Impact of the tibial slope on range of motion after low-contact-stress, mobile-bearing, total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyse a possible correlation between the tibial slope and range of motion (ROM) after implantation of the low-contact-stress (LCS), mobile-bearing, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after a minimum follow-up of ten years. METHODS: Eighty-three TKAs in 66 patients were investigated in this retrospective correlation analysis at a minimum follow up of ten years. Out of these 66 patients, 50 were women (76%) and 16 (24%) were men. The average age of these patients at the time of the examination was 76 years [standard deviation (SD) 11 years, range 37-95 years]. A lateral X-ray was taken at follow-up in order to analyse the tibial slope with respect to inter- and intra-observer agreement. ROM was measured and correlated with the tibial slope. RESULTS: The mean active ROM was 96.1° (SD 18.8) and the mean tibial slope after four measurements was 7.65° (SD 4.23), with substantial inter- and intra-observer agreement. We found no significant correlation between tibial slope and ROM in patients with a minimum follow-up of ten years [correlation 0.196 (p > 0.05) and 0.152, (p > 0.05), respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: Alteration of the tibial slope does not significantly influence ROM after implantation of the LCS TKA at a minimum follow-up of ten years. We conclude that the tibial slope is not the primary influencing factor for ROM in patients ten years after primary TKA and believe that it should not substantially be altered during surgery.

Correlation between the level of evidence and the class of recommendations concerning the pharmacological aspects of the Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology.

Background The reliability of the recommendations affecting the clinical decisions is being continuously weighed in everyday practice (Gershlick, 2018). The objective of our study was to assess the consistency of the evidence behind the recommendations. Methods We narrowed our focus on the pharmacotherapeutic aspects of the most recent 38 European Society of Cardiology guidelines and analyzed the correlation between the level of evidence (LoE) classified as A, B and C and the class of recommendations (CoR) subdivided into I, IIa, IIb and III. Results Contrary to the majority of recommendations based on a LoE C (43,0%), fewer recommendations were proposed on heavily evidence-supported LoE A (23.8%), which percentage increased with subsequent updates of the guidelines. The most common recommendation was CoR I (44,9%), while the least common recommendation was CoR III (9,2%). While a similar share of A (39,1%) and C (30,1%) LoE shaped the CoR I nearly half (48,8%) of the CoR III were based on LoE C. Conversely, the overwhelming majority of the recommendations within the scope of LoE A were indisputably strong and classified as CoR I (73,7%). Conclusion The pharmacological aspects of the ESC guidelines are predominantly based on LoE C. A greater number of pharmacological recommendations are based on LoE A in comparison to the general ones. Various constraints significantly skew the credibility due to paucity of scientific data. A more nuanced approach is needed, as the guidelines cannot completely substitute the clinical experience and the patient-centered approach in shaping the optimal therapeutic outcome.

Usefulness of Handgrip Strength to Predict Mortality in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.

Handgrip strength (HGS) is a validated and simple technique to estimate skeletal muscular strength. Whether HGS is a predictor of overall mortality in patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD) is not known, this question is therefore addressed in the present study. We prospectively investigated a cohort of 691 patients with angiographically proven CAD. HGS was measured at baseline, and all-cause death as well as cardiovascular events was recorded over a period of up to 12 years. During a follow-up time of 9.2 ± 3.1 years, 31.3% (n = 216) of the study participants died. Further, 27.8% (n = 192) suffered major cardiovascular events and 56.6% (n = 391) any cardiovascular event. Cox proportional hazard model analysis showed a reduced mortality risk with higher HGS univariately (hazard ratio [HR] for each 5 kg increase in HGS 0.87 [95% confidence interval 0.82 to 0.92]; p <0.001), after adjustment for age and gender (HR 0.86 [0.79 to 0.94]; p = 0.001), and after further adjustment for conventional cardiovascular risk factors (HR 0.86 [0.79 to 0.94]; p = 0.001). Similarly, high HGS was protective of major cardiovascular events as well as of total cardiovascular events (HRs in the fully adjusted model 0.86 [0.78 to 0.94]; p = 0.002 and 0.89 [0.83 to 0.96]; p = 0.002, respectively). From these data, we conclude that HGS is an independent predictor of overall survival and of cardiovascular events in patients with CAD.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a strong predictor of LDL cholesterol target achievement in patients with peripheral artery disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at a very high risk of cardiovascular events and strongly benefit from lowering LDL cholesterol (LDL-C); updated European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend an LDL-C target of at least <55 mg/dl for these patients. Whether the presence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) affects LDL-C target achievement in PAD patients is unknown and is addressed in the present study. METHODS: We investigated an unselected consecutive series of 319 patients with sonographically proven PAD, of whom 136 (42.6%) had T2DM. RESULTS: The LDL-C target of <55 mg/dl was met by 8.1% of T2DM patients and by 2.2% of non-diabetic patients (p = 0.014); LDL-C was <70 mg/dl in 22.8% of patients with T2DM and in 9.8% of non-diabetic patients (p = 0.002). Logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of T2DM was an independent and strong predictor of LDL-C target achievement after multivariate adjustment including age, gender, potency adjusted statin use, BMI, smoking, hypertension and other lipid-modifying therapy for the <55 mg/dl target (OR 3.58 [1.08-11.90]; p = 0.038) as well as for the <70 mg/dl target (OR 2.78 [1.40-5.35]; p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: We conclude that T2DM is a strong and independent predictor of LDL-C target achievement among PAD patients; however, also among PAD patients with T2DM only a minority meets the current target of <55 mg/dl and most patients do not even have an LDL-C < 70 mg/dl.