Cell-free DNA is abundant in ascites and represents a liquid biopsy of ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Malignant ascites is a common clinical feature of ovarian cancer and represents a readily accessible sample of tumour cells and tumour DNA. This study aimed to characterise the cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in ascites in terms of its size profile, stability and cell-free tumour DNA (cftDNA) content. METHODS: Cell spheroids, loose cells and cell-free fluid was collected from ascites from 18 patients with ovarian cancer. cfDNA was isolated and assessed for size by electrophoresis, concentration by fluorometry,cftDNA content by methylation specific qPCR of HOXA9 and IFFO1 promoter regions and by targeted sequencing. Stability was assessed after ascites fluid was stored at 4 °C for 24 and 72 h before fractionating. RESULTS: The concentration of cfDNA in ascites ranged from 6.6 to 300 ng/mL. cfDNA size distribution resembled blood plasma-derived cfDNA, with major peaks corresponding to mono- and di-nucleosome DNA fragments. High molecular weight cfDNA was observed in 7 of 18 patients and appeared to be associated with extracellular vesicles. IFFO1 and HOXA9 methylation was proportionately higher in cfDNA than spheroid- and loose-cell fractions and was not observed in healthy primary cells. Variant allele frequency was highest in cfDNA compared to single cells and spheroids from ascites. Though cancer cell numbers in ascites declined to near zero in recurrent ascites from one patient undertaking chemotherapy, cftDNA could still be sampled. cfDNA size, concentration and tumour content was stable over 72 h. CONCLUSION: cfDNA in ovarian cancer ascites demonstrates inter-patient variability, yet is consistently a rich source of cftDNA, which is a stable substrate. This supports the wider clinical use of ascites in the molecular analysis of ovarian cancer.

Older age should not be a barrier to testing for somatic variants in homologous recombination DNA repair-related genes in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Somatic pathogenic variants (PVs) in homologous recombination DNA repair (HR)-related genes found in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSC) are not well-characterised in older patients (≥70 years). This may reflect low testing rates in older patients. METHODS: Data from 1210 HGSC patients in AACR Project GENIE and 324 patients in an independent dataset INOVATe were analysed. Cases where somatic variants could be distinguished from germline variants were included, and analysis was restricted to those with a somatic TP53 variant, to ensure cases were HGSC. RESULTS: Of 1210 patients in GENIE, 27% (n = 325) were aged ≥70 years at testing. Patients with somatic-only PVs in BRCA2 were older compared with BRCA1 (median 71 vs 60 years, p = 0.002). Median age for 21 patients with somatic-only PVs in 11 other HR-related genes ranged from 40 to 67 years. In older patients, 7% (n = 22) had somatic BRCA1/2 PVs, and 1% (n = 2) had PVs other HR-related genes; this rate was not significantly different to younger patients (<70 years), 7% (n = 62) BRCA1/2 and 2% (n = 19) other HR-related genes (p = 0.36). The overall frequency of somatic BRCA1/2 PVs was similar in INOVATe (n = 25; 7.7%) and somatic-only BRCA2 PVs were again found in older patients compared with BRCA1 (median age: at testing, 70 vs 63 years; at diagnosis, 68 vs 60 years). CONCLUSIONS: The overall frequency of somatic-only PVs in HR-related genes was similar in older and younger patients with HGSC, highlighting the importance of somatic testing irrespective of age. Limiting somatic testing by age may exclude patients who could benefit from maintenance poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors.

BRAF Mutations in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer and Response to BRAF Inhibition.

PURPOSE: Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSC) responds poorly to chemotherapy and is characterized by activating mutations in the Ras sarcoma-mitogen-activated protein kinase (RAS-MAPK) pathway, including oncogenic BRAF. However, response to BRAF inhibitors is tumor-type specific. Significant improvement in survival is seen in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma, but other cancer types, such as colorectal cancers, are generally less sensitive. We examined the frequency and characteristics of BRAF-mutated LGSC and described the response to treatment with BRAF inhibitors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Mutations were assessed in LGSC (N = 65) by using targeted, exome, and whole-genome sequencing. Patient characteristics, treatment, and clinical outcome were assessed, and the median follow-up time was more than 5 years. BRAF inhibitors were trialed in two patients with a somatic BRAF V600E mutation: one patient received dabrafenib monotherapy and was monitored clinically, biochemically (cancer antigen [CA]-125 levels), and with positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Expression of the BRAF V600E protein in this patient was assessed by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Among patients with LGSC, nine (13.8%) of 65 had a somatic BRAF mutation. Of the nine patients with BRAF mutation-positive LGSC, four experienced progressive disease that did not respond to conventional chemotherapy. Two of the patients experienced progression quickly and died as a result of disease progression, and two received targeted treatment. Two patients with BRAF V600E mutation received BRAF inhibitors at relapse and both achieved durable responses. CONCLUSION: BRAF mutations are not uncommon in patients with LGSC and should be routinely tested, because BRAF inhibitors can be an effective treatment for these patients. The results highlight the need for targeted treatment in this rare tumor type, and a prospective study is needed to formally assess the response rate and clinical benefit.