Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 75(3): e49-e52, 2022 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35984457

RESUMEN

Serrated polyps are pathological neoplastic lesions in the colon with subtle gross morphology leading to underreporting during colonoscopy. While detection rates are increasing in average-risk adult screening colonoscopy, the rate of detection during pediatric colonoscopy is unknown. Serrated polyposis syndrome is characterized by the presence of multiple serrated polyps in the colon and an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer. Cancer prevention relies on early recognition, endoscopic clearance of all polyps > 5 mm, and continued interval surveillance or prophylactic colectomy. We report the diagnosis and management of serrated polyposis syndrome in a young adolescent patient and highlight the subtle features of serrated polyps that may go unrecognized leading to underreporting in childhood.


Asunto(s)
Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon , Pólipos del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/complicaciones , Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/diagnóstico , Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Colectomía , Pólipos del Colon/diagnóstico , Pólipos del Colon/patología , Pólipos del Colon/cirugía , Colonoscopía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Humanos , Síndrome
2.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 75(2): 287-93, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22047699

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery leaks can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic placement of self-expandable stents (SESs) is emerging as a less-invasive alternative to surgery for the treatment of leaks. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the success of SESs in the treatment of bariatric surgery leaks. DESIGN: Studies using SESs in the management of bariatric surgery leaks were selected. Success of SES treatment was defined as radiographic evidence of leak closure after stent removal. Articles were searched in MEDLINE, PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. Pooled proportions were calculated by using fixed- and random-effects models. Publication bias was calculated by using the Begg-Mazumdar and Harbord bias estimators. RESULTS: A total of 189 relevant articles were reviewed of which 7 studies (67 patients with leaks) met inclusion criteria. The pooled proportion of successful leak closures by using SESs was 87.77% (95% CI, 79.39%-94.19%). The pooled proportion of successful endoscopic stent removal was 91.57% (95% CI, 84.22%-96.77%). Stent migration was noted in 16.94% (95% CI, 9.32%-26.27%). Test of heterogeneity gave a P value >.10. There was no publication bias. LIMITATIONS: Small retrospective studies, different types of stents used. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic placement of SESs is a minimally invasive, safe, and effective alternative in the management of leaks after bariatric surgery. The use of SESs can minimize the need for surgical revision and improve patient outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Fuga Anastomótica/terapia , Cirugía Bariátrica/efectos adversos , Stents , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo , Humanos , Falla de Prótesis/etiología , Stents/efectos adversos
3.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 73(2): 315-21, 321.e1, 2011 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21111413

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy requires training and experience to ensure accuracy and safety. Currently, no objective, validated process exists to determine when an endoscopist has attained technical competence. Kinematics data describing movements of laparoscopic instruments have been used in surgical skill assessment to define expert surgical technique. We have developed a novel system to record kinematics data during colonoscopy and quantitatively assess colonoscopist performance. OBJECTIVE: To use kinematic analysis of colonoscopy to quantitatively assess endoscopic technical performance. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary-care academic medical center. POPULATION: This study involved physicians who perform colonoscopy. INTERVENTION: Application of a kinematics data collection system to colonoscopy evaluation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Kinematics data, validated task load assessment instrument, and technical difficulty visual analog scale. RESULTS: All 13 participants completed the colonoscopy to the terminal ileum on the standard colon model. Attending physicians reached the terminal ileum quicker than fellows (median time, 150.19 seconds vs 299.86 seconds; p<.01) with reduced path lengths for all 4 sensors, decreased flex (1.75 m vs 3.14 m; P=.03), smaller tip angulation, reduced absolute roll, and lower curvature of the endoscope. With performance of attending physicians serving as the expert reference standard, the mean kinematic score increased by 19.89 for each decrease in postgraduate year (P<.01). Overall, fellows experienced greater mental, physical, and temporal demand than did attending physicians. LIMITATION: Small cohort size. CONCLUSION: Kinematic data and score calculation appear useful in the evaluation of colonoscopy technical skill levels. The kinematic score appears to consistently vary by year of training. Because this assessment is nonsubjective, it may be an improvement over current methods for determination of competence. Ongoing studies are establishing benchmarks and characteristic profiles of skill groups based on kinematics data.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Colonoscopios/normas , Colonoscopía/educación , Internado y Residencia/métodos , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA