our findings showed that haemophilia care was considerably improved since the beginning of the National Haemophilia Programme and the survey of PWH showed a high degree of satisfaction with services provided in the HTC. In conclusion, close collaboration of the government, non-government entities and medical professionals in a Georgian national haemophilia care model; resulted in the successful delivery of the much needed services and care to the people living in Georgia with haemophilia.

New modified fluorescence polarization immunoassay does not falsely elevate vancomycin concentrations in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Recent literature has urged caution in the interpretation of vancomycin serum concentrations in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), because falsely elevated levels in excess of 70% have been reported with the most commonly used fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a recently modified FPIA assay for use in patients with ESRD, in comparison to high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and an enzyme-mediated immunoassay technique (EMIT). Serum vancomycin samples were prospectively collected from adults with ESRD undergoing chronic hemodialysis. Each sample was stored at -70 degrees C until analyzed in duplicate by FPIA, EMIT, and HPLC. In an in vitro experiment, blank serum samples with 15 microg/ml vancomycin were spiked with increasing amounts of CDP and analyzed in duplicate with the modified FPIA assay. When compared to HPLC, no statistically significant difference was found in patients with ESRD with the use of the modified FPIA assay (mean concentrations, HPLC 14.92 microg/ml, FPIA 15.96 microg/ml), with FPIA exhibiting a positive bias of 0.64 microg/ml and a precision of +/-3.49 microg/ml (n = 18, p = 0.44). The mean EMIT concentration was 18.34 microg/ml, with a positive bias of 3.43 microg/ml and a precision of +/-5.17 microg/ml (p < 0.01). The addition of increasing amounts of CDP to vancomycin in vitro resulted in concentrations similar to those expected in the absence of significant cross-reactivity with the modified FPIA assay. The modified FPIA assay is a satisfactory tool for monitoring vancomycin serum concentrations in patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis. Results obtained with EMIT were not as precise as with FPIA.