A Hexagonal Aim as a Driver of Change for Health Care and Health Insurance Systems.

Policy Points Improving health systems requires simultaneous pursuit of a patient centered approach aligned with the health professional: improving the experience of care, improving the health of populations, reducing per capita costs of care - Triple Aim - and improving the work life of the care providers - Quadruple Aim -. Reinforcing the recently defined Fifth Aim as equity through "health democracy" to represent the wants, needs and responsibility of the population in taking care of their health and their healthcare. Adding a Sixth Aim to take into account the increased health risks due to climate change. CONTEXT: Improving health systems, such as the U.S. or French, requires simultaneous pursuit of a patient centered approach aligned with the health professional: improving the experience of care, improving the health of populations, reducing per capita costs of care - Triple Aim - and improving the work life of the care providers, including clinicians and staff - Quadruple Aim -. While these aims are already ambitious, they may be insufficient when considering the economic, social and environmental challenges to the health of our communities in the near and long term. METHODS: A conceptual framework to provide additional ethical guardrails for health systems. RESULTS: Recently, authors have articulated a Fifth Aim and we propose to add a Sixth Aim to the Quadruple Aim model. These additional aims are meant to account for our growing knowledge around the determinants of health and the challenging processes and structures of governance across a wide range of sectors in society including healthcare. We are strengthening the Fifth Aim defined as equity through "health democracy" to represent the wants, needs and responsibility of the population in taking care of their health and their healthcare. The Sixth Aim is to account for the increase in risk to population health due to climate change as well as the impact our health systems have on the environment. CONCLUSIONS: As social tension and environmental changes seem to continue to impact the structure of our society this "Hexagonal Aim" taken together might provide additional ethical guiderails as we set our healthcare goals.

Feasibility of biliary atresia newborn screening in an integrated health network.

Diagnostic delay remains a barrier to improving biliary atresia (BA) outcomes. We tested the implementation feasibility of a two stage BA newborn screening program in an integrated healthcare system. METHODS: Under a waiver of consent, we measured direct bilirubin (DB) levels in well newborns undergoing standard of care hyperbilirubinemia screening at four hospitals. Initial DB was measured by modifying nursery admission electronic medical record order sets. Second-stage DB was obtained at ~2 weeks of age under parental permission/informed consent (PP/IC). Implementation measures included the proportions of (1) eligible newborns that were screened before nursery discharge, (2) newborns undergoing second stage screening at ~2 weeks of age, and (3) newborns that underwent clinical evaluation for persistently elevated DB. RESULTS: A total of 12,276 newborns met eligibility criteria for screening, of which 12,055 (98.2%) underwent first-stage screening in the newborn nursery. Ninety-four (0.78%) had elevated positive initial screens. Ninety newborns (95.7%) underwent second-stage screening (n = 20) or contact was made with the primary care provider to recommend second-stage screening (n = 70). Among all screened newborns, 15 (0.12%) had abnormal second screens. All had follow-up clinical evaluation for potential cholestatic liver disease. No BA cases were identified through screening, though two infants who met exclusion criteria (admission to the newborn intensive care unit) were subsequently diagnosed with BA during the screening period. CONCLUSIONS: BA newborn screening is feasible in an integrated health network. Low consent rates have implications for future studies. Program infrastructure is required for implementation success and sustainability.

Implementation of Lung-Protective Ventilation in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure.

OBJECTIVES: We implemented a computerized protocol for low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV) to improve management and outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients with, and without, the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). DESIGN: Pragmatic, nonrandomized stepped wedge type II hybrid implementation/effectiveness trial. SETTING: Twelve hospitals in an integrated healthcare system over a 2-year period. PATIENTS: Patients greater than or equal to 18 years old who had initiation of mechanical ventilation in the emergency department or ICU. We excluded patients who died or transitioned to comfort care on the day of admission to the ICU. We defined a subgroup of patients with ARDS for analysis. INTERVENTIONS: Implementation of ventilator protocols for LTVV in the ICU. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Our primary clinical outcome was ventilator-free days (VFDs) to day 28. Our primary process outcome was median initial set tidal volume. We included 8,692 mechanically ventilated patients, 3,282 (38%) of whom had ARDS. After implementation, set tidal volume reported as mL/kg predicted body weight decreased from median 6.1 mL/kg (interquartile range [IQR], 6.0-6.8 mL/kg) to 6.0 mL/kg (IQR, 6.0-6.6 mL/kg) ( p = 0.009). The percent of patients receiving LTVV (tidal volume ≤ 6.5 mL/kg) increased from 69.8% ( n = 1,721) to 72.5% ( n = 1,846) ( p = 0.036) after implementation. The percent of patients receiving greater than 8 mL/kg initial set tidal volume was reduced from 9.0% ( n = 222) to 6.7% ( n = 174) ( p = 0.005) after implementation. Among patients with ARDS, day 1 positive end-expiratory pressure increased from 6.7 to 8.0 cm H 2 O ( p < 0.001). We observed no difference in VFD (adjusted odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.91-1.24; p = 0.44), or in secondary outcomes of length of stay or mortality, either within the main cohort or the subgroup of patients with ARDS. CONCLUSIONS: We observed improved adherence to optimal ventilator management with implementation of a computerized protocol and reduction in the number of patients receiving tidal volumes greater than 8 mL/kg. We did not observe improvement in clinical outcomes.

Fractionated Bilirubin Among 252 892 Utah Newborns with and Without Biliary Atresia: A 15-year Historical Birth Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether neonatal conjugated or direct bilirubin levels were elevated in infants with biliary atresia (BA) and to estimate the number of newborns who would have positive screens in the nursery necessitating repeat testing after discharge. STUDY DESIGN: We used administrative data from a large integrated healthcare network in Utah to identify newborns who had a fractionated bilirubin recorded during birth admission from 2005 through 2019. Elevated conjugated bilirubin was defined as greater than 0.2 mg/dL and direct bilirubin was defined as greater than 0.5 mg/dL (>97.5th percentile for the assays). We performed simulations to estimate the anticipated number of false-positive screens. RESULTS: There were 32 cases of BA and 468 161 live births during the study period (1/14 700). There were 252 892 newborns with fractionated bilirubin assessed, including 26 of those subsequently confirmed to have BA. Conjugated or direct bilirubin was elevated in all 26 infants with BA and an additional 3246 newborns (1.3%) without BA. Simulated data suggest 9-21 per 1000 screened newborns will have an elevated conjugated or direct bilirubin using laboratory-based thresholds for a positive screen. Screening characteristics improved with higher thresholds without increasing false-negative tests. CONCLUSIONS: This study validates the previous findings that conjugated or direct bilirubin are elevated in the newborn period in patients with BA. A higher threshold for conjugated bilirubin improved screening performance. Future studies are warranted to determine the optimal screening test for BA and to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of implementing such a program.

Improving Head CT Scan Decisions for Pediatric Minor Head Trauma in General Emergency Departments: A Pragmatic Implementation Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To measure the effectiveness of a multimodal strategy, including simultaneous implementation of a clinical decision support system, to sustain adherence to a clinical pathway for care of children with minor head trauma treated in general emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: Prospective, type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation cohort study with a nonrandomized stepped-wedge design and monthly repeated site measures. The study population included pediatric minor head trauma encounters from July 2018 to December 2020 at 21 urban and rural general ED sites in an integrated health care system. Sites received the intervention in 1 of 2 steps, with each site providing control and intervention observations. Measures included guideline adherence, the computed tomography (CT) scan rate, and 72-hour readmissions with clinically important traumatic brain injury. Analysis was performed using multilevel hierarchical modeling with random intercepts for the site and physician. RESULTS: During the study, 12,670 pediatric minor head trauma encounters were cared for by 339 clinicians. The implementation of the clinical pathway resulted in higher odds of guideline adherence (adjusted odds ratio 1.12 [95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.22]) and lower odds of a CT scan (adjusted odds ratio 0.96 [95% confidence interval 0.93 to 0.98]) in intervention versus control months. Absolute risk difference was observed in both guideline adherence (site median: +2.3% improvement) and the CT scan rate (site median: -6.6% reduction). No 72-hour readmissions with confirmed clinically important traumatic brain injury were identified. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a minor head trauma clinical pathway using a multimodal approach, including a clinical decision support system, led to sustained improvements in adherence and a modest, yet safe, reduction in CT scans among generally low-risk patients in diverse general EDs.

Impact of Implementing Antibiotic Stewardship Programs in 15 Small Hospitals: A Cluster-Randomized Intervention.

Background: Studies on the implementation of antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) in small hospitals are limited. Accreditation organizations now require all hospitals to have ASPs. Methods: The objective of this cluster-randomized intervention was to assess the effectiveness of implementing ASPs in Intermountain Healthcare's 15 small hospitals. Each hospital was randomized to 1 of 3 ASPs of escalating intensity. Program 1 hospitals were provided basic antibiotic stewardship education and tools, access to an infectious disease hotline, and antibiotic utilization data. Program 2 hospitals received those interventions plus advanced education, audit and feedback for select antibiotics, and locally controlled antibiotic restrictions. Program 3 hospitals received program 2 interventions plus audit and feedback on the majority of antibiotics, and an infectious diseases-trained clinician approved restricted antibiotics and reviewed microbiology results. Changes in total and broad-spectrum antibiotic use within programs (intervention versus baseline) and the difference between programs in the magnitude of change in antibiotic use (eg, program 3 vs 1) were evaluated with mixed models. Results: Program 3 hospitals showed reductions in total (rate ratio, 0.89; confidence interval, .80-.99) and broad-spectrum (0.76; .63-.91) antibiotic use when the intervention period was compared with the baseline period. Program 1 and 2 hospitals did not experience a reduction in antibiotic use. Comparison of the magnitude of effects between programs showed a similar trend favoring program 3, but this was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Only the most intensive ASP intervention was associated with reduction in total and broad-spectrum antibiotic use when compared with baseline. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03245879.

Intravenous Versus Oral Antibiotics for the Prevention of Treatment Failure in Children With Complicated Appendicitis: Has the Abandonment of Peripherally Inserted Catheters Been Justified?

OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment failure leading to hospital readmission in children with complicated appendicitis who received oral versus intravenous antibiotics after discharge. BACKGROUND: Antibiotics are often employed after discharge to prevent treatment failure in children with complicated appendicitis, although existing studies comparing intravenous and oral antibiotics for this purpose are limited. METHODS: We identified all patients aged 3 to 18 years undergoing appendectomy for complicated appendicitis, who received postdischarge antibiotics at 35 childrens hospitals from 2009 to 2012. Discharge codes were used to identify study subjects from the Pediatric Health Information System database, and chart review confirmed eligibility, treatment assignment, and outcomes. Exposure status was based on outpatient antibiotic therapy, and analysis used optimal and full matching methods to adjust for demographic and clinical characteristics. Treatment failure (defined as an organ-space infection) requiring inpatient readmission was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included revisits from any cause to either the inpatient or emergency department setting. RESULTS: In all, 4579 patients were included (median: 99/hospital), and utilization of intravenous antibiotics after discharge ranged from 0% to 91.7% across hospitals. In the matched analysis, the rate of treatment failure was significantly higher for the intravenous group than the oral group [odds ratio (OR) 1.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-2.88; risk difference: 4.0%, 95% CI 0.4-7.6%], as was the rate of all-cause revisits (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.44-3.11; risk difference: 9.4%, 95% CI 4.7-14.2%). The rate of peripherally inserted central catheter line complications was 3.2% in the intravenous group, and drug reactions were rare in both groups (intravenous: 0.7%, oral: 0.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with oral antibiotics, use of intravenous antibiotics after discharge in children with complicated appendicitis was associated with higher rates of both treatment failure and all-cause hospital revisits.

Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program.

BACKGROUND: Miscommunications are a leading cause of serious medical errors. Data from multicenter studies assessing programs designed to improve handoff of information about patient care are lacking. METHODS: We conducted a prospective intervention study of a resident handoff-improvement program in nine hospitals, measuring rates of medical errors, preventable adverse events, and miscommunications, as well as resident workflow. The intervention included a mnemonic to standardize oral and written handoffs, handoff and communication training, a faculty development and observation program, and a sustainability campaign. Error rates were measured through active surveillance. Handoffs were assessed by means of evaluation of printed handoff documents and audio recordings. Workflow was assessed through time-motion observations. The primary outcome had two components: medical errors and preventable adverse events. RESULTS: In 10,740 patient admissions, the medical-error rate decreased by 23% from the preintervention period to the postintervention period (24.5 vs. 18.8 per 100 admissions, P<0.001), and the rate of preventable adverse events decreased by 30% (4.7 vs. 3.3 events per 100 admissions, P<0.001). The rate of nonpreventable adverse events did not change significantly (3.0 and 2.8 events per 100 admissions, P=0.79). Site-level analyses showed significant error reductions at six of nine sites. Across sites, significant increases were observed in the inclusion of all prespecified key elements in written documents and oral communication during handoff (nine written and five oral elements; P<0.001 for all 14 comparisons). There were no significant changes from the preintervention period to the postintervention period in the duration of oral handoffs (2.4 and 2.5 minutes per patient, respectively; P=0.55) or in resident workflow, including patient-family contact and computer time. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the handoff program was associated with reductions in medical errors and in preventable adverse events and with improvements in communication, without a negative effect on workflow. (Funded by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and others.).

Development and Prospective Validation of Tools to Accurately Identify Neurosurgical and Critical Care Events in Children With Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate case definitions (computable phenotypes) to accurately identify neurosurgical and critical care events in children with traumatic brain injury. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study, May 2013 to September 2015. SETTING: Two large U.S. children's hospitals with level 1 Pediatric Trauma Centers. PATIENTS: One hundred seventy-four children less than 18 years old admitted to an ICU after traumatic brain injury. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Prospective data were linked to database codes for each patient. The outcomes were prospectively identified acute traumatic brain injury, intracranial pressure monitor placement, craniotomy or craniectomy, vascular catheter placement, invasive mechanical ventilation, and new gastrostomy tube or tracheostomy placement. Candidate predictors were database codes present in administrative, billing, or trauma registry data. For each clinical event, we developed and validated penalized regression and Boolean classifiers (models to identify clinical events that take database codes as predictors). We externally validated the best model for each clinical event. The primary model performance measure was accuracy, the percent of test patients correctly classified. The cohort included 174 children who required ICU admission after traumatic brain injury. Simple Boolean classifiers were greater than or equal to 94% accurate for seven of nine clinical diagnoses and events. For central venous catheter placement, no classifier achieved 90% accuracy. Classifier accuracy was dependent on available data fields. Five of nine classifiers were acceptably accurate using only administrative data but three required trauma registry fields and two required billing data. CONCLUSIONS: In children with traumatic brain injury, computable phenotypes based on simple Boolean classifiers were highly accurate for most neurosurgical and critical care diagnoses and events. The computable phenotypes we developed and validated can be used in any observational study of children with traumatic brain injury and can reasonably be applied in studies of these interventions in other patient populations.

Integrating Research, Quality Improvement, and Medical Education for Better Handoffs and Safer Care: Disseminating, Adapting, and Implementing the I-PASS Program.

BACKGROUND: In 2009 the I-PASS Study Group was formed by patient safety, medical education, health services research, and clinical experts from multiple institutions in the United States and Canada. When the I-PASS Handoff Program, which was developed by the I-PASS Study Group, was implemented in nine hospitals, it was associated with a 30% reduction in injuries due to medical errors and significant improvements in handoff processes, without any adverse effects on provider work flow. METHODS: To effectively disseminate and adapt I-PASS for use across specialties and disciplines, a series of federally and privately funded dissemination and implementation projects were carried out following the publication of the initial study. The results of these efforts have informed ongoing initiatives intended to continue adapting and scaling the program. RESULTS: As of this writing, I-PASS Study Group members have directly worked with more than 50 hospitals to facilitate implementation of I-PASS. To further disseminate I-PASS, Study Group members delivered hundreds of academic presentations, including plenaries at scientific meetings, workshops, and institutional Grand Rounds. Some 3,563 individuals, representing more than 500 institutions in the 50 states in the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and 57 other countries, have requested access to I-PASS materials. Most recently, the I-PASSSM Patient Safety Institute has developed a virtual immersion training platform, mobile handoff observational tools, and processes to facilitate further spread of I-PASS. CONCLUSION: Implementation of I-PASS has been associated with substantial improvements in patient safety and can be applied to a variety of disciplines and types of patient handoffs. Widespread implementation of I-PASS has the potential to substantially improve patient safety in the United States and beyond.

Enhancing Comparative Effectiveness Research With Automated Pediatric Pneumonia Detection in a Multi-Institutional Clinical Repository: A PHIS+ Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Community-acquired pneumonia is a leading cause of pediatric morbidity. Administrative data are often used to conduct comparative effectiveness research (CER) with sufficient sample sizes to enhance detection of important outcomes. However, such studies are prone to misclassification errors because of the variable accuracy of discharge diagnosis codes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop an automated, scalable, and accurate method to determine the presence or absence of pneumonia in children using chest imaging reports. METHODS: The multi-institutional PHIS+ clinical repository was developed to support pediatric CER by expanding an administrative database of children's hospitals with detailed clinical data. To develop a scalable approach to find patients with bacterial pneumonia more accurately, we developed a Natural Language Processing (NLP) application to extract relevant information from chest diagnostic imaging reports. Domain experts established a reference standard by manually annotating 282 reports to train and then test the NLP application. Findings of pleural effusion, pulmonary infiltrate, and pneumonia were automatically extracted from the reports and then used to automatically classify whether a report was consistent with bacterial pneumonia. RESULTS: Compared with the annotated diagnostic imaging reports reference standard, the most accurate implementation of machine learning algorithms in our NLP application allowed extracting relevant findings with a sensitivity of .939 and a positive predictive value of .925. It allowed classifying reports with a sensitivity of .71, a positive predictive value of .86, and a specificity of .962. When compared with each of the domain experts manually annotating these reports, the NLP application allowed for significantly higher sensitivity (.71 vs .527) and similar positive predictive value and specificity . CONCLUSIONS: NLP-based pneumonia information extraction of pediatric diagnostic imaging reports performed better than domain experts in this pilot study. NLP is an efficient method to extract information from a large collection of imaging reports to facilitate CER.

Diagnostic Testing and Hospital Outcomes of Children with Neurologic Impairment and Bacterial Pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE: To assess hospital-level variability in diagnostic testing and outcomes for children with neurologic impairment hospitalized with pneumonia. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of 27 455 children ages 1-18 years with neurologic impairment hospitalized with pneumonia at 39 children's hospitals. K-means clustering was used to assign each hospital to 1 of 3 groups (termed A, B, and C) based on similar diagnostic testing patterns. Outcomes of hospital-level median length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmissions, and pneumonia-associated complications were compared while controlling for patient differences. RESULTS: Overall, 48.5% had comorbid complex chronic conditions, and 25.4% were assisted with medical technology. Outcomes and diagnostic testing varied across hospitals: median hospital-level LOS, 3.2 days (IQR 2.8-3.8); median readmission, 8.4% (IQR 6.8,-10.0); and median pneumonia-associated complication rate, 23.1% (IQR 18.7-26.8). Despite similar populations, hospitals in group A tended to perform fewer tests than those in groups B and C. Across hospital groups, there was a significant difference in adjusted readmission rates (group A 7.2%, group B 9.0%, group C 7.7%, P = .003). There was no significant difference in adjusted median LOS (group A 3.4 days, group B 3.2 days, group C 3.3 days, P = .3) or adjusted pneumonia-associated complication rates (group A 22.5%, group B 22.5%, group C 25.0%, P = .6). CONCLUSIONS: For children with neurologic impairment hospitalized with pneumonia, across hospital differences in diagnostic testing were not associated with clinically meaningful differences in outcomes. High-utilizing hospitals may be able to decrease diagnostic testing for children with neurologic impairment hospitalized with pneumonia without adversely impacting outcomes.

Patient Characteristics Associated with Differences in Admission Frequency for Diabetic Ketoacidosis in United States Children's Hospitals.

OBJECTIVES: To determine across and within hospital differences in the predictors of 365-day admission frequency for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in children at US children's hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective cohort analysis of 12,449 children 2-18 years of age with a diagnosis of DKA in 42 US children's hospitals between 2004 and 2012. The main outcome of interest was the maximum number of DKA admissions experienced by each child within any 365-day interval during a 5-year follow-up period. The association between patient characteristics and the maximum number of DKA admissions within a 365-day interval was examined across and within hospitals. RESULTS: In the sample, 28.3% of patients admitted for DKA experienced at least 1 additional DKA admission within the following 365 days. Across hospitals, patient characteristics associated with increasing DKA admission frequency were public insurance (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.71-2.26), non-Hispanic black race (OR 2.40, 95% CI 2.02-2.85), age ≥ 12 (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.7-2.32), female sex (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.29-1.55), and mental health comorbidity (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.13-1.62). Within hospitals, non-Hispanic black race was associated with higher odds of 365-day admission in 59% of hospitals, and public insurance was associated with higher odds in 56% of hospitals. Older age, female sex, and mental health comorbidity were associated with higher odds of 365-day admission in 42%, 29%, and 15% of hospitals, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Across children's hospitals, certain patient characteristics are associated with more frequent DKA admissions. However, these factors are not associated with increased DKA admission frequency for all hospitals.

Costs of children with medical complexity in Australian public hospitals.

AIM: To describe the hospital costs, hospital types and differences across states and territories for children with medical complexity cared for in Australian public hospitals. METHODS: Retrospective national administrative database study of 212 Australian public hospitals from six states (excluding Queensland) and two territories that submitted cost data to the National Hospital Costing Data Collection for 2010-2011. Participants included all hospitalised patients with comparisons between adults and children (17 years of age and younger), and adults with chronic diseases and children with medical complexity. Total hospital costs were the main outcome measure. RESULTS: The National Hospital Costing Data Collection contained data from 212 public hospitals; total admissions (adults and children) were 3 519 140 at a total hospital cost of $16 187 400 000. Children accounted for 350 499 (9.9%) of the admissions at a total hospital cost of $1 931 585 123 (11.9%). Of all children, those with medical complexity accounted for 48 758 (13.9%), and their total hospital costs were $620 948 769 (32.1%). Six children's hospitals had 145 213 (41%) of the total children admissions at a total hospital cost of $936 041 843 (48%). Across the states and territories, the number of childhood admissions ranged from 9164 to 146 618 with 4.7-14.8% for children with medical complexity. Total hospital costs ranged from $44 to $592 million with 15.4-39.4% for children with medical complexity. CONCLUSIONS: The national burden of hospitalised children is substantial. Children with medical complexity only account for a small percentage of hospitalisations but almost one third of total hospital costs for children, with children's hospitals bearing the major costs.

Effect of gastrojejunal feedings on visits and costs in children with neurologic impairment.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to determine the effect of gastrojejunal tube (GJT) feedings in children with neurologic impairment (NI) on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)- and/or dysfunctional swallowing-related visits and their associated costs. METHODS: The present study is a retrospective cohort study of children with NI and GERD who underwent GJT placement at the study hospital from December 1999 to October 2006. Visits (emergency department, radiology, and hospitalizations) were reviewed from the time of birth until 1 year following GJT placement and classified as either not GERD and/or dysfunctional swallowing related or GERD and/or dysfunctional swallowing related (eg, pneumonias). Incident rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated by dividing the post-GJT visit rate by the pre-GJT visit rate. Other outcomes included associated costs, fundoplications, and deaths. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients met inclusion criteria. The IRR for total visits was 1.78 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-2.81) and for GERD- and/or dysfunctional swallowing-related visits 2.88 (95% CI 1.68-4.94). Feeding tube-related visits (IRR 5.36, 95% CI 2.73-10.51) accounted for the majority. GERD- and/or dysfunctional swallowing-related costs per child per year were low overall, with no difference from pre-GJT versus post-GJT placement ($1851 vs $4601, P = 0.89). Seven (21%) children underwent Nissen fundoplication and 4 (12%) died within 1 year of GJT placement. Two deaths involved jejunal perforation. CONCLUSIONS: Children with NI and GERD who are treated with GJT feedings have significantly more GERD- and/or dysfunctional swallowing-related visits in the following year. The majority of these visits are because of the procedural complications, which are inexpensive. There is, however, mortality associated with the GJT and some children proceed to a fundoplication.

Probabilistic Linkage Creates a Novel Database to Study Bronchiolitis Care in the PICU.

OBJECTIVES: Lack of a comprehensive database containing diagnosis, patient and clinical characteristics, diagnostics, treatments, and outcomes limits needed comparative effectiveness research (CER) to improve care in the PICU. Combined, the Pediatric Hospital Information System (PHIS) and Virtual Pediatric Systems (VPS) databases contain the needed data for CER, but limits on the use of patient identifiers have thus far prevented linkage of these databases with traditional linkage methods. Focusing on the subgroup of patients with bronchiolitis, we aim to show that probabilistic linkage methods accurately link data from PHIS and VPS without the need for patient identifiers to create the database needed for CER. METHODS: We used probabilistic linkage to link PHIS and VPS records for patients admitted to a tertiary children's hospital between July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2019. We calculated the percentage of matched records, rate of false-positive matches, and compared demographics between matched and unmatched subjects with bronchiolitis. RESULTS: We linked 839 of 920 (91%) records with 4 (0.5%) false-positive matches. We found no differences in age (P = .76), presence of comorbidities (P = .16), admission illness severity (P = .44), intubation rate (P = .41), or PICU stay length (P = .36) between linked and unlinked subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Probabilistic linkage creates an accurate and representative combined VPS-PHIS database of patients with bronchiolitis. Our methods are scalable to join data from the 38 hospitals that jointly contribute to PHIS and VPS, creating a national database of diagnostics, treatment, outcome, and patient and clinical data to enable CER for bronchiolitis and other conditions cared for in the PICU.

Impact of Local Tailoring on Acute Stroke Care in 21 Disparate Emergency Departments: A Prospective Stepped Wedge Type III Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Study.

BACKGROUND: Faster delivery of tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator) results in better health outcomes for eligible patients with stroke. Standardization of stroke protocols in emergency departments (EDs) has been difficult, especially in nonstroke centers. We measured the effectiveness of a centrally led implementation strategy with local site tailoring to sustain adherence to an acute stroke protocol to improve door-to-needle (DTN) times across disparate EDs in a multihospital health system. METHODS: Prospective, type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation cohort study measuring performance at 21 EDs in Utah and Idaho (stroke centers [4]/nonstroke centers [17]) from January 2018 to February 2020 using a nonrandomized stepped-wedge design, monthly repeated site measures and multilevel hierarchical modeling. Each site received the implementation strategies in 1 of 6 steps providing control and intervention data. Co-primary outcomes were percentage of DTN times ≤60 minutes and median DTN time. Secondary outcomes included percentage of door-to-activation of neurological consult times ≤10 minutes and clinical effectiveness outcomes. Results were stratified between stroke and nonstroke centers. RESULTS: A total of 855 474 ED patient encounters occurred with 5325 code stroke activations (median age, 69 [IQR, 56-79] years; 51.8% female patients]. Percentage of door-to-activation times ≤10 minutes increased from 47.5% to 59.9% (adjusted odds ratio, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.40-2.67]). A total of 615 patients received tPA of ≤3 hours from symptom onset (median age, 71 [IQR, 58-80] years; 49.6% female patients). The percentage of DTN times ≤60 minutes increased from 72.5% to 86.1% (adjusted odds ratio, 3.38, [95% CI, 1.47-7.78]; stroke centers (77.4%-90.0%); nonstroke centers [59.3%-72.1%]). Median DTN time declined from 46 to 38 minutes (adjusted median difference, -9.68 [95% CI, -17.17 to -2.20]; stroke centers [41-35 minutes]; nonstroke centers [55-52 minutes]). No differences were observed in clinical effectiveness outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A centrally led implementation strategy with local site tailoring led to faster delivery of tPA across disparate EDs in a multihospital system with no change in clinical effectiveness outcomes including rates of complication. Disparities in performance persisted between stroke and nonstroke centers.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Pneumonia in Urgent Care Clinics: Opportunities for Improving Care.

Background: Community-acquired pneumonia is a well-studied condition; yet, in the urgent care setting, patient characteristics and adherence to guideline-recommended care are poorly described. Within Intermountain Health, a nonprofit integrated US health care system based in Utah, more patients present to urgent care clinics (UCCs) than emergency departments (EDs) for pneumonia care. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study 1 January 2019 through 31 December 2020 in 28 UCCs within Utah. We extracted electronic health record data for patients aged ≥12 years with ICD-10 pneumonia diagnoses entered by the bedside clinician, excluding patients with preceding pneumonia within 30 days or missing vital signs. We compared UCC patients with radiographic pneumonia (n = 4689), without radiographic pneumonia (n = 1053), without chest imaging (n = 1472), and matched controls with acute cough/bronchitis (n = 15 972). Additional outcomes were 30-day mortality and the proportion of patients with ED visits or hospital admission within 7 days after the index encounter. Results: UCC patients diagnosed with pneumonia and possible/likely radiographic pneumonia by radiologist report had a mean age of 40 years and 52% were female. Almost all patients with pneumonia (93%) were treated with antibiotics, including those without radiographic confirmation. Hospital admissions and ED visits within 7 days were more common in patients with radiographic pneumonia vs patients with "unlikely" radiographs (6% vs 2% and 10% vs 6%, respectively). Observed 30-day all-cause mortality was low (0.26%). Patients diagnosed without chest imaging presented similarly to matched patients with cough/acute bronchitis. Most patients admitted to the hospital the same day after the UCC visit (84%) had an interim ED encounter. Pneumonia severity scores (pneumonia severity index, electronic CURB-65, and shock index) overestimated patient need for hospitalization. Conclusions: Most UCC patients with pneumonia were successfully treated as outpatients. Opportunities to improve care include clinical decision support for diagnosing pneumonia with radiographic confirmation and development of pneumonia severity scores tailored to the UCC.

Implementing a Family-Centered Rounds Intervention Using Novel Mentor-Trios.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patient and Family Centered I-PASS (PFC I-PASS) emphasizes family and nurse engagement, health literacy, and structured communication on family-centered rounds organized around the I-PASS framework (Illness severity-Patient summary-Action items-Situational awareness-Synthesis by receiver). We assessed adherence, safety, and experience after implementing PFC I-PASS using a novel "Mentor-Trio" implementation approach with multidisciplinary parent-nurse-physician teams coaching sites. METHODS: Hybrid Type II effectiveness-implementation study from 2/29/19-3/13/22 with ≥3 months of baseline and 12 months of postimplementation data collection/site across 21 US community and tertiary pediatric teaching hospitals. We conducted rounds observations and surveyed nurses, physicians, and Arabic/Chinese/English/Spanish-speaking patients/parents. RESULTS: We conducted 4557 rounds observations and received 2285 patient/family, 1240 resident, 819 nurse, and 378 attending surveys. Adherence to all I-PASS components, bedside rounding, written rounds summaries, family and nurse engagement, and plain language improved post-implementation (13.0%-60.8% absolute increase by item), all P < .05. Except for written summary, improvements sustained 12 months post-implementation. Resident-reported harms/1000-resident-days were unchanged overall but decreased in larger hospitals (116.9 to 86.3 to 72.3 pre versus early- versus late-implementation, P = .006), hospitals with greater nurse engagement on rounds (110.6 to 73.3 to 65.3, P < .001), and greater adherence to I-PASS structure (95.3 to 73.6 to 72.3, P < .05). Twelve of 12 measures of staff safety climate improved (eg, "excellent"/"very good" safety grade improved from 80.4% to 86.3% to 88.0%), all P < .05. Patient/family experience and teaching were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals successfully used Mentor-Trios to implement PFC I-PASS. Family/nurse engagement, safety climate, and harms improved in larger hospitals and hospitals with better nurse engagement and intervention adherence. Patient/family experience and teaching were not affected.

Determinants of health care use in a population-based leukodystrophy cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the costs for children with leukodystrophies and whether high costs are associated with characteristic clinical features or resources use. STUDY DESIGN: We determined health care costs in a population cohort of 122 patients with leukodystrophies, including inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department use, during a 9-year period. We analyzed differences in patients with high costs (>85th percentile) and their health care use. RESULTS: Patients with leukodystrophy had significant variability in resource use, with the top 15th percentile of patients accounting for 73% of costs ($9.6 million). The majority of costs, 81% ($10.8 million), arose from inpatient hospitalization. High-cost patients had more and longer hospitalizations, increased requirements for intensive unit care and mechanical ventilation, and significantly more infections. Importantly, bone marrow transplantation did not solely account for the difference between high-cost and low-cost groups. CONCLUSION: Inpatient hospitalization is the greatest source of health care resource use in patients with leukodystrophies. A minority of patients account for the majority of costs, primarily attributable to an increased volume of hospitalization. Strategies to improve care and reduce costs will need to reduce inpatient stays and target modifiable reasons for hospitalization.