Alignment of Outcome Instruments Used in Hand Therapy With the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain and Process and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A Scoping Review.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify outcome instruments used in rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity; to determine their alignment with the constructs of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain and Process; and to report gaps in the constructs measured by outcome instruments as a basis for future research. METHOD: We searched CINAHL, MEDLINE, OTseeker, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials using scoping review methodology and evaluated outcome instruments for concordance with the ICF and the Framework. RESULTS: We identified 18 outcome instruments for analysis. The findings pertain to occupational therapists' focus on body functions, body structures, client factors, and activities of daily living; a gap in practice patterns in use of instruments; and overestimation of the degree to which instruments used are occupationally based. CONCLUSION: Occupational therapy practitioners should use outcome instruments that embody conceptual frameworks for classifying function and activity.

SLAP Trial: Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Mechanical Percussion Therapy Post ESWL for Renal Calculi.

Methods: We conducted a prospective randomised control trial. Included patients were males and females greater than 18 years of age with single or multiple ipsilateral renal calculi of total ≤10 mm on plain X-ray and noncontrast CT KUB. ESWL was performed at a single centre, at supine position under general anaesthesia with maximum 3000 shocks at a rate of 100 shocks per minute. Patients were discharged and randomised to either the control arm or MPI therapy. MPI therapy was self-directed in a home setting for 10 minutes a day, three times per week. Both arms had standard follow-up at 12 weeks with a plain X-ray KUB. Patients in the control group were offered cross over to the MPI arm after 12 weeks if residual stone fragments were detected. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software via Chi squared and Fisher's exact tests. Ethical approval was obtained via the Prince Charles Hospital HREC Committee, HREC/2022/QPCH/84961. Results: 70 patients met inclusion criteria and underwent ESWL, and 5 were withdrawn. 33 patients were randomised to the MPI group and 32 to the control group. MPI significantly increased the stone clearance rate anywhere in the kidney (87.9% in the MPI group versus 59.4% in the control group, p=0.089), as well as the clearance rate in the lower pole (91.7% in the MPI group versus 63.2% in the control group, p=0.022). Delayed percussion did not improve the clearance rate over primary percussion (p=0.835). Conclusion: This study has shown that MPI can be effectively performed in a home setting without the need for medical supervision and results in improved stone clearance rates post ESWL. The main limitations to the study were the use of X-ray over CT during the follow-up and variability in MPI compliance and administration. Further research is warranted into standardising home MPI protocols. This trial is registered with ANZCTR387061.

Preventing falls and eliminating injury at Ascension Health.

BACKGROUND: For Ascension Health's Healthcare That Is Safe strategy, eight hospitals served as alpha sites in the program to prevent falls and eliminate falls with injury. METHODS: The alpha sites implemented four key strategies: (1) assessment and re-assessment of patient risk factors for falls, (2) visual identification of patients at high risk, (3) communication of patient fall risk status, and (4) education of patients, families, and staff about fall prevention. RESULTS: The recommendations of the alpha initiative spread rapidly throughout Ascension Health and preceded measurement of the fall ratio. Even so, a 9.9% systemwide reduction in acute care fall rates from January to October 2006 was observed, and the average rate of falls with serious injury was less than 0.10 per 1,000 patient days. Compared with national rates, falls with serious injury at Ascension Health were less than 10% of the expected rate. DISCUSSION: Although it is not possible to prevent all falls in acute care facilities, decreasing the number of falls and the risk of serious injury from falls is possible. Key steps caregivers can take to prevent falls and fall injuries include establishing a trusting relationship with patients and their significant others; frequently reorienting patients to their environments, reminding those at high risk of falls not to get out of bed without help; checking on patients frequently and keeping their personal articles within reach; and protecting patients from falls at all entry points into the health care system.

A systematic review of the effectiveness of contrast baths.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. INTRODUCTION: Contrast baths are used as an intervention in hand therapy, yet it is unclear which patients, if any, benefit from this intervention. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To examine the nature and quality of the evidence regarding the use of contrast baths using a systematic review process. METHODS: Of a total of 28 clinical research articles on contrast baths, from 1938 forward, ten met the inclusion criteria set by the authors. RESULTS: These studies addressed the physiological changes of hot and cold on blood flow, intramuscular temperature, subcutaneous temperature, and the influence of room temperature and age. The subjects included normal/healthy volunteers and patients with a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, or foot/ankle injuries. The diversity of conditions, protocols, and outcomes limited the ability to make definitive conclusions on efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: The contrast bath procedure may increase superficial blood flow and skin temperature, though the evidence on the impact on edema is conflicting. No relationship between physiologic effects and functional outcomes has been established. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2A.