Chemical peelings for the treatment of actinic keratosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Actinic keratosis (AK) is a common precancerous lesion of the skin that may be treated with chemical peelings. Despite their long-standing usage and clinical experience, no evidence-based recommendation regarding the efficacy and safety of chemical peelings for AK exists. OBJECTIVES: To systematically review and synthesize the current knowledge on chemically exfoliative peelings as interventions for AK. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature research in Medline, Embase and CENTRAL and hand-searched pertinent trial registers for eligible records until 5 August 2019. Results from individual studies were pooled using a random-effects model or described in a qualitative synthesis. The risk of bias was estimated with the tools provided by the Cochrane Collaboration (randomized and non-randomized trials) and the Evidence Project (single-arm trials). RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials, two non-randomized controlled trials and two single-arm studies with a total sample size of n = 170 patients were included. Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) plus Jessner's solution showed significantly lower participant complete clearance (RR 0.36, 95% CI: 0.14-0.90, two studies, I2  = 0%, P = 0.03) and lower lesion clearance (RR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85-0.99, one study, P = 0.03) compared to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 5% cream. TCA as monotherapy showed lower lesion complete clearance (RR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.69-0.82, two studies, I2  = 7%, P < 0.001) and lower mean lesion reduction per patient compared to conventional photodynamic therapy (cPDT) (MD -20.48, 95% CI: -31.55 to -9.41, two studies, I2  = 43%, P = 0.0003). Pain was more pronounced in patients treated with cPDT in comparison with TCA (MD -1.71 95% CI: -3.02 to -0.41, two studies, I2  = 55%, P = 0.01). In the single-arm studies, 5-FU plus glycolic acid showed 92% lesion clearance and phenol peeling 90.6% participant complete clearance. All studies showed a high risk for bias. CONCLUSIONS: Future high-quality studies and a standardization of peeling protocols are warranted to determine the value of chemical peelings in the treatment of AK.

The more the better? An appraisal of combination therapies for actinic keratosis.

Actinic keratoses (AK) are common precancerous lesions of the skin. Numerous interventions exist for the treatment of AK, including lesion- and field-directed approaches. In daily practice, different treatment modalities are often combined to maximize clearance rates. However, whether a combination therapy is preferable to monotherapy in terms of efficacy and safety has been subject of intense debate. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the efficacy and safety of local combination therapies for the treatment of patients with AK. Combination approaches of cryosurgery followed by photodynamic therapy (PDT), laser-assisted PDT, PDT in combination with topical interventions and microneedling-assisted PDT have shown slightly better efficacy results with similar tolerability compared to the respective monotherapy. However, the individual usage of combination therapies should be checked on a case-by-case basis and take into account individual patient- and lesion-specific aspects as more resources are needed and because the individual monotherapies are already highly effective.

[Actinic keratosis]. / Aktinische Keratosen.

Actinic keratoses (AK) are common precancerous cutaneous lesions in fair-skinned individuals as a result of cumulative exposure to ultraviolet radiation. Due to their high prevalence, AK account for a large disease burden, in particular in older persons. As AK may potentially progress into invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, guidelines recommend early and consequent treatment. Numerous lesion- and field-directed interventions with different efficacy and safety profiles are currently licensed in Germany. The appropriate intervention should be chosen together with the patient based on his or her motivation and expectations towards the treatment.

[Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma]. / Kutanes Plattenepithelkarzinom.

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is one of the most common cancers of the Caucasian population and accounts for 20% of all skin tumours. An S3 guideline of the German Guideline Program in Oncology has been available since 2019. The diagnosis is based on the clinical examination. Excision and histological confirmation is required for all clinically suspicious lesions to allow prognostic assessment and correct treatment. The therapy of first choice is complete excision with histological control of the surgical margin. In cSCC with risk factors such as tumor thickness >6 mm, sentinel lymph node biopsy may be discussed, but there is currently no clear evidence of its prognostic and therapeutic relevance. Adjuvant radiation therapy may be considered in cases of high risk of recurrence and should be tested in cases of inoperable tumors. The indication for electrochemotherapy should also be considered in the treatment of local or locoregional recurrence. The immune checkpoint inhibitor cemiplimab is approved for the treatment of inoperable or metastasized cSCC. In case of contraindications, chemotherapeutic agents, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors or palliative radiotherapy can be used. Since the evidence is low in these cases, a systemic therapy should be used preferentially within clinical studies. Follow-up care should be risk-adapted and includes a dermatological control, supplemented by ultrasound examinations in high-risk patients.

Cryosurgery combined with topical interventions for actinic keratosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Actinic keratoses (AKs) are early in situ carcinomas of the skin caused by cumulative sun exposure. Cryosurgery is an easy and practicable lesion-directed approach for treatment of isolated lesions. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether an upfront combination of cryosurgery with a topical intervention is superior to cryosurgery alone for treatment of AK. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL and hand searched pertinent trial registers for eligible randomized controlled trials until 17 July 2018. Results from individual studies were pooled using a random effects model. The risk of bias was estimated with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and the quality of evidence of the outcomes with the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Out of 1758 records initially identified, nine studies with a total sample size of 1644 patients were included. Cryosurgery in combination with a topical approach showed significantly higher participant complete clearance rates than monotherapy [risk ratio (RR) 1·74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·25-2·43, I2 = 73%, eight studies]. The participant partial clearance rate was not statistically different (RR 1·64, 95% CI 0·88-3·03, I2 = 77%, three studies). The number of patients who completed the study protocol and did not withdraw due to adverse events was equal in both groups (RR 0·98, 95% CI 0·95-1·01, I2 = 75%, seven studies). The studies were estimated to have high risk for selective reporting bias. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest the superiority of a combination regimen for AK clearance, with equal tolerability. This study highlights the importance of a field-directed approach in patients with multiple AKs or field cancerization.

Local interventions for actinic keratosis in organ transplant recipients: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Actinic keratosis (AK) in organ transplant recipients (OTRs) has a high risk of progressing to invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Thus, early and consequent treatment of AKs is warranted in OTRs. OBJECTIVES: To summarize the current evidence for nonsystemic treatments of AKs in OTRs. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and hand-searched pertinent trial registers up to 22 August 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating nonsystemic interventions for AKs in OTRs were included. The risk of bias was estimated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. RESULTS: Of 663 records initially identified, eight RCTs with 242 OTRs were included in a qualitative synthesis. Most studies evaluated methyl aminolaevulinate photodynamic therapy (MAL-PDT), followed by ablative fractional laser (AFXL) and diclofenac sodium 3% in hyaluronic acid, imiquimod 5% cream and 5-fluorouracil 5% cream (5-FU). MAL-PDT showed the highest rates of participant complete clearance (40-76·4%), followed by imiquimod (27·5-62·1%), diclofenac (41%) and 5-FU (11%). Similar results were observed for lesion-specific clearance rates. Treatment with AFXL alone revealed low lesion clearance (5-31%). Local skin reactions were most intense in participants treated with a combination of AFXL and daylight MAL-PDT. There were no therapy-related transplant rejections or worsening of graft function in any trial. The overall risk of bias was high. CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence is available for the treatment of AKs in OTRs. MAL-PDT is currently the best-studied intervention. Lesion-specific regimens may not be sufficient to achieve disease control. Field-directed regimens are preferable in this high-risk population.

Comparison of guidelines for the management of patients with high-risk and advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma - a systematic review.

The management of high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) can be a challenge as evidence from high quality clinical trials is rare. Guideline developers are challenged to provide practical and useful guidance for clinicians even in the absence of good evidence. In order to compare treatment recommendations for high-risk and advanced cSCC among national and international guidelines and to extract the most precise guidance provided, a systematic search was carried out in guideline databases Medline and Embase with a cutoff of 4 March 2019. Treatment recommendations for predefined clinical scenarios were extracted from selected guidelines and compared qualitatively. Five guidelines published from 2015 to 2018 were included. Excision of high-risk tumours with margin assessment was recommended in all guidelines. A safety margin of at least 6 mm was suggested in four guidelines. There was no clear recommendation to perform a sentinel lymph node biopsy in any guideline. Lymph node dissection was uniformly recommended in the presence of nodal disease. Treatment for metastatic cSCC was poorly characterized and restricted to the use of chemotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. Recommendations for the management of high-risk and advanced cSCC were limited. We propose that guidelines should be updated to reflect recent advances in checkpoint blockade for metastatic cSCC.

Efficacy of photodynamic therapy combined with topical interventions for the treatment of actinic keratosis: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a highly effective treatment option for patients with actinic keratoses (AK). However, efficacy can be reduced by insufficient illumination or hyperkeratotic nature of lesions. OBJECTIVES: To investigate if PDT combined with a topical intervention is superior to monotherapy in terms of efficacy and tolerability. METHODS: A systematic literature research was conducted in Medline, Embase and CENTRAL. Pertinent trial registers were hand-searched for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) until 20 August 2018. Results were pooled using a random effects model to calculate relative risks (RR) or mean differences. The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The quality of evidence was estimated for each outcome of interest according to GRADE. RESULTS: Out of 1800 references initially identified, 10 RCTs with a total sample size of n = 277 were included. Four studies investigated a combination of PDT with imiquimod cream, three with 5-fluorouracil cream and one each with ingenol mebutate gel, tazarotene gel and calcipotriol ointment, respectively. Patients treated with a combination showed higher participant complete (RR 1.63; 95% CI 1.15-2.33; P = 0.007) and partial clearance rates (RR 1.19; 95% CI 0.84-1.67; P = 0.33). Similarly, the lesion-specific clearance was higher for PDT plus topical intervention compared to monotherapy (RR 1.48; 95% CI 1.04-2.11; P = 0.03). A subgroup analysis was performed for PDT combined with imiquimod, revealing an increased participant complete clearance rate compared to monotherapy (RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.09-2.25, P = 0.02). PDT-induced pain and local skin reactions after treatment were poorly reported. The studies were estimated at high risk for performance and detection bias. CONCLUSION: The combination of PDT with another topical drug intervention does improve AK clearance rates compared to either monotherapy alone. This study highlights that the sequential application of two field-directed treatments represents an efficient approach in patients with multiple AK and field cancerization.