Reduction of inter-observer contouring variability in daily clinical practice through a retrospective, evidence-based intervention.

BACKGROUND: Inter-observer variations (IOVs) arising during contouring can potentially impact plan quality and patient outcomes. Regular assessment of contouring IOV is not commonly performed in clinical practice due to the large time commitment required of clinicians from conventional methods. This work uses retrospective information from past treatment plans to facilitate a time-efficient, evidence-based intervention to reduce contouring IOV. METHODS: The contours of 492 prostate cancer treatment plans created by four radiation oncologists were analyzed in this study. Structure volumes, lengths, and DVHs were extracted from the treatment planning system and stratified based on primary oncologist and inclusion of a pelvic lymph node (PLN) target. Inter-observer variations and their dosimetric consequences were assessed using Student's t-tests. Results of this analysis were presented at an intervention meeting, where new consensus contour definitions were agreed upon. The impact of the intervention was assessed one-year later by repeating the analysis on 152 new plans. RESULTS: Significant IOV in prostate and PLN target delineation existed pre-intervention between oncologists, impacting dose to nearby OARs. IOV was also present for rectum and penile-bulb structures. Post-intervention, IOV decreased for all previously discordant structures. Dosimetric variations were also reduced. Although target contouring concordance increased significantly, some variations still persisted for PLN structures, highlighting remaining areas for improvement. CONCLUSION: We detected significant contouring IOV in routine practice using easily accessible retrospective data and successfully decreased IOV in our clinic through a reflective intervention. Continued application of this approach may aid improvements in practice standardization and enhance quality of care.

Benefit of re-operation and salvage therapies for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: results from a single institution.

The optimal management of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) has yet to be determined. We aim to assess the benefits of re-operation and salvage therapies (chemotherapy and/or re-irradiation) for recurrent GBM and to identify prognostic factors associated with better survival. All patients who underwent surgery for GBM between January 2005 and December 2012 followed by adjuvant radiotherapy, and who developed GBM recurrence on imaging were included in this retrospective study. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed using Cox models in order to identify factors associated with overall survival (OS). One hundred and eighty patients treated to a dose of 60 Gy were diagnosed with recurrent GBM. At a median follow-up time of 6.2 months, the median survival (MS) from time of recurrence was 6.6 months. Sixty-nine patients underwent repeat surgery for recurrence based on imaging. To establish the benefits of repeat surgery and salvage therapies, 68 patients who underwent repeat surgery were matched to patients who did not based on extent of initial resection and presence of subventricular zone involvement at recurrence. MS for patients who underwent re-operation was 9.6 months, compared to 5.3 months for patients who did not have repeat surgery (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis in the matched pairs confirmed that repeat surgery with the addition of other salvage treatment can significantly affect patient outcome (HR 0.53). Re-operation with additional salvage therapies for recurrent GBM provides survival prolongation at the time of progression.

Acute toxicity in patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation, with irradiation to the prostate and pelvic nodes.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy has been used for prostate cancer. However, the bulk of published studies on stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer has involved the irradiation of the prostate alone, without irradiation of the pelvic lymph nodes. We report our preliminary experience with this approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The files of patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy in our institution were reviewed. Stereotactic body radiation was delivered with intensity modulated-volumetric arctherapy with daily image-guidance. The prostate planning target volume included the prostate plus a margin of 5mm in all directions. The pelvic planning target volume included pelvic nodes plus an expansion of 6 to 7mm in all directions. The prostate planning target volume received a total dose of 36.25Gy delivered in five fractions on alternate days. The nodal planning target volume received a dose of 25Gy in the same five fractions. Patients were followed during treatment, after 1, and 3 months and every 6 months thereafter. Gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity was prospectively graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. RESULTS: Among the 188 patients, 80 received stereotactic body radiation to the prostate and the pelvic nodes, while 108 received stereotactic body radiation to the prostate target only. Grade 2 acute gastrointestinal toxicity was 4% in both groups, and grade 2 acute genitourinary toxicity was 27% and 20% (P=0.9) for prostate only versus prostate and pelvis respectively. There was no grade 3 or higher acute gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic body radiation therapy in five fractions including the prostate and pelvic nodes, in patients with high-risk prostate cancer, has been feasible and safe in terms of acute toxicity.

Early toxicity predicts long-term survival in high-grade glioma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with high-grade gliomas are treated with surgery followed by chemoradiation. The risk factors and implications of neurological side effects are not known. METHODS: Acute and late ≥ grade 3 neurological toxicities (NTs) were analysed among 2761 patients from 14 RTOG trials accrued from 1983 to 2003. The association between acute and late toxicity was analysed using a stepwise logistic regression model. The association between the occurrence of acute NT and survival was analysed as an independent variable. RESULTS: There were 2610 analysable patients (86% glioblastoma, 10% anaplastic astrocytoma). All received a systemic agent during radiation (83% chemotherapy, 17% biological agents). Median radiation dose was 60 Gy. There were 182 acute and 83 late NT events. On univariate analysis, older age, poor performance status, aggressive surgery, pre-existing neurological dysfunction, poor mental status and twice-daily radiation were associated with increased acute NT. In a stepwise logistic regression model the occurrence of acute NT was significantly associated with late NT (OR=2.40; 95% CI=1.2-4.8; P=0.014). The occurrence of acute NT predicted poorer overall survival, independent of recursive partitioning analysis class (median 7.8 vs 11.8 months). INTERPRETATION: Acute NT is significantly associated with both late NT and overall survival.

Cyst formation following radiosurgery for AVMs: report of 3 cases.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactically-focused radiosurgery (SRS) for the treatment of arteriovenous malformations (AVM) has been in widespread use for over two decades. Over this timeframe the indications for treatment, standardization of radiation dosage, and the results expected from treatment have been elaborated. Less well known are the long-term complications associated with SRS. We report three patients who had SRS for the treatment of AVM who developed a cyst at the site of treatment as a late complication. METHODS: From 201 patients treated by SRS for an AVM, three developed a cyst at the treatment site. Their clinical presentation, the characteristics of the AVMs and the treatment were reviewed, as well as similar cases gleaned from the literature. RESULTS: Three women, aged 28-43 years, had an AVM treated by: craniotomy and clipping of arterial feeders followed by SRS, by craniotomy for resection followed by SRS or by endovascular embolization and SRS. The patients did well following treatment but two of them developed a symptomatic and the other an asymptomatic cyst at the treatment site 3-19 years later. The symptomatic patients underwent marsupialization of the cyst and the other is under observation. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic radiosurgery is an established and safe treatment for patients with AVMs. Delayed cyst formation can occur many years after treatment and long term follow-up is indicated in patients whose AVM has been treated with SRS.

The challenge of scoring radiation-induced lung toxicity.

AIMS: The increasing use of curative radiation treatment in lung cancer mandates accurate assessment of late lung toxicity. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/EORTC) scoring schema combines clinical symptoms and radiological changes and may be confusing. Some have used a scoring scale modified from the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) version 2 scale based on symptoms only. Clinical data using these two different scales have been compared as if they give similar results. The present study compared the outcomes using the two scales in the same group of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records and imaging of patients with non-small cell lung cancer who received definitive radiotherapy were reviewed. Eligible patients had a minimum follow-up of 12 months with no clinical signs of local relapse. Radiation-induced lung toxicity was scored using the RTOG/EORTC and the NCI-CTC scales. RESULTS: In total, 50 patients were analysed. All patients developed radiographic abnormalities after curative radiotherapy. Grade 0, 1, 2 and 3 toxicity was 0, 28, 49 and 23%, respectively, according to the RTOG/EORTC scale and 86, 7, 7 and 0%, respectively, according to the NCI-CTC scale, showing that the inclusion of radiographic abnormalities changes and significantly upgrades the toxicity scores. CONCLUSION: After curative radiotherapy, all patients presented some radiographic abnormality. There was no correlation with lung symptoms. The assessment of radiation-induced lung toxicity differs depending on the scoring system used. Comparison of reports that use different scoring scales should be made with caution. A scale based on symptoms only, such as the NCI-CTC scale, may be more appropriate to evaluate long-term toxicity after curative radiotherapy for lung cancer.

Small cell carcinoma of the endometrium: report of a case and review of the literature.

Small cell carcinomas of the endometrium are rare and carry an ominous prognosis. Most patients present with advanced disease. The histopathological diagnosis requires immunohistochemistry confirmation and the tumor should be positive for a neuroendocrine marker. This article reports a new case and reviews the pertinent literature on the subject.

Conservative treatment of invasive bladder cancer.

The concept of organ-preserving therapies is a trend in modern oncology, and several tumour types are now treated in this fashion. Trimodality therapy consisting of as thorough a transurethral resection of the bladder tumour as is judged safe, followed by concomitant chemoradiation therapy, is emerging as an attractive alternative for bladder preservation in selected patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Long-term data from multiple institutional and cooperative group studies have shown that this approach is safe and effective and that it provides patients with the opportunity to maintain an intact and functional bladder with a survival rate similar to that for modern radical cystectomy.

A phase I-B trial of the radiosensitizer: etanidazole (SR-2508) with radiosurgery for the treatment of recurrent previously irradiated primary brain tumors or brain metastases (RTOG Study 95-02).

RTOG 95-02 assessed patient tolerance to hypoxic cell radiosensitizer, etanidazole (SR-2508), combined with radiosurgery. Patients had primary or metastatic brain tumors and previously localized or whole brain irradiation. The toxicity is reported in three groups of patients according to the tumor size. Etanidazole doses of 12g/m2 combined with radiosurgery were well tolerated.

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in the treatment of pituitary macroadenomas.

BACKGROUND: The use of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) has evolved with technical advances in noninvasive immobilization, radiation delivery, and image guidance. The application of FSRT to pituitary tumours is aimed at reducing toxicity through improved dose conformality and reduced treatment margins. The aim of the present paper is to report our own experience and to review the published data on FSRT for pituitary macroadenomas. METHODS: Between September 2000 and October 2005, 13 patients with pituitary macroadenoma underwent FSRT at our institution. In 12 patients, radiotherapy treatment followed surgical resection (transsphenoidal resection in 8, frontal craniotomy in 3, and multiple transsphenoidal resections followed by craniotomy in 1). In 4 patients, the tumours were functional (2 adrenocorticotropic hormone-secreting, 1 prolactinoma, and 1 growth hormone-secreting); the tumours in the remaining patients were clinically non-secretory. Before radiation, 3 patients had panhypopituitarism, and 6 patients had visual field defects. All patients were treated with FSRT using non-coplanar micro-multileaf collimation portals. A median dose of 50.4 Gy (range: 45-60 Gy) was prescribed to the 76.9%-95.2% isodose surface and delivered in 1.8-Gy fractions. The median planning target volume (gross tumour plus 3 mm) was 33.5 cm3 (range: 3.2-75 cm3). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 24 months (range: 6-60 months), local control was 100%. One patient achieved clinical complete response. Treatment was well tolerated acutely for all patients. Neither radiation-induced optic neuropathy nor any radiation-related endocrine dysfunction was observed in our patients. CONCLUSIONS: In accordance with published series, we found FSRT to be safe and effective in the management of large pituitary macroadenomas.

Thoracic irradiation in 3weeks for limited-stage small cell lung cancer: Is twice a day fractionation really needed?

PURPOSE: Many Canadian institutions treat limited-disease small cell lung cancer with 40Gy in 15 fractions delivered once-a-day in 3weeks concomitantly with chemotherapy. This regimen is convenient and seems to be effective. Here, we report and compare with a literature review the outcomes of patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer treated in our institution with this hypofractionated regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2004 to December 2012, patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer treated curatively with platinum-based chemotherapy and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy at a dose of 40Gy in 16 fractions once-a-day were eligible for this review. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients fit the analysis criteria, including ten patients with small pleural effusion. The median age was 66years old. After a median follow-up of 77months for those alive, the median survival was 28months. At 3 and 5years respectively, the locoregional control rates were 67 and 64%, while the overall survival rates were 40 and 35%. Prophylaxis cranial irradiation was delivered to 68% of the patients. Grade 2 and 3 acute esophagitis occurred in respectively 49 and 9% of the patients. There was no grade 4 radiation-induced toxicity. All patients, except for one, completed their thoracic irradiation course without interruption. CONCLUSION: Once-a-day hypofractionated radiation with concurrent chemotherapy followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation is a practical regimen. Based on our experience and the published literature, it appears to be similarly effective as regimens using twice-daily fractionation in 3weeks, or once-daily in 6 to 7weeks with higher radiotherapy doses. Further prospective comparisons of hypofractionation with the current recommendations are needed.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Versus Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy or External Beam Radiotherapy: Propensity Score Matched Analyses of Canadian Data.

AIMS: To compare biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) and overall survival for prostate cancer treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) using a large Canadian multi-institutional database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with low risk localised prostate cancer treated with SABR, LDR or EBRT and no androgen deprivation therapy were selected. Propensity score matching was used to create two sets of matched cohorts with LDR and EBRT serving as control groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to compare differences in BFFS and overall survival between treatment groups. RESULTS: The pre-matched cohort contained 602 patients; the median follow-up was >5.0 years. There were no significant differences in BFFS before or after matching for SABR versus LDR but the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir was lower after LDR. For the SABR versus EBRT, SABR had a BFFS trend before matching (P = 0.08), which became significant after matching (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using the Genitourinary Radiation Oncologists of Canada Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification database, low risk prostate cancer patients receiving SABR had similar BFFS compared with patients receiving LDR but better BFFS than EBRT patients. Further comparative studies of efficacy, quality of life and economic outcomes using a broader risk of patients are warranted.

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for low grade glioma at McGill University: long-term follow-up.

Small, well-defined, unresectable low-grade gliomas are attractive targets for stereotactic irradiation. Fractionated stereotactic irradiation of these targets has the theoretical benefit of increased normal tissue sparing beyond that provided by the physical characteristics of stereotactic radiosurgery. From July 1987 to November 1992, 21 patients were treated for low-grade glioma at our institution using a hypofractionated regimen of stereotactic radiotherapy. All patients had well-circumscribed, < 40 mm tumors. No patient had had prior radiotherapy. All lesions were histologically proven WHO grade I or II glial tumors. Lesions involved sensitive brain structures and were deemed unresectable. A typical dose of 42 Gy was delivered in 6 fractions over a two-week period using rigid immobilization and a linac-based dynamic stereotactic radiosurgical technique. Patients had a median age of 23 years (9-74) and were predominantly female (60%). Median tumor diameter was 20 mm. With a median follow-up for living patients of 13.3 years, the actuarial 5, 10, and 15-year overall survival rates are 76%, 71%, and 63%, respectively. Treatment was acutely well tolerated although three patients experienced late post-therapy complications. Our results and those of 241 patients treated in nine other institutional series are reviewed. Despite some examples of favorable short-term outcomes, all reported series are highly selected and thus likely biased. The data regarding the use of SRS is limited and, in our opinion, insufficient to claim a clear therapeutic advantage to SRS in the initial management of low-grade glioma. Our own results with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy are similar to those expected with standard therapy.

A randomized trial of chemotherapy followed by pelvic radiation therapy in stage IIIB carcinoma of the cervix.

Because of the poor results in stage III B carcinoma of the cervix with standard treatment using radiotherapy alone, we designed a randomized trial to determine whether administration of chemotherapy before pelvic irradiation would improve survival. Between May 1984 and August 1986, 107 patients with previously untreated squamous cell carcinoma were randomly assigned, after stratification by age (less than 50 v greater than 50 years), extent of parametrial involvement (unilateral v bilateral), and lymphangiographic findings (negative v positive) to pelvic radiotherapy (RT; arm A) or three cycles of chemotherapy (CT; bleomycin, vincristine, mitomycin, and cisplatin [BOMP]), followed by the same radiotherapy regimen (CT + RT; arm B). The groups were balanced by age, performance status, extent of parametrial involvement, bulkiness of cervical disease, nodal involvement, and presence of hydronephrosis. Minimal follow-up is 34 months. A complete local response was observed in 32.5% of the patients in arm A and in 47% of the patients in arm B (P = .19). Overall 5-year survival rates were 39% for the RT arm and 23% for the CT + RT approach (P = .02). Toxicity was severe in arm B and included fatal pulmonary toxicity in four patients. Locoregional and distant failures were similar in both groups. We conclude that, despite a satisfactory response rate, neoadjuvant BOMP chemotherapy adversely affects survival in stage III B cervical cancer and is associated with unacceptable toxicity.

Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the addition of cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CT) to pelvic radiation therapy (RT) will improve the survival of early-stage, high-risk patients with cervical carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with clinical stage IA(2), IB, and IIA carcinoma of the cervix, initially treated with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, and who had positive pelvic lymph nodes and/or positive margins and/or microscopic involvement of the parametrium were eligible for this study. Patients were randomized to receive RT or RT + CT. Patients in each group received 49.3 GY RT in 29 fractions to a standard pelvic field. Chemotherapy consisted of bolus cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) and a 96-hour infusion of fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m(2)/d every 3 weeks for four cycles, with the first and second cycles given concurrent to RT. RESULTS: Between 1991 and 1996, 268 patients were entered onto the study. Two hundred forty-three patients were assessable (127 RT + CT patients and 116 RT patients). Progression-free and overall survival are significantly improved in the patients receiving CT. The hazard ratios for progression-free survival and overall survival in the RT only arm versus the RT + CT arm are 2.01 (P =.003) and 1.96 (P =. 007), respectively. The projected progression-free survivals at 4 years is 63% with RT and 80% with RT + CT. The projected overall survival rate at 4 years is 71% with RT and 81% with RT + CT. Grades 3 and 4 hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicity were more frequent in the RT + CT group. CONCLUSION: The addition of concurrent cisplatin-based CT to RT significantly improves progression-free and overall survival for high-risk, early-stage patients who undergo radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the cervix.

Phase III trial comparing radical radiotherapy with and without cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with advanced squamous cell cancer of the cervix.

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that cisplatin (CDDP) administered concurrently with standard radiotherapy (RT) would improve pelvic control and survival in patients with advanced squamous cell cancer of the cervix. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 259 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB to IVA squamous cell cervical cancer with central disease greater-than-or-equal 5 cm or histologically confirmed pelvic lymph node involvement were randomized to receive RT (external-beam RT plus brachytherapy) plus weekly CDDP chemotherapy (40 mg/m(2)) (arm 1) or the same RT without chemotherapy (arm 2). RESULTS: A total of 253 patients were available for analysis. Median follow-up was 82 months. No significant difference was found in progression-free survival (P =.33). No significant difference in 3- and 5-year survival rates was found (69% v 66% and 62% v 58%, respectively; P =.42). The hazard ratio for survival (arm 2 to arm 1) was 1.10 (95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.62). CONCLUSION: This study did not show a benefit to either pelvic control or survival by adding concurrent weekly CDDP chemotherapy in a dose of 40 mg/m(2) to radical RT as given in this trial. Careful attention to RT details is important for achieving optimum outcome for patients with this disease.

[Prostate and seminal vesicle displacement following urethrography: a computed tomography-based study]. / Déplacements de la prostate et des vésicules séminales suite à l'uréthrographie: une étude par tomographie axiale.

PURPOSE: It has been suggested that urethrography used for localization of the prostate apex may cause a systematic cranial displacement of the organ. Our objective was to use CT-CT image registration to identify if a clinically relevant systematic shift occurs in the position of the prostate and seminal vesicles following retrograde urethrography. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were scanned twice at the time of simulation. They were imaged supine, bladder empty. Scan resolution was 512x512 with 5 mm cuts. After the first CT sequence, with the patient still on the CT couch, an urethrogram was performed. The patients were then re-scanned. The image sets were registered through the use of external skin fiducials. A single author reviewed x, y and z-axis displacement. Z-axis motion of the prostate was also assessed by having three blinded radiation oncologists mark the cranial limit of the prostate on all 104 image sets. RESULTS: Fifty-two pairs of CT scans were analyzed for post-urethrogram organ displacement. The mean x axis displacement of the prostate was 0.016 mm (P=0.8), the mean y-axis displacement was 1.3 mm anterior (P<0.001). Mean z-axis displacement of the prostate, using the blinded assessments, was a 1.35 mm cranial shift (P<0.0001). Analogous shifts were identified for the seminal vesicles. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest a small cranial and anterior displacement of the prostate and seminal vesicles following retrograde urethrography.

Hypofractionated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: The McGill University Health Center experience.

PURPOSE: In 2002, at the McGill University Health Centre, we began a program of hypofractionated radiotherapy for patients with low risk prostate cancer as an alternative to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our initial hypofractionation regimen was 66 Gy given in 22 fractions, prescribed to the isocenter, delivered with 3D-conformal radiotherapy plan. The clinical target volume was the prostate gland and the planning target volume consisted of the clinical target volume plus a 7-mm margin in all directions. Hormonal therapy was not given to any patient. RESULTS: The long-term results for this group of patients confirmed the feasibility, good tolerance and excellent disease control of the regimen with the extra-benefit of being convenient to both patients and the health system by shortening treatment duration. The outcomes of this approach stimulated us to use hypofractionation in patients with intermediate-risk. Analysis of 100 intermediate-risk patients receiving our hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen (no hormones) shows, at median follow-up of 75 months, 8-year biochemical recurrence free and cancer specific survival rates of 90% and 95%, respectively, with acceptable toxicity. DISCUSSION: Our technique changed from 3D to intensity modulated radiotherapy with the dose adjusted to 60 Gy in 20 fractions. Lastly, we have expanded the program to high-risk patients where IMRT treatments are given to the pelvic nodes (44 Gy in 20 fractions) with a simultaneous integrated boost delivery to the prostate (60 Gy in the same 20 fractions). Our long-term results have shown that moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer is safe and provides good tumor control comparable to high-dose conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. This hypofractionated regimen has been routinely used in our institution.

Vinorelbine (Navelbine) in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Several Canadian centers are studying the favorable activity and toxicity profile of vinorelbine (Navelbine; Burroughs Wellcome Co, Research Triangle Park, NC; Pierre Fabre Médicament, Paris, France) in current and future trials of adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. In locally advanced, unresectable disease, the 10-week regimen in cisplatin 100 mg/m2 during weeks 1 and 5, vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 weekly for 5 weeks with a 50% dose reduction planned for week 2 only, and accelerated fractionation thoracic irradiation during weeks 7 to 10 (30 fractions of 2 Gy in 4 weeks, once daily during weeks 7 and 8, and twice daily during weeks 9 and 10). Preliminary data on 17 patients who have completed treatment to date show it has been well tolerated, with only four cases of grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities. Favorable results from combined therapy with cisplatin and vinorelbine in advanced disease have led the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group to consider testing adjuvant cisplatin and vinorelbine in completely resected non-small cell lung cancer. Surgically staged patients with T2, N0 and T1-2N1 tumors will be stratified according to nodal status and presence or absence of ras oncogene mutations in resected tumor DNA. Patients will be randomized to observation or a 16-week trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin 50 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 every 4 weeks during the 16 weeks, and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 weekly for 16 weeks. All resected tumors will be banked for further correlative studies to identify a clinically meaningful panel of molecular prognostic markers.

Quality assurance in radiation therapy: clinical aspects.

A survey was conducted in Latin America to evaluate the clinical aspects of quality assurance in radiotherapy. A questionnaire was prepared and sent to 46 institutions. Twenty-seven centers (58.5%), from nine countries, answered the questionnaire. The study was divided into three topics: a) patient-related statistics; b) staffing and education; and c) equipment and facilities. Fifty-two percent of the radiotherapists and 44% of the physicists work on a part-time basis. One third of the institutions are understaffed. Radiotherapy training programs are available in only 37% of the centers studied. A large number of megavoltage units are old, operating at a shorter than optimum distance with sources of very low activity. The number of high energy linear accelerators is unsatisfactory. Problems in treatment planning facilities were also identified. Regionalization of radiation therapy services is recommended as a possible way to improve quality at a reasonable cost.